Attitude Estimation or Quaternion Estimation?
The absence of a globally nonsingular three-parameter representation of the rotation group forces attitude Kalman filters to estimate either a singular or a redundant attitude representation. We compare two filtering strategies using simplified kinematics and measurement models. Our favored strategy...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of the astronautical sciences 2004-01, Vol.52 (1-2), p.221-238 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 238 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1-2 |
container_start_page | 221 |
container_title | The Journal of the astronautical sciences |
container_volume | 52 |
creator | Markley, F. Landis |
description | The absence of a globally nonsingular three-parameter representation of the rotation group forces attitude Kalman filters to estimate either a singular or a redundant attitude representation. We compare two filtering strategies using simplified kinematics and measurement models. Our favored strategy estimates a three-parameter representation of attitude deviations from a reference attitude specified by a higher-dimensional nonsingular parameterization. The deviations from the reference are assumed to be small enough to avoid any singularity or discontinuity of the three-dimensional parameterization. We point out some disadvantages of the other strategy, which directly estimates the four-component quaternion representation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/BF03546430 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_28463480</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2436893596</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-61b3ede32d4eb2f716f1dcd002691475cf9287b92f54657764ae3ecfd9123b003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkMFKAzEQhoMoWKsXn2BB8CBEM0k22ZykllaFggh6DrvZBLZsNzXJHnx7s7RQ8DQM8_HzzY_QLZBHIEQ-vawJK7ngjJyhGQVVYlJKOEczQihgBZxeoqsYt4QwIApmCC9S6tLY2mIVU7erU-eHwofic6yTDcO0nQ7P1-jC1X20N8c5R9_r1dfyDW8-Xt-Xiw02jIqEBTTMtpbRltuGOgnCQWva7CCygiyNU7SSjaIuu5ZSCl5bZo1rFVDWZLc5uj_k7oP_GW1MetdFY_u-Hqwfo6YVF4xXE3j3D9z6MQzZTVPORKVYqUSmHg6UCT7GYJ3eh_xS-NVA9NSbPvXG_gCt2F1Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2436893596</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Attitude Estimation or Quaternion Estimation?</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Markley, F. Landis</creator><creatorcontrib>Markley, F. Landis</creatorcontrib><description>The absence of a globally nonsingular three-parameter representation of the rotation group forces attitude Kalman filters to estimate either a singular or a redundant attitude representation. We compare two filtering strategies using simplified kinematics and measurement models. Our favored strategy estimates a three-parameter representation of attitude deviations from a reference attitude specified by a higher-dimensional nonsingular parameterization. The deviations from the reference are assumed to be small enough to avoid any singularity or discontinuity of the three-dimensional parameterization. We point out some disadvantages of the other strategy, which directly estimates the four-component quaternion representation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9142</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2195-0571</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF03546430</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Attitudes ; Kalman filters ; Kinematics ; Parameter estimation ; Parameterization ; Quaternions ; Representations</subject><ispartof>The Journal of the astronautical sciences, 2004-01, Vol.52 (1-2), p.221-238</ispartof><rights>American Astronautical Society 2004.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-61b3ede32d4eb2f716f1dcd002691475cf9287b92f54657764ae3ecfd9123b003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-61b3ede32d4eb2f716f1dcd002691475cf9287b92f54657764ae3ecfd9123b003</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Markley, F. Landis</creatorcontrib><title>Attitude Estimation or Quaternion Estimation?</title><title>The Journal of the astronautical sciences</title><description>The absence of a globally nonsingular three-parameter representation of the rotation group forces attitude Kalman filters to estimate either a singular or a redundant attitude representation. We compare two filtering strategies using simplified kinematics and measurement models. Our favored strategy estimates a three-parameter representation of attitude deviations from a reference attitude specified by a higher-dimensional nonsingular parameterization. The deviations from the reference are assumed to be small enough to avoid any singularity or discontinuity of the three-dimensional parameterization. We point out some disadvantages of the other strategy, which directly estimates the four-component quaternion representation.</description><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Kalman filters</subject><subject>Kinematics</subject><subject>Parameter estimation</subject><subject>Parameterization</subject><subject>Quaternions</subject><subject>Representations</subject><issn>0021-9142</issn><issn>2195-0571</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkMFKAzEQhoMoWKsXn2BB8CBEM0k22ZykllaFggh6DrvZBLZsNzXJHnx7s7RQ8DQM8_HzzY_QLZBHIEQ-vawJK7ngjJyhGQVVYlJKOEczQihgBZxeoqsYt4QwIApmCC9S6tLY2mIVU7erU-eHwofic6yTDcO0nQ7P1-jC1X20N8c5R9_r1dfyDW8-Xt-Xiw02jIqEBTTMtpbRltuGOgnCQWva7CCygiyNU7SSjaIuu5ZSCl5bZo1rFVDWZLc5uj_k7oP_GW1MetdFY_u-Hqwfo6YVF4xXE3j3D9z6MQzZTVPORKVYqUSmHg6UCT7GYJ3eh_xS-NVA9NSbPvXG_gCt2F1Y</recordid><startdate>20040101</startdate><enddate>20040101</enddate><creator>Markley, F. Landis</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040101</creationdate><title>Attitude Estimation or Quaternion Estimation?</title><author>Markley, F. Landis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-61b3ede32d4eb2f716f1dcd002691475cf9287b92f54657764ae3ecfd9123b003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Kalman filters</topic><topic>Kinematics</topic><topic>Parameter estimation</topic><topic>Parameterization</topic><topic>Quaternions</topic><topic>Representations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Markley, F. Landis</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>The Journal of the astronautical sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Markley, F. Landis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Attitude Estimation or Quaternion Estimation?</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of the astronautical sciences</jtitle><date>2004-01-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>221</spage><epage>238</epage><pages>221-238</pages><issn>0021-9142</issn><eissn>2195-0571</eissn><abstract>The absence of a globally nonsingular three-parameter representation of the rotation group forces attitude Kalman filters to estimate either a singular or a redundant attitude representation. We compare two filtering strategies using simplified kinematics and measurement models. Our favored strategy estimates a three-parameter representation of attitude deviations from a reference attitude specified by a higher-dimensional nonsingular parameterization. The deviations from the reference are assumed to be small enough to avoid any singularity or discontinuity of the three-dimensional parameterization. We point out some disadvantages of the other strategy, which directly estimates the four-component quaternion representation.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1007/BF03546430</doi><tpages>18</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-9142 |
ispartof | The Journal of the astronautical sciences, 2004-01, Vol.52 (1-2), p.221-238 |
issn | 0021-9142 2195-0571 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_28463480 |
source | SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Attitudes Kalman filters Kinematics Parameter estimation Parameterization Quaternions Representations |
title | Attitude Estimation or Quaternion Estimation? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T00%3A15%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Attitude%20Estimation%20or%20Quaternion%20Estimation?&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20the%20astronautical%20sciences&rft.au=Markley,%20F.%20Landis&rft.date=2004-01-01&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=221&rft.epage=238&rft.pages=221-238&rft.issn=0021-9142&rft.eissn=2195-0571&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF03546430&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2436893596%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2436893596&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |