Potential impact of doxycycline post-exposure prophylaxis prescribing strategies on incidence of bacterial sexually transmitted infections

Doxycycline post-exposure prophylaxis (doxyPEP) reduces bacterial sexually transmitted infection (STI) incidence in people with HIV (PWH) or using HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Given concerns about widespread antibiotic use, we identified doxyPEP prescribing strategies to minimize use while ma...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical infectious diseases 2023-08
Hauptverfasser: Traeger, Michael W, Mayer, Kenneth H, Krakower, Douglas S, Gitin, Sy, Jenness, Samuel M, Marcus, Julia L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Clinical infectious diseases
container_volume
creator Traeger, Michael W
Mayer, Kenneth H
Krakower, Douglas S
Gitin, Sy
Jenness, Samuel M
Marcus, Julia L
description Doxycycline post-exposure prophylaxis (doxyPEP) reduces bacterial sexually transmitted infection (STI) incidence in people with HIV (PWH) or using HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Given concerns about widespread antibiotic use, we identified doxyPEP prescribing strategies to minimize use while maximizing impact on STIs. We used electronic health records of gay and bisexual men (GBM), transgender women, and non-binary people assigned male sex at birth with ≥2 STI tests (chlamydia, gonorrhea, syphilis) at an LGBTQ-focused health center during 2015-2020. We defined 10 hypothetical doxyPEP prescribing strategies based on PrEP use, HIV status, or STI history. We estimated doxyPEP use and STI diagnoses averted in counterfactual scenarios in which people meeting prescribing criteria received doxyPEP, assuming STI rates during use would have been reduced by clinical trial efficacy estimates. Among 10,546 individuals (94% GBM), rate of any STI was 35.9/100 person-years. Prescribing doxyPEP to all individuals would have averted 71% of STI diagnoses (number needed to treat for one year to avert one STI diagnosis, NNT = 3.9); prescribing to PrEP users/PWH (52%/12% of individuals) would have averted 60% of STI diagnoses (NNT = 2.9). Prescribing doxyPEP for 12 months after STI diagnosis would have reduced the proportion using doxyPEP to 38% and averted 39% of STI diagnoses (NNT = 2.4). Prescribing after concurrent or repeated STIs would have maximized efficiency (lowest NNTs) but prevented fewer STIs. Prescribing doxyPEP to individuals with STIs, particularly concurrent or repeated STIs, could avert a substantial proportion of all STI diagnoses. The most efficient prescribing strategies are based on STI history rather than HIV status or PrEP use.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/cid/ciad488
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2853944494</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2853944494</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-2894510e5b8eaba3755f6b03ae506be3e869daeb5ebe28c0db921476de5262c93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE9LxDAQxYMo7rp68i49ClJNmqabHGXxHyzoQc8lSadrpE1qksL2K_ipzbKrh2Fm4MebeQ-hS4JvCRb0TpsmlWxKzo_QnDC6zCsmyHGaMeN5ySmfobMQvjAmhGN2imZ0yQQjVMzRz5uLYKORXWb6QeqYuTZr3HbSk-6MhWxwIeawTW30afNu-Jw6uTUhzRC0N8rYTRailxE2BkLmbGZs-gmshp2YSqLgdwcCbEfZdVOWYBt6EyM0iW1BR-NsOEcnrewCXBz6An08PryvnvP169PL6n6d64JVMS-4KBnBwBQHqWSywtpKYSqB4UoBBV6JRoJioKDgGjdKFKRcVg2woiq0oAt0vddNZr5HCLHuTdDQddKCG0NdcEZFWZaiTOjNHtXeheChrQdveumnmuB6F36djNaH8BN9dRAeVQ_NP_uXNv0FUzaGTw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2853944494</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Potential impact of doxycycline post-exposure prophylaxis prescribing strategies on incidence of bacterial sexually transmitted infections</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Traeger, Michael W ; Mayer, Kenneth H ; Krakower, Douglas S ; Gitin, Sy ; Jenness, Samuel M ; Marcus, Julia L</creator><creatorcontrib>Traeger, Michael W ; Mayer, Kenneth H ; Krakower, Douglas S ; Gitin, Sy ; Jenness, Samuel M ; Marcus, Julia L</creatorcontrib><description>Doxycycline post-exposure prophylaxis (doxyPEP) reduces bacterial sexually transmitted infection (STI) incidence in people with HIV (PWH) or using HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Given concerns about widespread antibiotic use, we identified doxyPEP prescribing strategies to minimize use while maximizing impact on STIs. We used electronic health records of gay and bisexual men (GBM), transgender women, and non-binary people assigned male sex at birth with ≥2 STI tests (chlamydia, gonorrhea, syphilis) at an LGBTQ-focused health center during 2015-2020. We defined 10 hypothetical doxyPEP prescribing strategies based on PrEP use, HIV status, or STI history. We estimated doxyPEP use and STI diagnoses averted in counterfactual scenarios in which people meeting prescribing criteria received doxyPEP, assuming STI rates during use would have been reduced by clinical trial efficacy estimates. Among 10,546 individuals (94% GBM), rate of any STI was 35.9/100 person-years. Prescribing doxyPEP to all individuals would have averted 71% of STI diagnoses (number needed to treat for one year to avert one STI diagnosis, NNT = 3.9); prescribing to PrEP users/PWH (52%/12% of individuals) would have averted 60% of STI diagnoses (NNT = 2.9). Prescribing doxyPEP for 12 months after STI diagnosis would have reduced the proportion using doxyPEP to 38% and averted 39% of STI diagnoses (NNT = 2.4). Prescribing after concurrent or repeated STIs would have maximized efficiency (lowest NNTs) but prevented fewer STIs. Prescribing doxyPEP to individuals with STIs, particularly concurrent or repeated STIs, could avert a substantial proportion of all STI diagnoses. The most efficient prescribing strategies are based on STI history rather than HIV status or PrEP use.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-4838</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-6591</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciad488</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37595139</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><ispartof>Clinical infectious diseases, 2023-08</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-2894510e5b8eaba3755f6b03ae506be3e869daeb5ebe28c0db921476de5262c93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-2894510e5b8eaba3755f6b03ae506be3e869daeb5ebe28c0db921476de5262c93</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3452-350X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37595139$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Traeger, Michael W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayer, Kenneth H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krakower, Douglas S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gitin, Sy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jenness, Samuel M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marcus, Julia L</creatorcontrib><title>Potential impact of doxycycline post-exposure prophylaxis prescribing strategies on incidence of bacterial sexually transmitted infections</title><title>Clinical infectious diseases</title><addtitle>Clin Infect Dis</addtitle><description>Doxycycline post-exposure prophylaxis (doxyPEP) reduces bacterial sexually transmitted infection (STI) incidence in people with HIV (PWH) or using HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Given concerns about widespread antibiotic use, we identified doxyPEP prescribing strategies to minimize use while maximizing impact on STIs. We used electronic health records of gay and bisexual men (GBM), transgender women, and non-binary people assigned male sex at birth with ≥2 STI tests (chlamydia, gonorrhea, syphilis) at an LGBTQ-focused health center during 2015-2020. We defined 10 hypothetical doxyPEP prescribing strategies based on PrEP use, HIV status, or STI history. We estimated doxyPEP use and STI diagnoses averted in counterfactual scenarios in which people meeting prescribing criteria received doxyPEP, assuming STI rates during use would have been reduced by clinical trial efficacy estimates. Among 10,546 individuals (94% GBM), rate of any STI was 35.9/100 person-years. Prescribing doxyPEP to all individuals would have averted 71% of STI diagnoses (number needed to treat for one year to avert one STI diagnosis, NNT = 3.9); prescribing to PrEP users/PWH (52%/12% of individuals) would have averted 60% of STI diagnoses (NNT = 2.9). Prescribing doxyPEP for 12 months after STI diagnosis would have reduced the proportion using doxyPEP to 38% and averted 39% of STI diagnoses (NNT = 2.4). Prescribing after concurrent or repeated STIs would have maximized efficiency (lowest NNTs) but prevented fewer STIs. Prescribing doxyPEP to individuals with STIs, particularly concurrent or repeated STIs, could avert a substantial proportion of all STI diagnoses. The most efficient prescribing strategies are based on STI history rather than HIV status or PrEP use.</description><issn>1058-4838</issn><issn>1537-6591</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kE9LxDAQxYMo7rp68i49ClJNmqabHGXxHyzoQc8lSadrpE1qksL2K_ipzbKrh2Fm4MebeQ-hS4JvCRb0TpsmlWxKzo_QnDC6zCsmyHGaMeN5ySmfobMQvjAmhGN2imZ0yQQjVMzRz5uLYKORXWb6QeqYuTZr3HbSk-6MhWxwIeawTW30afNu-Jw6uTUhzRC0N8rYTRailxE2BkLmbGZs-gmshp2YSqLgdwcCbEfZdVOWYBt6EyM0iW1BR-NsOEcnrewCXBz6An08PryvnvP169PL6n6d64JVMS-4KBnBwBQHqWSywtpKYSqB4UoBBV6JRoJioKDgGjdKFKRcVg2woiq0oAt0vddNZr5HCLHuTdDQddKCG0NdcEZFWZaiTOjNHtXeheChrQdveumnmuB6F36djNaH8BN9dRAeVQ_NP_uXNv0FUzaGTw</recordid><startdate>20230818</startdate><enddate>20230818</enddate><creator>Traeger, Michael W</creator><creator>Mayer, Kenneth H</creator><creator>Krakower, Douglas S</creator><creator>Gitin, Sy</creator><creator>Jenness, Samuel M</creator><creator>Marcus, Julia L</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3452-350X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230818</creationdate><title>Potential impact of doxycycline post-exposure prophylaxis prescribing strategies on incidence of bacterial sexually transmitted infections</title><author>Traeger, Michael W ; Mayer, Kenneth H ; Krakower, Douglas S ; Gitin, Sy ; Jenness, Samuel M ; Marcus, Julia L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-2894510e5b8eaba3755f6b03ae506be3e869daeb5ebe28c0db921476de5262c93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Traeger, Michael W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayer, Kenneth H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krakower, Douglas S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gitin, Sy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jenness, Samuel M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marcus, Julia L</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical infectious diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Traeger, Michael W</au><au>Mayer, Kenneth H</au><au>Krakower, Douglas S</au><au>Gitin, Sy</au><au>Jenness, Samuel M</au><au>Marcus, Julia L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Potential impact of doxycycline post-exposure prophylaxis prescribing strategies on incidence of bacterial sexually transmitted infections</atitle><jtitle>Clinical infectious diseases</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Infect Dis</addtitle><date>2023-08-18</date><risdate>2023</risdate><issn>1058-4838</issn><eissn>1537-6591</eissn><abstract>Doxycycline post-exposure prophylaxis (doxyPEP) reduces bacterial sexually transmitted infection (STI) incidence in people with HIV (PWH) or using HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Given concerns about widespread antibiotic use, we identified doxyPEP prescribing strategies to minimize use while maximizing impact on STIs. We used electronic health records of gay and bisexual men (GBM), transgender women, and non-binary people assigned male sex at birth with ≥2 STI tests (chlamydia, gonorrhea, syphilis) at an LGBTQ-focused health center during 2015-2020. We defined 10 hypothetical doxyPEP prescribing strategies based on PrEP use, HIV status, or STI history. We estimated doxyPEP use and STI diagnoses averted in counterfactual scenarios in which people meeting prescribing criteria received doxyPEP, assuming STI rates during use would have been reduced by clinical trial efficacy estimates. Among 10,546 individuals (94% GBM), rate of any STI was 35.9/100 person-years. Prescribing doxyPEP to all individuals would have averted 71% of STI diagnoses (number needed to treat for one year to avert one STI diagnosis, NNT = 3.9); prescribing to PrEP users/PWH (52%/12% of individuals) would have averted 60% of STI diagnoses (NNT = 2.9). Prescribing doxyPEP for 12 months after STI diagnosis would have reduced the proportion using doxyPEP to 38% and averted 39% of STI diagnoses (NNT = 2.4). Prescribing after concurrent or repeated STIs would have maximized efficiency (lowest NNTs) but prevented fewer STIs. Prescribing doxyPEP to individuals with STIs, particularly concurrent or repeated STIs, could avert a substantial proportion of all STI diagnoses. The most efficient prescribing strategies are based on STI history rather than HIV status or PrEP use.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>37595139</pmid><doi>10.1093/cid/ciad488</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3452-350X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1058-4838
ispartof Clinical infectious diseases, 2023-08
issn 1058-4838
1537-6591
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2853944494
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Potential impact of doxycycline post-exposure prophylaxis prescribing strategies on incidence of bacterial sexually transmitted infections
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T17%3A55%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Potential%20impact%20of%20doxycycline%20post-exposure%20prophylaxis%20prescribing%20strategies%20on%20incidence%20of%20bacterial%20sexually%20transmitted%20infections&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20infectious%20diseases&rft.au=Traeger,%20Michael%20W&rft.date=2023-08-18&rft.issn=1058-4838&rft.eissn=1537-6591&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/cid/ciad488&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2853944494%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2853944494&rft_id=info:pmid/37595139&rfr_iscdi=true