Citizen science approaches to crowdsourcing food environment data: A scoping review of the literature
Globally, the adoption and implementation of policies to improve the healthiness of food environments and prevent population weight gain have been inadequate. This is partly because of the complexity associated with monitoring dynamic food environments. Crowdsourcing is a citizen science approach th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Obesity reviews 2023-11, Vol.24 (11), p.e13618-e13618 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e13618 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | e13618 |
container_title | Obesity reviews |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Monaghan, Jacqueline Backholer, Kathryn McKelvey, Amy‐Louise Christidis, Rebecca Borda, Ann Calyx, Cobi Crocetti, Alessandro Driessen, Christine Zorbas, Christina |
description | Globally, the adoption and implementation of policies to improve the healthiness of food environments and prevent population weight gain have been inadequate. This is partly because of the complexity associated with monitoring dynamic food environments. Crowdsourcing is a citizen science approach that can increase the extent and nature of food environment data collection by engaging citizens as sensors or volunteered computing experts. There has been no literature synthesis to guide the application of crowdsourcing to food environment monitoring. We systematically conducted a scoping review to address this gap. Forty‐two articles met our eligibility criteria. Photovoice techniques were the most employed methodological approaches (
n
= 25 studies), commonly used to understand overall access to healthy food. A small number of studies made purpose‐built apps to collect price or nutritional composition data and were scaled to receive large amounts of data points. Twenty‐nine studies crowdsourced food environment data by engaging priority populations (e.g., households receiving low incomes). There is growing potential to develop scalable crowdsourcing platforms to understand food environments through the eyes of everyday people. Such crowdsourced data may improve public and policy engagement with equitable food policy actions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/obr.13618 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2854346758</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2874044674</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-f93e2fad5d49b22188447e72eff86c8776b6573ebebea8f7a0b43905e42374f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkD1PwzAQQC0EEqUw8A8sscCQEsdO7LBVFV9SJZYObJHjnKmr1A62UwS_HpciBu6Gu-Hd6e4hdEnyGUlx61o_I7Qi4ghNCKt4xkX9evzXC3KKzkLY5DnhNSUTBAsTzRdYHJQBqwDLYfBOqjUEHB1W3n10wY1eGfuGtXMdBrsz3tkt2Ig7GeUdnqdhN-wBDzsDH9hpHNeAexPByzh6OEcnWvYBLn7rFK0e7leLp2z58vi8mC8zRYsyZrqmUGjZlR2r26IgQjDGgRegtaiU4Lxqq5JTaFNKobnMW0brvARWUM40naLrw9r0wvsIITZbExT0vbTgxtAUomQ0iShFQq_-oZv0pU3HJYqznCWMJermQCUPIXjQzeDNVvrPhuTN3neTfDc_vuk3CfZ0IA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2874044674</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Citizen science approaches to crowdsourcing food environment data: A scoping review of the literature</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Monaghan, Jacqueline ; Backholer, Kathryn ; McKelvey, Amy‐Louise ; Christidis, Rebecca ; Borda, Ann ; Calyx, Cobi ; Crocetti, Alessandro ; Driessen, Christine ; Zorbas, Christina</creator><creatorcontrib>Monaghan, Jacqueline ; Backholer, Kathryn ; McKelvey, Amy‐Louise ; Christidis, Rebecca ; Borda, Ann ; Calyx, Cobi ; Crocetti, Alessandro ; Driessen, Christine ; Zorbas, Christina</creatorcontrib><description>Globally, the adoption and implementation of policies to improve the healthiness of food environments and prevent population weight gain have been inadequate. This is partly because of the complexity associated with monitoring dynamic food environments. Crowdsourcing is a citizen science approach that can increase the extent and nature of food environment data collection by engaging citizens as sensors or volunteered computing experts. There has been no literature synthesis to guide the application of crowdsourcing to food environment monitoring. We systematically conducted a scoping review to address this gap. Forty‐two articles met our eligibility criteria. Photovoice techniques were the most employed methodological approaches (
n
= 25 studies), commonly used to understand overall access to healthy food. A small number of studies made purpose‐built apps to collect price or nutritional composition data and were scaled to receive large amounts of data points. Twenty‐nine studies crowdsourced food environment data by engaging priority populations (e.g., households receiving low incomes). There is growing potential to develop scalable crowdsourcing platforms to understand food environments through the eyes of everyday people. Such crowdsourced data may improve public and policy engagement with equitable food policy actions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1467-7881</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-789X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/obr.13618</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Crowdsourcing ; Data collection ; Data points ; Environmental monitoring ; Food ; Households ; Literature reviews ; Monitoring</subject><ispartof>Obesity reviews, 2023-11, Vol.24 (11), p.e13618-e13618</ispartof><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-f93e2fad5d49b22188447e72eff86c8776b6573ebebea8f7a0b43905e42374f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-f93e2fad5d49b22188447e72eff86c8776b6573ebebea8f7a0b43905e42374f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3323-575X ; 0000-0002-7343-2424</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Monaghan, Jacqueline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Backholer, Kathryn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKelvey, Amy‐Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christidis, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borda, Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calyx, Cobi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crocetti, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Driessen, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zorbas, Christina</creatorcontrib><title>Citizen science approaches to crowdsourcing food environment data: A scoping review of the literature</title><title>Obesity reviews</title><description>Globally, the adoption and implementation of policies to improve the healthiness of food environments and prevent population weight gain have been inadequate. This is partly because of the complexity associated with monitoring dynamic food environments. Crowdsourcing is a citizen science approach that can increase the extent and nature of food environment data collection by engaging citizens as sensors or volunteered computing experts. There has been no literature synthesis to guide the application of crowdsourcing to food environment monitoring. We systematically conducted a scoping review to address this gap. Forty‐two articles met our eligibility criteria. Photovoice techniques were the most employed methodological approaches (
n
= 25 studies), commonly used to understand overall access to healthy food. A small number of studies made purpose‐built apps to collect price or nutritional composition data and were scaled to receive large amounts of data points. Twenty‐nine studies crowdsourced food environment data by engaging priority populations (e.g., households receiving low incomes). There is growing potential to develop scalable crowdsourcing platforms to understand food environments through the eyes of everyday people. Such crowdsourced data may improve public and policy engagement with equitable food policy actions.</description><subject>Crowdsourcing</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Data points</subject><subject>Environmental monitoring</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><issn>1467-7881</issn><issn>1467-789X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkD1PwzAQQC0EEqUw8A8sscCQEsdO7LBVFV9SJZYObJHjnKmr1A62UwS_HpciBu6Gu-Hd6e4hdEnyGUlx61o_I7Qi4ghNCKt4xkX9evzXC3KKzkLY5DnhNSUTBAsTzRdYHJQBqwDLYfBOqjUEHB1W3n10wY1eGfuGtXMdBrsz3tkt2Ig7GeUdnqdhN-wBDzsDH9hpHNeAexPByzh6OEcnWvYBLn7rFK0e7leLp2z58vi8mC8zRYsyZrqmUGjZlR2r26IgQjDGgRegtaiU4Lxqq5JTaFNKobnMW0brvARWUM40naLrw9r0wvsIITZbExT0vbTgxtAUomQ0iShFQq_-oZv0pU3HJYqznCWMJermQCUPIXjQzeDNVvrPhuTN3neTfDc_vuk3CfZ0IA</recordid><startdate>20231101</startdate><enddate>20231101</enddate><creator>Monaghan, Jacqueline</creator><creator>Backholer, Kathryn</creator><creator>McKelvey, Amy‐Louise</creator><creator>Christidis, Rebecca</creator><creator>Borda, Ann</creator><creator>Calyx, Cobi</creator><creator>Crocetti, Alessandro</creator><creator>Driessen, Christine</creator><creator>Zorbas, Christina</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3323-575X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7343-2424</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231101</creationdate><title>Citizen science approaches to crowdsourcing food environment data: A scoping review of the literature</title><author>Monaghan, Jacqueline ; Backholer, Kathryn ; McKelvey, Amy‐Louise ; Christidis, Rebecca ; Borda, Ann ; Calyx, Cobi ; Crocetti, Alessandro ; Driessen, Christine ; Zorbas, Christina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-f93e2fad5d49b22188447e72eff86c8776b6573ebebea8f7a0b43905e42374f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Crowdsourcing</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Data points</topic><topic>Environmental monitoring</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Monaghan, Jacqueline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Backholer, Kathryn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKelvey, Amy‐Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christidis, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borda, Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calyx, Cobi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crocetti, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Driessen, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zorbas, Christina</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Obesity reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Monaghan, Jacqueline</au><au>Backholer, Kathryn</au><au>McKelvey, Amy‐Louise</au><au>Christidis, Rebecca</au><au>Borda, Ann</au><au>Calyx, Cobi</au><au>Crocetti, Alessandro</au><au>Driessen, Christine</au><au>Zorbas, Christina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Citizen science approaches to crowdsourcing food environment data: A scoping review of the literature</atitle><jtitle>Obesity reviews</jtitle><date>2023-11-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>e13618</spage><epage>e13618</epage><pages>e13618-e13618</pages><issn>1467-7881</issn><eissn>1467-789X</eissn><abstract>Globally, the adoption and implementation of policies to improve the healthiness of food environments and prevent population weight gain have been inadequate. This is partly because of the complexity associated with monitoring dynamic food environments. Crowdsourcing is a citizen science approach that can increase the extent and nature of food environment data collection by engaging citizens as sensors or volunteered computing experts. There has been no literature synthesis to guide the application of crowdsourcing to food environment monitoring. We systematically conducted a scoping review to address this gap. Forty‐two articles met our eligibility criteria. Photovoice techniques were the most employed methodological approaches (
n
= 25 studies), commonly used to understand overall access to healthy food. A small number of studies made purpose‐built apps to collect price or nutritional composition data and were scaled to receive large amounts of data points. Twenty‐nine studies crowdsourced food environment data by engaging priority populations (e.g., households receiving low incomes). There is growing potential to develop scalable crowdsourcing platforms to understand food environments through the eyes of everyday people. Such crowdsourced data may improve public and policy engagement with equitable food policy actions.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/obr.13618</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3323-575X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7343-2424</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1467-7881 |
ispartof | Obesity reviews, 2023-11, Vol.24 (11), p.e13618-e13618 |
issn | 1467-7881 1467-789X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2854346758 |
source | Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Crowdsourcing Data collection Data points Environmental monitoring Food Households Literature reviews Monitoring |
title | Citizen science approaches to crowdsourcing food environment data: A scoping review of the literature |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T04%3A04%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Citizen%20science%20approaches%20to%20crowdsourcing%20food%20environment%20data:%20A%20scoping%20review%20of%20the%20literature&rft.jtitle=Obesity%20reviews&rft.au=Monaghan,%20Jacqueline&rft.date=2023-11-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=e13618&rft.epage=e13618&rft.pages=e13618-e13618&rft.issn=1467-7881&rft.eissn=1467-789X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/obr.13618&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2874044674%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2874044674&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |