How Are Newcomer Proactive Behaviors Received by Leaders and Peers? A Relational Perspective
Although most studies have shown that newcomers benefit from proactive behaviors, these behaviors are not always viewed positively by colleagues, resulting in negative consequences for newcomers. Drawing on uncertainty reduction and social cognitive theories, we contend that newcomer proactive behav...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of applied psychology 2024-02, Vol.109 (2), p.283-292 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 292 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 283 |
container_title | Journal of applied psychology |
container_volume | 109 |
creator | Yin, Jingfeng Liden, Robert C. Wayne, Sandy J. Wu, Ying Liu, Leigh Anne Guo, Rui Gu, Jibao |
description | Although most studies have shown that newcomers benefit from proactive behaviors, these behaviors are not always viewed positively by colleagues, resulting in negative consequences for newcomers. Drawing on uncertainty reduction and social cognitive theories, we contend that newcomer proactive behaviors are viewed positively by competent leaders and peers but negatively by those with low competence. Further, we argue that newcomer proactive behaviors impact leader and peer threat perceptions, affecting subsequent workplace relationships, which in turn influence newcomer voluntary turnover. We empirically test our hypotheses in a three-time multisource study, utilizing a sample of 377 newcomers, 132 leaders, and 721 peers. Supporting our hypotheses, when leaders and peers are less competent, newcomer proactive behaviors, through impacting leader and peer threat perceptions, result in lower quality relationships with leaders and peers. These cascading effects positively correlate with newcomer voluntary turnover. Conversely, opposite effects arise for more competent leaders and peers. Implications of how newcomer proactive behaviors impact workplace relationships and turnover are discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/apl0001123 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2852631106</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2925604870</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a339t-19599e52c1f4c603022f56795f078595bb5405ca74e139046f1e8f79e01d2c23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90dGr0zAUBvAgipvTF_-AS-C-iFg9J2na5knmUCcMHbJHoaTpKXa0S2_S3rH_3sxNhfvgU8LHj48DH2MvEd4iyPydGToAQBTyEZujljrBQqWP2RxAYKIBYcaehbCPJpUanrKZzFWhs1zM2Y-1O_KlJ_6Vjtb15PnWO2PH9p74B_pp7lvnA_9OlmJS8-rEN2Rqipk51HxL8feeLyPozNi6g-li5sNAvxuesyeN6QK9uL4Ltvv0cbdaJ5tvn7-slpvESKnHBLXSmpSw2KQ2AwlCNCrLtWogL5RWVaVSUNbkKWG8P80apKLJNQHWwgq5YK8utYN3dxOFsezbYKnrzIHcFEpRKJFJRMgivX1A927y8eyotFAZpEUO_1WxC0CnKKN6fVHWuxA8NeXg2974U4lQnocp_w0T8c21cqp6qv_SP0tE8OYCzGDKIZys8WNrOwp28p4O47kstupSxBuk_AWIrJS7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2852009413</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How Are Newcomer Proactive Behaviors Received by Leaders and Peers? A Relational Perspective</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Yin, Jingfeng ; Liden, Robert C. ; Wayne, Sandy J. ; Wu, Ying ; Liu, Leigh Anne ; Guo, Rui ; Gu, Jibao</creator><contributor>Eby, Lillian T</contributor><creatorcontrib>Yin, Jingfeng ; Liden, Robert C. ; Wayne, Sandy J. ; Wu, Ying ; Liu, Leigh Anne ; Guo, Rui ; Gu, Jibao ; Eby, Lillian T</creatorcontrib><description>Although most studies have shown that newcomers benefit from proactive behaviors, these behaviors are not always viewed positively by colleagues, resulting in negative consequences for newcomers. Drawing on uncertainty reduction and social cognitive theories, we contend that newcomer proactive behaviors are viewed positively by competent leaders and peers but negatively by those with low competence. Further, we argue that newcomer proactive behaviors impact leader and peer threat perceptions, affecting subsequent workplace relationships, which in turn influence newcomer voluntary turnover. We empirically test our hypotheses in a three-time multisource study, utilizing a sample of 377 newcomers, 132 leaders, and 721 peers. Supporting our hypotheses, when leaders and peers are less competent, newcomer proactive behaviors, through impacting leader and peer threat perceptions, result in lower quality relationships with leaders and peers. These cascading effects positively correlate with newcomer voluntary turnover. Conversely, opposite effects arise for more competent leaders and peers. Implications of how newcomer proactive behaviors impact workplace relationships and turnover are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9010</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1854</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/apl0001123</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37589672</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Behavior ; Cognitive theories ; Cognitive-behavioral factors ; Competence ; Female ; Followership ; Human ; Humans ; Hypotheses ; Interpersonal Relations ; Interpersonal Relationships ; Leadership ; Male ; Multisource ; Newcomers ; Peer Group ; Peers ; Perceptions ; Personnel Turnover ; Proactive Inhibition ; Threat ; Threats ; Uncertainty ; Workplace - psychology ; Workplaces</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied psychology, 2024-02, Vol.109 (2), p.283-292</ispartof><rights>2023 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2023, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Feb 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930,31004</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37589672$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Eby, Lillian T</contributor><creatorcontrib>Yin, Jingfeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liden, Robert C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wayne, Sandy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Leigh Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gu, Jibao</creatorcontrib><title>How Are Newcomer Proactive Behaviors Received by Leaders and Peers? A Relational Perspective</title><title>Journal of applied psychology</title><addtitle>J Appl Psychol</addtitle><description>Although most studies have shown that newcomers benefit from proactive behaviors, these behaviors are not always viewed positively by colleagues, resulting in negative consequences for newcomers. Drawing on uncertainty reduction and social cognitive theories, we contend that newcomer proactive behaviors are viewed positively by competent leaders and peers but negatively by those with low competence. Further, we argue that newcomer proactive behaviors impact leader and peer threat perceptions, affecting subsequent workplace relationships, which in turn influence newcomer voluntary turnover. We empirically test our hypotheses in a three-time multisource study, utilizing a sample of 377 newcomers, 132 leaders, and 721 peers. Supporting our hypotheses, when leaders and peers are less competent, newcomer proactive behaviors, through impacting leader and peer threat perceptions, result in lower quality relationships with leaders and peers. These cascading effects positively correlate with newcomer voluntary turnover. Conversely, opposite effects arise for more competent leaders and peers. Implications of how newcomer proactive behaviors impact workplace relationships and turnover are discussed.</description><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Cognitive theories</subject><subject>Cognitive-behavioral factors</subject><subject>Competence</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Followership</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Interpersonal Relations</subject><subject>Interpersonal Relationships</subject><subject>Leadership</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Multisource</subject><subject>Newcomers</subject><subject>Peer Group</subject><subject>Peers</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Personnel Turnover</subject><subject>Proactive Inhibition</subject><subject>Threat</subject><subject>Threats</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>Workplace - psychology</subject><subject>Workplaces</subject><issn>0021-9010</issn><issn>1939-1854</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp90dGr0zAUBvAgipvTF_-AS-C-iFg9J2na5knmUCcMHbJHoaTpKXa0S2_S3rH_3sxNhfvgU8LHj48DH2MvEd4iyPydGToAQBTyEZujljrBQqWP2RxAYKIBYcaehbCPJpUanrKZzFWhs1zM2Y-1O_KlJ_6Vjtb15PnWO2PH9p74B_pp7lvnA_9OlmJS8-rEN2Rqipk51HxL8feeLyPozNi6g-li5sNAvxuesyeN6QK9uL4Ltvv0cbdaJ5tvn7-slpvESKnHBLXSmpSw2KQ2AwlCNCrLtWogL5RWVaVSUNbkKWG8P80apKLJNQHWwgq5YK8utYN3dxOFsezbYKnrzIHcFEpRKJFJRMgivX1A927y8eyotFAZpEUO_1WxC0CnKKN6fVHWuxA8NeXg2974U4lQnocp_w0T8c21cqp6qv_SP0tE8OYCzGDKIZys8WNrOwp28p4O47kstupSxBuk_AWIrJS7</recordid><startdate>20240201</startdate><enddate>20240201</enddate><creator>Yin, Jingfeng</creator><creator>Liden, Robert C.</creator><creator>Wayne, Sandy J.</creator><creator>Wu, Ying</creator><creator>Liu, Leigh Anne</creator><creator>Guo, Rui</creator><creator>Gu, Jibao</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240201</creationdate><title>How Are Newcomer Proactive Behaviors Received by Leaders and Peers? A Relational Perspective</title><author>Yin, Jingfeng ; Liden, Robert C. ; Wayne, Sandy J. ; Wu, Ying ; Liu, Leigh Anne ; Guo, Rui ; Gu, Jibao</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a339t-19599e52c1f4c603022f56795f078595bb5405ca74e139046f1e8f79e01d2c23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Cognitive theories</topic><topic>Cognitive-behavioral factors</topic><topic>Competence</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Followership</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Interpersonal Relations</topic><topic>Interpersonal Relationships</topic><topic>Leadership</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Multisource</topic><topic>Newcomers</topic><topic>Peer Group</topic><topic>Peers</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Personnel Turnover</topic><topic>Proactive Inhibition</topic><topic>Threat</topic><topic>Threats</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>Workplace - psychology</topic><topic>Workplaces</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yin, Jingfeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liden, Robert C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wayne, Sandy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Leigh Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gu, Jibao</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yin, Jingfeng</au><au>Liden, Robert C.</au><au>Wayne, Sandy J.</au><au>Wu, Ying</au><au>Liu, Leigh Anne</au><au>Guo, Rui</au><au>Gu, Jibao</au><au>Eby, Lillian T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How Are Newcomer Proactive Behaviors Received by Leaders and Peers? A Relational Perspective</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied psychology</jtitle><addtitle>J Appl Psychol</addtitle><date>2024-02-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>109</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>283</spage><epage>292</epage><pages>283-292</pages><issn>0021-9010</issn><eissn>1939-1854</eissn><abstract>Although most studies have shown that newcomers benefit from proactive behaviors, these behaviors are not always viewed positively by colleagues, resulting in negative consequences for newcomers. Drawing on uncertainty reduction and social cognitive theories, we contend that newcomer proactive behaviors are viewed positively by competent leaders and peers but negatively by those with low competence. Further, we argue that newcomer proactive behaviors impact leader and peer threat perceptions, affecting subsequent workplace relationships, which in turn influence newcomer voluntary turnover. We empirically test our hypotheses in a three-time multisource study, utilizing a sample of 377 newcomers, 132 leaders, and 721 peers. Supporting our hypotheses, when leaders and peers are less competent, newcomer proactive behaviors, through impacting leader and peer threat perceptions, result in lower quality relationships with leaders and peers. These cascading effects positively correlate with newcomer voluntary turnover. Conversely, opposite effects arise for more competent leaders and peers. Implications of how newcomer proactive behaviors impact workplace relationships and turnover are discussed.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>37589672</pmid><doi>10.1037/apl0001123</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-9010 |
ispartof | Journal of applied psychology, 2024-02, Vol.109 (2), p.283-292 |
issn | 0021-9010 1939-1854 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2852631106 |
source | MEDLINE; APA PsycARTICLES; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
subjects | Behavior Cognitive theories Cognitive-behavioral factors Competence Female Followership Human Humans Hypotheses Interpersonal Relations Interpersonal Relationships Leadership Male Multisource Newcomers Peer Group Peers Perceptions Personnel Turnover Proactive Inhibition Threat Threats Uncertainty Workplace - psychology Workplaces |
title | How Are Newcomer Proactive Behaviors Received by Leaders and Peers? A Relational Perspective |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T06%3A49%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20Are%20Newcomer%20Proactive%20Behaviors%20Received%20by%20Leaders%20and%20Peers?%20A%20Relational%20Perspective&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20psychology&rft.au=Yin,%20Jingfeng&rft.date=2024-02-01&rft.volume=109&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=283&rft.epage=292&rft.pages=283-292&rft.issn=0021-9010&rft.eissn=1939-1854&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/apl0001123&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2925604870%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2852009413&rft_id=info:pmid/37589672&rfr_iscdi=true |