Anticholinergic Versus Antihistaminic Treatment for Simulator Sickness Prevention

Flight simulators have an essential role in aircrew training. Occasionally, symptoms of motion sickness, defined as simulator sickness, develop during these sessions. Preventive methods for motion sickness have been investigated thoroughly; however, only a few studies have examined preventive treatm...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical pharmacology 2023-10, Vol.63 (10), p.1119-1125
Hauptverfasser: Ben-Ari, Oded, Sarfati, Shani, Gordon, Barak, Assa, Amit, Nakdimon, Idan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1125
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1119
container_title Journal of clinical pharmacology
container_volume 63
creator Ben-Ari, Oded
Sarfati, Shani
Gordon, Barak
Assa, Amit
Nakdimon, Idan
description Flight simulators have an essential role in aircrew training. Occasionally, symptoms of motion sickness, defined as simulator sickness, develop during these sessions. Preventive methods for motion sickness have been investigated thoroughly; however, only a few studies have examined preventive treatments for simulator sickness. The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy of scopolamine (an anticholinergic drug) compared with cinnarizine (an antihistaminic drug) for helicopter simulator sickness prevention. A validated simulator sickness questionnaire (SSQ) score was used to determine the severity of simulator sickness symptoms in this study. Preliminary SSQ scores and SSQ scores after each sortie were calculated. Each participant was given scopolamine, cinnarizine, or a placebo in a double-blind randomized manner before the first sortie of each training day. Forty-one helicopter pilots participated in the trial. The average age was 30.5 ± 7.1 years. SSQ values significantly improved from an average of 73.30 in the preliminary SSQ questionnaire to an average of 30.92 after 2 hours following the administration of cinnarizine (P = .012, 95%CI 8.071-76.703). Scopolamine was found to be less effective than both cinnarizine and the placebo in the alleviation of simulator sickness symptoms. This study is the first to compare scopolamine with cinnarizine for simulator sickness prevention. Based on the results of this study, we recommend the use of cinnarizine over scopolamine for simulator sickness prevention.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jcph.2319
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2842451723</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2862870883</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c273t-1a2178957dfe0d4268c97529bbcc8930fbf42d0bb01efd22e60870861647ac633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkEtPwzAQhC0EoqVw4A-gSFzgkLJ2HnaOVcVLqgSIwjVynA11SZxiJ0j8exxaOHDa1e6n0cwQckphSgHY1VptVlMW0WyPjGmSsDBOId4nY4CMhowDjMiRc2sAmsYJPSSjiMcZ5UKMydPMdFqt2lobtG9aBa9oXe-C4bzSrpONNv66tCi7Bk0XVK0NnnXT17L72dS7QeeCR4uf_q1bc0wOKlk7PNnNCXm5uV7O78LFw-39fLYIFeNRF1LJvIMs4WWFUMYsFSrjCcuKQimRRVAVVcxKKAqgWJWMYQqCg0h9BC5VGkUTcrHV3dj2o0fX5Y12CutaGmx7lzMRM5-WswE9_4eu294a785TKRt0xUBdbillW-csVvnG6kbar5xCPvScDz3nQ8-ePdsp9kWD5R_5W2z0Db2qeIs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2862870883</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Anticholinergic Versus Antihistaminic Treatment for Simulator Sickness Prevention</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Ben-Ari, Oded ; Sarfati, Shani ; Gordon, Barak ; Assa, Amit ; Nakdimon, Idan</creator><creatorcontrib>Ben-Ari, Oded ; Sarfati, Shani ; Gordon, Barak ; Assa, Amit ; Nakdimon, Idan</creatorcontrib><description>Flight simulators have an essential role in aircrew training. Occasionally, symptoms of motion sickness, defined as simulator sickness, develop during these sessions. Preventive methods for motion sickness have been investigated thoroughly; however, only a few studies have examined preventive treatments for simulator sickness. The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy of scopolamine (an anticholinergic drug) compared with cinnarizine (an antihistaminic drug) for helicopter simulator sickness prevention. A validated simulator sickness questionnaire (SSQ) score was used to determine the severity of simulator sickness symptoms in this study. Preliminary SSQ scores and SSQ scores after each sortie were calculated. Each participant was given scopolamine, cinnarizine, or a placebo in a double-blind randomized manner before the first sortie of each training day. Forty-one helicopter pilots participated in the trial. The average age was 30.5 ± 7.1 years. SSQ values significantly improved from an average of 73.30 in the preliminary SSQ questionnaire to an average of 30.92 after 2 hours following the administration of cinnarizine (P = .012, 95%CI 8.071-76.703). Scopolamine was found to be less effective than both cinnarizine and the placebo in the alleviation of simulator sickness symptoms. This study is the first to compare scopolamine with cinnarizine for simulator sickness prevention. Based on the results of this study, we recommend the use of cinnarizine over scopolamine for simulator sickness prevention.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0091-2700</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-4604</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jcph.2319</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37491788</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Anticholinergics ; Motion sickness ; Placebos ; Prevention ; Questionnaires ; Scopolamine</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical pharmacology, 2023-10, Vol.63 (10), p.1119-1125</ispartof><rights>2023, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c273t-1a2178957dfe0d4268c97529bbcc8930fbf42d0bb01efd22e60870861647ac633</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6190-3567</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37491788$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ben-Ari, Oded</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarfati, Shani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gordon, Barak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Assa, Amit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakdimon, Idan</creatorcontrib><title>Anticholinergic Versus Antihistaminic Treatment for Simulator Sickness Prevention</title><title>Journal of clinical pharmacology</title><addtitle>J Clin Pharmacol</addtitle><description>Flight simulators have an essential role in aircrew training. Occasionally, symptoms of motion sickness, defined as simulator sickness, develop during these sessions. Preventive methods for motion sickness have been investigated thoroughly; however, only a few studies have examined preventive treatments for simulator sickness. The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy of scopolamine (an anticholinergic drug) compared with cinnarizine (an antihistaminic drug) for helicopter simulator sickness prevention. A validated simulator sickness questionnaire (SSQ) score was used to determine the severity of simulator sickness symptoms in this study. Preliminary SSQ scores and SSQ scores after each sortie were calculated. Each participant was given scopolamine, cinnarizine, or a placebo in a double-blind randomized manner before the first sortie of each training day. Forty-one helicopter pilots participated in the trial. The average age was 30.5 ± 7.1 years. SSQ values significantly improved from an average of 73.30 in the preliminary SSQ questionnaire to an average of 30.92 after 2 hours following the administration of cinnarizine (P = .012, 95%CI 8.071-76.703). Scopolamine was found to be less effective than both cinnarizine and the placebo in the alleviation of simulator sickness symptoms. This study is the first to compare scopolamine with cinnarizine for simulator sickness prevention. Based on the results of this study, we recommend the use of cinnarizine over scopolamine for simulator sickness prevention.</description><subject>Anticholinergics</subject><subject>Motion sickness</subject><subject>Placebos</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Scopolamine</subject><issn>0091-2700</issn><issn>1552-4604</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkEtPwzAQhC0EoqVw4A-gSFzgkLJ2HnaOVcVLqgSIwjVynA11SZxiJ0j8exxaOHDa1e6n0cwQckphSgHY1VptVlMW0WyPjGmSsDBOId4nY4CMhowDjMiRc2sAmsYJPSSjiMcZ5UKMydPMdFqt2lobtG9aBa9oXe-C4bzSrpONNv66tCi7Bk0XVK0NnnXT17L72dS7QeeCR4uf_q1bc0wOKlk7PNnNCXm5uV7O78LFw-39fLYIFeNRF1LJvIMs4WWFUMYsFSrjCcuKQimRRVAVVcxKKAqgWJWMYQqCg0h9BC5VGkUTcrHV3dj2o0fX5Y12CutaGmx7lzMRM5-WswE9_4eu294a785TKRt0xUBdbillW-csVvnG6kbar5xCPvScDz3nQ8-ePdsp9kWD5R_5W2z0Db2qeIs</recordid><startdate>20231001</startdate><enddate>20231001</enddate><creator>Ben-Ari, Oded</creator><creator>Sarfati, Shani</creator><creator>Gordon, Barak</creator><creator>Assa, Amit</creator><creator>Nakdimon, Idan</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6190-3567</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231001</creationdate><title>Anticholinergic Versus Antihistaminic Treatment for Simulator Sickness Prevention</title><author>Ben-Ari, Oded ; Sarfati, Shani ; Gordon, Barak ; Assa, Amit ; Nakdimon, Idan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c273t-1a2178957dfe0d4268c97529bbcc8930fbf42d0bb01efd22e60870861647ac633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Anticholinergics</topic><topic>Motion sickness</topic><topic>Placebos</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Scopolamine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ben-Ari, Oded</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarfati, Shani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gordon, Barak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Assa, Amit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakdimon, Idan</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical pharmacology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ben-Ari, Oded</au><au>Sarfati, Shani</au><au>Gordon, Barak</au><au>Assa, Amit</au><au>Nakdimon, Idan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Anticholinergic Versus Antihistaminic Treatment for Simulator Sickness Prevention</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical pharmacology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Pharmacol</addtitle><date>2023-10-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1119</spage><epage>1125</epage><pages>1119-1125</pages><issn>0091-2700</issn><eissn>1552-4604</eissn><abstract>Flight simulators have an essential role in aircrew training. Occasionally, symptoms of motion sickness, defined as simulator sickness, develop during these sessions. Preventive methods for motion sickness have been investigated thoroughly; however, only a few studies have examined preventive treatments for simulator sickness. The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy of scopolamine (an anticholinergic drug) compared with cinnarizine (an antihistaminic drug) for helicopter simulator sickness prevention. A validated simulator sickness questionnaire (SSQ) score was used to determine the severity of simulator sickness symptoms in this study. Preliminary SSQ scores and SSQ scores after each sortie were calculated. Each participant was given scopolamine, cinnarizine, or a placebo in a double-blind randomized manner before the first sortie of each training day. Forty-one helicopter pilots participated in the trial. The average age was 30.5 ± 7.1 years. SSQ values significantly improved from an average of 73.30 in the preliminary SSQ questionnaire to an average of 30.92 after 2 hours following the administration of cinnarizine (P = .012, 95%CI 8.071-76.703). Scopolamine was found to be less effective than both cinnarizine and the placebo in the alleviation of simulator sickness symptoms. This study is the first to compare scopolamine with cinnarizine for simulator sickness prevention. Based on the results of this study, we recommend the use of cinnarizine over scopolamine for simulator sickness prevention.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>37491788</pmid><doi>10.1002/jcph.2319</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6190-3567</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0091-2700
ispartof Journal of clinical pharmacology, 2023-10, Vol.63 (10), p.1119-1125
issn 0091-2700
1552-4604
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2842451723
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Anticholinergics
Motion sickness
Placebos
Prevention
Questionnaires
Scopolamine
title Anticholinergic Versus Antihistaminic Treatment for Simulator Sickness Prevention
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T02%3A57%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Anticholinergic%20Versus%20Antihistaminic%20Treatment%20for%20Simulator%20Sickness%20Prevention&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20pharmacology&rft.au=Ben-Ari,%20Oded&rft.date=2023-10-01&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1119&rft.epage=1125&rft.pages=1119-1125&rft.issn=0091-2700&rft.eissn=1552-4604&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jcph.2319&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2862870883%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2862870883&rft_id=info:pmid/37491788&rfr_iscdi=true