Flight safety risk assessment of self-medication among fighter pilots: a cross-sectional study
Background Fighter pilots are a specific population in which any adverse drug reaction can unpredictably interact with aeronautical constraints and thus compromise flight safety. This issue has not been evaluated in risk assessments. Aim To provide a semi-quantitative assessment of the risk to fligh...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of clinical pharmacy 2023-12, Vol.45 (6), p.1415-1423 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1423 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1415 |
container_title | International journal of clinical pharmacy |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Chiniard, Thomas Dib, Élise Guénot, François du Baret de Limé, Mathilde Manen, Olivier Monin, Jonathan |
description | Background
Fighter pilots are a specific population in which any adverse drug reaction can unpredictably interact with aeronautical constraints and thus compromise flight safety. This issue has not been evaluated in risk assessments.
Aim
To provide a semi-quantitative assessment of the risk to flight safety of self-medication in fighter pilots.
Method
A cross-sectional survey that aimed at identifying the determinants of self-medication in fighter pilots was conducted. All medications consumed within 8 h preceding a flight were listed. A modified Failure Mode and Effects Analysis was performed, and any adverse drug reaction reported in the French marketing authorization document of a drug was considered a failure mode. The frequency of occurrence and severity were evaluated using specific scales to assign each to three risk criticality categories: acceptable, tolerable, and unacceptable.
Results
Between March and November 2020, the responses of 170 fighter pilots were analyzed, for an overall return rate of approximately 34%. Among them, 78 reported 140 self-medication events within 8 h preceding a flight. Thirty-nine drug trade names (48 different international nonproprietary names) were listed, from which 694 potential adverse drug reactions were identified. The risk criticality was considered unacceptable, tolerable and acceptable for 37, 325 and 332 adverse drug reactions, respectively. Thus, the risk criticality was considered unacceptable, tolerable and acceptable for 17, 17, and 5 drugs, respectively.
Conclusion
This analysis suggests that the overall risk to flight safety of the current practice of self-medication in fighter pilots may be considered at least tolerable, or even unacceptable. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11096-023-01611-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2854424710</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A774406267</galeid><sourcerecordid>A774406267</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-99fb6c3116c9a9f5738f961b6a6d0afabbf813a333178a9655a83cfb424e2b73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUFvFSEUhYnR2Kb2D7gwJG7cULnAwIy7prFq0sRN1xKGB0_qzPDkzizm38v01TYaIywg8J1zLxxCXgO_AM7NewTgnWZcSMZBA7D1GTkVAjgzBuD5457LE3KOeMfrUFpAo16SE2mU5CD4Kfl2PaT995mii2FeaUn4gzrEgDiGaaY5UgxDZGPYJe_mlCfqxjztadxUodBDGvKMH6ijvmREhsFvlBsozstufUVeRDdgOH9Yz8jt9cfbq8_s5uunL1eXN8wrJWbWdbHXXgJo37kuNka2sdPQa6d33EXX97EF6aSUYFrX6aZxrfSxV0IF0Rt5Rt4dbQ8l_1wCznZM6MMwuCnkBa1om1pHGeAVffsXepeXUhveqE5BLSHgidq7Idg0xTwX5zdTe2mMUlwLvZW9-AdV5y6MyecpxFTP_xCIo-D-s0qI9lDS6MpqgdstVnuM1dZY7X2sdq2iNw8dL33N4VHyO8QKyCOA9Wrah_L0pP_Y_gJSV6vz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2894133121</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Flight safety risk assessment of self-medication among fighter pilots: a cross-sectional study</title><source>SpringerLink</source><creator>Chiniard, Thomas ; Dib, Élise ; Guénot, François ; du Baret de Limé, Mathilde ; Manen, Olivier ; Monin, Jonathan</creator><creatorcontrib>Chiniard, Thomas ; Dib, Élise ; Guénot, François ; du Baret de Limé, Mathilde ; Manen, Olivier ; Monin, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Fighter pilots are a specific population in which any adverse drug reaction can unpredictably interact with aeronautical constraints and thus compromise flight safety. This issue has not been evaluated in risk assessments.
Aim
To provide a semi-quantitative assessment of the risk to flight safety of self-medication in fighter pilots.
Method
A cross-sectional survey that aimed at identifying the determinants of self-medication in fighter pilots was conducted. All medications consumed within 8 h preceding a flight were listed. A modified Failure Mode and Effects Analysis was performed, and any adverse drug reaction reported in the French marketing authorization document of a drug was considered a failure mode. The frequency of occurrence and severity were evaluated using specific scales to assign each to three risk criticality categories: acceptable, tolerable, and unacceptable.
Results
Between March and November 2020, the responses of 170 fighter pilots were analyzed, for an overall return rate of approximately 34%. Among them, 78 reported 140 self-medication events within 8 h preceding a flight. Thirty-nine drug trade names (48 different international nonproprietary names) were listed, from which 694 potential adverse drug reactions were identified. The risk criticality was considered unacceptable, tolerable and acceptable for 37, 325 and 332 adverse drug reactions, respectively. Thus, the risk criticality was considered unacceptable, tolerable and acceptable for 17, 17, and 5 drugs, respectively.
Conclusion
This analysis suggests that the overall risk to flight safety of the current practice of self-medication in fighter pilots may be considered at least tolerable, or even unacceptable.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2210-7703</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2210-7711</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11096-023-01611-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37430120</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Aircraft accidents & safety ; Drug approval ; Drug dealing ; Drug traffic ; Drugs ; Fighter pilots ; Flight ; Internal Medicine ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Military aspects ; Pharmacy ; Research Article ; Risk assessment ; Safety ; Safety and security measures ; Self-care, Health ; Self-medication</subject><ispartof>International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2023-12, Vol.45 (6), p.1415-1423</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-99fb6c3116c9a9f5738f961b6a6d0afabbf813a333178a9655a83cfb424e2b73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-99fb6c3116c9a9f5738f961b6a6d0afabbf813a333178a9655a83cfb424e2b73</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8616-5767 ; 0000-0002-6721-3444</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11096-023-01611-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11096-023-01611-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37430120$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chiniard, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dib, Élise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guénot, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>du Baret de Limé, Mathilde</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manen, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monin, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><title>Flight safety risk assessment of self-medication among fighter pilots: a cross-sectional study</title><title>International journal of clinical pharmacy</title><addtitle>Int J Clin Pharm</addtitle><addtitle>Int J Clin Pharm</addtitle><description>Background
Fighter pilots are a specific population in which any adverse drug reaction can unpredictably interact with aeronautical constraints and thus compromise flight safety. This issue has not been evaluated in risk assessments.
Aim
To provide a semi-quantitative assessment of the risk to flight safety of self-medication in fighter pilots.
Method
A cross-sectional survey that aimed at identifying the determinants of self-medication in fighter pilots was conducted. All medications consumed within 8 h preceding a flight were listed. A modified Failure Mode and Effects Analysis was performed, and any adverse drug reaction reported in the French marketing authorization document of a drug was considered a failure mode. The frequency of occurrence and severity were evaluated using specific scales to assign each to three risk criticality categories: acceptable, tolerable, and unacceptable.
Results
Between March and November 2020, the responses of 170 fighter pilots were analyzed, for an overall return rate of approximately 34%. Among them, 78 reported 140 self-medication events within 8 h preceding a flight. Thirty-nine drug trade names (48 different international nonproprietary names) were listed, from which 694 potential adverse drug reactions were identified. The risk criticality was considered unacceptable, tolerable and acceptable for 37, 325 and 332 adverse drug reactions, respectively. Thus, the risk criticality was considered unacceptable, tolerable and acceptable for 17, 17, and 5 drugs, respectively.
Conclusion
This analysis suggests that the overall risk to flight safety of the current practice of self-medication in fighter pilots may be considered at least tolerable, or even unacceptable.</description><subject>Aircraft accidents & safety</subject><subject>Drug approval</subject><subject>Drug dealing</subject><subject>Drug traffic</subject><subject>Drugs</subject><subject>Fighter pilots</subject><subject>Flight</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Military aspects</subject><subject>Pharmacy</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Safety and security measures</subject><subject>Self-care, Health</subject><subject>Self-medication</subject><issn>2210-7703</issn><issn>2210-7711</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUFvFSEUhYnR2Kb2D7gwJG7cULnAwIy7prFq0sRN1xKGB0_qzPDkzizm38v01TYaIywg8J1zLxxCXgO_AM7NewTgnWZcSMZBA7D1GTkVAjgzBuD5457LE3KOeMfrUFpAo16SE2mU5CD4Kfl2PaT995mii2FeaUn4gzrEgDiGaaY5UgxDZGPYJe_mlCfqxjztadxUodBDGvKMH6ijvmREhsFvlBsozstufUVeRDdgOH9Yz8jt9cfbq8_s5uunL1eXN8wrJWbWdbHXXgJo37kuNka2sdPQa6d33EXX97EF6aSUYFrX6aZxrfSxV0IF0Rt5Rt4dbQ8l_1wCznZM6MMwuCnkBa1om1pHGeAVffsXepeXUhveqE5BLSHgidq7Idg0xTwX5zdTe2mMUlwLvZW9-AdV5y6MyecpxFTP_xCIo-D-s0qI9lDS6MpqgdstVnuM1dZY7X2sdq2iNw8dL33N4VHyO8QKyCOA9Wrah_L0pP_Y_gJSV6vz</recordid><startdate>20231201</startdate><enddate>20231201</enddate><creator>Chiniard, Thomas</creator><creator>Dib, Élise</creator><creator>Guénot, François</creator><creator>du Baret de Limé, Mathilde</creator><creator>Manen, Olivier</creator><creator>Monin, Jonathan</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8616-5767</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6721-3444</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231201</creationdate><title>Flight safety risk assessment of self-medication among fighter pilots: a cross-sectional study</title><author>Chiniard, Thomas ; Dib, Élise ; Guénot, François ; du Baret de Limé, Mathilde ; Manen, Olivier ; Monin, Jonathan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-99fb6c3116c9a9f5738f961b6a6d0afabbf813a333178a9655a83cfb424e2b73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Aircraft accidents & safety</topic><topic>Drug approval</topic><topic>Drug dealing</topic><topic>Drug traffic</topic><topic>Drugs</topic><topic>Fighter pilots</topic><topic>Flight</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Military aspects</topic><topic>Pharmacy</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Safety and security measures</topic><topic>Self-care, Health</topic><topic>Self-medication</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chiniard, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dib, Élise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guénot, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>du Baret de Limé, Mathilde</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manen, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monin, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of clinical pharmacy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chiniard, Thomas</au><au>Dib, Élise</au><au>Guénot, François</au><au>du Baret de Limé, Mathilde</au><au>Manen, Olivier</au><au>Monin, Jonathan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Flight safety risk assessment of self-medication among fighter pilots: a cross-sectional study</atitle><jtitle>International journal of clinical pharmacy</jtitle><stitle>Int J Clin Pharm</stitle><addtitle>Int J Clin Pharm</addtitle><date>2023-12-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1415</spage><epage>1423</epage><pages>1415-1423</pages><issn>2210-7703</issn><eissn>2210-7711</eissn><abstract>Background
Fighter pilots are a specific population in which any adverse drug reaction can unpredictably interact with aeronautical constraints and thus compromise flight safety. This issue has not been evaluated in risk assessments.
Aim
To provide a semi-quantitative assessment of the risk to flight safety of self-medication in fighter pilots.
Method
A cross-sectional survey that aimed at identifying the determinants of self-medication in fighter pilots was conducted. All medications consumed within 8 h preceding a flight were listed. A modified Failure Mode and Effects Analysis was performed, and any adverse drug reaction reported in the French marketing authorization document of a drug was considered a failure mode. The frequency of occurrence and severity were evaluated using specific scales to assign each to three risk criticality categories: acceptable, tolerable, and unacceptable.
Results
Between March and November 2020, the responses of 170 fighter pilots were analyzed, for an overall return rate of approximately 34%. Among them, 78 reported 140 self-medication events within 8 h preceding a flight. Thirty-nine drug trade names (48 different international nonproprietary names) were listed, from which 694 potential adverse drug reactions were identified. The risk criticality was considered unacceptable, tolerable and acceptable for 37, 325 and 332 adverse drug reactions, respectively. Thus, the risk criticality was considered unacceptable, tolerable and acceptable for 17, 17, and 5 drugs, respectively.
Conclusion
This analysis suggests that the overall risk to flight safety of the current practice of self-medication in fighter pilots may be considered at least tolerable, or even unacceptable.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>37430120</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11096-023-01611-y</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8616-5767</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6721-3444</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2210-7703 |
ispartof | International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2023-12, Vol.45 (6), p.1415-1423 |
issn | 2210-7703 2210-7711 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2854424710 |
source | SpringerLink |
subjects | Aircraft accidents & safety Drug approval Drug dealing Drug traffic Drugs Fighter pilots Flight Internal Medicine Medicine Medicine & Public Health Military aspects Pharmacy Research Article Risk assessment Safety Safety and security measures Self-care, Health Self-medication |
title | Flight safety risk assessment of self-medication among fighter pilots: a cross-sectional study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T20%3A12%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Flight%20safety%20risk%20assessment%20of%20self-medication%20among%20fighter%20pilots:%20a%20cross-sectional%20study&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20clinical%20pharmacy&rft.au=Chiniard,%20Thomas&rft.date=2023-12-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1415&rft.epage=1423&rft.pages=1415-1423&rft.issn=2210-7703&rft.eissn=2210-7711&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11096-023-01611-y&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA774406267%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2894133121&rft_id=info:pmid/37430120&rft_galeid=A774406267&rfr_iscdi=true |