Comparison of plasma parameters between QH and ELMing phases of the same discharges
H-mode confinement is observed for many energy confinement times without edge localized modes (ELMs) in QH (quiescent high-confinement)-mode discharges in DIII–D. To determine the critical differences between ELMing and QH modes we compared electron temperature (Te), density (ne), and ion temperatur...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of nuclear materials 2005-03, Vol.337-339, p.391-394 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 394 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 391 |
| container_title | Journal of nuclear materials |
| container_volume | 337-339 |
| creator | Lasniera, C.J. West, W.P. Burrell, K.H. deGrassie, J.S. Doyle, E.J. Osborne, T.H. |
| description | H-mode confinement is observed for many energy confinement times without edge localized modes (ELMs) in QH (quiescent high-confinement)-mode discharges in DIII–D. To determine the critical differences between ELMing and QH modes we compared electron temperature (Te), density (ne), and ion temperature (Ti), in the pedestal (ped) and scrape-off layer (SOL) for a group of discharges. We also compared the electron pressures Pped, and maximum pressure gradient ∇maxPe,ped because of their importance in confinement and stability. Experimental results show that the core line averaged density, median Te,ped, Te,SOL, and Te,ped width, and Ti,SOL are nearly the same in QH mode as that during ELMs. The ne,ped (average), ne,ped width, Pped, and ∇maxPe,ped are similar to corresponding values in QH mode and at various times between ELMs. However, the median Ti,ped is 1.6 times higher in QH mode than during ELMing. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.10.059 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_28474249</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S002231150400827X</els_id><sourcerecordid>28474249</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-b627abda8075452e9b97d0e08b500418bb00ba20de26e373ef8ec8cc4c7cedbc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE9LAzEQxYMoWKsfQcjJ266T7KabPYkUtUJFRD2HJDvbZtl_JlvFb29Ke_c08HhvZt6PkGsGKQO2uG3Spt_ZTk8pB8ijloIoT8iMySJLcsnhlMwAOE8yxsQ5uQihAYgWEDPyvhy6UXsXhp4ONR1bHTpNo6I7nNAHanD6Qezp24rqvqIP6xfXb-i41QHDPjFtkYZoppULdqv9BsMlOat1G_DqOOfk8_HhY7lK1q9Pz8v7dWKzTEyJWfBCm0pLKEQuOJamLCpAkEbEGkwaA2A0hwr5ArMiw1qildbmtrBYGZvNyc1h7-iHrx2GSXXxB2xb3eOwC4rLvMh5XkajOBitH0LwWKvRu077X8VA7RGqRh0Rqj3CvRz5xNzdIYexxbdDr4J12MfrzqOdVDW4fzb8AeoPfc8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>28474249</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of plasma parameters between QH and ELMing phases of the same discharges</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Lasniera, C.J. ; West, W.P. ; Burrell, K.H. ; deGrassie, J.S. ; Doyle, E.J. ; Osborne, T.H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lasniera, C.J. ; West, W.P. ; Burrell, K.H. ; deGrassie, J.S. ; Doyle, E.J. ; Osborne, T.H.</creatorcontrib><description>H-mode confinement is observed for many energy confinement times without edge localized modes (ELMs) in QH (quiescent high-confinement)-mode discharges in DIII–D. To determine the critical differences between ELMing and QH modes we compared electron temperature (Te), density (ne), and ion temperature (Ti), in the pedestal (ped) and scrape-off layer (SOL) for a group of discharges. We also compared the electron pressures Pped, and maximum pressure gradient ∇maxPe,ped because of their importance in confinement and stability. Experimental results show that the core line averaged density, median Te,ped, Te,SOL, and Te,ped width, and Ti,SOL are nearly the same in QH mode as that during ELMs. The ne,ped (average), ne,ped width, Pped, and ∇maxPe,ped are similar to corresponding values in QH mode and at various times between ELMs. However, the median Ti,ped is 1.6 times higher in QH mode than during ELMing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3115</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4820</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.10.059</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>DIII–D ; Divertor ; Edge pedestal ; SOL plasma boundary</subject><ispartof>Journal of nuclear materials, 2005-03, Vol.337-339, p.391-394</ispartof><rights>2004 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-b627abda8075452e9b97d0e08b500418bb00ba20de26e373ef8ec8cc4c7cedbc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.10.059$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27922,27923,45993</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lasniera, C.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>West, W.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burrell, K.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>deGrassie, J.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doyle, E.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osborne, T.H.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of plasma parameters between QH and ELMing phases of the same discharges</title><title>Journal of nuclear materials</title><description>H-mode confinement is observed for many energy confinement times without edge localized modes (ELMs) in QH (quiescent high-confinement)-mode discharges in DIII–D. To determine the critical differences between ELMing and QH modes we compared electron temperature (Te), density (ne), and ion temperature (Ti), in the pedestal (ped) and scrape-off layer (SOL) for a group of discharges. We also compared the electron pressures Pped, and maximum pressure gradient ∇maxPe,ped because of their importance in confinement and stability. Experimental results show that the core line averaged density, median Te,ped, Te,SOL, and Te,ped width, and Ti,SOL are nearly the same in QH mode as that during ELMs. The ne,ped (average), ne,ped width, Pped, and ∇maxPe,ped are similar to corresponding values in QH mode and at various times between ELMs. However, the median Ti,ped is 1.6 times higher in QH mode than during ELMing.</description><subject>DIII–D</subject><subject>Divertor</subject><subject>Edge pedestal</subject><subject>SOL plasma boundary</subject><issn>0022-3115</issn><issn>1873-4820</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE9LAzEQxYMoWKsfQcjJ266T7KabPYkUtUJFRD2HJDvbZtl_JlvFb29Ke_c08HhvZt6PkGsGKQO2uG3Spt_ZTk8pB8ijloIoT8iMySJLcsnhlMwAOE8yxsQ5uQihAYgWEDPyvhy6UXsXhp4ONR1bHTpNo6I7nNAHanD6Qezp24rqvqIP6xfXb-i41QHDPjFtkYZoppULdqv9BsMlOat1G_DqOOfk8_HhY7lK1q9Pz8v7dWKzTEyJWfBCm0pLKEQuOJamLCpAkEbEGkwaA2A0hwr5ArMiw1qildbmtrBYGZvNyc1h7-iHrx2GSXXxB2xb3eOwC4rLvMh5XkajOBitH0LwWKvRu077X8VA7RGqRh0Rqj3CvRz5xNzdIYexxbdDr4J12MfrzqOdVDW4fzb8AeoPfc8</recordid><startdate>20050301</startdate><enddate>20050301</enddate><creator>Lasniera, C.J.</creator><creator>West, W.P.</creator><creator>Burrell, K.H.</creator><creator>deGrassie, J.S.</creator><creator>Doyle, E.J.</creator><creator>Osborne, T.H.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050301</creationdate><title>Comparison of plasma parameters between QH and ELMing phases of the same discharges</title><author>Lasniera, C.J. ; West, W.P. ; Burrell, K.H. ; deGrassie, J.S. ; Doyle, E.J. ; Osborne, T.H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-b627abda8075452e9b97d0e08b500418bb00ba20de26e373ef8ec8cc4c7cedbc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>DIII–D</topic><topic>Divertor</topic><topic>Edge pedestal</topic><topic>SOL plasma boundary</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lasniera, C.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>West, W.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burrell, K.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>deGrassie, J.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doyle, E.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osborne, T.H.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of nuclear materials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lasniera, C.J.</au><au>West, W.P.</au><au>Burrell, K.H.</au><au>deGrassie, J.S.</au><au>Doyle, E.J.</au><au>Osborne, T.H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of plasma parameters between QH and ELMing phases of the same discharges</atitle><jtitle>Journal of nuclear materials</jtitle><date>2005-03-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>337-339</volume><spage>391</spage><epage>394</epage><pages>391-394</pages><issn>0022-3115</issn><eissn>1873-4820</eissn><abstract>H-mode confinement is observed for many energy confinement times without edge localized modes (ELMs) in QH (quiescent high-confinement)-mode discharges in DIII–D. To determine the critical differences between ELMing and QH modes we compared electron temperature (Te), density (ne), and ion temperature (Ti), in the pedestal (ped) and scrape-off layer (SOL) for a group of discharges. We also compared the electron pressures Pped, and maximum pressure gradient ∇maxPe,ped because of their importance in confinement and stability. Experimental results show that the core line averaged density, median Te,ped, Te,SOL, and Te,ped width, and Ti,SOL are nearly the same in QH mode as that during ELMs. The ne,ped (average), ne,ped width, Pped, and ∇maxPe,ped are similar to corresponding values in QH mode and at various times between ELMs. However, the median Ti,ped is 1.6 times higher in QH mode than during ELMing.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.10.059</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0022-3115 |
| ispartof | Journal of nuclear materials, 2005-03, Vol.337-339, p.391-394 |
| issn | 0022-3115 1873-4820 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_28474249 |
| source | ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
| subjects | DIII–D Divertor Edge pedestal SOL plasma boundary |
| title | Comparison of plasma parameters between QH and ELMing phases of the same discharges |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T13%3A58%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20plasma%20parameters%20between%20QH%20and%20ELMing%20phases%20of%20the%20same%20discharges&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20nuclear%20materials&rft.au=Lasniera,%20C.J.&rft.date=2005-03-01&rft.volume=337-339&rft.spage=391&rft.epage=394&rft.pages=391-394&rft.issn=0022-3115&rft.eissn=1873-4820&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.10.059&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E28474249%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=28474249&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S002231150400827X&rfr_iscdi=true |