Clinical evaluation of the safety and efficacy of a 1060 nm diode laser for non‐invasive fat reduction of the flanks
Background Laser hyperthermia‐induced lipolysis is a non‐invasive method of localized fat treatment. Non‐invasive approaches could be an option for a growing number of patients who are risk‐averse and are seeking out non‐invasive alternatives to surgical procedures such as liposuction. This study ev...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of cosmetic dermatology 2023-11, Vol.22 (11), p.3017-3025 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 3025 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 11 |
| container_start_page | 3017 |
| container_title | Journal of cosmetic dermatology |
| container_volume | 22 |
| creator | Kang, Alison Kislevitz, Mikaela Wamsley, Christine Barillas, Jennifer Hoopman, John Kenkel, Jeffrey Kilmer, Suzanne |
| description | Background Laser hyperthermia‐induced lipolysis is a non‐invasive method of localized fat treatment. Non‐invasive approaches could be an option for a growing number of patients who are risk‐averse and are seeking out non‐invasive alternatives to surgical procedures such as liposuction. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of a 1060 nm diode laser for the non‐invasive fat reduction of the flanks. Methods A total of 30 subjects were enrolled in this prospective, single center study. Subjects received one 25‐min treatment with a 1060 nm diode laser to both flanks. Follow‐up visits were conducted at 6 and 12 weeks after the last treatment. Ultrasound adipose thickness, body weight, and circumference measurements were taken at baseline and at the 6‐ and 12‐week follow‐up visits. Subject satisfaction was assessed using a self‐assessment of fat reduction, pain, and tolerability scales, and a subject satisfaction questionnaire. Safety was assessed via the presence or absence of any adverse events. Results The average age of subjects was 47.3 years. A total of 27 subjects completed the treatment and returned for both follow‐up visits. An adipose reduction of 7.57 ± 1.15% at 6 weeks post‐treatment (p |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jocd.15954 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2856319330</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2856319330</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-eb56daf974f8390c66594697932a4777c5b800b88c7a17da7c940d5549e3cea63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkctKAzEUhoMoWKsbnyDgRoSpyWSSTJZSvIHgRtfhNBecOk1qMjPQnY_gM_okTq2IeDbnwPn4-eFD6JSSGR3nchmNnVGueLWHJrSSrCip4Pu_NyOH6CjnJSFUKsonaJi3TWgMtNgN0PbQNTHg6HH34nAG77oNhmCx836EzGb7AkyJIDissG2idbiF7BL2MeEQw-f7RxMGyM3gsIcOJ2d78zfUtxBe8zE68NBmd_Kzp-j55vppflc8PN7ez68eCsPKuivcggsLXsnK10wRIwRXlVBSsRIqKaXhi5qQRV0bCVRakEZVxHJeKceMA8Gm6HyXu07xrXe506smG9eOJVzssy5rLhhVjJERPfuHLmOfwthOM6KIoLQWW-piR5kUc07O63VqVpA2mhK9VaC3CvS3AvYFXgV5Vw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3090611860</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical evaluation of the safety and efficacy of a 1060 nm diode laser for non‐invasive fat reduction of the flanks</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><creator>Kang, Alison ; Kislevitz, Mikaela ; Wamsley, Christine ; Barillas, Jennifer ; Hoopman, John ; Kenkel, Jeffrey ; Kilmer, Suzanne</creator><creatorcontrib>Kang, Alison ; Kislevitz, Mikaela ; Wamsley, Christine ; Barillas, Jennifer ; Hoopman, John ; Kenkel, Jeffrey ; Kilmer, Suzanne</creatorcontrib><description>Background Laser hyperthermia‐induced lipolysis is a non‐invasive method of localized fat treatment. Non‐invasive approaches could be an option for a growing number of patients who are risk‐averse and are seeking out non‐invasive alternatives to surgical procedures such as liposuction. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of a 1060 nm diode laser for the non‐invasive fat reduction of the flanks. Methods A total of 30 subjects were enrolled in this prospective, single center study. Subjects received one 25‐min treatment with a 1060 nm diode laser to both flanks. Follow‐up visits were conducted at 6 and 12 weeks after the last treatment. Ultrasound adipose thickness, body weight, and circumference measurements were taken at baseline and at the 6‐ and 12‐week follow‐up visits. Subject satisfaction was assessed using a self‐assessment of fat reduction, pain, and tolerability scales, and a subject satisfaction questionnaire. Safety was assessed via the presence or absence of any adverse events. Results The average age of subjects was 47.3 years. A total of 27 subjects completed the treatment and returned for both follow‐up visits. An adipose reduction of 7.57 ± 1.15% at 6 weeks post‐treatment (p < 0.0001) was measured using ultrasound. High subject satisfaction was seen, with 74% of subjects reporting being either “satisfied” or “very satisfied” with their results on a 5‐point Likert Scale. Eighty‐two percent of subjects stated they would recommend the treatment to their friends. All subjects had either mild or moderate pain, with 52% of subjects rating their pain as “mild” (1–3), while 48% rated their pain as moderate (4–7) on the Wong‐Baker Scale. Conclusions A single treatment with a 1060 nm diode laser was both safe and effective in reducing unwanted fat in the flanks without any unanticipated adverse events. Subjects described their treatment pain as mild or moderate and were highly satisfied with their treatment outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1473-2130</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1473-2165</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jocd.15954</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Adipocytes ; Attitude surveys ; Body mass index ; Diodes ; Females ; Lasers ; Lifestyles ; Liposuction ; Pain ; Questionnaires ; Review boards ; Skin ; Ultrasonic imaging ; White people</subject><ispartof>Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2023-11, Vol.22 (11), p.3017-3025</ispartof><rights>2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the "License"). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-eb56daf974f8390c66594697932a4777c5b800b88c7a17da7c940d5549e3cea63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-eb56daf974f8390c66594697932a4777c5b800b88c7a17da7c940d5549e3cea63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kang, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kislevitz, Mikaela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wamsley, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barillas, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoopman, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kenkel, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kilmer, Suzanne</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical evaluation of the safety and efficacy of a 1060 nm diode laser for non‐invasive fat reduction of the flanks</title><title>Journal of cosmetic dermatology</title><description>Background Laser hyperthermia‐induced lipolysis is a non‐invasive method of localized fat treatment. Non‐invasive approaches could be an option for a growing number of patients who are risk‐averse and are seeking out non‐invasive alternatives to surgical procedures such as liposuction. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of a 1060 nm diode laser for the non‐invasive fat reduction of the flanks. Methods A total of 30 subjects were enrolled in this prospective, single center study. Subjects received one 25‐min treatment with a 1060 nm diode laser to both flanks. Follow‐up visits were conducted at 6 and 12 weeks after the last treatment. Ultrasound adipose thickness, body weight, and circumference measurements were taken at baseline and at the 6‐ and 12‐week follow‐up visits. Subject satisfaction was assessed using a self‐assessment of fat reduction, pain, and tolerability scales, and a subject satisfaction questionnaire. Safety was assessed via the presence or absence of any adverse events. Results The average age of subjects was 47.3 years. A total of 27 subjects completed the treatment and returned for both follow‐up visits. An adipose reduction of 7.57 ± 1.15% at 6 weeks post‐treatment (p < 0.0001) was measured using ultrasound. High subject satisfaction was seen, with 74% of subjects reporting being either “satisfied” or “very satisfied” with their results on a 5‐point Likert Scale. Eighty‐two percent of subjects stated they would recommend the treatment to their friends. All subjects had either mild or moderate pain, with 52% of subjects rating their pain as “mild” (1–3), while 48% rated their pain as moderate (4–7) on the Wong‐Baker Scale. Conclusions A single treatment with a 1060 nm diode laser was both safe and effective in reducing unwanted fat in the flanks without any unanticipated adverse events. Subjects described their treatment pain as mild or moderate and were highly satisfied with their treatment outcomes.</description><subject>Adipocytes</subject><subject>Attitude surveys</subject><subject>Body mass index</subject><subject>Diodes</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Lasers</subject><subject>Lifestyles</subject><subject>Liposuction</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Review boards</subject><subject>Skin</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>White people</subject><issn>1473-2130</issn><issn>1473-2165</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkctKAzEUhoMoWKsbnyDgRoSpyWSSTJZSvIHgRtfhNBecOk1qMjPQnY_gM_okTq2IeDbnwPn4-eFD6JSSGR3nchmNnVGueLWHJrSSrCip4Pu_NyOH6CjnJSFUKsonaJi3TWgMtNgN0PbQNTHg6HH34nAG77oNhmCx836EzGb7AkyJIDissG2idbiF7BL2MeEQw-f7RxMGyM3gsIcOJ2d78zfUtxBe8zE68NBmd_Kzp-j55vppflc8PN7ez68eCsPKuivcggsLXsnK10wRIwRXlVBSsRIqKaXhi5qQRV0bCVRakEZVxHJeKceMA8Gm6HyXu07xrXe506smG9eOJVzssy5rLhhVjJERPfuHLmOfwthOM6KIoLQWW-piR5kUc07O63VqVpA2mhK9VaC3CvS3AvYFXgV5Vw</recordid><startdate>20231101</startdate><enddate>20231101</enddate><creator>Kang, Alison</creator><creator>Kislevitz, Mikaela</creator><creator>Wamsley, Christine</creator><creator>Barillas, Jennifer</creator><creator>Hoopman, John</creator><creator>Kenkel, Jeffrey</creator><creator>Kilmer, Suzanne</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231101</creationdate><title>Clinical evaluation of the safety and efficacy of a 1060 nm diode laser for non‐invasive fat reduction of the flanks</title><author>Kang, Alison ; Kislevitz, Mikaela ; Wamsley, Christine ; Barillas, Jennifer ; Hoopman, John ; Kenkel, Jeffrey ; Kilmer, Suzanne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-eb56daf974f8390c66594697932a4777c5b800b88c7a17da7c940d5549e3cea63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Adipocytes</topic><topic>Attitude surveys</topic><topic>Body mass index</topic><topic>Diodes</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Lasers</topic><topic>Lifestyles</topic><topic>Liposuction</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Review boards</topic><topic>Skin</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>White people</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kang, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kislevitz, Mikaela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wamsley, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barillas, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoopman, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kenkel, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kilmer, Suzanne</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of cosmetic dermatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kang, Alison</au><au>Kislevitz, Mikaela</au><au>Wamsley, Christine</au><au>Barillas, Jennifer</au><au>Hoopman, John</au><au>Kenkel, Jeffrey</au><au>Kilmer, Suzanne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical evaluation of the safety and efficacy of a 1060 nm diode laser for non‐invasive fat reduction of the flanks</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cosmetic dermatology</jtitle><date>2023-11-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>3017</spage><epage>3025</epage><pages>3017-3025</pages><issn>1473-2130</issn><eissn>1473-2165</eissn><abstract>Background Laser hyperthermia‐induced lipolysis is a non‐invasive method of localized fat treatment. Non‐invasive approaches could be an option for a growing number of patients who are risk‐averse and are seeking out non‐invasive alternatives to surgical procedures such as liposuction. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of a 1060 nm diode laser for the non‐invasive fat reduction of the flanks. Methods A total of 30 subjects were enrolled in this prospective, single center study. Subjects received one 25‐min treatment with a 1060 nm diode laser to both flanks. Follow‐up visits were conducted at 6 and 12 weeks after the last treatment. Ultrasound adipose thickness, body weight, and circumference measurements were taken at baseline and at the 6‐ and 12‐week follow‐up visits. Subject satisfaction was assessed using a self‐assessment of fat reduction, pain, and tolerability scales, and a subject satisfaction questionnaire. Safety was assessed via the presence or absence of any adverse events. Results The average age of subjects was 47.3 years. A total of 27 subjects completed the treatment and returned for both follow‐up visits. An adipose reduction of 7.57 ± 1.15% at 6 weeks post‐treatment (p < 0.0001) was measured using ultrasound. High subject satisfaction was seen, with 74% of subjects reporting being either “satisfied” or “very satisfied” with their results on a 5‐point Likert Scale. Eighty‐two percent of subjects stated they would recommend the treatment to their friends. All subjects had either mild or moderate pain, with 52% of subjects rating their pain as “mild” (1–3), while 48% rated their pain as moderate (4–7) on the Wong‐Baker Scale. Conclusions A single treatment with a 1060 nm diode laser was both safe and effective in reducing unwanted fat in the flanks without any unanticipated adverse events. Subjects described their treatment pain as mild or moderate and were highly satisfied with their treatment outcomes.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/jocd.15954</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1473-2130 |
| ispartof | Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2023-11, Vol.22 (11), p.3017-3025 |
| issn | 1473-2130 1473-2165 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2856319330 |
| source | Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; Wiley Online Library Open Access |
| subjects | Adipocytes Attitude surveys Body mass index Diodes Females Lasers Lifestyles Liposuction Pain Questionnaires Review boards Skin Ultrasonic imaging White people |
| title | Clinical evaluation of the safety and efficacy of a 1060 nm diode laser for non‐invasive fat reduction of the flanks |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T13%3A44%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20evaluation%20of%20the%20safety%20and%20efficacy%20of%20a%201060%20nm%20diode%20laser%20for%20non%E2%80%90invasive%20fat%20reduction%20of%20the%20flanks&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cosmetic%20dermatology&rft.au=Kang,%20Alison&rft.date=2023-11-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=3017&rft.epage=3025&rft.pages=3017-3025&rft.issn=1473-2130&rft.eissn=1473-2165&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jocd.15954&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2856319330%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3090611860&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |