Factors associated with household transmission of SARS‐CoV‐2 omicron variant to health care workers: A retrospective cohort study
What is already known about this topic? During the COVID‐19 pandemic, nurses have been exposed to SARS‐CoV‐2 not only from COVID‐19 patients but also from family members infected with SARS‐CoV‐2 but prevention of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection to nurses is important to maintain health services function. The h...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of nursing practice 2023-10, Vol.29 (5), p.e13195-e13195 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | e13195 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | e13195 |
| container_title | International journal of nursing practice |
| container_volume | 29 |
| creator | Kagami, Keisuke Oyamada, Reiko Watanabe, Tsubasa Nakakubo, Sho Hayashi, Takahiro Iwasaki, Sumio Fukumoto, Tatsuya Usami, Takayuki Hayasaka, Kasumi Fujisawa, Shinichi Watanabe, Chiaki Nishida, Mutsumi Teshima, Takanori Niinuma, Yusuke Yokota, Isao Takekuma, Yoh Sugawara, Mitsuru Ishiguro, Nobuhisa |
| description | What is already known about this topic?
During the COVID‐19 pandemic, nurses have been exposed to SARS‐CoV‐2 not only from COVID‐19 patients but also from family members infected with SARS‐CoV‐2 but prevention of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection to nurses is important to maintain health services function.
The household infection rate was reported to be higher for the omicron variant (42.7%) than for non‐omicron variants (36.4% for Alpha, 29.7% for Delta and 22.5% for Beta). Determination of the risk factors for household transmission of the omicron variant is therefore important.
What this paper adds?
Unvaccinated HCWs had higher transmission rates (OR: 3.97, 95% CI: 1.22–12.88) than those of HCWs who received more than two doses of BNT162b2 or mRNA‐1273 mRNA COVID‐19 vaccines.
Index cases aged 6 years or younger had higher transmission rates (OR: 1.94, 95% CI: 1.13–3.35) than those of index cases aged 7 years or older.
The odds of transmitting to HCWs was higher (OR: 10.18, 95% CI: 2.98–34.72) for HCWs who stayed at home with the index cases than for HCWs who spent time in a different building from the index cases.
The implications of this paper:
If there is a strong desire to avoid household infection, family members infected with SARS‐CoV‐2 should live separately during the period of viral shedding. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ijn.13195 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2857839972</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2870798715</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c285t-fdbe02a6c43b9de1c9f8da403464ac94a25d505bb67de738ab7648f8a006ae253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUTtPwzAQthBIQGHgH1higSHFdpw4YasqXhISEgXEFl2ci-KSxsV2qdhY2PmN_BLMY-KGu9Pdp-8eHyEHnI15tBMzH8Y85WW2QXa4lCzhSjxuxjwVIlGcy22y6_2csVjg2Q55PwcdrPMUvLfaQMCGrk3oaGdXHjvbNzQ4GPzCeG_sQG1LZ5Pb2efbx9Q-RC-oXRjtYucFnIEh0GBph9BHCg0O6dq6J3T-lE6ow-CsX6IO5gWptp11gfqwal73yFYLvcf9vzgi9-dnd9PL5Prm4mo6uU60KLKQtE2NTECuZVqXDXJdtkUDkqUyl6BLCSJrMpbVda4aVGkBtcpl0RbAWA4osnREjn55l84-r9CHKt6lse9hwHhvFaeoIi1LJSL08B90blduiNtFlGKqLBT_Jjz-RcUXeO-wrZbOLMC9VpxV34JUUZDqR5D0C94ughY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2870798715</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Factors associated with household transmission of SARS‐CoV‐2 omicron variant to health care workers: A retrospective cohort study</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Kagami, Keisuke ; Oyamada, Reiko ; Watanabe, Tsubasa ; Nakakubo, Sho ; Hayashi, Takahiro ; Iwasaki, Sumio ; Fukumoto, Tatsuya ; Usami, Takayuki ; Hayasaka, Kasumi ; Fujisawa, Shinichi ; Watanabe, Chiaki ; Nishida, Mutsumi ; Teshima, Takanori ; Niinuma, Yusuke ; Yokota, Isao ; Takekuma, Yoh ; Sugawara, Mitsuru ; Ishiguro, Nobuhisa</creator><creatorcontrib>Kagami, Keisuke ; Oyamada, Reiko ; Watanabe, Tsubasa ; Nakakubo, Sho ; Hayashi, Takahiro ; Iwasaki, Sumio ; Fukumoto, Tatsuya ; Usami, Takayuki ; Hayasaka, Kasumi ; Fujisawa, Shinichi ; Watanabe, Chiaki ; Nishida, Mutsumi ; Teshima, Takanori ; Niinuma, Yusuke ; Yokota, Isao ; Takekuma, Yoh ; Sugawara, Mitsuru ; Ishiguro, Nobuhisa</creatorcontrib><description>What is already known about this topic?
During the COVID‐19 pandemic, nurses have been exposed to SARS‐CoV‐2 not only from COVID‐19 patients but also from family members infected with SARS‐CoV‐2 but prevention of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection to nurses is important to maintain health services function.
The household infection rate was reported to be higher for the omicron variant (42.7%) than for non‐omicron variants (36.4% for Alpha, 29.7% for Delta and 22.5% for Beta). Determination of the risk factors for household transmission of the omicron variant is therefore important.
What this paper adds?
Unvaccinated HCWs had higher transmission rates (OR: 3.97, 95% CI: 1.22–12.88) than those of HCWs who received more than two doses of BNT162b2 or mRNA‐1273 mRNA COVID‐19 vaccines.
Index cases aged 6 years or younger had higher transmission rates (OR: 1.94, 95% CI: 1.13–3.35) than those of index cases aged 7 years or older.
The odds of transmitting to HCWs was higher (OR: 10.18, 95% CI: 2.98–34.72) for HCWs who stayed at home with the index cases than for HCWs who spent time in a different building from the index cases.
The implications of this paper:
If there is a strong desire to avoid household infection, family members infected with SARS‐CoV‐2 should live separately during the period of viral shedding.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1322-7114</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1440-172X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ijn.13195</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Richmond: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Cohort analysis ; COVID-19 ; Desire ; Dosage ; Health services ; Households ; Infections ; Medical personnel ; Nurses ; Pandemics ; Relatives ; Risk factors ; Severe acute respiratory syndrome ; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 ; Vaccines ; Variants ; Workers</subject><ispartof>International journal of nursing practice, 2023-10, Vol.29 (5), p.e13195-e13195</ispartof><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c285t-fdbe02a6c43b9de1c9f8da403464ac94a25d505bb67de738ab7648f8a006ae253</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8594-6345</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,30976</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kagami, Keisuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oyamada, Reiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watanabe, Tsubasa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakakubo, Sho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayashi, Takahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwasaki, Sumio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukumoto, Tatsuya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Usami, Takayuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayasaka, Kasumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujisawa, Shinichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watanabe, Chiaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nishida, Mutsumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teshima, Takanori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niinuma, Yusuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yokota, Isao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takekuma, Yoh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugawara, Mitsuru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishiguro, Nobuhisa</creatorcontrib><title>Factors associated with household transmission of SARS‐CoV‐2 omicron variant to health care workers: A retrospective cohort study</title><title>International journal of nursing practice</title><description>What is already known about this topic?
During the COVID‐19 pandemic, nurses have been exposed to SARS‐CoV‐2 not only from COVID‐19 patients but also from family members infected with SARS‐CoV‐2 but prevention of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection to nurses is important to maintain health services function.
The household infection rate was reported to be higher for the omicron variant (42.7%) than for non‐omicron variants (36.4% for Alpha, 29.7% for Delta and 22.5% for Beta). Determination of the risk factors for household transmission of the omicron variant is therefore important.
What this paper adds?
Unvaccinated HCWs had higher transmission rates (OR: 3.97, 95% CI: 1.22–12.88) than those of HCWs who received more than two doses of BNT162b2 or mRNA‐1273 mRNA COVID‐19 vaccines.
Index cases aged 6 years or younger had higher transmission rates (OR: 1.94, 95% CI: 1.13–3.35) than those of index cases aged 7 years or older.
The odds of transmitting to HCWs was higher (OR: 10.18, 95% CI: 2.98–34.72) for HCWs who stayed at home with the index cases than for HCWs who spent time in a different building from the index cases.
The implications of this paper:
If there is a strong desire to avoid household infection, family members infected with SARS‐CoV‐2 should live separately during the period of viral shedding.</description><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Desire</subject><subject>Dosage</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Relatives</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Severe acute respiratory syndrome</subject><subject>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><subject>Variants</subject><subject>Workers</subject><issn>1322-7114</issn><issn>1440-172X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUTtPwzAQthBIQGHgH1higSHFdpw4YasqXhISEgXEFl2ci-KSxsV2qdhY2PmN_BLMY-KGu9Pdp-8eHyEHnI15tBMzH8Y85WW2QXa4lCzhSjxuxjwVIlGcy22y6_2csVjg2Q55PwcdrPMUvLfaQMCGrk3oaGdXHjvbNzQ4GPzCeG_sQG1LZ5Pb2efbx9Q-RC-oXRjtYucFnIEh0GBph9BHCg0O6dq6J3T-lE6ow-CsX6IO5gWptp11gfqwal73yFYLvcf9vzgi9-dnd9PL5Prm4mo6uU60KLKQtE2NTECuZVqXDXJdtkUDkqUyl6BLCSJrMpbVda4aVGkBtcpl0RbAWA4osnREjn55l84-r9CHKt6lse9hwHhvFaeoIi1LJSL08B90blduiNtFlGKqLBT_Jjz-RcUXeO-wrZbOLMC9VpxV34JUUZDqR5D0C94ughY</recordid><startdate>20231001</startdate><enddate>20231001</enddate><creator>Kagami, Keisuke</creator><creator>Oyamada, Reiko</creator><creator>Watanabe, Tsubasa</creator><creator>Nakakubo, Sho</creator><creator>Hayashi, Takahiro</creator><creator>Iwasaki, Sumio</creator><creator>Fukumoto, Tatsuya</creator><creator>Usami, Takayuki</creator><creator>Hayasaka, Kasumi</creator><creator>Fujisawa, Shinichi</creator><creator>Watanabe, Chiaki</creator><creator>Nishida, Mutsumi</creator><creator>Teshima, Takanori</creator><creator>Niinuma, Yusuke</creator><creator>Yokota, Isao</creator><creator>Takekuma, Yoh</creator><creator>Sugawara, Mitsuru</creator><creator>Ishiguro, Nobuhisa</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8594-6345</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231001</creationdate><title>Factors associated with household transmission of SARS‐CoV‐2 omicron variant to health care workers: A retrospective cohort study</title><author>Kagami, Keisuke ; Oyamada, Reiko ; Watanabe, Tsubasa ; Nakakubo, Sho ; Hayashi, Takahiro ; Iwasaki, Sumio ; Fukumoto, Tatsuya ; Usami, Takayuki ; Hayasaka, Kasumi ; Fujisawa, Shinichi ; Watanabe, Chiaki ; Nishida, Mutsumi ; Teshima, Takanori ; Niinuma, Yusuke ; Yokota, Isao ; Takekuma, Yoh ; Sugawara, Mitsuru ; Ishiguro, Nobuhisa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c285t-fdbe02a6c43b9de1c9f8da403464ac94a25d505bb67de738ab7648f8a006ae253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Desire</topic><topic>Dosage</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Relatives</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Severe acute respiratory syndrome</topic><topic>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><topic>Variants</topic><topic>Workers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kagami, Keisuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oyamada, Reiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watanabe, Tsubasa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakakubo, Sho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayashi, Takahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwasaki, Sumio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukumoto, Tatsuya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Usami, Takayuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayasaka, Kasumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujisawa, Shinichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watanabe, Chiaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nishida, Mutsumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teshima, Takanori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niinuma, Yusuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yokota, Isao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takekuma, Yoh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugawara, Mitsuru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishiguro, Nobuhisa</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of nursing practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kagami, Keisuke</au><au>Oyamada, Reiko</au><au>Watanabe, Tsubasa</au><au>Nakakubo, Sho</au><au>Hayashi, Takahiro</au><au>Iwasaki, Sumio</au><au>Fukumoto, Tatsuya</au><au>Usami, Takayuki</au><au>Hayasaka, Kasumi</au><au>Fujisawa, Shinichi</au><au>Watanabe, Chiaki</au><au>Nishida, Mutsumi</au><au>Teshima, Takanori</au><au>Niinuma, Yusuke</au><au>Yokota, Isao</au><au>Takekuma, Yoh</au><au>Sugawara, Mitsuru</au><au>Ishiguro, Nobuhisa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Factors associated with household transmission of SARS‐CoV‐2 omicron variant to health care workers: A retrospective cohort study</atitle><jtitle>International journal of nursing practice</jtitle><date>2023-10-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e13195</spage><epage>e13195</epage><pages>e13195-e13195</pages><issn>1322-7114</issn><eissn>1440-172X</eissn><abstract>What is already known about this topic?
During the COVID‐19 pandemic, nurses have been exposed to SARS‐CoV‐2 not only from COVID‐19 patients but also from family members infected with SARS‐CoV‐2 but prevention of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection to nurses is important to maintain health services function.
The household infection rate was reported to be higher for the omicron variant (42.7%) than for non‐omicron variants (36.4% for Alpha, 29.7% for Delta and 22.5% for Beta). Determination of the risk factors for household transmission of the omicron variant is therefore important.
What this paper adds?
Unvaccinated HCWs had higher transmission rates (OR: 3.97, 95% CI: 1.22–12.88) than those of HCWs who received more than two doses of BNT162b2 or mRNA‐1273 mRNA COVID‐19 vaccines.
Index cases aged 6 years or younger had higher transmission rates (OR: 1.94, 95% CI: 1.13–3.35) than those of index cases aged 7 years or older.
The odds of transmitting to HCWs was higher (OR: 10.18, 95% CI: 2.98–34.72) for HCWs who stayed at home with the index cases than for HCWs who spent time in a different building from the index cases.
The implications of this paper:
If there is a strong desire to avoid household infection, family members infected with SARS‐CoV‐2 should live separately during the period of viral shedding.</abstract><cop>Richmond</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/ijn.13195</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8594-6345</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1322-7114 |
| ispartof | International journal of nursing practice, 2023-10, Vol.29 (5), p.e13195-e13195 |
| issn | 1322-7114 1440-172X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2857839972 |
| source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | Cohort analysis COVID-19 Desire Dosage Health services Households Infections Medical personnel Nurses Pandemics Relatives Risk factors Severe acute respiratory syndrome Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 Vaccines Variants Workers |
| title | Factors associated with household transmission of SARS‐CoV‐2 omicron variant to health care workers: A retrospective cohort study |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T15%3A43%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Factors%20associated%20with%20household%20transmission%20of%20SARS%E2%80%90CoV%E2%80%902%20omicron%20variant%20to%20health%20care%20workers:%20A%20retrospective%20cohort%20study&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20nursing%20practice&rft.au=Kagami,%20Keisuke&rft.date=2023-10-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e13195&rft.epage=e13195&rft.pages=e13195-e13195&rft.issn=1322-7114&rft.eissn=1440-172X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ijn.13195&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2870798715%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2870798715&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |