Fate of microplastic captured in the marine demosponge Halichondria panicea

Microplastic particles are widespread pollutants in the sea and filter-feeding sponges have recently been suggested as useful monitoring organisms. However, the fate of microplastic particles in sponges is poorly understood, yet crucial for interpreting monitoring data. The present study aims to hel...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Marine pollution bulletin 2023-09, Vol.194, p.115403-115403, Article 115403
Hauptverfasser: Funch, Peter, Kealy, Rachael A., Goldstein, Josephine, Brewer, Jonathan R., Solovyeva, Vita, Riisgård, Hans Ulrik
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 115403
container_issue
container_start_page 115403
container_title Marine pollution bulletin
container_volume 194
creator Funch, Peter
Kealy, Rachael A.
Goldstein, Josephine
Brewer, Jonathan R.
Solovyeva, Vita
Riisgård, Hans Ulrik
description Microplastic particles are widespread pollutants in the sea and filter-feeding sponges have recently been suggested as useful monitoring organisms. However, the fate of microplastic particles in sponges is poorly understood, yet crucial for interpreting monitoring data. The present study aims to help develop sponges as more useful monitoring organisms for microplastic in the sea. Here, we describe the fate of inedible (2 and 10 μm) plastic beads compared to that of edible bacteria and algal cells captured in the marine demosponge Halichondria panicea. Small Cyanobium bacillare cells entered the choanocyte chambers and were phagocytized by choanocytes, while larger Rhodomonas salina cells were captured in incurrent canals and phagocytized in the mesohyl. Small 2 μm-beads were captured by choanocytes and subsequently expelled into the excurrent canals after 58 ± 34 min. Larger 10 μm-beads were captured in the incurrent canals and transferred to the mesohyl, where amoeboid cells moved them across the mesohyl before they were expelled into the excurrent canal after 95 ± 36 min. SEM observations further indicated engulfment of plastic beads on the outer sponge surface. This insight provides useful information on how sponges, in general, treat microplastic particles of various sizes. It helps us understand actual measured sizes and concentrations of microplastic particles in sponges in relation to those in the ambient water. [Display omitted] •Filter-feeding sponges efficiently capture microplastic particles.•However, the captured 2 μm-beads are expelled after 58 min.•While the larger 10 μm-beads are expelled after 95 min.•This insight makes sponges more usable as monitoring organisms.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.115403
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2852632601</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0025326X23008378</els_id><sourcerecordid>2852632601</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-d077d2b15bdbf32fa32f3ceddb107f67f9db07742d9d7111bdb0cd04f4b1adbd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwG_CRS4IfSdwcq4pSRCUuIHGz_NhQV0kc7ASJf4-rIK4cVnv5ZnZnELqlJKeEVvfHvFNh8K2e2pwRxnNKy4LwM7SgK1FnnFf8HC0IYWXGWfV-ia5iPBJCBBN0gZ63agTsG9w5E_zQqjg6g40aximAxa7H4wFwuuB6wBY6HwfffwDeqdaZg-9tcAoPqncG1DW6aFQb4eZ3L9Hb9uF1s8v2L49Pm_U-M7wWY2aJEJZpWmqrG84alYYbsFZTIppKNLXVCSmYra2glCaMGEuKptBUWW35Et3NvkPwnxPEUXYuGmhb1YOfomSrklUpK6EJFTOawsUYoJFDcCnNt6REnuqTR_lXnzzVJ-f6knI9KyEl-XIQZDQO-vSnC2BGab371-MHZfN_AA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2852632601</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fate of microplastic captured in the marine demosponge Halichondria panicea</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Funch, Peter ; Kealy, Rachael A. ; Goldstein, Josephine ; Brewer, Jonathan R. ; Solovyeva, Vita ; Riisgård, Hans Ulrik</creator><creatorcontrib>Funch, Peter ; Kealy, Rachael A. ; Goldstein, Josephine ; Brewer, Jonathan R. ; Solovyeva, Vita ; Riisgård, Hans Ulrik</creatorcontrib><description>Microplastic particles are widespread pollutants in the sea and filter-feeding sponges have recently been suggested as useful monitoring organisms. However, the fate of microplastic particles in sponges is poorly understood, yet crucial for interpreting monitoring data. The present study aims to help develop sponges as more useful monitoring organisms for microplastic in the sea. Here, we describe the fate of inedible (2 and 10 μm) plastic beads compared to that of edible bacteria and algal cells captured in the marine demosponge Halichondria panicea. Small Cyanobium bacillare cells entered the choanocyte chambers and were phagocytized by choanocytes, while larger Rhodomonas salina cells were captured in incurrent canals and phagocytized in the mesohyl. Small 2 μm-beads were captured by choanocytes and subsequently expelled into the excurrent canals after 58 ± 34 min. Larger 10 μm-beads were captured in the incurrent canals and transferred to the mesohyl, where amoeboid cells moved them across the mesohyl before they were expelled into the excurrent canal after 95 ± 36 min. SEM observations further indicated engulfment of plastic beads on the outer sponge surface. This insight provides useful information on how sponges, in general, treat microplastic particles of various sizes. It helps us understand actual measured sizes and concentrations of microplastic particles in sponges in relation to those in the ambient water. [Display omitted] •Filter-feeding sponges efficiently capture microplastic particles.•However, the captured 2 μm-beads are expelled after 58 min.•While the larger 10 μm-beads are expelled after 95 min.•This insight makes sponges more usable as monitoring organisms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-326X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3363</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.115403</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Live-cell imaging ; Microplastic particles ; Monitoring organism ; Sandwich culture ; SEM ; Sponge explant</subject><ispartof>Marine pollution bulletin, 2023-09, Vol.194, p.115403-115403, Article 115403</ispartof><rights>2023 The Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-d077d2b15bdbf32fa32f3ceddb107f67f9db07742d9d7111bdb0cd04f4b1adbd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-d077d2b15bdbf32fa32f3ceddb107f67f9db07742d9d7111bdb0cd04f4b1adbd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.115403$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,45974</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Funch, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kealy, Rachael A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldstein, Josephine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brewer, Jonathan R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solovyeva, Vita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riisgård, Hans Ulrik</creatorcontrib><title>Fate of microplastic captured in the marine demosponge Halichondria panicea</title><title>Marine pollution bulletin</title><description>Microplastic particles are widespread pollutants in the sea and filter-feeding sponges have recently been suggested as useful monitoring organisms. However, the fate of microplastic particles in sponges is poorly understood, yet crucial for interpreting monitoring data. The present study aims to help develop sponges as more useful monitoring organisms for microplastic in the sea. Here, we describe the fate of inedible (2 and 10 μm) plastic beads compared to that of edible bacteria and algal cells captured in the marine demosponge Halichondria panicea. Small Cyanobium bacillare cells entered the choanocyte chambers and were phagocytized by choanocytes, while larger Rhodomonas salina cells were captured in incurrent canals and phagocytized in the mesohyl. Small 2 μm-beads were captured by choanocytes and subsequently expelled into the excurrent canals after 58 ± 34 min. Larger 10 μm-beads were captured in the incurrent canals and transferred to the mesohyl, where amoeboid cells moved them across the mesohyl before they were expelled into the excurrent canal after 95 ± 36 min. SEM observations further indicated engulfment of plastic beads on the outer sponge surface. This insight provides useful information on how sponges, in general, treat microplastic particles of various sizes. It helps us understand actual measured sizes and concentrations of microplastic particles in sponges in relation to those in the ambient water. [Display omitted] •Filter-feeding sponges efficiently capture microplastic particles.•However, the captured 2 μm-beads are expelled after 58 min.•While the larger 10 μm-beads are expelled after 95 min.•This insight makes sponges more usable as monitoring organisms.</description><subject>Live-cell imaging</subject><subject>Microplastic particles</subject><subject>Monitoring organism</subject><subject>Sandwich culture</subject><subject>SEM</subject><subject>Sponge explant</subject><issn>0025-326X</issn><issn>1879-3363</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwG_CRS4IfSdwcq4pSRCUuIHGz_NhQV0kc7ASJf4-rIK4cVnv5ZnZnELqlJKeEVvfHvFNh8K2e2pwRxnNKy4LwM7SgK1FnnFf8HC0IYWXGWfV-ia5iPBJCBBN0gZ63agTsG9w5E_zQqjg6g40aximAxa7H4wFwuuB6wBY6HwfffwDeqdaZg-9tcAoPqncG1DW6aFQb4eZ3L9Hb9uF1s8v2L49Pm_U-M7wWY2aJEJZpWmqrG84alYYbsFZTIppKNLXVCSmYra2glCaMGEuKptBUWW35Et3NvkPwnxPEUXYuGmhb1YOfomSrklUpK6EJFTOawsUYoJFDcCnNt6REnuqTR_lXnzzVJ-f6knI9KyEl-XIQZDQO-vSnC2BGab371-MHZfN_AA</recordid><startdate>202309</startdate><enddate>202309</enddate><creator>Funch, Peter</creator><creator>Kealy, Rachael A.</creator><creator>Goldstein, Josephine</creator><creator>Brewer, Jonathan R.</creator><creator>Solovyeva, Vita</creator><creator>Riisgård, Hans Ulrik</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202309</creationdate><title>Fate of microplastic captured in the marine demosponge Halichondria panicea</title><author>Funch, Peter ; Kealy, Rachael A. ; Goldstein, Josephine ; Brewer, Jonathan R. ; Solovyeva, Vita ; Riisgård, Hans Ulrik</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-d077d2b15bdbf32fa32f3ceddb107f67f9db07742d9d7111bdb0cd04f4b1adbd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Live-cell imaging</topic><topic>Microplastic particles</topic><topic>Monitoring organism</topic><topic>Sandwich culture</topic><topic>SEM</topic><topic>Sponge explant</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Funch, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kealy, Rachael A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldstein, Josephine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brewer, Jonathan R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solovyeva, Vita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riisgård, Hans Ulrik</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Marine pollution bulletin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Funch, Peter</au><au>Kealy, Rachael A.</au><au>Goldstein, Josephine</au><au>Brewer, Jonathan R.</au><au>Solovyeva, Vita</au><au>Riisgård, Hans Ulrik</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fate of microplastic captured in the marine demosponge Halichondria panicea</atitle><jtitle>Marine pollution bulletin</jtitle><date>2023-09</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>194</volume><spage>115403</spage><epage>115403</epage><pages>115403-115403</pages><artnum>115403</artnum><issn>0025-326X</issn><eissn>1879-3363</eissn><abstract>Microplastic particles are widespread pollutants in the sea and filter-feeding sponges have recently been suggested as useful monitoring organisms. However, the fate of microplastic particles in sponges is poorly understood, yet crucial for interpreting monitoring data. The present study aims to help develop sponges as more useful monitoring organisms for microplastic in the sea. Here, we describe the fate of inedible (2 and 10 μm) plastic beads compared to that of edible bacteria and algal cells captured in the marine demosponge Halichondria panicea. Small Cyanobium bacillare cells entered the choanocyte chambers and were phagocytized by choanocytes, while larger Rhodomonas salina cells were captured in incurrent canals and phagocytized in the mesohyl. Small 2 μm-beads were captured by choanocytes and subsequently expelled into the excurrent canals after 58 ± 34 min. Larger 10 μm-beads were captured in the incurrent canals and transferred to the mesohyl, where amoeboid cells moved them across the mesohyl before they were expelled into the excurrent canal after 95 ± 36 min. SEM observations further indicated engulfment of plastic beads on the outer sponge surface. This insight provides useful information on how sponges, in general, treat microplastic particles of various sizes. It helps us understand actual measured sizes and concentrations of microplastic particles in sponges in relation to those in the ambient water. [Display omitted] •Filter-feeding sponges efficiently capture microplastic particles.•However, the captured 2 μm-beads are expelled after 58 min.•While the larger 10 μm-beads are expelled after 95 min.•This insight makes sponges more usable as monitoring organisms.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.115403</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0025-326X
ispartof Marine pollution bulletin, 2023-09, Vol.194, p.115403-115403, Article 115403
issn 0025-326X
1879-3363
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2852632601
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Live-cell imaging
Microplastic particles
Monitoring organism
Sandwich culture
SEM
Sponge explant
title Fate of microplastic captured in the marine demosponge Halichondria panicea
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T06%3A24%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fate%20of%20microplastic%20captured%20in%20the%20marine%20demosponge%20Halichondria%20panicea&rft.jtitle=Marine%20pollution%20bulletin&rft.au=Funch,%20Peter&rft.date=2023-09&rft.volume=194&rft.spage=115403&rft.epage=115403&rft.pages=115403-115403&rft.artnum=115403&rft.issn=0025-326X&rft.eissn=1879-3363&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.115403&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2852632601%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2852632601&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0025326X23008378&rfr_iscdi=true