Deep learning‐based reconstruction for canine brain magnetic resonance imaging could improve image quality while reducing scan time

Optimal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) quality and shorter scan time are challenging to achieve in veterinary practices. Recently, deep learning‐based reconstruction (DLR) has been proposed for ideal image quality. We hypothesized that DLR‐based MRI will improve brain imaging quality and reduce sc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Veterinary radiology & ultrasound 2023-09, Vol.64 (5), p.873-880
Hauptverfasser: Choi, Hyejoon, Lee, Sang‐Kwon, Choi, Hojung, Lee, Youngwon, Lee, Kija
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Optimal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) quality and shorter scan time are challenging to achieve in veterinary practices. Recently, deep learning‐based reconstruction (DLR) has been proposed for ideal image quality. We hypothesized that DLR‐based MRI will improve brain imaging quality and reduce scan time. This prospective, methods comparison study compared the MR image denoising performances of DLR and conventional methods, with the aim of reducing scan time and improving canine brain image quality. Transverse T2‐weighted and fluid‐attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences of the brain were performed in 12 clinically healthy beagle dogs. Different numbers of excitations (NEX) were used to obtain the image groups NEX4, NEX2, and NEX1. DLR was applied to NEX2 and NEX1 to obtain NEX2 DL and NEX1 DL . The scan times were recorded, signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) and contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR) were calculated for quantitative analysis. Five blinded veterinarians assessed the overall quality, contrast, and perceived SNR on four‐point Likert scales. Quantitative and qualitative values were compared among the five groups. Compared with NEX4, NEX2 and NEX1 reduced scan time by 50% and 75%, respectively. The mean SNR and CNR of NEX2 DL and NEX1 DL were significantly superior to those of NEX4, NEX2, and NEX1 ( P <  0.05). In all image quality indices, DLR‐applied images for both T2‐weighted and FLAIR images were significantly higher than NEX4 and NEX2 DL had significantly better quality than NEX1 DL for FLAIR ( P <  0.05). Findings indicated that DLR reduced scan time and improved image quality compared with conventional MRI images in a sample of clinically healthy beagles.
ISSN:1058-8183
1740-8261
DOI:10.1111/vru.13279