Predicting radiation response from process parameters: Verification of a physically based predictive model
We evaluate the hole trapping response of twenty-two oxides subjected to twenty-two different sets of processing parameters. The oxides were prepared in three different facilities, the Harris Semiconductor-Intersil Palm Bay facility, the former Naval Research and Development Laboratory (NRAD) 4"...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE transactions on nuclear science 1999-12, Vol.46 (6), p.1534-1543 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1543 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1534 |
container_title | IEEE transactions on nuclear science |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Lenahan, P.M. Mele, J.J. Conley, J.F. Lowry, R.K. Woodbury, D. |
description | We evaluate the hole trapping response of twenty-two oxides subjected to twenty-two different sets of processing parameters. The oxides were prepared in three different facilities, the Harris Semiconductor-Intersil Palm Bay facility, the former Naval Research and Development Laboratory (NRAD) 4" facility, and the new SPAWAR 6" fabrication facility in San Diego, California. In twenty of the twenty-two cases, oxide hole trapping is almost completely determined by the highest processing temperature and is in reasonable agreement with a recently proposed physically based predictive model. We have also evaluated Si/SiO/sub 2/ interface trap (D/sub it/) generation in a subset of four very simply processed oxides utilized in the hole trapping study. The D/sub it/ results are also in reasonable agreement with the recently proposed model. Our results indicate that it is possible to make reasonably accurate predictions of radiation response from processing parameters and that such predictions can be made with our current understanding of radiation damage phenomena. (It should be emphasized that the current level of understanding is not yet complete. This work does not demonstrate that precise predictions involving all imaginable process parameters are possible.). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/23.819118 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_28526901</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>819118</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>28823440</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-6ca6ea9b554e1850221983c2b2f0596b766b73d57ba4853af8e6d3cc325f98353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0UtL7TAQAOAgCh4fC7euAoJyF9U8mjZxJ6L3CoIu1G1I06lG2qZmqnD-vZGKS7mLYZjkm4FhCDng7JRzZs6EPNXccK43yIorpQuuar1JVoxxXZjSmG2yg_iay1IxtSKv9wna4OcwPtPk2uDmEEeaAKc4ItAuxYFOKXpApJNLboAZEp7TJ0ihC37hsaOOTi9rzA99v6aNQ2hz2zL5A-gQW-j3yFbneoT977xLHq-vHi7_Fbd3f28uL24LLys9F5V3FTjTKFUC14oJwY2WXjSiY8pUTV3lkK2qG1dqJV2noWql91KoLkMld8nRMjfiHCz6MIN_8XEcwc9WfG1eM53VyaLydm_vgLMdAnroezdCfEdruDGcaVVnefyrFFoLWZbsP6ASlWE8wz8L9CkiJujslMLg0tpyZr_OaIW0yxmzPVxsAIAf9_35CSiPl6Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>28526901</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predicting radiation response from process parameters: Verification of a physically based predictive model</title><source>IEEE/IET Electronic Library</source><creator>Lenahan, P.M. ; Mele, J.J. ; Conley, J.F. ; Lowry, R.K. ; Woodbury, D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lenahan, P.M. ; Mele, J.J. ; Conley, J.F. ; Lowry, R.K. ; Woodbury, D. ; Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA (US)</creatorcontrib><description>We evaluate the hole trapping response of twenty-two oxides subjected to twenty-two different sets of processing parameters. The oxides were prepared in three different facilities, the Harris Semiconductor-Intersil Palm Bay facility, the former Naval Research and Development Laboratory (NRAD) 4" facility, and the new SPAWAR 6" fabrication facility in San Diego, California. In twenty of the twenty-two cases, oxide hole trapping is almost completely determined by the highest processing temperature and is in reasonable agreement with a recently proposed physically based predictive model. We have also evaluated Si/SiO/sub 2/ interface trap (D/sub it/) generation in a subset of four very simply processed oxides utilized in the hole trapping study. The D/sub it/ results are also in reasonable agreement with the recently proposed model. Our results indicate that it is possible to make reasonably accurate predictions of radiation response from processing parameters and that such predictions can be made with our current understanding of radiation damage phenomena. (It should be emphasized that the current level of understanding is not yet complete. This work does not demonstrate that precise predictions involving all imaginable process parameters are possible.).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-9499</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-1578</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/23.819118</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IETNAE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: IEEE</publisher><subject>Circuits ; Costs ; FABRICATION ; HOLES ; INSTRUMENTATION ; Laboratories ; Large Hadron Collider ; MATERIALS SCIENCE ; MATHEMATICAL MODELS ; Naval ; Oxides ; Paramagnetic resonance ; PHYSICAL RADIATION EFFECTS ; Predictive models ; Process parameters ; Radiation damage ; Radiation effects ; Research and development ; SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES ; SEMICONDUCTOR MATERIALS ; SILICON ; SILICON OXIDES ; Solids ; Substrates ; TRAPPING</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on nuclear science, 1999-12, Vol.46 (6), p.1534-1543</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-6ca6ea9b554e1850221983c2b2f0596b766b73d57ba4853af8e6d3cc325f98353</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-6ca6ea9b554e1850221983c2b2f0596b766b73d57ba4853af8e6d3cc325f98353</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/819118$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,796,885,27924,27925,54758</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/819118$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/20014708$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lenahan, P.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mele, J.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conley, J.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lowry, R.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woodbury, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA (US)</creatorcontrib><title>Predicting radiation response from process parameters: Verification of a physically based predictive model</title><title>IEEE transactions on nuclear science</title><addtitle>TNS</addtitle><description>We evaluate the hole trapping response of twenty-two oxides subjected to twenty-two different sets of processing parameters. The oxides were prepared in three different facilities, the Harris Semiconductor-Intersil Palm Bay facility, the former Naval Research and Development Laboratory (NRAD) 4" facility, and the new SPAWAR 6" fabrication facility in San Diego, California. In twenty of the twenty-two cases, oxide hole trapping is almost completely determined by the highest processing temperature and is in reasonable agreement with a recently proposed physically based predictive model. We have also evaluated Si/SiO/sub 2/ interface trap (D/sub it/) generation in a subset of four very simply processed oxides utilized in the hole trapping study. The D/sub it/ results are also in reasonable agreement with the recently proposed model. Our results indicate that it is possible to make reasonably accurate predictions of radiation response from processing parameters and that such predictions can be made with our current understanding of radiation damage phenomena. (It should be emphasized that the current level of understanding is not yet complete. This work does not demonstrate that precise predictions involving all imaginable process parameters are possible.).</description><subject>Circuits</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>FABRICATION</subject><subject>HOLES</subject><subject>INSTRUMENTATION</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Large Hadron Collider</subject><subject>MATERIALS SCIENCE</subject><subject>MATHEMATICAL MODELS</subject><subject>Naval</subject><subject>Oxides</subject><subject>Paramagnetic resonance</subject><subject>PHYSICAL RADIATION EFFECTS</subject><subject>Predictive models</subject><subject>Process parameters</subject><subject>Radiation damage</subject><subject>Radiation effects</subject><subject>Research and development</subject><subject>SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES</subject><subject>SEMICONDUCTOR MATERIALS</subject><subject>SILICON</subject><subject>SILICON OXIDES</subject><subject>Solids</subject><subject>Substrates</subject><subject>TRAPPING</subject><issn>0018-9499</issn><issn>1558-1578</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0UtL7TAQAOAgCh4fC7euAoJyF9U8mjZxJ6L3CoIu1G1I06lG2qZmqnD-vZGKS7mLYZjkm4FhCDng7JRzZs6EPNXccK43yIorpQuuar1JVoxxXZjSmG2yg_iay1IxtSKv9wna4OcwPtPk2uDmEEeaAKc4ItAuxYFOKXpApJNLboAZEp7TJ0ihC37hsaOOTi9rzA99v6aNQ2hz2zL5A-gQW-j3yFbneoT977xLHq-vHi7_Fbd3f28uL24LLys9F5V3FTjTKFUC14oJwY2WXjSiY8pUTV3lkK2qG1dqJV2noWql91KoLkMld8nRMjfiHCz6MIN_8XEcwc9WfG1eM53VyaLydm_vgLMdAnroezdCfEdruDGcaVVnefyrFFoLWZbsP6ASlWE8wz8L9CkiJujslMLg0tpyZr_OaIW0yxmzPVxsAIAf9_35CSiPl6Q</recordid><startdate>19991201</startdate><enddate>19991201</enddate><creator>Lenahan, P.M.</creator><creator>Mele, J.J.</creator><creator>Conley, J.F.</creator><creator>Lowry, R.K.</creator><creator>Woodbury, D.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19991201</creationdate><title>Predicting radiation response from process parameters: Verification of a physically based predictive model</title><author>Lenahan, P.M. ; Mele, J.J. ; Conley, J.F. ; Lowry, R.K. ; Woodbury, D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-6ca6ea9b554e1850221983c2b2f0596b766b73d57ba4853af8e6d3cc325f98353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Circuits</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>FABRICATION</topic><topic>HOLES</topic><topic>INSTRUMENTATION</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Large Hadron Collider</topic><topic>MATERIALS SCIENCE</topic><topic>MATHEMATICAL MODELS</topic><topic>Naval</topic><topic>Oxides</topic><topic>Paramagnetic resonance</topic><topic>PHYSICAL RADIATION EFFECTS</topic><topic>Predictive models</topic><topic>Process parameters</topic><topic>Radiation damage</topic><topic>Radiation effects</topic><topic>Research and development</topic><topic>SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES</topic><topic>SEMICONDUCTOR MATERIALS</topic><topic>SILICON</topic><topic>SILICON OXIDES</topic><topic>Solids</topic><topic>Substrates</topic><topic>TRAPPING</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lenahan, P.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mele, J.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conley, J.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lowry, R.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woodbury, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA (US)</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) Online</collection><collection>IEEE/IET Electronic Library</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on nuclear science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lenahan, P.M.</au><au>Mele, J.J.</au><au>Conley, J.F.</au><au>Lowry, R.K.</au><au>Woodbury, D.</au><aucorp>Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA (US)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predicting radiation response from process parameters: Verification of a physically based predictive model</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on nuclear science</jtitle><stitle>TNS</stitle><date>1999-12-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1534</spage><epage>1543</epage><pages>1534-1543</pages><issn>0018-9499</issn><eissn>1558-1578</eissn><coden>IETNAE</coden><abstract>We evaluate the hole trapping response of twenty-two oxides subjected to twenty-two different sets of processing parameters. The oxides were prepared in three different facilities, the Harris Semiconductor-Intersil Palm Bay facility, the former Naval Research and Development Laboratory (NRAD) 4" facility, and the new SPAWAR 6" fabrication facility in San Diego, California. In twenty of the twenty-two cases, oxide hole trapping is almost completely determined by the highest processing temperature and is in reasonable agreement with a recently proposed physically based predictive model. We have also evaluated Si/SiO/sub 2/ interface trap (D/sub it/) generation in a subset of four very simply processed oxides utilized in the hole trapping study. The D/sub it/ results are also in reasonable agreement with the recently proposed model. Our results indicate that it is possible to make reasonably accurate predictions of radiation response from processing parameters and that such predictions can be made with our current understanding of radiation damage phenomena. (It should be emphasized that the current level of understanding is not yet complete. This work does not demonstrate that precise predictions involving all imaginable process parameters are possible.).</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/23.819118</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 0018-9499 |
ispartof | IEEE transactions on nuclear science, 1999-12, Vol.46 (6), p.1534-1543 |
issn | 0018-9499 1558-1578 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_28526901 |
source | IEEE/IET Electronic Library |
subjects | Circuits Costs FABRICATION HOLES INSTRUMENTATION Laboratories Large Hadron Collider MATERIALS SCIENCE MATHEMATICAL MODELS Naval Oxides Paramagnetic resonance PHYSICAL RADIATION EFFECTS Predictive models Process parameters Radiation damage Radiation effects Research and development SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES SEMICONDUCTOR MATERIALS SILICON SILICON OXIDES Solids Substrates TRAPPING |
title | Predicting radiation response from process parameters: Verification of a physically based predictive model |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T09%3A11%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predicting%20radiation%20response%20from%20process%20parameters:%20Verification%20of%20a%20physically%20based%20predictive%20model&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20nuclear%20science&rft.au=Lenahan,%20P.M.&rft.aucorp=Pennsylvania%20State%20Univ.,%20University%20Park,%20PA%20(US)&rft.date=1999-12-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1534&rft.epage=1543&rft.pages=1534-1543&rft.issn=0018-9499&rft.eissn=1558-1578&rft.coden=IETNAE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/23.819118&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E28823440%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=28526901&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=819118&rfr_iscdi=true |