Deep learning pipeline for quality filtering of MRSI spectra
With the rise of novel 3D magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging (MRSI) acquisition protocols in clinical practice, which are capable of capturing a large number of spectra from a subject's brain, there is a need for an automated preprocessing pipeline that filters out bad‐quality spectra and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | NMR in biomedicine 2024-07, Vol.37 (7), p.e5012-n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | e5012 |
container_title | NMR in biomedicine |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Rakić, Mladen Turco, Federico Weng, Guodong Maes, Frederik Sima, Diana M. Slotboom, Johannes |
description | With the rise of novel 3D magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging (MRSI) acquisition protocols in clinical practice, which are capable of capturing a large number of spectra from a subject's brain, there is a need for an automated preprocessing pipeline that filters out bad‐quality spectra and identifies contaminated but salvageable spectra prior to the metabolite quantification step. This work introduces such a pipeline based on an ensemble of deep‐learning classifiers. The dataset consists of 36,338 spectra from one healthy subject and five brain tumor patients, acquired with an EPSI variant, which implemented a novel type of spectral editing named SLOtboom–Weng (SLOW) editing on a 7T MR scanner. The spectra were labeled manually by an expert into four classes of spectral quality as follows: (i) noise, (ii) spectra greatly influenced by lipid‐related artifacts (deemed not to contain clinical information), (iii) spectra containing metabolic information slightly contaminated by lipid signals, and (iv) good‐quality spectra.
The AI model consists of three pairs of networks, each comprising a convolutional autoencoder and a multilayer perceptron network. In the classification step, the encoding half of the autoencoder is kept as a dimensionality reduction tool, while the fully connected layers are added to its output. Each of the three pairs of networks is trained on different representations of spectra (real, imaginary, or both), aiming at robust decision‐making. The final class is assigned via a majority voting scheme.
The F1 scores obtained on the test dataset for the four previously defined classes are 0.96, 0.93, 0.82, and 0.90, respectively. The arguably lower value of 0.82 was reached for the least represented class of spectra mildly influenced by lipids.
Not only does the proposed model minimise the required user interaction, but it also greatly reduces the computation time at the metabolite quantification step (by selecting a subset of spectra worth quantifying) and enforces the display of only clinically relevant information.
We introduce an automated robust deep‐learning pipeline for quality filtering of MRSI spectra. Spectra are classified into four classes and the bad‐quality spectra are filtered out prior to the metabolite quantification step. The network is an ensemble of convolutional autoencoders and multilayer perceptrons trained on spectra in the frequency domain. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/nbm.5012 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2844089108</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2844089108</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3442-be352f83a960dac4c369535ed01c20edaab6a5c23300a3202c87c5f25f36b7a53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLw0AURgdRbK2Cv0ACbtyk3nnlAW60vgqtgo_1MJnckZQ0iTMJ0n9vaquC4Oou7uHwcQg5pjCmAOy8ypZjCZTtkCGFNA2pSNkuGUIqWchFAgNy4P0CABLB2T4Z8FjSJBVsSC6uEZugRO2qonoLmqLBsqgwsLUL3jtdFu0qsEXZolu_axvMn56ngW_QtE4fkj2rS49H2zsir7c3L5P7cPZ4N51czkLDhWBhhlwym3CdRpBrIwyPUskl5kANA8y1ziItDeMcQHMGzCSxkZZJy6Ms1pKPyNnG27j6vUPfqmXhDZalrrDuvGKJEJCkFJIePf2DLurOVf06xSGSccSZjH6FxtXeO7SqccVSu5WioNZFVV9UrYv26MlW2GVLzH_A74Q9EG6Aj6LE1b8i9XA1_xJ-Ahh0fNY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3065763256</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Deep learning pipeline for quality filtering of MRSI spectra</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Rakić, Mladen ; Turco, Federico ; Weng, Guodong ; Maes, Frederik ; Sima, Diana M. ; Slotboom, Johannes</creator><creatorcontrib>Rakić, Mladen ; Turco, Federico ; Weng, Guodong ; Maes, Frederik ; Sima, Diana M. ; Slotboom, Johannes</creatorcontrib><description>With the rise of novel 3D magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging (MRSI) acquisition protocols in clinical practice, which are capable of capturing a large number of spectra from a subject's brain, there is a need for an automated preprocessing pipeline that filters out bad‐quality spectra and identifies contaminated but salvageable spectra prior to the metabolite quantification step. This work introduces such a pipeline based on an ensemble of deep‐learning classifiers. The dataset consists of 36,338 spectra from one healthy subject and five brain tumor patients, acquired with an EPSI variant, which implemented a novel type of spectral editing named SLOtboom–Weng (SLOW) editing on a 7T MR scanner. The spectra were labeled manually by an expert into four classes of spectral quality as follows: (i) noise, (ii) spectra greatly influenced by lipid‐related artifacts (deemed not to contain clinical information), (iii) spectra containing metabolic information slightly contaminated by lipid signals, and (iv) good‐quality spectra.
The AI model consists of three pairs of networks, each comprising a convolutional autoencoder and a multilayer perceptron network. In the classification step, the encoding half of the autoencoder is kept as a dimensionality reduction tool, while the fully connected layers are added to its output. Each of the three pairs of networks is trained on different representations of spectra (real, imaginary, or both), aiming at robust decision‐making. The final class is assigned via a majority voting scheme.
The F1 scores obtained on the test dataset for the four previously defined classes are 0.96, 0.93, 0.82, and 0.90, respectively. The arguably lower value of 0.82 was reached for the least represented class of spectra mildly influenced by lipids.
Not only does the proposed model minimise the required user interaction, but it also greatly reduces the computation time at the metabolite quantification step (by selecting a subset of spectra worth quantifying) and enforces the display of only clinically relevant information.
We introduce an automated robust deep‐learning pipeline for quality filtering of MRSI spectra. Spectra are classified into four classes and the bad‐quality spectra are filtered out prior to the metabolite quantification step. The network is an ensemble of convolutional autoencoders and multilayer perceptrons trained on spectra in the frequency domain.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0952-3480</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1492</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/nbm.5012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37518942</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Brain ; Brain - diagnostic imaging ; Brain - metabolism ; Brain Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Brain tumors ; convolutional autoencoders ; Datasets ; Decision making ; Deep Learning ; Editing ; Humans ; Lipids ; Machine learning ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Magnetic resonance spectroscopy ; Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy - methods ; Metabolites ; MRSI ; Multilayer perceptrons ; Neuroimaging ; quality filtering ; Signal quality ; Spectra ; spectral quality ; Spectrum analysis</subject><ispartof>NMR in biomedicine, 2024-07, Vol.37 (7), p.e5012-n/a</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2023 The Authors. NMR in Biomedicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3442-be352f83a960dac4c369535ed01c20edaab6a5c23300a3202c87c5f25f36b7a53</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1950-6760 ; 0000-0001-5121-9852</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fnbm.5012$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fnbm.5012$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37518942$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rakić, Mladen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turco, Federico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weng, Guodong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maes, Frederik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sima, Diana M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slotboom, Johannes</creatorcontrib><title>Deep learning pipeline for quality filtering of MRSI spectra</title><title>NMR in biomedicine</title><addtitle>NMR Biomed</addtitle><description>With the rise of novel 3D magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging (MRSI) acquisition protocols in clinical practice, which are capable of capturing a large number of spectra from a subject's brain, there is a need for an automated preprocessing pipeline that filters out bad‐quality spectra and identifies contaminated but salvageable spectra prior to the metabolite quantification step. This work introduces such a pipeline based on an ensemble of deep‐learning classifiers. The dataset consists of 36,338 spectra from one healthy subject and five brain tumor patients, acquired with an EPSI variant, which implemented a novel type of spectral editing named SLOtboom–Weng (SLOW) editing on a 7T MR scanner. The spectra were labeled manually by an expert into four classes of spectral quality as follows: (i) noise, (ii) spectra greatly influenced by lipid‐related artifacts (deemed not to contain clinical information), (iii) spectra containing metabolic information slightly contaminated by lipid signals, and (iv) good‐quality spectra.
The AI model consists of three pairs of networks, each comprising a convolutional autoencoder and a multilayer perceptron network. In the classification step, the encoding half of the autoencoder is kept as a dimensionality reduction tool, while the fully connected layers are added to its output. Each of the three pairs of networks is trained on different representations of spectra (real, imaginary, or both), aiming at robust decision‐making. The final class is assigned via a majority voting scheme.
The F1 scores obtained on the test dataset for the four previously defined classes are 0.96, 0.93, 0.82, and 0.90, respectively. The arguably lower value of 0.82 was reached for the least represented class of spectra mildly influenced by lipids.
Not only does the proposed model minimise the required user interaction, but it also greatly reduces the computation time at the metabolite quantification step (by selecting a subset of spectra worth quantifying) and enforces the display of only clinically relevant information.
We introduce an automated robust deep‐learning pipeline for quality filtering of MRSI spectra. Spectra are classified into four classes and the bad‐quality spectra are filtered out prior to the metabolite quantification step. The network is an ensemble of convolutional autoencoders and multilayer perceptrons trained on spectra in the frequency domain.</description><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Brain - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Brain - metabolism</subject><subject>Brain Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Brain tumors</subject><subject>convolutional autoencoders</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Deep Learning</subject><subject>Editing</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lipids</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance spectroscopy</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy - methods</subject><subject>Metabolites</subject><subject>MRSI</subject><subject>Multilayer perceptrons</subject><subject>Neuroimaging</subject><subject>quality filtering</subject><subject>Signal quality</subject><subject>Spectra</subject><subject>spectral quality</subject><subject>Spectrum analysis</subject><issn>0952-3480</issn><issn>1099-1492</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLw0AURgdRbK2Cv0ACbtyk3nnlAW60vgqtgo_1MJnckZQ0iTMJ0n9vaquC4Oou7uHwcQg5pjCmAOy8ypZjCZTtkCGFNA2pSNkuGUIqWchFAgNy4P0CABLB2T4Z8FjSJBVsSC6uEZugRO2qonoLmqLBsqgwsLUL3jtdFu0qsEXZolu_axvMn56ngW_QtE4fkj2rS49H2zsir7c3L5P7cPZ4N51czkLDhWBhhlwym3CdRpBrIwyPUskl5kANA8y1ziItDeMcQHMGzCSxkZZJy6Ms1pKPyNnG27j6vUPfqmXhDZalrrDuvGKJEJCkFJIePf2DLurOVf06xSGSccSZjH6FxtXeO7SqccVSu5WioNZFVV9UrYv26MlW2GVLzH_A74Q9EG6Aj6LE1b8i9XA1_xJ-Ahh0fNY</recordid><startdate>202407</startdate><enddate>202407</enddate><creator>Rakić, Mladen</creator><creator>Turco, Federico</creator><creator>Weng, Guodong</creator><creator>Maes, Frederik</creator><creator>Sima, Diana M.</creator><creator>Slotboom, Johannes</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1950-6760</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5121-9852</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202407</creationdate><title>Deep learning pipeline for quality filtering of MRSI spectra</title><author>Rakić, Mladen ; Turco, Federico ; Weng, Guodong ; Maes, Frederik ; Sima, Diana M. ; Slotboom, Johannes</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3442-be352f83a960dac4c369535ed01c20edaab6a5c23300a3202c87c5f25f36b7a53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Brain - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Brain - metabolism</topic><topic>Brain Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Brain tumors</topic><topic>convolutional autoencoders</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Deep Learning</topic><topic>Editing</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lipids</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance spectroscopy</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy - methods</topic><topic>Metabolites</topic><topic>MRSI</topic><topic>Multilayer perceptrons</topic><topic>Neuroimaging</topic><topic>quality filtering</topic><topic>Signal quality</topic><topic>Spectra</topic><topic>spectral quality</topic><topic>Spectrum analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rakić, Mladen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turco, Federico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weng, Guodong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maes, Frederik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sima, Diana M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slotboom, Johannes</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>NMR in biomedicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rakić, Mladen</au><au>Turco, Federico</au><au>Weng, Guodong</au><au>Maes, Frederik</au><au>Sima, Diana M.</au><au>Slotboom, Johannes</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Deep learning pipeline for quality filtering of MRSI spectra</atitle><jtitle>NMR in biomedicine</jtitle><addtitle>NMR Biomed</addtitle><date>2024-07</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e5012</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e5012-n/a</pages><issn>0952-3480</issn><eissn>1099-1492</eissn><abstract>With the rise of novel 3D magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging (MRSI) acquisition protocols in clinical practice, which are capable of capturing a large number of spectra from a subject's brain, there is a need for an automated preprocessing pipeline that filters out bad‐quality spectra and identifies contaminated but salvageable spectra prior to the metabolite quantification step. This work introduces such a pipeline based on an ensemble of deep‐learning classifiers. The dataset consists of 36,338 spectra from one healthy subject and five brain tumor patients, acquired with an EPSI variant, which implemented a novel type of spectral editing named SLOtboom–Weng (SLOW) editing on a 7T MR scanner. The spectra were labeled manually by an expert into four classes of spectral quality as follows: (i) noise, (ii) spectra greatly influenced by lipid‐related artifacts (deemed not to contain clinical information), (iii) spectra containing metabolic information slightly contaminated by lipid signals, and (iv) good‐quality spectra.
The AI model consists of three pairs of networks, each comprising a convolutional autoencoder and a multilayer perceptron network. In the classification step, the encoding half of the autoencoder is kept as a dimensionality reduction tool, while the fully connected layers are added to its output. Each of the three pairs of networks is trained on different representations of spectra (real, imaginary, or both), aiming at robust decision‐making. The final class is assigned via a majority voting scheme.
The F1 scores obtained on the test dataset for the four previously defined classes are 0.96, 0.93, 0.82, and 0.90, respectively. The arguably lower value of 0.82 was reached for the least represented class of spectra mildly influenced by lipids.
Not only does the proposed model minimise the required user interaction, but it also greatly reduces the computation time at the metabolite quantification step (by selecting a subset of spectra worth quantifying) and enforces the display of only clinically relevant information.
We introduce an automated robust deep‐learning pipeline for quality filtering of MRSI spectra. Spectra are classified into four classes and the bad‐quality spectra are filtered out prior to the metabolite quantification step. The network is an ensemble of convolutional autoencoders and multilayer perceptrons trained on spectra in the frequency domain.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>37518942</pmid><doi>10.1002/nbm.5012</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1950-6760</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5121-9852</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0952-3480 |
ispartof | NMR in biomedicine, 2024-07, Vol.37 (7), p.e5012-n/a |
issn | 0952-3480 1099-1492 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2844089108 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Brain Brain - diagnostic imaging Brain - metabolism Brain Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Brain tumors convolutional autoencoders Datasets Decision making Deep Learning Editing Humans Lipids Machine learning Magnetic Resonance Imaging Magnetic resonance spectroscopy Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy - methods Metabolites MRSI Multilayer perceptrons Neuroimaging quality filtering Signal quality Spectra spectral quality Spectrum analysis |
title | Deep learning pipeline for quality filtering of MRSI spectra |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T02%3A35%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Deep%20learning%20pipeline%20for%20quality%20filtering%20of%20MRSI%20spectra&rft.jtitle=NMR%20in%20biomedicine&rft.au=Raki%C4%87,%20Mladen&rft.date=2024-07&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e5012&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e5012-n/a&rft.issn=0952-3480&rft.eissn=1099-1492&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/nbm.5012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2844089108%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3065763256&rft_id=info:pmid/37518942&rfr_iscdi=true |