How Are Newcomer Proactive Behaviors Received by Leaders and Peers? A Relational Perspective

Although most studies have shown that newcomers benefit from proactive behaviors, these behaviors are not always viewed positively by colleagues, resulting in negative consequences for newcomers. Drawing on uncertainty reduction and social cognitive theories, we contend that newcomer proactive behav...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of applied psychology 2024-02, Vol.109 (2), p.283-292
Hauptverfasser: Yin, Jingfeng, Liden, Robert C., Wayne, Sandy J., Wu, Ying, Liu, Leigh Anne, Guo, Rui, Gu, Jibao
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 292
container_issue 2
container_start_page 283
container_title Journal of applied psychology
container_volume 109
creator Yin, Jingfeng
Liden, Robert C.
Wayne, Sandy J.
Wu, Ying
Liu, Leigh Anne
Guo, Rui
Gu, Jibao
description Although most studies have shown that newcomers benefit from proactive behaviors, these behaviors are not always viewed positively by colleagues, resulting in negative consequences for newcomers. Drawing on uncertainty reduction and social cognitive theories, we contend that newcomer proactive behaviors are viewed positively by competent leaders and peers but negatively by those with low competence. Further, we argue that newcomer proactive behaviors impact leader and peer threat perceptions, affecting subsequent workplace relationships, which in turn influence newcomer voluntary turnover. We empirically test our hypotheses in a three-time multisource study, utilizing a sample of 377 newcomers, 132 leaders, and 721 peers. Supporting our hypotheses, when leaders and peers are less competent, newcomer proactive behaviors, through impacting leader and peer threat perceptions, result in lower quality relationships with leaders and peers. These cascading effects positively correlate with newcomer voluntary turnover. Conversely, opposite effects arise for more competent leaders and peers. Implications of how newcomer proactive behaviors impact workplace relationships and turnover are discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/apl0001123
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2852631106</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2925604870</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a339t-19599e52c1f4c603022f56795f078595bb5405ca74e139046f1e8f79e01d2c23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90dGr0zAUBvAgipvTF_-AS-C-iFg9J2na5knmUCcMHbJHoaTpKXa0S2_S3rH_3sxNhfvgU8LHj48DH2MvEd4iyPydGToAQBTyEZujljrBQqWP2RxAYKIBYcaehbCPJpUanrKZzFWhs1zM2Y-1O_KlJ_6Vjtb15PnWO2PH9p74B_pp7lvnA_9OlmJS8-rEN2Rqipk51HxL8feeLyPozNi6g-li5sNAvxuesyeN6QK9uL4Ltvv0cbdaJ5tvn7-slpvESKnHBLXSmpSw2KQ2AwlCNCrLtWogL5RWVaVSUNbkKWG8P80apKLJNQHWwgq5YK8utYN3dxOFsezbYKnrzIHcFEpRKJFJRMgivX1A927y8eyotFAZpEUO_1WxC0CnKKN6fVHWuxA8NeXg2974U4lQnocp_w0T8c21cqp6qv_SP0tE8OYCzGDKIZys8WNrOwp28p4O47kstupSxBuk_AWIrJS7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2852009413</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How Are Newcomer Proactive Behaviors Received by Leaders and Peers? A Relational Perspective</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Yin, Jingfeng ; Liden, Robert C. ; Wayne, Sandy J. ; Wu, Ying ; Liu, Leigh Anne ; Guo, Rui ; Gu, Jibao</creator><contributor>Eby, Lillian T</contributor><creatorcontrib>Yin, Jingfeng ; Liden, Robert C. ; Wayne, Sandy J. ; Wu, Ying ; Liu, Leigh Anne ; Guo, Rui ; Gu, Jibao ; Eby, Lillian T</creatorcontrib><description>Although most studies have shown that newcomers benefit from proactive behaviors, these behaviors are not always viewed positively by colleagues, resulting in negative consequences for newcomers. Drawing on uncertainty reduction and social cognitive theories, we contend that newcomer proactive behaviors are viewed positively by competent leaders and peers but negatively by those with low competence. Further, we argue that newcomer proactive behaviors impact leader and peer threat perceptions, affecting subsequent workplace relationships, which in turn influence newcomer voluntary turnover. We empirically test our hypotheses in a three-time multisource study, utilizing a sample of 377 newcomers, 132 leaders, and 721 peers. Supporting our hypotheses, when leaders and peers are less competent, newcomer proactive behaviors, through impacting leader and peer threat perceptions, result in lower quality relationships with leaders and peers. These cascading effects positively correlate with newcomer voluntary turnover. Conversely, opposite effects arise for more competent leaders and peers. Implications of how newcomer proactive behaviors impact workplace relationships and turnover are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9010</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1854</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/apl0001123</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37589672</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Behavior ; Cognitive theories ; Cognitive-behavioral factors ; Competence ; Female ; Followership ; Human ; Humans ; Hypotheses ; Interpersonal Relations ; Interpersonal Relationships ; Leadership ; Male ; Multisource ; Newcomers ; Peer Group ; Peers ; Perceptions ; Personnel Turnover ; Proactive Inhibition ; Threat ; Threats ; Uncertainty ; Workplace - psychology ; Workplaces</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied psychology, 2024-02, Vol.109 (2), p.283-292</ispartof><rights>2023 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2023, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Feb 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930,31004</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37589672$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Eby, Lillian T</contributor><creatorcontrib>Yin, Jingfeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liden, Robert C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wayne, Sandy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Leigh Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gu, Jibao</creatorcontrib><title>How Are Newcomer Proactive Behaviors Received by Leaders and Peers? A Relational Perspective</title><title>Journal of applied psychology</title><addtitle>J Appl Psychol</addtitle><description>Although most studies have shown that newcomers benefit from proactive behaviors, these behaviors are not always viewed positively by colleagues, resulting in negative consequences for newcomers. Drawing on uncertainty reduction and social cognitive theories, we contend that newcomer proactive behaviors are viewed positively by competent leaders and peers but negatively by those with low competence. Further, we argue that newcomer proactive behaviors impact leader and peer threat perceptions, affecting subsequent workplace relationships, which in turn influence newcomer voluntary turnover. We empirically test our hypotheses in a three-time multisource study, utilizing a sample of 377 newcomers, 132 leaders, and 721 peers. Supporting our hypotheses, when leaders and peers are less competent, newcomer proactive behaviors, through impacting leader and peer threat perceptions, result in lower quality relationships with leaders and peers. These cascading effects positively correlate with newcomer voluntary turnover. Conversely, opposite effects arise for more competent leaders and peers. Implications of how newcomer proactive behaviors impact workplace relationships and turnover are discussed.</description><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Cognitive theories</subject><subject>Cognitive-behavioral factors</subject><subject>Competence</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Followership</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Interpersonal Relations</subject><subject>Interpersonal Relationships</subject><subject>Leadership</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Multisource</subject><subject>Newcomers</subject><subject>Peer Group</subject><subject>Peers</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Personnel Turnover</subject><subject>Proactive Inhibition</subject><subject>Threat</subject><subject>Threats</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>Workplace - psychology</subject><subject>Workplaces</subject><issn>0021-9010</issn><issn>1939-1854</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp90dGr0zAUBvAgipvTF_-AS-C-iFg9J2na5knmUCcMHbJHoaTpKXa0S2_S3rH_3sxNhfvgU8LHj48DH2MvEd4iyPydGToAQBTyEZujljrBQqWP2RxAYKIBYcaehbCPJpUanrKZzFWhs1zM2Y-1O_KlJ_6Vjtb15PnWO2PH9p74B_pp7lvnA_9OlmJS8-rEN2Rqipk51HxL8feeLyPozNi6g-li5sNAvxuesyeN6QK9uL4Ltvv0cbdaJ5tvn7-slpvESKnHBLXSmpSw2KQ2AwlCNCrLtWogL5RWVaVSUNbkKWG8P80apKLJNQHWwgq5YK8utYN3dxOFsezbYKnrzIHcFEpRKJFJRMgivX1A927y8eyotFAZpEUO_1WxC0CnKKN6fVHWuxA8NeXg2974U4lQnocp_w0T8c21cqp6qv_SP0tE8OYCzGDKIZys8WNrOwp28p4O47kstupSxBuk_AWIrJS7</recordid><startdate>20240201</startdate><enddate>20240201</enddate><creator>Yin, Jingfeng</creator><creator>Liden, Robert C.</creator><creator>Wayne, Sandy J.</creator><creator>Wu, Ying</creator><creator>Liu, Leigh Anne</creator><creator>Guo, Rui</creator><creator>Gu, Jibao</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240201</creationdate><title>How Are Newcomer Proactive Behaviors Received by Leaders and Peers? A Relational Perspective</title><author>Yin, Jingfeng ; Liden, Robert C. ; Wayne, Sandy J. ; Wu, Ying ; Liu, Leigh Anne ; Guo, Rui ; Gu, Jibao</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a339t-19599e52c1f4c603022f56795f078595bb5405ca74e139046f1e8f79e01d2c23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Cognitive theories</topic><topic>Cognitive-behavioral factors</topic><topic>Competence</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Followership</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Interpersonal Relations</topic><topic>Interpersonal Relationships</topic><topic>Leadership</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Multisource</topic><topic>Newcomers</topic><topic>Peer Group</topic><topic>Peers</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Personnel Turnover</topic><topic>Proactive Inhibition</topic><topic>Threat</topic><topic>Threats</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>Workplace - psychology</topic><topic>Workplaces</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yin, Jingfeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liden, Robert C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wayne, Sandy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Leigh Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gu, Jibao</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yin, Jingfeng</au><au>Liden, Robert C.</au><au>Wayne, Sandy J.</au><au>Wu, Ying</au><au>Liu, Leigh Anne</au><au>Guo, Rui</au><au>Gu, Jibao</au><au>Eby, Lillian T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How Are Newcomer Proactive Behaviors Received by Leaders and Peers? A Relational Perspective</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied psychology</jtitle><addtitle>J Appl Psychol</addtitle><date>2024-02-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>109</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>283</spage><epage>292</epage><pages>283-292</pages><issn>0021-9010</issn><eissn>1939-1854</eissn><abstract>Although most studies have shown that newcomers benefit from proactive behaviors, these behaviors are not always viewed positively by colleagues, resulting in negative consequences for newcomers. Drawing on uncertainty reduction and social cognitive theories, we contend that newcomer proactive behaviors are viewed positively by competent leaders and peers but negatively by those with low competence. Further, we argue that newcomer proactive behaviors impact leader and peer threat perceptions, affecting subsequent workplace relationships, which in turn influence newcomer voluntary turnover. We empirically test our hypotheses in a three-time multisource study, utilizing a sample of 377 newcomers, 132 leaders, and 721 peers. Supporting our hypotheses, when leaders and peers are less competent, newcomer proactive behaviors, through impacting leader and peer threat perceptions, result in lower quality relationships with leaders and peers. These cascading effects positively correlate with newcomer voluntary turnover. Conversely, opposite effects arise for more competent leaders and peers. Implications of how newcomer proactive behaviors impact workplace relationships and turnover are discussed.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>37589672</pmid><doi>10.1037/apl0001123</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9010
ispartof Journal of applied psychology, 2024-02, Vol.109 (2), p.283-292
issn 0021-9010
1939-1854
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2852631106
source MEDLINE; APA PsycARTICLES; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects Behavior
Cognitive theories
Cognitive-behavioral factors
Competence
Female
Followership
Human
Humans
Hypotheses
Interpersonal Relations
Interpersonal Relationships
Leadership
Male
Multisource
Newcomers
Peer Group
Peers
Perceptions
Personnel Turnover
Proactive Inhibition
Threat
Threats
Uncertainty
Workplace - psychology
Workplaces
title How Are Newcomer Proactive Behaviors Received by Leaders and Peers? A Relational Perspective
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T06%3A49%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20Are%20Newcomer%20Proactive%20Behaviors%20Received%20by%20Leaders%20and%20Peers?%20A%20Relational%20Perspective&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20psychology&rft.au=Yin,%20Jingfeng&rft.date=2024-02-01&rft.volume=109&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=283&rft.epage=292&rft.pages=283-292&rft.issn=0021-9010&rft.eissn=1939-1854&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/apl0001123&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2925604870%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2852009413&rft_id=info:pmid/37589672&rfr_iscdi=true