Hands‐On: Investigating the role of physical manipulatives in spatial training
Studies show that spatial interventions lead to improvements in mathematics. However, outcomes vary based on whether physical manipulatives (embodied action) are used during training. This study compares the effects of embodied and non‐embodied spatial interventions on spatial and mathematics outcom...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Child development 2023-09, Vol.94 (5), p.1205-1221 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1221 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 1205 |
| container_title | Child development |
| container_volume | 94 |
| creator | Gilligan‐Lee, Katie A. Hawes, Zachary C. K. Williams, Ashley Y. Farran, Emily K. Mix, Kelly S. |
| description | Studies show that spatial interventions lead to improvements in mathematics. However, outcomes vary based on whether physical manipulatives (embodied action) are used during training. This study compares the effects of embodied and non‐embodied spatial interventions on spatial and mathematics outcomes. The study has a randomized, controlled, pre‐post, follow‐up, training design (N = 182; mean age 8 years; 49% female; 83.5% White). We show that both embodied and non‐embodied spatial training approaches improve spatial skills compared to control. However, we conclude that embodied spatial training using physical manipulatives leads to larger, more consistent gains in mathematics and greater depth of spatial processing than non‐embodied training. These findings highlight the potential of spatial activities, particularly those that use physical materials, for improving children's mathematics skills. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/cdev.13963 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2847341771</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1394002</ericid><sourcerecordid>2860537421</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4153-e3e05135a3d083eee36f826e880da0080d52248a93a14d9672698430837729333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kbtOxDAQRS0EguXR0IMi0SCkgO1x4oQOLctLSFAAbWSSWTDKOsHegLbjE_hGvoRZAhQUuPBD98zM1TVjm4LvC1oHZYUv-wLyFBbYQKhUx1kq1SIbcM7zGHLJV9hqCE_0lGkOy2wFdKJ0nogBuz4zrgofb-9X7jA6dy8YpvbBTK17iKaPGPmmxqgZR-3jLNjS1NHEONt2NRGERtZFoaU7CVNvrKOydbY0NnXAje9zjd2ejG6GZ_Hl1en58OgyLpVIIEZAnghIDFQ8A0SEdJzJFLOMV4Zz2hMpVWZyMEJVearJeaaAWK1lDgBrbLfv2_rmuSPbxcSGEuvaOGy6UMhMaVBCa0Hozh_0qem8I3dEpTwBreSc2uup0jcheBwXrbcT42eF4MU852Kec_GVM8Hb3y27-wlWv-hPsARs9QB6W_7KowsqV_QNpItef7U1zv4ZVQyPR3f90E9hII_W</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2860537421</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hands‐On: Investigating the role of physical manipulatives in spatial training</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>Gilligan‐Lee, Katie A. ; Hawes, Zachary C. K. ; Williams, Ashley Y. ; Farran, Emily K. ; Mix, Kelly S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gilligan‐Lee, Katie A. ; Hawes, Zachary C. K. ; Williams, Ashley Y. ; Farran, Emily K. ; Mix, Kelly S.</creatorcontrib><description>Studies show that spatial interventions lead to improvements in mathematics. However, outcomes vary based on whether physical manipulatives (embodied action) are used during training. This study compares the effects of embodied and non‐embodied spatial interventions on spatial and mathematics outcomes. The study has a randomized, controlled, pre‐post, follow‐up, training design (N = 182; mean age 8 years; 49% female; 83.5% White). We show that both embodied and non‐embodied spatial training approaches improve spatial skills compared to control. However, we conclude that embodied spatial training using physical manipulatives leads to larger, more consistent gains in mathematics and greater depth of spatial processing than non‐embodied training. These findings highlight the potential of spatial activities, particularly those that use physical materials, for improving children's mathematics skills.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-3920</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-8624</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/cdev.13963</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37547951</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley</publisher><subject>Information processing ; Instructional Effectiveness ; Intervention ; Manipulative Materials ; Mathematics ; Mathematics Instruction ; Mathematics Skills ; Skill Development ; Spatial Ability ; Training ; Young Children</subject><ispartof>Child development, 2023-09, Vol.94 (5), p.1205-1221</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Research in Child Development.</rights><rights>2023 The Authors. Child Development published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Research in Child Development.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4153-e3e05135a3d083eee36f826e880da0080d52248a93a14d9672698430837729333</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4153-e3e05135a3d083eee36f826e880da0080d52248a93a14d9672698430837729333</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6409-0875 ; 0000-0003-4055-7607 ; 0000-0002-4402-2557 ; 0000-0002-5406-2149</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fcdev.13963$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fcdev.13963$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,30976,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1394002$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37547951$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gilligan‐Lee, Katie A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawes, Zachary C. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Ashley Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farran, Emily K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mix, Kelly S.</creatorcontrib><title>Hands‐On: Investigating the role of physical manipulatives in spatial training</title><title>Child development</title><addtitle>Child Dev</addtitle><description>Studies show that spatial interventions lead to improvements in mathematics. However, outcomes vary based on whether physical manipulatives (embodied action) are used during training. This study compares the effects of embodied and non‐embodied spatial interventions on spatial and mathematics outcomes. The study has a randomized, controlled, pre‐post, follow‐up, training design (N = 182; mean age 8 years; 49% female; 83.5% White). We show that both embodied and non‐embodied spatial training approaches improve spatial skills compared to control. However, we conclude that embodied spatial training using physical manipulatives leads to larger, more consistent gains in mathematics and greater depth of spatial processing than non‐embodied training. These findings highlight the potential of spatial activities, particularly those that use physical materials, for improving children's mathematics skills.</description><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Instructional Effectiveness</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Manipulative Materials</subject><subject>Mathematics</subject><subject>Mathematics Instruction</subject><subject>Mathematics Skills</subject><subject>Skill Development</subject><subject>Spatial Ability</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Young Children</subject><issn>0009-3920</issn><issn>1467-8624</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kbtOxDAQRS0EguXR0IMi0SCkgO1x4oQOLctLSFAAbWSSWTDKOsHegLbjE_hGvoRZAhQUuPBD98zM1TVjm4LvC1oHZYUv-wLyFBbYQKhUx1kq1SIbcM7zGHLJV9hqCE_0lGkOy2wFdKJ0nogBuz4zrgofb-9X7jA6dy8YpvbBTK17iKaPGPmmxqgZR-3jLNjS1NHEONt2NRGERtZFoaU7CVNvrKOydbY0NnXAje9zjd2ejG6GZ_Hl1en58OgyLpVIIEZAnghIDFQ8A0SEdJzJFLOMV4Zz2hMpVWZyMEJVearJeaaAWK1lDgBrbLfv2_rmuSPbxcSGEuvaOGy6UMhMaVBCa0Hozh_0qem8I3dEpTwBreSc2uup0jcheBwXrbcT42eF4MU852Kec_GVM8Hb3y27-wlWv-hPsARs9QB6W_7KowsqV_QNpItef7U1zv4ZVQyPR3f90E9hII_W</recordid><startdate>202309</startdate><enddate>202309</enddate><creator>Gilligan‐Lee, Katie A.</creator><creator>Hawes, Zachary C. K.</creator><creator>Williams, Ashley Y.</creator><creator>Farran, Emily K.</creator><creator>Mix, Kelly S.</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6409-0875</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4055-7607</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4402-2557</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5406-2149</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202309</creationdate><title>Hands‐On: Investigating the role of physical manipulatives in spatial training</title><author>Gilligan‐Lee, Katie A. ; Hawes, Zachary C. K. ; Williams, Ashley Y. ; Farran, Emily K. ; Mix, Kelly S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4153-e3e05135a3d083eee36f826e880da0080d52248a93a14d9672698430837729333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Instructional Effectiveness</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Manipulative Materials</topic><topic>Mathematics</topic><topic>Mathematics Instruction</topic><topic>Mathematics Skills</topic><topic>Skill Development</topic><topic>Spatial Ability</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Young Children</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gilligan‐Lee, Katie A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawes, Zachary C. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Ashley Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farran, Emily K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mix, Kelly S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Child development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gilligan‐Lee, Katie A.</au><au>Hawes, Zachary C. K.</au><au>Williams, Ashley Y.</au><au>Farran, Emily K.</au><au>Mix, Kelly S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1394002</ericid><atitle>Hands‐On: Investigating the role of physical manipulatives in spatial training</atitle><jtitle>Child development</jtitle><addtitle>Child Dev</addtitle><date>2023-09</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>94</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1205</spage><epage>1221</epage><pages>1205-1221</pages><issn>0009-3920</issn><eissn>1467-8624</eissn><abstract>Studies show that spatial interventions lead to improvements in mathematics. However, outcomes vary based on whether physical manipulatives (embodied action) are used during training. This study compares the effects of embodied and non‐embodied spatial interventions on spatial and mathematics outcomes. The study has a randomized, controlled, pre‐post, follow‐up, training design (N = 182; mean age 8 years; 49% female; 83.5% White). We show that both embodied and non‐embodied spatial training approaches improve spatial skills compared to control. However, we conclude that embodied spatial training using physical manipulatives leads to larger, more consistent gains in mathematics and greater depth of spatial processing than non‐embodied training. These findings highlight the potential of spatial activities, particularly those that use physical materials, for improving children's mathematics skills.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><pmid>37547951</pmid><doi>10.1111/cdev.13963</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6409-0875</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4055-7607</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4402-2557</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5406-2149</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0009-3920 |
| ispartof | Child development, 2023-09, Vol.94 (5), p.1205-1221 |
| issn | 0009-3920 1467-8624 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2847341771 |
| source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; Education Source |
| subjects | Information processing Instructional Effectiveness Intervention Manipulative Materials Mathematics Mathematics Instruction Mathematics Skills Skill Development Spatial Ability Training Young Children |
| title | Hands‐On: Investigating the role of physical manipulatives in spatial training |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T04%3A11%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hands%E2%80%90On:%20Investigating%20the%20role%20of%20physical%20manipulatives%20in%20spatial%20training&rft.jtitle=Child%20development&rft.au=Gilligan%E2%80%90Lee,%20Katie%20A.&rft.date=2023-09&rft.volume=94&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1205&rft.epage=1221&rft.pages=1205-1221&rft.issn=0009-3920&rft.eissn=1467-8624&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/cdev.13963&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2860537421%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2860537421&rft_id=info:pmid/37547951&rft_ericid=EJ1394002&rfr_iscdi=true |