Improving knowledge-based treatment planning for lung cancer radiotherapy with automatic multi-criteria optimized training plans

BACKGROUNDKnowledge-based planning (KBP) is a method for automated radiotherapy treatment planning where appropriate optimization objectives for new patients are predicted based on a library of training plans. KBP can save time and improve organ at-risk sparing and inter-patient consistency compared...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Acta oncologica 2023-10, Vol.62 (10), p.1194-1200
Hauptverfasser: Fjellanger, Kristine, Hordnes, Marte, Sandvik, Inger Marie, Sulen, Turid Husevåg, Heijmen, Ben J. M., Breedveld, Sebastiaan, Rossi, Linda, Pettersen, Helge Egil Seime, Hysing, Liv Bolstad
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1200
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1194
container_title Acta oncologica
container_volume 62
creator Fjellanger, Kristine
Hordnes, Marte
Sandvik, Inger Marie
Sulen, Turid Husevåg
Heijmen, Ben J. M.
Breedveld, Sebastiaan
Rossi, Linda
Pettersen, Helge Egil Seime
Hysing, Liv Bolstad
description BACKGROUNDKnowledge-based planning (KBP) is a method for automated radiotherapy treatment planning where appropriate optimization objectives for new patients are predicted based on a library of training plans. KBP can save time and improve organ at-risk sparing and inter-patient consistency compared to manual planning, but its performance depends on the quality of the training plans. We used another system for automated planning, which generates multi-criteria optimized (MCO) plans based on a wish list, to create training plans for the KBP model, to allow seamless integration of knowledge from a new system into clinical routine. Model performance was compared for KBP models trained with manually created and automatic MCO treatment plans.MATERIAL AND METHODSTwo RapidPlan models with the same 30 locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients included were created, one containing manually created clinical plans (RP_CLIN) and one containing fully automatic multi-criteria optimized plans (RP_MCO). For 15 validation patients, model performance was compared in terms of dose-volume parameters and normal tissue complication probabilities, and an oncologist performed a blind comparison of the clinical (CLIN), RP_CLIN, and RP_MCO plans.RESULTSThe heart and esophagus doses were lower for RP_MCO compared to RP_CLIN, resulting in an average reduction in the risk of 2-year mortality by 0.9 percentage points and the risk of acute esophageal toxicity by 1.6 percentage points with RP_MCO. The oncologist preferred the RP_MCO plan for 8 patients and the CLIN plan for 7 patients, while the RP_CLIN plan was not preferred for any patients.CONCLUSIONRP_MCO improved OAR sparing compared to RP_CLIN and was selected for implementation in the clinic. Training a KBP model with clinical plans may lead to suboptimal output plans, and making an extra effort to optimize the library plans in the KBP model creation phase can improve the plan quality for many future patients.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/0284186X.2023.2238882
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2852631259</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2852631259</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-130c3c4913ec19f2b601b904b3e3fcf0917baf8c28d689302a2531e584828d173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kF1LwzAUQIMoOKc_QcijL535aLv0UYYfg4EvCnsLaXq7RZumJqljPvnTbbf5lEs4HO49CN1SMqNEkHvCREpFvp4xwviMMS6EYGdoQvOMJozl63M0GZlkhC7RVQgfhAzoPJug36XtvPs27QZ_tm7XQLWBpFQBKhw9qGihjbhrVNuOSO08bvph0KrV4LFXlXFxC151e7wzcYtVH51V0Whs-yaaRHsTwRuFXReNNT8HrzIH26gN1-iiVk2Am9M7Re9Pj2-Ll2T1-rxcPKwSzTmPCeVEc50WlIOmRc3KnNCyIGnJgde6JgWdl6oWmokqFwUnTLGMU8hEKoYvOudTdHf0Dud-9RCitCZoaIYdwPVBMpGxnFOWFQOaHVHtXQgeatl5Y5XfS0rkWFz-F5djcXkqzv8AhUh3Gg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2852631259</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improving knowledge-based treatment planning for lung cancer radiotherapy with automatic multi-criteria optimized training plans</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Journals Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Fjellanger, Kristine ; Hordnes, Marte ; Sandvik, Inger Marie ; Sulen, Turid Husevåg ; Heijmen, Ben J. M. ; Breedveld, Sebastiaan ; Rossi, Linda ; Pettersen, Helge Egil Seime ; Hysing, Liv Bolstad</creator><creatorcontrib>Fjellanger, Kristine ; Hordnes, Marte ; Sandvik, Inger Marie ; Sulen, Turid Husevåg ; Heijmen, Ben J. M. ; Breedveld, Sebastiaan ; Rossi, Linda ; Pettersen, Helge Egil Seime ; Hysing, Liv Bolstad</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUNDKnowledge-based planning (KBP) is a method for automated radiotherapy treatment planning where appropriate optimization objectives for new patients are predicted based on a library of training plans. KBP can save time and improve organ at-risk sparing and inter-patient consistency compared to manual planning, but its performance depends on the quality of the training plans. We used another system for automated planning, which generates multi-criteria optimized (MCO) plans based on a wish list, to create training plans for the KBP model, to allow seamless integration of knowledge from a new system into clinical routine. Model performance was compared for KBP models trained with manually created and automatic MCO treatment plans.MATERIAL AND METHODSTwo RapidPlan models with the same 30 locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients included were created, one containing manually created clinical plans (RP_CLIN) and one containing fully automatic multi-criteria optimized plans (RP_MCO). For 15 validation patients, model performance was compared in terms of dose-volume parameters and normal tissue complication probabilities, and an oncologist performed a blind comparison of the clinical (CLIN), RP_CLIN, and RP_MCO plans.RESULTSThe heart and esophagus doses were lower for RP_MCO compared to RP_CLIN, resulting in an average reduction in the risk of 2-year mortality by 0.9 percentage points and the risk of acute esophageal toxicity by 1.6 percentage points with RP_MCO. The oncologist preferred the RP_MCO plan for 8 patients and the CLIN plan for 7 patients, while the RP_CLIN plan was not preferred for any patients.CONCLUSIONRP_MCO improved OAR sparing compared to RP_CLIN and was selected for implementation in the clinic. Training a KBP model with clinical plans may lead to suboptimal output plans, and making an extra effort to optimize the library plans in the KBP model creation phase can improve the plan quality for many future patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0284-186X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1651-226X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/0284186X.2023.2238882</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Acta oncologica, 2023-10, Vol.62 (10), p.1194-1200</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-130c3c4913ec19f2b601b904b3e3fcf0917baf8c28d689302a2531e584828d173</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-130c3c4913ec19f2b601b904b3e3fcf0917baf8c28d689302a2531e584828d173</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4879-771X ; 0000-0002-7593-7549 ; 0000-0002-7376-0321</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fjellanger, Kristine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hordnes, Marte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandvik, Inger Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sulen, Turid Husevåg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heijmen, Ben J. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breedveld, Sebastiaan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossi, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pettersen, Helge Egil Seime</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hysing, Liv Bolstad</creatorcontrib><title>Improving knowledge-based treatment planning for lung cancer radiotherapy with automatic multi-criteria optimized training plans</title><title>Acta oncologica</title><description>BACKGROUNDKnowledge-based planning (KBP) is a method for automated radiotherapy treatment planning where appropriate optimization objectives for new patients are predicted based on a library of training plans. KBP can save time and improve organ at-risk sparing and inter-patient consistency compared to manual planning, but its performance depends on the quality of the training plans. We used another system for automated planning, which generates multi-criteria optimized (MCO) plans based on a wish list, to create training plans for the KBP model, to allow seamless integration of knowledge from a new system into clinical routine. Model performance was compared for KBP models trained with manually created and automatic MCO treatment plans.MATERIAL AND METHODSTwo RapidPlan models with the same 30 locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients included were created, one containing manually created clinical plans (RP_CLIN) and one containing fully automatic multi-criteria optimized plans (RP_MCO). For 15 validation patients, model performance was compared in terms of dose-volume parameters and normal tissue complication probabilities, and an oncologist performed a blind comparison of the clinical (CLIN), RP_CLIN, and RP_MCO plans.RESULTSThe heart and esophagus doses were lower for RP_MCO compared to RP_CLIN, resulting in an average reduction in the risk of 2-year mortality by 0.9 percentage points and the risk of acute esophageal toxicity by 1.6 percentage points with RP_MCO. The oncologist preferred the RP_MCO plan for 8 patients and the CLIN plan for 7 patients, while the RP_CLIN plan was not preferred for any patients.CONCLUSIONRP_MCO improved OAR sparing compared to RP_CLIN and was selected for implementation in the clinic. Training a KBP model with clinical plans may lead to suboptimal output plans, and making an extra effort to optimize the library plans in the KBP model creation phase can improve the plan quality for many future patients.</description><issn>0284-186X</issn><issn>1651-226X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo1kF1LwzAUQIMoOKc_QcijL535aLv0UYYfg4EvCnsLaXq7RZumJqljPvnTbbf5lEs4HO49CN1SMqNEkHvCREpFvp4xwviMMS6EYGdoQvOMJozl63M0GZlkhC7RVQgfhAzoPJug36XtvPs27QZ_tm7XQLWBpFQBKhw9qGihjbhrVNuOSO08bvph0KrV4LFXlXFxC151e7wzcYtVH51V0Whs-yaaRHsTwRuFXReNNT8HrzIH26gN1-iiVk2Am9M7Re9Pj2-Ll2T1-rxcPKwSzTmPCeVEc50WlIOmRc3KnNCyIGnJgde6JgWdl6oWmokqFwUnTLGMU8hEKoYvOudTdHf0Dud-9RCitCZoaIYdwPVBMpGxnFOWFQOaHVHtXQgeatl5Y5XfS0rkWFz-F5djcXkqzv8AhUh3Gg</recordid><startdate>20231003</startdate><enddate>20231003</enddate><creator>Fjellanger, Kristine</creator><creator>Hordnes, Marte</creator><creator>Sandvik, Inger Marie</creator><creator>Sulen, Turid Husevåg</creator><creator>Heijmen, Ben J. M.</creator><creator>Breedveld, Sebastiaan</creator><creator>Rossi, Linda</creator><creator>Pettersen, Helge Egil Seime</creator><creator>Hysing, Liv Bolstad</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4879-771X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7593-7549</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7376-0321</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231003</creationdate><title>Improving knowledge-based treatment planning for lung cancer radiotherapy with automatic multi-criteria optimized training plans</title><author>Fjellanger, Kristine ; Hordnes, Marte ; Sandvik, Inger Marie ; Sulen, Turid Husevåg ; Heijmen, Ben J. M. ; Breedveld, Sebastiaan ; Rossi, Linda ; Pettersen, Helge Egil Seime ; Hysing, Liv Bolstad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-130c3c4913ec19f2b601b904b3e3fcf0917baf8c28d689302a2531e584828d173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fjellanger, Kristine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hordnes, Marte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandvik, Inger Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sulen, Turid Husevåg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heijmen, Ben J. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breedveld, Sebastiaan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossi, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pettersen, Helge Egil Seime</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hysing, Liv Bolstad</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Acta oncologica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fjellanger, Kristine</au><au>Hordnes, Marte</au><au>Sandvik, Inger Marie</au><au>Sulen, Turid Husevåg</au><au>Heijmen, Ben J. M.</au><au>Breedveld, Sebastiaan</au><au>Rossi, Linda</au><au>Pettersen, Helge Egil Seime</au><au>Hysing, Liv Bolstad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Improving knowledge-based treatment planning for lung cancer radiotherapy with automatic multi-criteria optimized training plans</atitle><jtitle>Acta oncologica</jtitle><date>2023-10-03</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1194</spage><epage>1200</epage><pages>1194-1200</pages><issn>0284-186X</issn><eissn>1651-226X</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUNDKnowledge-based planning (KBP) is a method for automated radiotherapy treatment planning where appropriate optimization objectives for new patients are predicted based on a library of training plans. KBP can save time and improve organ at-risk sparing and inter-patient consistency compared to manual planning, but its performance depends on the quality of the training plans. We used another system for automated planning, which generates multi-criteria optimized (MCO) plans based on a wish list, to create training plans for the KBP model, to allow seamless integration of knowledge from a new system into clinical routine. Model performance was compared for KBP models trained with manually created and automatic MCO treatment plans.MATERIAL AND METHODSTwo RapidPlan models with the same 30 locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients included were created, one containing manually created clinical plans (RP_CLIN) and one containing fully automatic multi-criteria optimized plans (RP_MCO). For 15 validation patients, model performance was compared in terms of dose-volume parameters and normal tissue complication probabilities, and an oncologist performed a blind comparison of the clinical (CLIN), RP_CLIN, and RP_MCO plans.RESULTSThe heart and esophagus doses were lower for RP_MCO compared to RP_CLIN, resulting in an average reduction in the risk of 2-year mortality by 0.9 percentage points and the risk of acute esophageal toxicity by 1.6 percentage points with RP_MCO. The oncologist preferred the RP_MCO plan for 8 patients and the CLIN plan for 7 patients, while the RP_CLIN plan was not preferred for any patients.CONCLUSIONRP_MCO improved OAR sparing compared to RP_CLIN and was selected for implementation in the clinic. Training a KBP model with clinical plans may lead to suboptimal output plans, and making an extra effort to optimize the library plans in the KBP model creation phase can improve the plan quality for many future patients.</abstract><doi>10.1080/0284186X.2023.2238882</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4879-771X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7593-7549</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7376-0321</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0284-186X
ispartof Acta oncologica, 2023-10, Vol.62 (10), p.1194-1200
issn 0284-186X
1651-226X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2852631259
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Taylor & Francis Journals Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Improving knowledge-based treatment planning for lung cancer radiotherapy with automatic multi-criteria optimized training plans
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T16%3A41%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improving%20knowledge-based%20treatment%20planning%20for%20lung%20cancer%20radiotherapy%20with%20automatic%20multi-criteria%20optimized%20training%20plans&rft.jtitle=Acta%20oncologica&rft.au=Fjellanger,%20Kristine&rft.date=2023-10-03&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1194&rft.epage=1200&rft.pages=1194-1200&rft.issn=0284-186X&rft.eissn=1651-226X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/0284186X.2023.2238882&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2852631259%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2852631259&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true