Predicting radiation response from process parameters: Verification of a physically based predictive model

We evaluate the hole trapping response of twenty-two oxides subjected to twenty-two different sets of processing parameters. The oxides were prepared in three different facilities, the Harris Semiconductor-Intersil Palm Bay facility, the former Naval Research and Development Laboratory (NRAD) 4"...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE transactions on nuclear science 1999-12, Vol.46 (6), p.1534-1543
Hauptverfasser: Lenahan, P.M., Mele, J.J., Conley, J.F., Lowry, R.K., Woodbury, D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1543
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1534
container_title IEEE transactions on nuclear science
container_volume 46
creator Lenahan, P.M.
Mele, J.J.
Conley, J.F.
Lowry, R.K.
Woodbury, D.
description We evaluate the hole trapping response of twenty-two oxides subjected to twenty-two different sets of processing parameters. The oxides were prepared in three different facilities, the Harris Semiconductor-Intersil Palm Bay facility, the former Naval Research and Development Laboratory (NRAD) 4" facility, and the new SPAWAR 6" fabrication facility in San Diego, California. In twenty of the twenty-two cases, oxide hole trapping is almost completely determined by the highest processing temperature and is in reasonable agreement with a recently proposed physically based predictive model. We have also evaluated Si/SiO/sub 2/ interface trap (D/sub it/) generation in a subset of four very simply processed oxides utilized in the hole trapping study. The D/sub it/ results are also in reasonable agreement with the recently proposed model. Our results indicate that it is possible to make reasonably accurate predictions of radiation response from processing parameters and that such predictions can be made with our current understanding of radiation damage phenomena. (It should be emphasized that the current level of understanding is not yet complete. This work does not demonstrate that precise predictions involving all imaginable process parameters are possible.).
doi_str_mv 10.1109/23.819118
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_28526901</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>819118</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>28823440</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-6ca6ea9b554e1850221983c2b2f0596b766b73d57ba4853af8e6d3cc325f98353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0UtL7TAQAOAgCh4fC7euAoJyF9U8mjZxJ6L3CoIu1G1I06lG2qZmqnD-vZGKS7mLYZjkm4FhCDng7JRzZs6EPNXccK43yIorpQuuar1JVoxxXZjSmG2yg_iay1IxtSKv9wna4OcwPtPk2uDmEEeaAKc4ItAuxYFOKXpApJNLboAZEp7TJ0ihC37hsaOOTi9rzA99v6aNQ2hz2zL5A-gQW-j3yFbneoT977xLHq-vHi7_Fbd3f28uL24LLys9F5V3FTjTKFUC14oJwY2WXjSiY8pUTV3lkK2qG1dqJV2noWql91KoLkMld8nRMjfiHCz6MIN_8XEcwc9WfG1eM53VyaLydm_vgLMdAnroezdCfEdruDGcaVVnefyrFFoLWZbsP6ASlWE8wz8L9CkiJujslMLg0tpyZr_OaIW0yxmzPVxsAIAf9_35CSiPl6Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>28526901</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predicting radiation response from process parameters: Verification of a physically based predictive model</title><source>IEEE/IET Electronic Library</source><creator>Lenahan, P.M. ; Mele, J.J. ; Conley, J.F. ; Lowry, R.K. ; Woodbury, D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lenahan, P.M. ; Mele, J.J. ; Conley, J.F. ; Lowry, R.K. ; Woodbury, D. ; Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA (US)</creatorcontrib><description>We evaluate the hole trapping response of twenty-two oxides subjected to twenty-two different sets of processing parameters. The oxides were prepared in three different facilities, the Harris Semiconductor-Intersil Palm Bay facility, the former Naval Research and Development Laboratory (NRAD) 4" facility, and the new SPAWAR 6" fabrication facility in San Diego, California. In twenty of the twenty-two cases, oxide hole trapping is almost completely determined by the highest processing temperature and is in reasonable agreement with a recently proposed physically based predictive model. We have also evaluated Si/SiO/sub 2/ interface trap (D/sub it/) generation in a subset of four very simply processed oxides utilized in the hole trapping study. The D/sub it/ results are also in reasonable agreement with the recently proposed model. Our results indicate that it is possible to make reasonably accurate predictions of radiation response from processing parameters and that such predictions can be made with our current understanding of radiation damage phenomena. (It should be emphasized that the current level of understanding is not yet complete. This work does not demonstrate that precise predictions involving all imaginable process parameters are possible.).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-9499</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-1578</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/23.819118</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IETNAE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: IEEE</publisher><subject>Circuits ; Costs ; FABRICATION ; HOLES ; INSTRUMENTATION ; Laboratories ; Large Hadron Collider ; MATERIALS SCIENCE ; MATHEMATICAL MODELS ; Naval ; Oxides ; Paramagnetic resonance ; PHYSICAL RADIATION EFFECTS ; Predictive models ; Process parameters ; Radiation damage ; Radiation effects ; Research and development ; SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES ; SEMICONDUCTOR MATERIALS ; SILICON ; SILICON OXIDES ; Solids ; Substrates ; TRAPPING</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on nuclear science, 1999-12, Vol.46 (6), p.1534-1543</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-6ca6ea9b554e1850221983c2b2f0596b766b73d57ba4853af8e6d3cc325f98353</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-6ca6ea9b554e1850221983c2b2f0596b766b73d57ba4853af8e6d3cc325f98353</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/819118$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,796,885,27924,27925,54758</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/819118$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/20014708$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lenahan, P.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mele, J.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conley, J.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lowry, R.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woodbury, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA (US)</creatorcontrib><title>Predicting radiation response from process parameters: Verification of a physically based predictive model</title><title>IEEE transactions on nuclear science</title><addtitle>TNS</addtitle><description>We evaluate the hole trapping response of twenty-two oxides subjected to twenty-two different sets of processing parameters. The oxides were prepared in three different facilities, the Harris Semiconductor-Intersil Palm Bay facility, the former Naval Research and Development Laboratory (NRAD) 4" facility, and the new SPAWAR 6" fabrication facility in San Diego, California. In twenty of the twenty-two cases, oxide hole trapping is almost completely determined by the highest processing temperature and is in reasonable agreement with a recently proposed physically based predictive model. We have also evaluated Si/SiO/sub 2/ interface trap (D/sub it/) generation in a subset of four very simply processed oxides utilized in the hole trapping study. The D/sub it/ results are also in reasonable agreement with the recently proposed model. Our results indicate that it is possible to make reasonably accurate predictions of radiation response from processing parameters and that such predictions can be made with our current understanding of radiation damage phenomena. (It should be emphasized that the current level of understanding is not yet complete. This work does not demonstrate that precise predictions involving all imaginable process parameters are possible.).</description><subject>Circuits</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>FABRICATION</subject><subject>HOLES</subject><subject>INSTRUMENTATION</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Large Hadron Collider</subject><subject>MATERIALS SCIENCE</subject><subject>MATHEMATICAL MODELS</subject><subject>Naval</subject><subject>Oxides</subject><subject>Paramagnetic resonance</subject><subject>PHYSICAL RADIATION EFFECTS</subject><subject>Predictive models</subject><subject>Process parameters</subject><subject>Radiation damage</subject><subject>Radiation effects</subject><subject>Research and development</subject><subject>SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES</subject><subject>SEMICONDUCTOR MATERIALS</subject><subject>SILICON</subject><subject>SILICON OXIDES</subject><subject>Solids</subject><subject>Substrates</subject><subject>TRAPPING</subject><issn>0018-9499</issn><issn>1558-1578</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0UtL7TAQAOAgCh4fC7euAoJyF9U8mjZxJ6L3CoIu1G1I06lG2qZmqnD-vZGKS7mLYZjkm4FhCDng7JRzZs6EPNXccK43yIorpQuuar1JVoxxXZjSmG2yg_iay1IxtSKv9wna4OcwPtPk2uDmEEeaAKc4ItAuxYFOKXpApJNLboAZEp7TJ0ihC37hsaOOTi9rzA99v6aNQ2hz2zL5A-gQW-j3yFbneoT977xLHq-vHi7_Fbd3f28uL24LLys9F5V3FTjTKFUC14oJwY2WXjSiY8pUTV3lkK2qG1dqJV2noWql91KoLkMld8nRMjfiHCz6MIN_8XEcwc9WfG1eM53VyaLydm_vgLMdAnroezdCfEdruDGcaVVnefyrFFoLWZbsP6ASlWE8wz8L9CkiJujslMLg0tpyZr_OaIW0yxmzPVxsAIAf9_35CSiPl6Q</recordid><startdate>19991201</startdate><enddate>19991201</enddate><creator>Lenahan, P.M.</creator><creator>Mele, J.J.</creator><creator>Conley, J.F.</creator><creator>Lowry, R.K.</creator><creator>Woodbury, D.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19991201</creationdate><title>Predicting radiation response from process parameters: Verification of a physically based predictive model</title><author>Lenahan, P.M. ; Mele, J.J. ; Conley, J.F. ; Lowry, R.K. ; Woodbury, D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-6ca6ea9b554e1850221983c2b2f0596b766b73d57ba4853af8e6d3cc325f98353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Circuits</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>FABRICATION</topic><topic>HOLES</topic><topic>INSTRUMENTATION</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Large Hadron Collider</topic><topic>MATERIALS SCIENCE</topic><topic>MATHEMATICAL MODELS</topic><topic>Naval</topic><topic>Oxides</topic><topic>Paramagnetic resonance</topic><topic>PHYSICAL RADIATION EFFECTS</topic><topic>Predictive models</topic><topic>Process parameters</topic><topic>Radiation damage</topic><topic>Radiation effects</topic><topic>Research and development</topic><topic>SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES</topic><topic>SEMICONDUCTOR MATERIALS</topic><topic>SILICON</topic><topic>SILICON OXIDES</topic><topic>Solids</topic><topic>Substrates</topic><topic>TRAPPING</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lenahan, P.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mele, J.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conley, J.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lowry, R.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woodbury, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA (US)</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) Online</collection><collection>IEEE/IET Electronic Library</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on nuclear science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lenahan, P.M.</au><au>Mele, J.J.</au><au>Conley, J.F.</au><au>Lowry, R.K.</au><au>Woodbury, D.</au><aucorp>Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA (US)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predicting radiation response from process parameters: Verification of a physically based predictive model</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on nuclear science</jtitle><stitle>TNS</stitle><date>1999-12-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1534</spage><epage>1543</epage><pages>1534-1543</pages><issn>0018-9499</issn><eissn>1558-1578</eissn><coden>IETNAE</coden><abstract>We evaluate the hole trapping response of twenty-two oxides subjected to twenty-two different sets of processing parameters. The oxides were prepared in three different facilities, the Harris Semiconductor-Intersil Palm Bay facility, the former Naval Research and Development Laboratory (NRAD) 4" facility, and the new SPAWAR 6" fabrication facility in San Diego, California. In twenty of the twenty-two cases, oxide hole trapping is almost completely determined by the highest processing temperature and is in reasonable agreement with a recently proposed physically based predictive model. We have also evaluated Si/SiO/sub 2/ interface trap (D/sub it/) generation in a subset of four very simply processed oxides utilized in the hole trapping study. The D/sub it/ results are also in reasonable agreement with the recently proposed model. Our results indicate that it is possible to make reasonably accurate predictions of radiation response from processing parameters and that such predictions can be made with our current understanding of radiation damage phenomena. (It should be emphasized that the current level of understanding is not yet complete. This work does not demonstrate that precise predictions involving all imaginable process parameters are possible.).</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/23.819118</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 0018-9499
ispartof IEEE transactions on nuclear science, 1999-12, Vol.46 (6), p.1534-1543
issn 0018-9499
1558-1578
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_28526901
source IEEE/IET Electronic Library
subjects Circuits
Costs
FABRICATION
HOLES
INSTRUMENTATION
Laboratories
Large Hadron Collider
MATERIALS SCIENCE
MATHEMATICAL MODELS
Naval
Oxides
Paramagnetic resonance
PHYSICAL RADIATION EFFECTS
Predictive models
Process parameters
Radiation damage
Radiation effects
Research and development
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES
SEMICONDUCTOR MATERIALS
SILICON
SILICON OXIDES
Solids
Substrates
TRAPPING
title Predicting radiation response from process parameters: Verification of a physically based predictive model
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T09%3A11%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predicting%20radiation%20response%20from%20process%20parameters:%20Verification%20of%20a%20physically%20based%20predictive%20model&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20nuclear%20science&rft.au=Lenahan,%20P.M.&rft.aucorp=Pennsylvania%20State%20Univ.,%20University%20Park,%20PA%20(US)&rft.date=1999-12-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1534&rft.epage=1543&rft.pages=1534-1543&rft.issn=0018-9499&rft.eissn=1558-1578&rft.coden=IETNAE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/23.819118&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E28823440%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=28526901&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=819118&rfr_iscdi=true