Editor's Choice - Quality of Life after Stenting for Iliofemoral Venous Obstruction: A Randomised Controlled Trial with One Year Follow Up

Deep venous obstruction (DVO) is a great burden on the healthcare system and patients' quality of life (QoL). Case series show stenting is safe and effective, however most studies lack control groups and QoL changes have not been compared with conventional treatment. The aim was to assess the d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery 2023-11, Vol.66 (5), p.678-685
Hauptverfasser: Shekarchian, Soroosh, Van Laanen, Jorinde, Esmaeil Barbati, Mohammad, Vleugels, Marie-José, Nelemans, Patty, Razavi, Mahmood K, Mees, Barend, Jacobs, Michael J, Jalaie, Houman
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 685
container_issue 5
container_start_page 678
container_title European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery
container_volume 66
creator Shekarchian, Soroosh
Van Laanen, Jorinde
Esmaeil Barbati, Mohammad
Vleugels, Marie-José
Nelemans, Patty
Razavi, Mahmood K
Mees, Barend
Jacobs, Michael J
Jalaie, Houman
description Deep venous obstruction (DVO) is a great burden on the healthcare system and patients' quality of life (QoL). Case series show stenting is safe and effective, however most studies lack control groups and QoL changes have not been compared with conventional treatment. The aim was to assess the difference in QoL changes from baseline to 12 months between stent and conventionally treated patients with DVO. Subjects > 18 years old with DVO due to post-thrombotic (PTS) or non-thrombotic iliac vein lesions (NIVLs) in a tertiary hospital were prospectively randomised to best medical therapy (BMT) or stent placement with BMT in a ratio 2:1, stratified for PTS or NIVL. The primary outcome was the between group difference in VEINES-QoL scores change from baseline to 12 months after treatment. Secondary outcomes included the difference in score changes for EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L), Pain Disability Index (PDI), Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS), and the Villalta score. After three years, the inclusion rate dropped to almost zero, therefore the study had to be stopped. Sixty-three patients were randomised to either the stent (n = 42) or control group (n = 21). Overall, 50 patients had available data for primary outcome analysis. The adjusted mean difference between 12 month scores for VEINES-QoL and VEINES-Sym was 8.07 (95% CI 3.04 - 13.09) and 5.99 (95% CI 0.75 - 11.24) (p = .026), respectively, in favour of the stent group. The differences were significant, but a pre-defined meaningful 14 point improvement in QoL was not reached. The mean difference between 12 month scores for VCSS was -2.93 (95% CI -5.71 - 0.16, p = .040), -11.83 (95% CI -20.81 - 2.86, p = .011) for PDI, 0.015 (95% CI -0.12 - 0.15, p = .82) for the EQ-5D index, and -2.99 (95% CI -7.28 - 1.30, p = .17) for the Villalta score. Symptomatic patients with DVO who received dedicated venous stents had significantly higher VEINES-QoL/Sym scores at 12 months compared with the control group, but the between group difference was lower than the pre-specified clinically relevant QoL difference of at least 14 points. NCT03026049.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.07.044
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2844086807</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2844086807</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2624-551020a0b9e2e4dafc2d1477194446fab227db28330c6c9d96d62ccbeb75ab173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kcFu1DAQhi0EoqXwAhzQ3OglwXbsOOFWrVqotNKqpa3Uk-XYY-pVNl5sh6qvwFOTVQun-aX5_9HMfIR8ZLRmlLVftjVuf-eaU97UVNVUiFfkmMmGV5y18vWiqeoq2XXiiLzLeUsplayRb8lRoyRTUvXH5M-5CyWmzxlWDzFYhAquZjOG8gTRwzp4BOMLJvhRcCph-gk-JrgcQ_S4i8mMcIdTnDNshlzSbEuI01c4g2szubgLGR2s4lRSHMdF3qSwJB5DeYDNhHCPJsHF0oqPcLt_T954M2b88FJPyO3F-c3qe7XefLtcna0ry1suKikZ5dTQoUeOwhlvuWNCKdYLIVpvBs6VG3jXNNS2tnd961pu7YCDkmZgqjkhp89z9yn-mjEXvexpcRzNhMslmndC0K7t6MHKn602xZwTer1PYWfSk2ZUHxjorT4w0AcGmiq9MFhCn17mz8MO3f_Iv6c3fwF2eoRL</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2844086807</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Editor's Choice - Quality of Life after Stenting for Iliofemoral Venous Obstruction: A Randomised Controlled Trial with One Year Follow Up</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Shekarchian, Soroosh ; Van Laanen, Jorinde ; Esmaeil Barbati, Mohammad ; Vleugels, Marie-José ; Nelemans, Patty ; Razavi, Mahmood K ; Mees, Barend ; Jacobs, Michael J ; Jalaie, Houman</creator><creatorcontrib>Shekarchian, Soroosh ; Van Laanen, Jorinde ; Esmaeil Barbati, Mohammad ; Vleugels, Marie-José ; Nelemans, Patty ; Razavi, Mahmood K ; Mees, Barend ; Jacobs, Michael J ; Jalaie, Houman</creatorcontrib><description>Deep venous obstruction (DVO) is a great burden on the healthcare system and patients' quality of life (QoL). Case series show stenting is safe and effective, however most studies lack control groups and QoL changes have not been compared with conventional treatment. The aim was to assess the difference in QoL changes from baseline to 12 months between stent and conventionally treated patients with DVO. Subjects &gt; 18 years old with DVO due to post-thrombotic (PTS) or non-thrombotic iliac vein lesions (NIVLs) in a tertiary hospital were prospectively randomised to best medical therapy (BMT) or stent placement with BMT in a ratio 2:1, stratified for PTS or NIVL. The primary outcome was the between group difference in VEINES-QoL scores change from baseline to 12 months after treatment. Secondary outcomes included the difference in score changes for EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L), Pain Disability Index (PDI), Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS), and the Villalta score. After three years, the inclusion rate dropped to almost zero, therefore the study had to be stopped. Sixty-three patients were randomised to either the stent (n = 42) or control group (n = 21). Overall, 50 patients had available data for primary outcome analysis. The adjusted mean difference between 12 month scores for VEINES-QoL and VEINES-Sym was 8.07 (95% CI 3.04 - 13.09) and 5.99 (95% CI 0.75 - 11.24) (p = .026), respectively, in favour of the stent group. The differences were significant, but a pre-defined meaningful 14 point improvement in QoL was not reached. The mean difference between 12 month scores for VCSS was -2.93 (95% CI -5.71 - 0.16, p = .040), -11.83 (95% CI -20.81 - 2.86, p = .011) for PDI, 0.015 (95% CI -0.12 - 0.15, p = .82) for the EQ-5D index, and -2.99 (95% CI -7.28 - 1.30, p = .17) for the Villalta score. Symptomatic patients with DVO who received dedicated venous stents had significantly higher VEINES-QoL/Sym scores at 12 months compared with the control group, but the between group difference was lower than the pre-specified clinically relevant QoL difference of at least 14 points. NCT03026049.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1078-5884</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2165</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.07.044</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37517579</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><ispartof>European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery, 2023-11, Vol.66 (5), p.678-685</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2624-551020a0b9e2e4dafc2d1477194446fab227db28330c6c9d96d62ccbeb75ab173</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2624-551020a0b9e2e4dafc2d1477194446fab227db28330c6c9d96d62ccbeb75ab173</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2312-7023 ; 0000-0001-6545-5813</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37517579$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shekarchian, Soroosh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Laanen, Jorinde</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esmaeil Barbati, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vleugels, Marie-José</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelemans, Patty</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Razavi, Mahmood K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mees, Barend</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobs, Michael J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jalaie, Houman</creatorcontrib><title>Editor's Choice - Quality of Life after Stenting for Iliofemoral Venous Obstruction: A Randomised Controlled Trial with One Year Follow Up</title><title>European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery</title><addtitle>Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg</addtitle><description>Deep venous obstruction (DVO) is a great burden on the healthcare system and patients' quality of life (QoL). Case series show stenting is safe and effective, however most studies lack control groups and QoL changes have not been compared with conventional treatment. The aim was to assess the difference in QoL changes from baseline to 12 months between stent and conventionally treated patients with DVO. Subjects &gt; 18 years old with DVO due to post-thrombotic (PTS) or non-thrombotic iliac vein lesions (NIVLs) in a tertiary hospital were prospectively randomised to best medical therapy (BMT) or stent placement with BMT in a ratio 2:1, stratified for PTS or NIVL. The primary outcome was the between group difference in VEINES-QoL scores change from baseline to 12 months after treatment. Secondary outcomes included the difference in score changes for EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L), Pain Disability Index (PDI), Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS), and the Villalta score. After three years, the inclusion rate dropped to almost zero, therefore the study had to be stopped. Sixty-three patients were randomised to either the stent (n = 42) or control group (n = 21). Overall, 50 patients had available data for primary outcome analysis. The adjusted mean difference between 12 month scores for VEINES-QoL and VEINES-Sym was 8.07 (95% CI 3.04 - 13.09) and 5.99 (95% CI 0.75 - 11.24) (p = .026), respectively, in favour of the stent group. The differences were significant, but a pre-defined meaningful 14 point improvement in QoL was not reached. The mean difference between 12 month scores for VCSS was -2.93 (95% CI -5.71 - 0.16, p = .040), -11.83 (95% CI -20.81 - 2.86, p = .011) for PDI, 0.015 (95% CI -0.12 - 0.15, p = .82) for the EQ-5D index, and -2.99 (95% CI -7.28 - 1.30, p = .17) for the Villalta score. Symptomatic patients with DVO who received dedicated venous stents had significantly higher VEINES-QoL/Sym scores at 12 months compared with the control group, but the between group difference was lower than the pre-specified clinically relevant QoL difference of at least 14 points. NCT03026049.</description><issn>1078-5884</issn><issn>1532-2165</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kcFu1DAQhi0EoqXwAhzQ3OglwXbsOOFWrVqotNKqpa3Uk-XYY-pVNl5sh6qvwFOTVQun-aX5_9HMfIR8ZLRmlLVftjVuf-eaU97UVNVUiFfkmMmGV5y18vWiqeoq2XXiiLzLeUsplayRb8lRoyRTUvXH5M-5CyWmzxlWDzFYhAquZjOG8gTRwzp4BOMLJvhRcCph-gk-JrgcQ_S4i8mMcIdTnDNshlzSbEuI01c4g2szubgLGR2s4lRSHMdF3qSwJB5DeYDNhHCPJsHF0oqPcLt_T954M2b88FJPyO3F-c3qe7XefLtcna0ry1suKikZ5dTQoUeOwhlvuWNCKdYLIVpvBs6VG3jXNNS2tnd961pu7YCDkmZgqjkhp89z9yn-mjEXvexpcRzNhMslmndC0K7t6MHKn602xZwTer1PYWfSk2ZUHxjorT4w0AcGmiq9MFhCn17mz8MO3f_Iv6c3fwF2eoRL</recordid><startdate>202311</startdate><enddate>202311</enddate><creator>Shekarchian, Soroosh</creator><creator>Van Laanen, Jorinde</creator><creator>Esmaeil Barbati, Mohammad</creator><creator>Vleugels, Marie-José</creator><creator>Nelemans, Patty</creator><creator>Razavi, Mahmood K</creator><creator>Mees, Barend</creator><creator>Jacobs, Michael J</creator><creator>Jalaie, Houman</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2312-7023</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6545-5813</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202311</creationdate><title>Editor's Choice - Quality of Life after Stenting for Iliofemoral Venous Obstruction: A Randomised Controlled Trial with One Year Follow Up</title><author>Shekarchian, Soroosh ; Van Laanen, Jorinde ; Esmaeil Barbati, Mohammad ; Vleugels, Marie-José ; Nelemans, Patty ; Razavi, Mahmood K ; Mees, Barend ; Jacobs, Michael J ; Jalaie, Houman</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2624-551020a0b9e2e4dafc2d1477194446fab227db28330c6c9d96d62ccbeb75ab173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shekarchian, Soroosh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Laanen, Jorinde</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esmaeil Barbati, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vleugels, Marie-José</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelemans, Patty</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Razavi, Mahmood K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mees, Barend</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobs, Michael J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jalaie, Houman</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shekarchian, Soroosh</au><au>Van Laanen, Jorinde</au><au>Esmaeil Barbati, Mohammad</au><au>Vleugels, Marie-José</au><au>Nelemans, Patty</au><au>Razavi, Mahmood K</au><au>Mees, Barend</au><au>Jacobs, Michael J</au><au>Jalaie, Houman</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Editor's Choice - Quality of Life after Stenting for Iliofemoral Venous Obstruction: A Randomised Controlled Trial with One Year Follow Up</atitle><jtitle>European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg</addtitle><date>2023-11</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>678</spage><epage>685</epage><pages>678-685</pages><issn>1078-5884</issn><eissn>1532-2165</eissn><abstract>Deep venous obstruction (DVO) is a great burden on the healthcare system and patients' quality of life (QoL). Case series show stenting is safe and effective, however most studies lack control groups and QoL changes have not been compared with conventional treatment. The aim was to assess the difference in QoL changes from baseline to 12 months between stent and conventionally treated patients with DVO. Subjects &gt; 18 years old with DVO due to post-thrombotic (PTS) or non-thrombotic iliac vein lesions (NIVLs) in a tertiary hospital were prospectively randomised to best medical therapy (BMT) or stent placement with BMT in a ratio 2:1, stratified for PTS or NIVL. The primary outcome was the between group difference in VEINES-QoL scores change from baseline to 12 months after treatment. Secondary outcomes included the difference in score changes for EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L), Pain Disability Index (PDI), Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS), and the Villalta score. After three years, the inclusion rate dropped to almost zero, therefore the study had to be stopped. Sixty-three patients were randomised to either the stent (n = 42) or control group (n = 21). Overall, 50 patients had available data for primary outcome analysis. The adjusted mean difference between 12 month scores for VEINES-QoL and VEINES-Sym was 8.07 (95% CI 3.04 - 13.09) and 5.99 (95% CI 0.75 - 11.24) (p = .026), respectively, in favour of the stent group. The differences were significant, but a pre-defined meaningful 14 point improvement in QoL was not reached. The mean difference between 12 month scores for VCSS was -2.93 (95% CI -5.71 - 0.16, p = .040), -11.83 (95% CI -20.81 - 2.86, p = .011) for PDI, 0.015 (95% CI -0.12 - 0.15, p = .82) for the EQ-5D index, and -2.99 (95% CI -7.28 - 1.30, p = .17) for the Villalta score. Symptomatic patients with DVO who received dedicated venous stents had significantly higher VEINES-QoL/Sym scores at 12 months compared with the control group, but the between group difference was lower than the pre-specified clinically relevant QoL difference of at least 14 points. NCT03026049.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>37517579</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.07.044</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2312-7023</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6545-5813</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1078-5884
ispartof European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery, 2023-11, Vol.66 (5), p.678-685
issn 1078-5884
1532-2165
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2844086807
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; EZB Electronic Journals Library
title Editor's Choice - Quality of Life after Stenting for Iliofemoral Venous Obstruction: A Randomised Controlled Trial with One Year Follow Up
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T09%3A48%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Editor's%20Choice%20-%20Quality%20of%20Life%20after%20Stenting%20for%20Iliofemoral%20Venous%20Obstruction:%20A%20Randomised%20Controlled%20Trial%20with%20One%20Year%20Follow%20Up&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20vascular%20and%20endovascular%20surgery&rft.au=Shekarchian,%20Soroosh&rft.date=2023-11&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=678&rft.epage=685&rft.pages=678-685&rft.issn=1078-5884&rft.eissn=1532-2165&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.07.044&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2844086807%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2844086807&rft_id=info:pmid/37517579&rfr_iscdi=true