Triple contrast computed tomography reveals site‐specific biomechanical differences in the human knee joint—A proof of concept study

Cartilage and synovial fluid are challenging to observe separately in native computed tomography (CT). We report the use of triple contrast agent (bismuth nanoparticles [BiNPs], CA4+, and gadoteridol) to image and segment cartilage in cadaveric knee joints with a clinical CT scanner. We hypothesize...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of orthopaedic research 2024-02, Vol.42 (2), p.415-424
Hauptverfasser: Orava, Heta, Paakkari, Petri, Jäntti, Jiri, Honkanen, Miitu K. M., Honkanen, Juuso T. J., Virén, Tuomas, Joenathan, Anisha, Tanska, Petri, Korhonen, Rami K., Grinstaff, Mark W., Töyräs, Juha, Mäkelä, Janne T. A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 424
container_issue 2
container_start_page 415
container_title Journal of orthopaedic research
container_volume 42
creator Orava, Heta
Paakkari, Petri
Jäntti, Jiri
Honkanen, Miitu K. M.
Honkanen, Juuso T. J.
Virén, Tuomas
Joenathan, Anisha
Tanska, Petri
Korhonen, Rami K.
Grinstaff, Mark W.
Töyräs, Juha
Mäkelä, Janne T. A.
description Cartilage and synovial fluid are challenging to observe separately in native computed tomography (CT). We report the use of triple contrast agent (bismuth nanoparticles [BiNPs], CA4+, and gadoteridol) to image and segment cartilage in cadaveric knee joints with a clinical CT scanner. We hypothesize that BiNPs will remain in synovial fluid while the CA4+ and gadoteridol will diffuse into cartilage, allowing (1) segmentation of cartilage, and (2) evaluation of cartilage biomechanical properties based on contrast agent concentrations. To investigate these hypotheses, triple contrast agent was injected into both knee joints of a cadaver (N = 1), imaged with a clinical CT at multiple timepoints during the contrast agent diffusion. Knee joints were extracted, imaged with micro‐CT (µCT), and biomechanical properties of the cartilage surface were determined by stress‐relaxation mapping. Cartilage was segmented and contrast agent concentrations (CA4+ and gadoteridol) were compared with the biomechanical properties at multiple locations (n = 185). Spearman's correlation between cartilage thickness from clinical CT and reference µCT images verifies successful and reliable segmentation. CA4+ concentration is significantly higher in femoral than in tibial cartilage at 60 min and further timepoints, which corresponds to the higher Young's modulus observed in femoral cartilage. In this pilot study, we show that (1) large BiNPs do not diffuse into cartilage, facilitating straightforward segmentation of human knee joint cartilage in a clinical setting, and (2) CA4+ concentration in cartilage reflects the biomechanical differences between femoral and tibial cartilage. Thus, the triple contrast agent CT shows potential in cartilage morphology and condition estimation in clinical CT.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jor.25683
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2853945480</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2853945480</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3203-37e8c66e1b27296fcc297b0f1b1d44668a53bbe817d18ec9b2dbb10c5772b5be3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD1v1TAUhi0EopeWgT-APNIhrT_ij4xVBaWoUiVUpG6R7ZxwfUni1HZAd-vYsUN_YX8Jhlu6IR3pnOHR-x49CL2j5IgSwo43IR4xITV_gVZUiLoSTF2_RCuiuKwIk3IPvUlpQwhRlOnXaI8r0XBNxQrdXUU_D4BdmHI0KZdjnJcMHc5hDN-jmddbHOEnmCHh5DM83t6nGZzvvcPWhxHc2kzemQF3vu8hwuQgYT_hvAa8XkYz4R8TAN4EP-XH24cTPMcQelymdDqYM0556bYH6FVfOuDt095H3z59vDr9XF1cnp2fnlxUjjPCK65AOymBWqZYI3vnWKMs6amlXV1LqY3g1oKmqqMaXGNZZy0lTijFrLDA99GHXW5542aBlNvRJwfDYCYIS2qZFrypRa1JQQ93qIshpQh9O0c_mrhtKWn_iG-L-Pav-MK-f4pd7AjdM_nPdAGOd8AvP8D2_0ntl8uvu8jf6lCSYA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2853945480</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Triple contrast computed tomography reveals site‐specific biomechanical differences in the human knee joint—A proof of concept study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Orava, Heta ; Paakkari, Petri ; Jäntti, Jiri ; Honkanen, Miitu K. M. ; Honkanen, Juuso T. J. ; Virén, Tuomas ; Joenathan, Anisha ; Tanska, Petri ; Korhonen, Rami K. ; Grinstaff, Mark W. ; Töyräs, Juha ; Mäkelä, Janne T. A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Orava, Heta ; Paakkari, Petri ; Jäntti, Jiri ; Honkanen, Miitu K. M. ; Honkanen, Juuso T. J. ; Virén, Tuomas ; Joenathan, Anisha ; Tanska, Petri ; Korhonen, Rami K. ; Grinstaff, Mark W. ; Töyräs, Juha ; Mäkelä, Janne T. A.</creatorcontrib><description>Cartilage and synovial fluid are challenging to observe separately in native computed tomography (CT). We report the use of triple contrast agent (bismuth nanoparticles [BiNPs], CA4+, and gadoteridol) to image and segment cartilage in cadaveric knee joints with a clinical CT scanner. We hypothesize that BiNPs will remain in synovial fluid while the CA4+ and gadoteridol will diffuse into cartilage, allowing (1) segmentation of cartilage, and (2) evaluation of cartilage biomechanical properties based on contrast agent concentrations. To investigate these hypotheses, triple contrast agent was injected into both knee joints of a cadaver (N = 1), imaged with a clinical CT at multiple timepoints during the contrast agent diffusion. Knee joints were extracted, imaged with micro‐CT (µCT), and biomechanical properties of the cartilage surface were determined by stress‐relaxation mapping. Cartilage was segmented and contrast agent concentrations (CA4+ and gadoteridol) were compared with the biomechanical properties at multiple locations (n = 185). Spearman's correlation between cartilage thickness from clinical CT and reference µCT images verifies successful and reliable segmentation. CA4+ concentration is significantly higher in femoral than in tibial cartilage at 60 min and further timepoints, which corresponds to the higher Young's modulus observed in femoral cartilage. In this pilot study, we show that (1) large BiNPs do not diffuse into cartilage, facilitating straightforward segmentation of human knee joint cartilage in a clinical setting, and (2) CA4+ concentration in cartilage reflects the biomechanical differences between femoral and tibial cartilage. Thus, the triple contrast agent CT shows potential in cartilage morphology and condition estimation in clinical CT.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0736-0266</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1554-527X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jor.25683</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37593815</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>articular cartilage ; biomechanical testing ; Cartilage, Articular ; clinical contrast‐enhanced computed tomography ; Contrast Media ; Humans ; Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging ; osteoarthritis ; Pilot Projects ; Proof of Concept Study ; segmentation ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><ispartof>Journal of orthopaedic research, 2024-02, Vol.42 (2), p.415-424</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Orthopaedic Research Society.</rights><rights>2023 The Authors. Journal of Orthopaedic Research® published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Orthopaedic Research Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3203-37e8c66e1b27296fcc297b0f1b1d44668a53bbe817d18ec9b2dbb10c5772b5be3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2548-4457 ; 0000-0001-8442-8458 ; 0000-0002-3486-7855 ; 0000-0002-6123-1262 ; 0000-0003-1954-9573 ; 0000-0002-9150-9253 ; 0000-0002-1388-0997 ; 0000-0002-9684-6902 ; 0000-0002-8035-1606 ; 0000-0002-5453-3668</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjor.25683$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjor.25683$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27915,27916,45565,45566</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37593815$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Orava, Heta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paakkari, Petri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jäntti, Jiri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Honkanen, Miitu K. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Honkanen, Juuso T. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Virén, Tuomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joenathan, Anisha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanska, Petri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korhonen, Rami K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grinstaff, Mark W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Töyräs, Juha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mäkelä, Janne T. A.</creatorcontrib><title>Triple contrast computed tomography reveals site‐specific biomechanical differences in the human knee joint—A proof of concept study</title><title>Journal of orthopaedic research</title><addtitle>J Orthop Res</addtitle><description>Cartilage and synovial fluid are challenging to observe separately in native computed tomography (CT). We report the use of triple contrast agent (bismuth nanoparticles [BiNPs], CA4+, and gadoteridol) to image and segment cartilage in cadaveric knee joints with a clinical CT scanner. We hypothesize that BiNPs will remain in synovial fluid while the CA4+ and gadoteridol will diffuse into cartilage, allowing (1) segmentation of cartilage, and (2) evaluation of cartilage biomechanical properties based on contrast agent concentrations. To investigate these hypotheses, triple contrast agent was injected into both knee joints of a cadaver (N = 1), imaged with a clinical CT at multiple timepoints during the contrast agent diffusion. Knee joints were extracted, imaged with micro‐CT (µCT), and biomechanical properties of the cartilage surface were determined by stress‐relaxation mapping. Cartilage was segmented and contrast agent concentrations (CA4+ and gadoteridol) were compared with the biomechanical properties at multiple locations (n = 185). Spearman's correlation between cartilage thickness from clinical CT and reference µCT images verifies successful and reliable segmentation. CA4+ concentration is significantly higher in femoral than in tibial cartilage at 60 min and further timepoints, which corresponds to the higher Young's modulus observed in femoral cartilage. In this pilot study, we show that (1) large BiNPs do not diffuse into cartilage, facilitating straightforward segmentation of human knee joint cartilage in a clinical setting, and (2) CA4+ concentration in cartilage reflects the biomechanical differences between femoral and tibial cartilage. Thus, the triple contrast agent CT shows potential in cartilage morphology and condition estimation in clinical CT.</description><subject>articular cartilage</subject><subject>biomechanical testing</subject><subject>Cartilage, Articular</subject><subject>clinical contrast‐enhanced computed tomography</subject><subject>Contrast Media</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>osteoarthritis</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Proof of Concept Study</subject><subject>segmentation</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><issn>0736-0266</issn><issn>1554-527X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kD1v1TAUhi0EopeWgT-APNIhrT_ij4xVBaWoUiVUpG6R7ZxwfUni1HZAd-vYsUN_YX8Jhlu6IR3pnOHR-x49CL2j5IgSwo43IR4xITV_gVZUiLoSTF2_RCuiuKwIk3IPvUlpQwhRlOnXaI8r0XBNxQrdXUU_D4BdmHI0KZdjnJcMHc5hDN-jmddbHOEnmCHh5DM83t6nGZzvvcPWhxHc2kzemQF3vu8hwuQgYT_hvAa8XkYz4R8TAN4EP-XH24cTPMcQelymdDqYM0556bYH6FVfOuDt095H3z59vDr9XF1cnp2fnlxUjjPCK65AOymBWqZYI3vnWKMs6amlXV1LqY3g1oKmqqMaXGNZZy0lTijFrLDA99GHXW5542aBlNvRJwfDYCYIS2qZFrypRa1JQQ93qIshpQh9O0c_mrhtKWn_iG-L-Pav-MK-f4pd7AjdM_nPdAGOd8AvP8D2_0ntl8uvu8jf6lCSYA</recordid><startdate>202402</startdate><enddate>202402</enddate><creator>Orava, Heta</creator><creator>Paakkari, Petri</creator><creator>Jäntti, Jiri</creator><creator>Honkanen, Miitu K. M.</creator><creator>Honkanen, Juuso T. J.</creator><creator>Virén, Tuomas</creator><creator>Joenathan, Anisha</creator><creator>Tanska, Petri</creator><creator>Korhonen, Rami K.</creator><creator>Grinstaff, Mark W.</creator><creator>Töyräs, Juha</creator><creator>Mäkelä, Janne T. A.</creator><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2548-4457</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8442-8458</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3486-7855</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6123-1262</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1954-9573</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9150-9253</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1388-0997</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9684-6902</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8035-1606</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5453-3668</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202402</creationdate><title>Triple contrast computed tomography reveals site‐specific biomechanical differences in the human knee joint—A proof of concept study</title><author>Orava, Heta ; Paakkari, Petri ; Jäntti, Jiri ; Honkanen, Miitu K. M. ; Honkanen, Juuso T. J. ; Virén, Tuomas ; Joenathan, Anisha ; Tanska, Petri ; Korhonen, Rami K. ; Grinstaff, Mark W. ; Töyräs, Juha ; Mäkelä, Janne T. A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3203-37e8c66e1b27296fcc297b0f1b1d44668a53bbe817d18ec9b2dbb10c5772b5be3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>articular cartilage</topic><topic>biomechanical testing</topic><topic>Cartilage, Articular</topic><topic>clinical contrast‐enhanced computed tomography</topic><topic>Contrast Media</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>osteoarthritis</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Proof of Concept Study</topic><topic>segmentation</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Orava, Heta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paakkari, Petri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jäntti, Jiri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Honkanen, Miitu K. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Honkanen, Juuso T. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Virén, Tuomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joenathan, Anisha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanska, Petri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korhonen, Rami K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grinstaff, Mark W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Töyräs, Juha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mäkelä, Janne T. A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of orthopaedic research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Orava, Heta</au><au>Paakkari, Petri</au><au>Jäntti, Jiri</au><au>Honkanen, Miitu K. M.</au><au>Honkanen, Juuso T. J.</au><au>Virén, Tuomas</au><au>Joenathan, Anisha</au><au>Tanska, Petri</au><au>Korhonen, Rami K.</au><au>Grinstaff, Mark W.</au><au>Töyräs, Juha</au><au>Mäkelä, Janne T. A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Triple contrast computed tomography reveals site‐specific biomechanical differences in the human knee joint—A proof of concept study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of orthopaedic research</jtitle><addtitle>J Orthop Res</addtitle><date>2024-02</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>415</spage><epage>424</epage><pages>415-424</pages><issn>0736-0266</issn><eissn>1554-527X</eissn><abstract>Cartilage and synovial fluid are challenging to observe separately in native computed tomography (CT). We report the use of triple contrast agent (bismuth nanoparticles [BiNPs], CA4+, and gadoteridol) to image and segment cartilage in cadaveric knee joints with a clinical CT scanner. We hypothesize that BiNPs will remain in synovial fluid while the CA4+ and gadoteridol will diffuse into cartilage, allowing (1) segmentation of cartilage, and (2) evaluation of cartilage biomechanical properties based on contrast agent concentrations. To investigate these hypotheses, triple contrast agent was injected into both knee joints of a cadaver (N = 1), imaged with a clinical CT at multiple timepoints during the contrast agent diffusion. Knee joints were extracted, imaged with micro‐CT (µCT), and biomechanical properties of the cartilage surface were determined by stress‐relaxation mapping. Cartilage was segmented and contrast agent concentrations (CA4+ and gadoteridol) were compared with the biomechanical properties at multiple locations (n = 185). Spearman's correlation between cartilage thickness from clinical CT and reference µCT images verifies successful and reliable segmentation. CA4+ concentration is significantly higher in femoral than in tibial cartilage at 60 min and further timepoints, which corresponds to the higher Young's modulus observed in femoral cartilage. In this pilot study, we show that (1) large BiNPs do not diffuse into cartilage, facilitating straightforward segmentation of human knee joint cartilage in a clinical setting, and (2) CA4+ concentration in cartilage reflects the biomechanical differences between femoral and tibial cartilage. Thus, the triple contrast agent CT shows potential in cartilage morphology and condition estimation in clinical CT.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>37593815</pmid><doi>10.1002/jor.25683</doi><tpages>0</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2548-4457</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8442-8458</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3486-7855</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6123-1262</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1954-9573</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9150-9253</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1388-0997</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9684-6902</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8035-1606</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5453-3668</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0736-0266
ispartof Journal of orthopaedic research, 2024-02, Vol.42 (2), p.415-424
issn 0736-0266
1554-527X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2853945480
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects articular cartilage
biomechanical testing
Cartilage, Articular
clinical contrast‐enhanced computed tomography
Contrast Media
Humans
Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging
osteoarthritis
Pilot Projects
Proof of Concept Study
segmentation
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods
title Triple contrast computed tomography reveals site‐specific biomechanical differences in the human knee joint—A proof of concept study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T03%3A34%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Triple%20contrast%20computed%20tomography%20reveals%20site%E2%80%90specific%20biomechanical%20differences%20in%20the%20human%20knee%20joint%E2%80%94A%20proof%20of%20concept%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20orthopaedic%20research&rft.au=Orava,%20Heta&rft.date=2024-02&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=415&rft.epage=424&rft.pages=415-424&rft.issn=0736-0266&rft.eissn=1554-527X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jor.25683&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2853945480%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2853945480&rft_id=info:pmid/37593815&rfr_iscdi=true