Immortal time bias in a retrospective study examining colorectal cancer mortality according to adherence to colonoscopy

Correspondence to Dr Conchubhair Winters, University of Leeds Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK; Conchubhair.winters@nhs.net We read with interest the study by Zorzi et al.1 The authors conducted a retrospective cohort study comparing outcomes between individu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gut 2023-09, Vol.72 (9), p.1799-1800
Hauptverfasser: Winters, Conchubhair, Ford, Alexander Charles
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1800
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1799
container_title Gut
container_volume 72
creator Winters, Conchubhair
Ford, Alexander Charles
description Correspondence to Dr Conchubhair Winters, University of Leeds Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK; Conchubhair.winters@nhs.net We read with interest the study by Zorzi et al.1 The authors conducted a retrospective cohort study comparing outcomes between individuals with a positive faecal immunochemical test (FIT) as part of an Italian screening programme, dependent on whether they were adherent with a colonoscopy within the programme, reporting an adjusted HR of 2.03 (95% CI 1.68 to 2.44) for mortality from colorectal cancer (CRC) among non-adherent individuals during a median 4.9 years of follow-up. Correct approaches would include using a time dependent analysis,4 studying only ‘survivors’ of the immortal period by moving the start of follow-up to the end of the immortal period,5 or moving the start of follow-up to the date of colonoscopy in adherent individuals, with a date assigned according to the distribution of adherent individuals’ immortal time for the non-adherent group.6 In conclusion, the risk of residual confounding due to inherent differences between these two populations, as well as the high likelihood of immortal time bias, represent major methodological limitations of this study and, therefore, the results should be viewed with caution. Colonoscopy later than 270 days in a fecal immunochemical test-based population screening program is associated with higher prevalence of colorectal cancer.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-328419
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2847747184</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2847747184</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b398t-f5ec81e137f1513d331dba047d0f60eef1253c0378ca3d305130c8c1ef0553113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9r3DAQxUVJaDZ_vkAPRZBLLt5oLMmSjyW0SSDQS3I2sjxOtdjWVpLb7LevjJMWeshJDPN7T8N7hHwCtgXg1fXznHbTUJSsLAteagH1B7IBUell0kdkwxioQipRn5DTGHeMMa1r-EhOuJKirnW5Ib_vx9GHZAaa3Ii0dSZSN1FDA6bg4x5tcr-QxjR3B4ovZnSTm56p9YMPeZd11kwWA11dXDpQY60P3UIlT033AwNmYhkW1eSj9fvDOTnuzRDx4vU9I0_fvj7e3BUP32_vb748FC2vdSp6iVYDAlc9SOAd59C1hgnVsb5iiD2UklvGlbYmb1lmmNUWsGdS8pzSGblafffB_5wxpmZ00eIwmAn9HJscm1JCgRYZvfwP3fk5TPm6TEkQQlWSv0spVtdVKarFq1wpm0OMAftmH9xowqEB1izlNWt5zVJes5aXRZ9fred2xO6v5K2tDGxXoB13_759x_EPPP2mGw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2709962464</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Immortal time bias in a retrospective study examining colorectal cancer mortality according to adherence to colonoscopy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Winters, Conchubhair ; Ford, Alexander Charles</creator><creatorcontrib>Winters, Conchubhair ; Ford, Alexander Charles</creatorcontrib><description>Correspondence to Dr Conchubhair Winters, University of Leeds Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK; Conchubhair.winters@nhs.net We read with interest the study by Zorzi et al.1 The authors conducted a retrospective cohort study comparing outcomes between individuals with a positive faecal immunochemical test (FIT) as part of an Italian screening programme, dependent on whether they were adherent with a colonoscopy within the programme, reporting an adjusted HR of 2.03 (95% CI 1.68 to 2.44) for mortality from colorectal cancer (CRC) among non-adherent individuals during a median 4.9 years of follow-up. Correct approaches would include using a time dependent analysis,4 studying only ‘survivors’ of the immortal period by moving the start of follow-up to the end of the immortal period,5 or moving the start of follow-up to the date of colonoscopy in adherent individuals, with a date assigned according to the distribution of adherent individuals’ immortal time for the non-adherent group.6 In conclusion, the risk of residual confounding due to inherent differences between these two populations, as well as the high likelihood of immortal time bias, represent major methodological limitations of this study and, therefore, the results should be viewed with caution. Colonoscopy later than 270 days in a fecal immunochemical test-based population screening program is associated with higher prevalence of colorectal cancer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0017-5749</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-3288</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-328419</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37549982</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Society of Gastroenterology</publisher><subject>Bias ; Cancer ; Cohort analysis ; COLONOSCOPY ; COLORECTAL CANCER ; Colorectal carcinoma ; Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Early Detection of Cancer ; Humans ; Letter ; Mass Screening ; Medical research ; Mortality ; Population ; Retrospective Studies</subject><ispartof>Gut, 2023-09, Vol.72 (9), p.1799-1800</ispartof><rights>Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.</rights><rights>2022 Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.</rights><rights>2023 Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b398t-f5ec81e137f1513d331dba047d0f60eef1253c0378ca3d305130c8c1ef0553113</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b398t-f5ec81e137f1513d331dba047d0f60eef1253c0378ca3d305130c8c1ef0553113</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6371-4359 ; 0000-0001-5773-2876</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37549982$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Winters, Conchubhair</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ford, Alexander Charles</creatorcontrib><title>Immortal time bias in a retrospective study examining colorectal cancer mortality according to adherence to colonoscopy</title><title>Gut</title><addtitle>Gut</addtitle><addtitle>Gut</addtitle><description>Correspondence to Dr Conchubhair Winters, University of Leeds Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK; Conchubhair.winters@nhs.net We read with interest the study by Zorzi et al.1 The authors conducted a retrospective cohort study comparing outcomes between individuals with a positive faecal immunochemical test (FIT) as part of an Italian screening programme, dependent on whether they were adherent with a colonoscopy within the programme, reporting an adjusted HR of 2.03 (95% CI 1.68 to 2.44) for mortality from colorectal cancer (CRC) among non-adherent individuals during a median 4.9 years of follow-up. Correct approaches would include using a time dependent analysis,4 studying only ‘survivors’ of the immortal period by moving the start of follow-up to the end of the immortal period,5 or moving the start of follow-up to the date of colonoscopy in adherent individuals, with a date assigned according to the distribution of adherent individuals’ immortal time for the non-adherent group.6 In conclusion, the risk of residual confounding due to inherent differences between these two populations, as well as the high likelihood of immortal time bias, represent major methodological limitations of this study and, therefore, the results should be viewed with caution. Colonoscopy later than 270 days in a fecal immunochemical test-based population screening program is associated with higher prevalence of colorectal cancer.</description><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>COLONOSCOPY</subject><subject>COLORECTAL CANCER</subject><subject>Colorectal carcinoma</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Early Detection of Cancer</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Letter</subject><subject>Mass Screening</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><issn>0017-5749</issn><issn>1468-3288</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9r3DAQxUVJaDZ_vkAPRZBLLt5oLMmSjyW0SSDQS3I2sjxOtdjWVpLb7LevjJMWeshJDPN7T8N7hHwCtgXg1fXznHbTUJSsLAteagH1B7IBUell0kdkwxioQipRn5DTGHeMMa1r-EhOuJKirnW5Ib_vx9GHZAaa3Ii0dSZSN1FDA6bg4x5tcr-QxjR3B4ovZnSTm56p9YMPeZd11kwWA11dXDpQY60P3UIlT033AwNmYhkW1eSj9fvDOTnuzRDx4vU9I0_fvj7e3BUP32_vb748FC2vdSp6iVYDAlc9SOAd59C1hgnVsb5iiD2UklvGlbYmb1lmmNUWsGdS8pzSGblafffB_5wxpmZ00eIwmAn9HJscm1JCgRYZvfwP3fk5TPm6TEkQQlWSv0spVtdVKarFq1wpm0OMAftmH9xowqEB1izlNWt5zVJes5aXRZ9fred2xO6v5K2tDGxXoB13_759x_EPPP2mGw</recordid><startdate>20230901</startdate><enddate>20230901</enddate><creator>Winters, Conchubhair</creator><creator>Ford, Alexander Charles</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Society of Gastroenterology</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6371-4359</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5773-2876</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230901</creationdate><title>Immortal time bias in a retrospective study examining colorectal cancer mortality according to adherence to colonoscopy</title><author>Winters, Conchubhair ; Ford, Alexander Charles</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b398t-f5ec81e137f1513d331dba047d0f60eef1253c0378ca3d305130c8c1ef0553113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>COLONOSCOPY</topic><topic>COLORECTAL CANCER</topic><topic>Colorectal carcinoma</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Early Detection of Cancer</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Letter</topic><topic>Mass Screening</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Winters, Conchubhair</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ford, Alexander Charles</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gut</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Winters, Conchubhair</au><au>Ford, Alexander Charles</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Immortal time bias in a retrospective study examining colorectal cancer mortality according to adherence to colonoscopy</atitle><jtitle>Gut</jtitle><stitle>Gut</stitle><addtitle>Gut</addtitle><date>2023-09-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1799</spage><epage>1800</epage><pages>1799-1800</pages><issn>0017-5749</issn><eissn>1468-3288</eissn><abstract>Correspondence to Dr Conchubhair Winters, University of Leeds Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK; Conchubhair.winters@nhs.net We read with interest the study by Zorzi et al.1 The authors conducted a retrospective cohort study comparing outcomes between individuals with a positive faecal immunochemical test (FIT) as part of an Italian screening programme, dependent on whether they were adherent with a colonoscopy within the programme, reporting an adjusted HR of 2.03 (95% CI 1.68 to 2.44) for mortality from colorectal cancer (CRC) among non-adherent individuals during a median 4.9 years of follow-up. Correct approaches would include using a time dependent analysis,4 studying only ‘survivors’ of the immortal period by moving the start of follow-up to the end of the immortal period,5 or moving the start of follow-up to the date of colonoscopy in adherent individuals, with a date assigned according to the distribution of adherent individuals’ immortal time for the non-adherent group.6 In conclusion, the risk of residual confounding due to inherent differences between these two populations, as well as the high likelihood of immortal time bias, represent major methodological limitations of this study and, therefore, the results should be viewed with caution. Colonoscopy later than 270 days in a fecal immunochemical test-based population screening program is associated with higher prevalence of colorectal cancer.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Society of Gastroenterology</pub><pmid>37549982</pmid><doi>10.1136/gutjnl-2022-328419</doi><tpages>2</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6371-4359</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5773-2876</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0017-5749
ispartof Gut, 2023-09, Vol.72 (9), p.1799-1800
issn 0017-5749
1468-3288
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2847747184
source MEDLINE; PubMed Central
subjects Bias
Cancer
Cohort analysis
COLONOSCOPY
COLORECTAL CANCER
Colorectal carcinoma
Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis
Early Detection of Cancer
Humans
Letter
Mass Screening
Medical research
Mortality
Population
Retrospective Studies
title Immortal time bias in a retrospective study examining colorectal cancer mortality according to adherence to colonoscopy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T07%3A08%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Immortal%20time%20bias%20in%20a%20retrospective%20study%20examining%20colorectal%20cancer%20mortality%20according%20to%20adherence%20to%20colonoscopy&rft.jtitle=Gut&rft.au=Winters,%20Conchubhair&rft.date=2023-09-01&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1799&rft.epage=1800&rft.pages=1799-1800&rft.issn=0017-5749&rft.eissn=1468-3288&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/gutjnl-2022-328419&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2847747184%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2709962464&rft_id=info:pmid/37549982&rfr_iscdi=true