Deep learning pipeline for quality filtering of MRSI spectra

With the rise of novel 3D magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging (MRSI) acquisition protocols in clinical practice, which are capable of capturing a large number of spectra from a subject's brain, there is a need for an automated preprocessing pipeline that filters out bad‐quality spectra and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:NMR in biomedicine 2024-07, Vol.37 (7), p.e5012-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Rakić, Mladen, Turco, Federico, Weng, Guodong, Maes, Frederik, Sima, Diana M., Slotboom, Johannes
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 7
container_start_page e5012
container_title NMR in biomedicine
container_volume 37
creator Rakić, Mladen
Turco, Federico
Weng, Guodong
Maes, Frederik
Sima, Diana M.
Slotboom, Johannes
description With the rise of novel 3D magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging (MRSI) acquisition protocols in clinical practice, which are capable of capturing a large number of spectra from a subject's brain, there is a need for an automated preprocessing pipeline that filters out bad‐quality spectra and identifies contaminated but salvageable spectra prior to the metabolite quantification step. This work introduces such a pipeline based on an ensemble of deep‐learning classifiers. The dataset consists of 36,338 spectra from one healthy subject and five brain tumor patients, acquired with an EPSI variant, which implemented a novel type of spectral editing named SLOtboom–Weng (SLOW) editing on a 7T MR scanner. The spectra were labeled manually by an expert into four classes of spectral quality as follows: (i) noise, (ii) spectra greatly influenced by lipid‐related artifacts (deemed not to contain clinical information), (iii) spectra containing metabolic information slightly contaminated by lipid signals, and (iv) good‐quality spectra. The AI model consists of three pairs of networks, each comprising a convolutional autoencoder and a multilayer perceptron network. In the classification step, the encoding half of the autoencoder is kept as a dimensionality reduction tool, while the fully connected layers are added to its output. Each of the three pairs of networks is trained on different representations of spectra (real, imaginary, or both), aiming at robust decision‐making. The final class is assigned via a majority voting scheme. The F1 scores obtained on the test dataset for the four previously defined classes are 0.96, 0.93, 0.82, and 0.90, respectively. The arguably lower value of 0.82 was reached for the least represented class of spectra mildly influenced by lipids. Not only does the proposed model minimise the required user interaction, but it also greatly reduces the computation time at the metabolite quantification step (by selecting a subset of spectra worth quantifying) and enforces the display of only clinically relevant information. We introduce an automated robust deep‐learning pipeline for quality filtering of MRSI spectra. Spectra are classified into four classes and the bad‐quality spectra are filtered out prior to the metabolite quantification step. The network is an ensemble of convolutional autoencoders and multilayer perceptrons trained on spectra in the frequency domain.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/nbm.5012
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2844089108</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2844089108</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3442-be352f83a960dac4c369535ed01c20edaab6a5c23300a3202c87c5f25f36b7a53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLw0AURgdRbK2Cv0ACbtyk3nnlAW60vgqtgo_1MJnckZQ0iTMJ0n9vaquC4Oou7uHwcQg5pjCmAOy8ypZjCZTtkCGFNA2pSNkuGUIqWchFAgNy4P0CABLB2T4Z8FjSJBVsSC6uEZugRO2qonoLmqLBsqgwsLUL3jtdFu0qsEXZolu_axvMn56ngW_QtE4fkj2rS49H2zsir7c3L5P7cPZ4N51czkLDhWBhhlwym3CdRpBrIwyPUskl5kANA8y1ziItDeMcQHMGzCSxkZZJy6Ms1pKPyNnG27j6vUPfqmXhDZalrrDuvGKJEJCkFJIePf2DLurOVf06xSGSccSZjH6FxtXeO7SqccVSu5WioNZFVV9UrYv26MlW2GVLzH_A74Q9EG6Aj6LE1b8i9XA1_xJ-Ahh0fNY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3065763256</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Deep learning pipeline for quality filtering of MRSI spectra</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Rakić, Mladen ; Turco, Federico ; Weng, Guodong ; Maes, Frederik ; Sima, Diana M. ; Slotboom, Johannes</creator><creatorcontrib>Rakić, Mladen ; Turco, Federico ; Weng, Guodong ; Maes, Frederik ; Sima, Diana M. ; Slotboom, Johannes</creatorcontrib><description>With the rise of novel 3D magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging (MRSI) acquisition protocols in clinical practice, which are capable of capturing a large number of spectra from a subject's brain, there is a need for an automated preprocessing pipeline that filters out bad‐quality spectra and identifies contaminated but salvageable spectra prior to the metabolite quantification step. This work introduces such a pipeline based on an ensemble of deep‐learning classifiers. The dataset consists of 36,338 spectra from one healthy subject and five brain tumor patients, acquired with an EPSI variant, which implemented a novel type of spectral editing named SLOtboom–Weng (SLOW) editing on a 7T MR scanner. The spectra were labeled manually by an expert into four classes of spectral quality as follows: (i) noise, (ii) spectra greatly influenced by lipid‐related artifacts (deemed not to contain clinical information), (iii) spectra containing metabolic information slightly contaminated by lipid signals, and (iv) good‐quality spectra. The AI model consists of three pairs of networks, each comprising a convolutional autoencoder and a multilayer perceptron network. In the classification step, the encoding half of the autoencoder is kept as a dimensionality reduction tool, while the fully connected layers are added to its output. Each of the three pairs of networks is trained on different representations of spectra (real, imaginary, or both), aiming at robust decision‐making. The final class is assigned via a majority voting scheme. The F1 scores obtained on the test dataset for the four previously defined classes are 0.96, 0.93, 0.82, and 0.90, respectively. The arguably lower value of 0.82 was reached for the least represented class of spectra mildly influenced by lipids. Not only does the proposed model minimise the required user interaction, but it also greatly reduces the computation time at the metabolite quantification step (by selecting a subset of spectra worth quantifying) and enforces the display of only clinically relevant information. We introduce an automated robust deep‐learning pipeline for quality filtering of MRSI spectra. Spectra are classified into four classes and the bad‐quality spectra are filtered out prior to the metabolite quantification step. The network is an ensemble of convolutional autoencoders and multilayer perceptrons trained on spectra in the frequency domain.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0952-3480</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1492</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/nbm.5012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37518942</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Brain ; Brain - diagnostic imaging ; Brain - metabolism ; Brain Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Brain tumors ; convolutional autoencoders ; Datasets ; Decision making ; Deep Learning ; Editing ; Humans ; Lipids ; Machine learning ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Magnetic resonance spectroscopy ; Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy - methods ; Metabolites ; MRSI ; Multilayer perceptrons ; Neuroimaging ; quality filtering ; Signal quality ; Spectra ; spectral quality ; Spectrum analysis</subject><ispartof>NMR in biomedicine, 2024-07, Vol.37 (7), p.e5012-n/a</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2023 The Authors. NMR in Biomedicine published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3442-be352f83a960dac4c369535ed01c20edaab6a5c23300a3202c87c5f25f36b7a53</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1950-6760 ; 0000-0001-5121-9852</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fnbm.5012$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fnbm.5012$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37518942$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rakić, Mladen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turco, Federico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weng, Guodong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maes, Frederik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sima, Diana M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slotboom, Johannes</creatorcontrib><title>Deep learning pipeline for quality filtering of MRSI spectra</title><title>NMR in biomedicine</title><addtitle>NMR Biomed</addtitle><description>With the rise of novel 3D magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging (MRSI) acquisition protocols in clinical practice, which are capable of capturing a large number of spectra from a subject's brain, there is a need for an automated preprocessing pipeline that filters out bad‐quality spectra and identifies contaminated but salvageable spectra prior to the metabolite quantification step. This work introduces such a pipeline based on an ensemble of deep‐learning classifiers. The dataset consists of 36,338 spectra from one healthy subject and five brain tumor patients, acquired with an EPSI variant, which implemented a novel type of spectral editing named SLOtboom–Weng (SLOW) editing on a 7T MR scanner. The spectra were labeled manually by an expert into four classes of spectral quality as follows: (i) noise, (ii) spectra greatly influenced by lipid‐related artifacts (deemed not to contain clinical information), (iii) spectra containing metabolic information slightly contaminated by lipid signals, and (iv) good‐quality spectra. The AI model consists of three pairs of networks, each comprising a convolutional autoencoder and a multilayer perceptron network. In the classification step, the encoding half of the autoencoder is kept as a dimensionality reduction tool, while the fully connected layers are added to its output. Each of the three pairs of networks is trained on different representations of spectra (real, imaginary, or both), aiming at robust decision‐making. The final class is assigned via a majority voting scheme. The F1 scores obtained on the test dataset for the four previously defined classes are 0.96, 0.93, 0.82, and 0.90, respectively. The arguably lower value of 0.82 was reached for the least represented class of spectra mildly influenced by lipids. Not only does the proposed model minimise the required user interaction, but it also greatly reduces the computation time at the metabolite quantification step (by selecting a subset of spectra worth quantifying) and enforces the display of only clinically relevant information. We introduce an automated robust deep‐learning pipeline for quality filtering of MRSI spectra. Spectra are classified into four classes and the bad‐quality spectra are filtered out prior to the metabolite quantification step. The network is an ensemble of convolutional autoencoders and multilayer perceptrons trained on spectra in the frequency domain.</description><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Brain - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Brain - metabolism</subject><subject>Brain Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Brain tumors</subject><subject>convolutional autoencoders</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Deep Learning</subject><subject>Editing</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lipids</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance spectroscopy</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy - methods</subject><subject>Metabolites</subject><subject>MRSI</subject><subject>Multilayer perceptrons</subject><subject>Neuroimaging</subject><subject>quality filtering</subject><subject>Signal quality</subject><subject>Spectra</subject><subject>spectral quality</subject><subject>Spectrum analysis</subject><issn>0952-3480</issn><issn>1099-1492</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLw0AURgdRbK2Cv0ACbtyk3nnlAW60vgqtgo_1MJnckZQ0iTMJ0n9vaquC4Oou7uHwcQg5pjCmAOy8ypZjCZTtkCGFNA2pSNkuGUIqWchFAgNy4P0CABLB2T4Z8FjSJBVsSC6uEZugRO2qonoLmqLBsqgwsLUL3jtdFu0qsEXZolu_axvMn56ngW_QtE4fkj2rS49H2zsir7c3L5P7cPZ4N51czkLDhWBhhlwym3CdRpBrIwyPUskl5kANA8y1ziItDeMcQHMGzCSxkZZJy6Ms1pKPyNnG27j6vUPfqmXhDZalrrDuvGKJEJCkFJIePf2DLurOVf06xSGSccSZjH6FxtXeO7SqccVSu5WioNZFVV9UrYv26MlW2GVLzH_A74Q9EG6Aj6LE1b8i9XA1_xJ-Ahh0fNY</recordid><startdate>202407</startdate><enddate>202407</enddate><creator>Rakić, Mladen</creator><creator>Turco, Federico</creator><creator>Weng, Guodong</creator><creator>Maes, Frederik</creator><creator>Sima, Diana M.</creator><creator>Slotboom, Johannes</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1950-6760</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5121-9852</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202407</creationdate><title>Deep learning pipeline for quality filtering of MRSI spectra</title><author>Rakić, Mladen ; Turco, Federico ; Weng, Guodong ; Maes, Frederik ; Sima, Diana M. ; Slotboom, Johannes</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3442-be352f83a960dac4c369535ed01c20edaab6a5c23300a3202c87c5f25f36b7a53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Brain - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Brain - metabolism</topic><topic>Brain Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Brain tumors</topic><topic>convolutional autoencoders</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Deep Learning</topic><topic>Editing</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lipids</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance spectroscopy</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy - methods</topic><topic>Metabolites</topic><topic>MRSI</topic><topic>Multilayer perceptrons</topic><topic>Neuroimaging</topic><topic>quality filtering</topic><topic>Signal quality</topic><topic>Spectra</topic><topic>spectral quality</topic><topic>Spectrum analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rakić, Mladen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turco, Federico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weng, Guodong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maes, Frederik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sima, Diana M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slotboom, Johannes</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>NMR in biomedicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rakić, Mladen</au><au>Turco, Federico</au><au>Weng, Guodong</au><au>Maes, Frederik</au><au>Sima, Diana M.</au><au>Slotboom, Johannes</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Deep learning pipeline for quality filtering of MRSI spectra</atitle><jtitle>NMR in biomedicine</jtitle><addtitle>NMR Biomed</addtitle><date>2024-07</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e5012</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e5012-n/a</pages><issn>0952-3480</issn><eissn>1099-1492</eissn><abstract>With the rise of novel 3D magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging (MRSI) acquisition protocols in clinical practice, which are capable of capturing a large number of spectra from a subject's brain, there is a need for an automated preprocessing pipeline that filters out bad‐quality spectra and identifies contaminated but salvageable spectra prior to the metabolite quantification step. This work introduces such a pipeline based on an ensemble of deep‐learning classifiers. The dataset consists of 36,338 spectra from one healthy subject and five brain tumor patients, acquired with an EPSI variant, which implemented a novel type of spectral editing named SLOtboom–Weng (SLOW) editing on a 7T MR scanner. The spectra were labeled manually by an expert into four classes of spectral quality as follows: (i) noise, (ii) spectra greatly influenced by lipid‐related artifacts (deemed not to contain clinical information), (iii) spectra containing metabolic information slightly contaminated by lipid signals, and (iv) good‐quality spectra. The AI model consists of three pairs of networks, each comprising a convolutional autoencoder and a multilayer perceptron network. In the classification step, the encoding half of the autoencoder is kept as a dimensionality reduction tool, while the fully connected layers are added to its output. Each of the three pairs of networks is trained on different representations of spectra (real, imaginary, or both), aiming at robust decision‐making. The final class is assigned via a majority voting scheme. The F1 scores obtained on the test dataset for the four previously defined classes are 0.96, 0.93, 0.82, and 0.90, respectively. The arguably lower value of 0.82 was reached for the least represented class of spectra mildly influenced by lipids. Not only does the proposed model minimise the required user interaction, but it also greatly reduces the computation time at the metabolite quantification step (by selecting a subset of spectra worth quantifying) and enforces the display of only clinically relevant information. We introduce an automated robust deep‐learning pipeline for quality filtering of MRSI spectra. Spectra are classified into four classes and the bad‐quality spectra are filtered out prior to the metabolite quantification step. The network is an ensemble of convolutional autoencoders and multilayer perceptrons trained on spectra in the frequency domain.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>37518942</pmid><doi>10.1002/nbm.5012</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1950-6760</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5121-9852</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0952-3480
ispartof NMR in biomedicine, 2024-07, Vol.37 (7), p.e5012-n/a
issn 0952-3480
1099-1492
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2844089108
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Brain
Brain - diagnostic imaging
Brain - metabolism
Brain Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Brain tumors
convolutional autoencoders
Datasets
Decision making
Deep Learning
Editing
Humans
Lipids
Machine learning
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Magnetic resonance spectroscopy
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy - methods
Metabolites
MRSI
Multilayer perceptrons
Neuroimaging
quality filtering
Signal quality
Spectra
spectral quality
Spectrum analysis
title Deep learning pipeline for quality filtering of MRSI spectra
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T02%3A35%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Deep%20learning%20pipeline%20for%20quality%20filtering%20of%20MRSI%20spectra&rft.jtitle=NMR%20in%20biomedicine&rft.au=Raki%C4%87,%20Mladen&rft.date=2024-07&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e5012&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e5012-n/a&rft.issn=0952-3480&rft.eissn=1099-1492&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/nbm.5012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2844089108%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3065763256&rft_id=info:pmid/37518942&rfr_iscdi=true