Detecting Adverse Pathology of Prostate Cancer With a Deep Learning Approach Based on a 3D Swin‐Transformer Model and Biparametric MRI: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
Background Accurately detecting adverse pathology (AP) presence in prostate cancer patients is important for personalized clinical decision‐making. Radiologists' assessment based on clinical characteristics showed poor performance for detecting AP presence. Purpose To develop deep learning mode...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of magnetic resonance imaging 2024-06, Vol.59 (6), p.2101-2112 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2112 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 2101 |
container_title | Journal of magnetic resonance imaging |
container_volume | 59 |
creator | Zhao, Litao Bao, Jie Wang, Ximing Qiao, Xiaomeng Shen, Junkang Zhang, Yueyue Jin, Pengfei Ji, Yanting Zhang, Ji Su, Yueting Ji, Libiao Li, Zhenkai Lu, Jian Hu, Chunhong Shen, Hailin Tian, Jie Liu, Jiangang |
description | Background
Accurately detecting adverse pathology (AP) presence in prostate cancer patients is important for personalized clinical decision‐making. Radiologists' assessment based on clinical characteristics showed poor performance for detecting AP presence.
Purpose
To develop deep learning models for detecting AP presence, and to compare the performance of these models with those of a clinical model (CM) and radiologists' interpretation (RI).
Study Type
Retrospective.
Population
Totally, 616 men from six institutions who underwent radical prostatectomy, were divided into a training cohort (508 patients from five institutions) and an external validation cohort (108 patients from one institution).
Field Strength/Sequences
T2‐weighted imaging with a turbo spin echo sequence and diffusion‐weighted imaging with a single‐shot echo plane‐imaging sequence at 3.0 T.
Assessment
The reference standard for AP was histopathological extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion, or positive surgical margins. A deep learning model based on the Swin‐Transformer network (TransNet) was developed for detecting AP. An integrated model was also developed, which combined TransNet signature with clinical characteristics (TransCL). The clinical characteristics included biopsy Gleason grade group, Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System scores, prostate‐specific antigen, ADC value, and the lesion maximum cross‐sectional diameter.
Statistical Tests
Model and radiologists' performance were assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity. The Delong test was used to evaluate difference in AUC. P |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jmri.28963 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2854346846</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2854346846</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-e5836e58b2a537825ad3d03c5db63eb6ea1664f958c073294ab59da71766840a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQxiMEoqVw4QGQJS4IKcV_Yifhtt0tULQrqraIY-TYk65XiR1sp9Xe-gi8B2_Fk-DtFg4cuMyMNL_5NDNflr0k-JhgTN9tBm-OaVUL9ig7JJzSnPJKPE415iwnFS4PsmchbDDGdV3wp9kBKwWmdUEPs58LiKCisddopm_AB0DnMq5d7663yHXo3LsQZQQ0l1aBR99MXCOJFgAjWoL09n5yHL2Tao1OZACNnE0EW6DLW2N_3f248tKGzvkhja-chh5Jq9GJGaWXA0RvFFpdnL1HM7Sa-mgU2JjIi9RxYdztdgPoMk56-zx70sk-wIuHfJR9_XB6Nf-UL798PJvPlrliNWM58IqJFFoqOSsryqVmGjPFdSsYtAIkEaLoal4pXLL0BtnyWsuSlEJUBZbsKHuz101XfZ8gxGYwQUHfSwtuCg2teMGKxIqEvv4H3bjJ27RdwzCnghJS1ol6u6dUOil46JrRm0H6bUNws7Ow2VnY3FuY4FcPklM7gP6L_vEsAWQP3Joetv-Raj6nv-5FfwPlT6er</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3052621179</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Detecting Adverse Pathology of Prostate Cancer With a Deep Learning Approach Based on a 3D Swin‐Transformer Model and Biparametric MRI: A Multicenter Retrospective Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Zhao, Litao ; Bao, Jie ; Wang, Ximing ; Qiao, Xiaomeng ; Shen, Junkang ; Zhang, Yueyue ; Jin, Pengfei ; Ji, Yanting ; Zhang, Ji ; Su, Yueting ; Ji, Libiao ; Li, Zhenkai ; Lu, Jian ; Hu, Chunhong ; Shen, Hailin ; Tian, Jie ; Liu, Jiangang</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Litao ; Bao, Jie ; Wang, Ximing ; Qiao, Xiaomeng ; Shen, Junkang ; Zhang, Yueyue ; Jin, Pengfei ; Ji, Yanting ; Zhang, Ji ; Su, Yueting ; Ji, Libiao ; Li, Zhenkai ; Lu, Jian ; Hu, Chunhong ; Shen, Hailin ; Tian, Jie ; Liu, Jiangang</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Accurately detecting adverse pathology (AP) presence in prostate cancer patients is important for personalized clinical decision‐making. Radiologists' assessment based on clinical characteristics showed poor performance for detecting AP presence.
Purpose
To develop deep learning models for detecting AP presence, and to compare the performance of these models with those of a clinical model (CM) and radiologists' interpretation (RI).
Study Type
Retrospective.
Population
Totally, 616 men from six institutions who underwent radical prostatectomy, were divided into a training cohort (508 patients from five institutions) and an external validation cohort (108 patients from one institution).
Field Strength/Sequences
T2‐weighted imaging with a turbo spin echo sequence and diffusion‐weighted imaging with a single‐shot echo plane‐imaging sequence at 3.0 T.
Assessment
The reference standard for AP was histopathological extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion, or positive surgical margins. A deep learning model based on the Swin‐Transformer network (TransNet) was developed for detecting AP. An integrated model was also developed, which combined TransNet signature with clinical characteristics (TransCL). The clinical characteristics included biopsy Gleason grade group, Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System scores, prostate‐specific antigen, ADC value, and the lesion maximum cross‐sectional diameter.
Statistical Tests
Model and radiologists' performance were assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity. The Delong test was used to evaluate difference in AUC. P < 0.05 was considered significant.
Results
The AUC of TransCL for detecting AP presence was 0.813 (95% CI, 0.726–0.882), which was higher than that of TransNet (0.791 [95% CI, 0.702–0.863], P = 0.429), and significantly higher than those of CM (0.749 [95% CI, 0.656–0.827]) and RI (0.664 [95% CI, 0.566–0.752]).
Data Conclusion
TransNet and TransCL have potential to aid in detecting the presence of AP and some single adverse pathologic features.
Level of Evidence
4
Technical Efficacy
Stage 4</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-1807</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1522-2586</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-2586</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jmri.28963</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37602942</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>adverse pathology ; Aged ; Biopsy ; Data systems ; Decision making ; Deep Learning ; Field strength ; Humans ; Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Male ; Mathematical models ; Medical imaging ; Middle Aged ; Model testing ; Pathology ; Population studies ; Prostate - diagnostic imaging ; Prostate - pathology ; Prostate cancer ; Prostatectomy ; Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology ; Reproducibility of Results ; Retrospective Studies ; ROC Curve ; Seminal vesicle ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical tests ; Three dimensional models ; Transformers</subject><ispartof>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging, 2024-06, Vol.59 (6), p.2101-2112</ispartof><rights>2023 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.</rights><rights>2024 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-e5836e58b2a537825ad3d03c5db63eb6ea1664f958c073294ab59da71766840a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-e5836e58b2a537825ad3d03c5db63eb6ea1664f958c073294ab59da71766840a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7715-2393 ; 0000-0003-0498-0432</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjmri.28963$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjmri.28963$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37602942$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Litao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bao, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ximing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiao, Xiaomeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Junkang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yueyue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jin, Pengfei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ji, Yanting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Ji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Su, Yueting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ji, Libiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Zhenkai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Jian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Chunhong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Hailin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tian, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Jiangang</creatorcontrib><title>Detecting Adverse Pathology of Prostate Cancer With a Deep Learning Approach Based on a 3D Swin‐Transformer Model and Biparametric MRI: A Multicenter Retrospective Study</title><title>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging</title><addtitle>J Magn Reson Imaging</addtitle><description>Background
Accurately detecting adverse pathology (AP) presence in prostate cancer patients is important for personalized clinical decision‐making. Radiologists' assessment based on clinical characteristics showed poor performance for detecting AP presence.
Purpose
To develop deep learning models for detecting AP presence, and to compare the performance of these models with those of a clinical model (CM) and radiologists' interpretation (RI).
Study Type
Retrospective.
Population
Totally, 616 men from six institutions who underwent radical prostatectomy, were divided into a training cohort (508 patients from five institutions) and an external validation cohort (108 patients from one institution).
Field Strength/Sequences
T2‐weighted imaging with a turbo spin echo sequence and diffusion‐weighted imaging with a single‐shot echo plane‐imaging sequence at 3.0 T.
Assessment
The reference standard for AP was histopathological extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion, or positive surgical margins. A deep learning model based on the Swin‐Transformer network (TransNet) was developed for detecting AP. An integrated model was also developed, which combined TransNet signature with clinical characteristics (TransCL). The clinical characteristics included biopsy Gleason grade group, Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System scores, prostate‐specific antigen, ADC value, and the lesion maximum cross‐sectional diameter.
Statistical Tests
Model and radiologists' performance were assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity. The Delong test was used to evaluate difference in AUC. P < 0.05 was considered significant.
Results
The AUC of TransCL for detecting AP presence was 0.813 (95% CI, 0.726–0.882), which was higher than that of TransNet (0.791 [95% CI, 0.702–0.863], P = 0.429), and significantly higher than those of CM (0.749 [95% CI, 0.656–0.827]) and RI (0.664 [95% CI, 0.566–0.752]).
Data Conclusion
TransNet and TransCL have potential to aid in detecting the presence of AP and some single adverse pathologic features.
Level of Evidence
4
Technical Efficacy
Stage 4</description><subject>adverse pathology</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Data systems</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Deep Learning</subject><subject>Field strength</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Model testing</subject><subject>Pathology</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Prostate - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Prostate - pathology</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Prostatectomy</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Seminal vesicle</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical tests</subject><subject>Three dimensional models</subject><subject>Transformers</subject><issn>1053-1807</issn><issn>1522-2586</issn><issn>1522-2586</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQxiMEoqVw4QGQJS4IKcV_Yifhtt0tULQrqraIY-TYk65XiR1sp9Xe-gi8B2_Fk-DtFg4cuMyMNL_5NDNflr0k-JhgTN9tBm-OaVUL9ig7JJzSnPJKPE415iwnFS4PsmchbDDGdV3wp9kBKwWmdUEPs58LiKCisddopm_AB0DnMq5d7663yHXo3LsQZQQ0l1aBR99MXCOJFgAjWoL09n5yHL2Tao1OZACNnE0EW6DLW2N_3f248tKGzvkhja-chh5Jq9GJGaWXA0RvFFpdnL1HM7Sa-mgU2JjIi9RxYdztdgPoMk56-zx70sk-wIuHfJR9_XB6Nf-UL798PJvPlrliNWM58IqJFFoqOSsryqVmGjPFdSsYtAIkEaLoal4pXLL0BtnyWsuSlEJUBZbsKHuz101XfZ8gxGYwQUHfSwtuCg2teMGKxIqEvv4H3bjJ27RdwzCnghJS1ol6u6dUOil46JrRm0H6bUNws7Ow2VnY3FuY4FcPklM7gP6L_vEsAWQP3Joetv-Raj6nv-5FfwPlT6er</recordid><startdate>202406</startdate><enddate>202406</enddate><creator>Zhao, Litao</creator><creator>Bao, Jie</creator><creator>Wang, Ximing</creator><creator>Qiao, Xiaomeng</creator><creator>Shen, Junkang</creator><creator>Zhang, Yueyue</creator><creator>Jin, Pengfei</creator><creator>Ji, Yanting</creator><creator>Zhang, Ji</creator><creator>Su, Yueting</creator><creator>Ji, Libiao</creator><creator>Li, Zhenkai</creator><creator>Lu, Jian</creator><creator>Hu, Chunhong</creator><creator>Shen, Hailin</creator><creator>Tian, Jie</creator><creator>Liu, Jiangang</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7715-2393</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0498-0432</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202406</creationdate><title>Detecting Adverse Pathology of Prostate Cancer With a Deep Learning Approach Based on a 3D Swin‐Transformer Model and Biparametric MRI: A Multicenter Retrospective Study</title><author>Zhao, Litao ; Bao, Jie ; Wang, Ximing ; Qiao, Xiaomeng ; Shen, Junkang ; Zhang, Yueyue ; Jin, Pengfei ; Ji, Yanting ; Zhang, Ji ; Su, Yueting ; Ji, Libiao ; Li, Zhenkai ; Lu, Jian ; Hu, Chunhong ; Shen, Hailin ; Tian, Jie ; Liu, Jiangang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-e5836e58b2a537825ad3d03c5db63eb6ea1664f958c073294ab59da71766840a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>adverse pathology</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Data systems</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Deep Learning</topic><topic>Field strength</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Model testing</topic><topic>Pathology</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Prostate - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Prostate - pathology</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Prostatectomy</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Seminal vesicle</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical tests</topic><topic>Three dimensional models</topic><topic>Transformers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Litao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bao, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ximing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiao, Xiaomeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Junkang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yueyue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jin, Pengfei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ji, Yanting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Ji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Su, Yueting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ji, Libiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Zhenkai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Jian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Chunhong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Hailin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tian, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Jiangang</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhao, Litao</au><au>Bao, Jie</au><au>Wang, Ximing</au><au>Qiao, Xiaomeng</au><au>Shen, Junkang</au><au>Zhang, Yueyue</au><au>Jin, Pengfei</au><au>Ji, Yanting</au><au>Zhang, Ji</au><au>Su, Yueting</au><au>Ji, Libiao</au><au>Li, Zhenkai</au><au>Lu, Jian</au><au>Hu, Chunhong</au><au>Shen, Hailin</au><au>Tian, Jie</au><au>Liu, Jiangang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Detecting Adverse Pathology of Prostate Cancer With a Deep Learning Approach Based on a 3D Swin‐Transformer Model and Biparametric MRI: A Multicenter Retrospective Study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging</jtitle><addtitle>J Magn Reson Imaging</addtitle><date>2024-06</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2101</spage><epage>2112</epage><pages>2101-2112</pages><issn>1053-1807</issn><issn>1522-2586</issn><eissn>1522-2586</eissn><abstract>Background
Accurately detecting adverse pathology (AP) presence in prostate cancer patients is important for personalized clinical decision‐making. Radiologists' assessment based on clinical characteristics showed poor performance for detecting AP presence.
Purpose
To develop deep learning models for detecting AP presence, and to compare the performance of these models with those of a clinical model (CM) and radiologists' interpretation (RI).
Study Type
Retrospective.
Population
Totally, 616 men from six institutions who underwent radical prostatectomy, were divided into a training cohort (508 patients from five institutions) and an external validation cohort (108 patients from one institution).
Field Strength/Sequences
T2‐weighted imaging with a turbo spin echo sequence and diffusion‐weighted imaging with a single‐shot echo plane‐imaging sequence at 3.0 T.
Assessment
The reference standard for AP was histopathological extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion, or positive surgical margins. A deep learning model based on the Swin‐Transformer network (TransNet) was developed for detecting AP. An integrated model was also developed, which combined TransNet signature with clinical characteristics (TransCL). The clinical characteristics included biopsy Gleason grade group, Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System scores, prostate‐specific antigen, ADC value, and the lesion maximum cross‐sectional diameter.
Statistical Tests
Model and radiologists' performance were assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity. The Delong test was used to evaluate difference in AUC. P < 0.05 was considered significant.
Results
The AUC of TransCL for detecting AP presence was 0.813 (95% CI, 0.726–0.882), which was higher than that of TransNet (0.791 [95% CI, 0.702–0.863], P = 0.429), and significantly higher than those of CM (0.749 [95% CI, 0.656–0.827]) and RI (0.664 [95% CI, 0.566–0.752]).
Data Conclusion
TransNet and TransCL have potential to aid in detecting the presence of AP and some single adverse pathologic features.
Level of Evidence
4
Technical Efficacy
Stage 4</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>37602942</pmid><doi>10.1002/jmri.28963</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7715-2393</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0498-0432</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1053-1807 |
ispartof | Journal of magnetic resonance imaging, 2024-06, Vol.59 (6), p.2101-2112 |
issn | 1053-1807 1522-2586 1522-2586 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2854346846 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | adverse pathology Aged Biopsy Data systems Decision making Deep Learning Field strength Humans Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods Male Mathematical models Medical imaging Middle Aged Model testing Pathology Population studies Prostate - diagnostic imaging Prostate - pathology Prostate cancer Prostatectomy Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology Reproducibility of Results Retrospective Studies ROC Curve Seminal vesicle Sensitivity and Specificity Statistical analysis Statistical tests Three dimensional models Transformers |
title | Detecting Adverse Pathology of Prostate Cancer With a Deep Learning Approach Based on a 3D Swin‐Transformer Model and Biparametric MRI: A Multicenter Retrospective Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T17%3A13%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Detecting%20Adverse%20Pathology%20of%20Prostate%20Cancer%20With%20a%20Deep%20Learning%20Approach%20Based%20on%20a%203D%20Swin%E2%80%90Transformer%20Model%20and%20Biparametric%20MRI:%20A%20Multicenter%20Retrospective%20Study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20magnetic%20resonance%20imaging&rft.au=Zhao,%20Litao&rft.date=2024-06&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2101&rft.epage=2112&rft.pages=2101-2112&rft.issn=1053-1807&rft.eissn=1522-2586&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jmri.28963&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2854346846%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3052621179&rft_id=info:pmid/37602942&rfr_iscdi=true |