Anticholinergic Versus Antihistaminic Treatment for Simulator Sickness Prevention
Flight simulators have an essential role in aircrew training. Occasionally, symptoms of motion sickness, defined as simulator sickness, develop during these sessions. Preventive methods for motion sickness have been investigated thoroughly; however, only a few studies have examined preventive treatm...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical pharmacology 2023-10, Vol.63 (10), p.1119-1125 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1125 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1119 |
container_title | Journal of clinical pharmacology |
container_volume | 63 |
creator | Ben-Ari, Oded Sarfati, Shani Gordon, Barak Assa, Amit Nakdimon, Idan |
description | Flight simulators have an essential role in aircrew training. Occasionally, symptoms of motion sickness, defined as simulator sickness, develop during these sessions. Preventive methods for motion sickness have been investigated thoroughly; however, only a few studies have examined preventive treatments for simulator sickness. The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy of scopolamine (an anticholinergic drug) compared with cinnarizine (an antihistaminic drug) for helicopter simulator sickness prevention. A validated simulator sickness questionnaire (SSQ) score was used to determine the severity of simulator sickness symptoms in this study. Preliminary SSQ scores and SSQ scores after each sortie were calculated. Each participant was given scopolamine, cinnarizine, or a placebo in a double-blind randomized manner before the first sortie of each training day. Forty-one helicopter pilots participated in the trial. The average age was 30.5 ± 7.1 years. SSQ values significantly improved from an average of 73.30 in the preliminary SSQ questionnaire to an average of 30.92 after 2 hours following the administration of cinnarizine (P = .012, 95%CI 8.071-76.703). Scopolamine was found to be less effective than both cinnarizine and the placebo in the alleviation of simulator sickness symptoms. This study is the first to compare scopolamine with cinnarizine for simulator sickness prevention. Based on the results of this study, we recommend the use of cinnarizine over scopolamine for simulator sickness prevention. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jcph.2319 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2842451723</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2862870883</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c273t-1a2178957dfe0d4268c97529bbcc8930fbf42d0bb01efd22e60870861647ac633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkEtPwzAQhC0EoqVw4A-gSFzgkLJ2HnaOVcVLqgSIwjVynA11SZxiJ0j8exxaOHDa1e6n0cwQckphSgHY1VptVlMW0WyPjGmSsDBOId4nY4CMhowDjMiRc2sAmsYJPSSjiMcZ5UKMydPMdFqt2lobtG9aBa9oXe-C4bzSrpONNv66tCi7Bk0XVK0NnnXT17L72dS7QeeCR4uf_q1bc0wOKlk7PNnNCXm5uV7O78LFw-39fLYIFeNRF1LJvIMs4WWFUMYsFSrjCcuKQimRRVAVVcxKKAqgWJWMYQqCg0h9BC5VGkUTcrHV3dj2o0fX5Y12CutaGmx7lzMRM5-WswE9_4eu294a785TKRt0xUBdbillW-csVvnG6kbar5xCPvScDz3nQ8-ePdsp9kWD5R_5W2z0Db2qeIs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2862870883</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Anticholinergic Versus Antihistaminic Treatment for Simulator Sickness Prevention</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Ben-Ari, Oded ; Sarfati, Shani ; Gordon, Barak ; Assa, Amit ; Nakdimon, Idan</creator><creatorcontrib>Ben-Ari, Oded ; Sarfati, Shani ; Gordon, Barak ; Assa, Amit ; Nakdimon, Idan</creatorcontrib><description>Flight simulators have an essential role in aircrew training. Occasionally, symptoms of motion sickness, defined as simulator sickness, develop during these sessions. Preventive methods for motion sickness have been investigated thoroughly; however, only a few studies have examined preventive treatments for simulator sickness. The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy of scopolamine (an anticholinergic drug) compared with cinnarizine (an antihistaminic drug) for helicopter simulator sickness prevention. A validated simulator sickness questionnaire (SSQ) score was used to determine the severity of simulator sickness symptoms in this study. Preliminary SSQ scores and SSQ scores after each sortie were calculated. Each participant was given scopolamine, cinnarizine, or a placebo in a double-blind randomized manner before the first sortie of each training day. Forty-one helicopter pilots participated in the trial. The average age was 30.5 ± 7.1 years. SSQ values significantly improved from an average of 73.30 in the preliminary SSQ questionnaire to an average of 30.92 after 2 hours following the administration of cinnarizine (P = .012, 95%CI 8.071-76.703). Scopolamine was found to be less effective than both cinnarizine and the placebo in the alleviation of simulator sickness symptoms. This study is the first to compare scopolamine with cinnarizine for simulator sickness prevention. Based on the results of this study, we recommend the use of cinnarizine over scopolamine for simulator sickness prevention.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0091-2700</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-4604</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jcph.2319</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37491788</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Anticholinergics ; Motion sickness ; Placebos ; Prevention ; Questionnaires ; Scopolamine</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical pharmacology, 2023-10, Vol.63 (10), p.1119-1125</ispartof><rights>2023, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c273t-1a2178957dfe0d4268c97529bbcc8930fbf42d0bb01efd22e60870861647ac633</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6190-3567</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37491788$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ben-Ari, Oded</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarfati, Shani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gordon, Barak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Assa, Amit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakdimon, Idan</creatorcontrib><title>Anticholinergic Versus Antihistaminic Treatment for Simulator Sickness Prevention</title><title>Journal of clinical pharmacology</title><addtitle>J Clin Pharmacol</addtitle><description>Flight simulators have an essential role in aircrew training. Occasionally, symptoms of motion sickness, defined as simulator sickness, develop during these sessions. Preventive methods for motion sickness have been investigated thoroughly; however, only a few studies have examined preventive treatments for simulator sickness. The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy of scopolamine (an anticholinergic drug) compared with cinnarizine (an antihistaminic drug) for helicopter simulator sickness prevention. A validated simulator sickness questionnaire (SSQ) score was used to determine the severity of simulator sickness symptoms in this study. Preliminary SSQ scores and SSQ scores after each sortie were calculated. Each participant was given scopolamine, cinnarizine, or a placebo in a double-blind randomized manner before the first sortie of each training day. Forty-one helicopter pilots participated in the trial. The average age was 30.5 ± 7.1 years. SSQ values significantly improved from an average of 73.30 in the preliminary SSQ questionnaire to an average of 30.92 after 2 hours following the administration of cinnarizine (P = .012, 95%CI 8.071-76.703). Scopolamine was found to be less effective than both cinnarizine and the placebo in the alleviation of simulator sickness symptoms. This study is the first to compare scopolamine with cinnarizine for simulator sickness prevention. Based on the results of this study, we recommend the use of cinnarizine over scopolamine for simulator sickness prevention.</description><subject>Anticholinergics</subject><subject>Motion sickness</subject><subject>Placebos</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Scopolamine</subject><issn>0091-2700</issn><issn>1552-4604</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkEtPwzAQhC0EoqVw4A-gSFzgkLJ2HnaOVcVLqgSIwjVynA11SZxiJ0j8exxaOHDa1e6n0cwQckphSgHY1VptVlMW0WyPjGmSsDBOId4nY4CMhowDjMiRc2sAmsYJPSSjiMcZ5UKMydPMdFqt2lobtG9aBa9oXe-C4bzSrpONNv66tCi7Bk0XVK0NnnXT17L72dS7QeeCR4uf_q1bc0wOKlk7PNnNCXm5uV7O78LFw-39fLYIFeNRF1LJvIMs4WWFUMYsFSrjCcuKQimRRVAVVcxKKAqgWJWMYQqCg0h9BC5VGkUTcrHV3dj2o0fX5Y12CutaGmx7lzMRM5-WswE9_4eu294a785TKRt0xUBdbillW-csVvnG6kbar5xCPvScDz3nQ8-ePdsp9kWD5R_5W2z0Db2qeIs</recordid><startdate>20231001</startdate><enddate>20231001</enddate><creator>Ben-Ari, Oded</creator><creator>Sarfati, Shani</creator><creator>Gordon, Barak</creator><creator>Assa, Amit</creator><creator>Nakdimon, Idan</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6190-3567</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231001</creationdate><title>Anticholinergic Versus Antihistaminic Treatment for Simulator Sickness Prevention</title><author>Ben-Ari, Oded ; Sarfati, Shani ; Gordon, Barak ; Assa, Amit ; Nakdimon, Idan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c273t-1a2178957dfe0d4268c97529bbcc8930fbf42d0bb01efd22e60870861647ac633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Anticholinergics</topic><topic>Motion sickness</topic><topic>Placebos</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Scopolamine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ben-Ari, Oded</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarfati, Shani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gordon, Barak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Assa, Amit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakdimon, Idan</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical pharmacology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ben-Ari, Oded</au><au>Sarfati, Shani</au><au>Gordon, Barak</au><au>Assa, Amit</au><au>Nakdimon, Idan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Anticholinergic Versus Antihistaminic Treatment for Simulator Sickness Prevention</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical pharmacology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Pharmacol</addtitle><date>2023-10-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1119</spage><epage>1125</epage><pages>1119-1125</pages><issn>0091-2700</issn><eissn>1552-4604</eissn><abstract>Flight simulators have an essential role in aircrew training. Occasionally, symptoms of motion sickness, defined as simulator sickness, develop during these sessions. Preventive methods for motion sickness have been investigated thoroughly; however, only a few studies have examined preventive treatments for simulator sickness. The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy of scopolamine (an anticholinergic drug) compared with cinnarizine (an antihistaminic drug) for helicopter simulator sickness prevention. A validated simulator sickness questionnaire (SSQ) score was used to determine the severity of simulator sickness symptoms in this study. Preliminary SSQ scores and SSQ scores after each sortie were calculated. Each participant was given scopolamine, cinnarizine, or a placebo in a double-blind randomized manner before the first sortie of each training day. Forty-one helicopter pilots participated in the trial. The average age was 30.5 ± 7.1 years. SSQ values significantly improved from an average of 73.30 in the preliminary SSQ questionnaire to an average of 30.92 after 2 hours following the administration of cinnarizine (P = .012, 95%CI 8.071-76.703). Scopolamine was found to be less effective than both cinnarizine and the placebo in the alleviation of simulator sickness symptoms. This study is the first to compare scopolamine with cinnarizine for simulator sickness prevention. Based on the results of this study, we recommend the use of cinnarizine over scopolamine for simulator sickness prevention.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>37491788</pmid><doi>10.1002/jcph.2319</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6190-3567</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0091-2700 |
ispartof | Journal of clinical pharmacology, 2023-10, Vol.63 (10), p.1119-1125 |
issn | 0091-2700 1552-4604 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2842451723 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Anticholinergics Motion sickness Placebos Prevention Questionnaires Scopolamine |
title | Anticholinergic Versus Antihistaminic Treatment for Simulator Sickness Prevention |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T02%3A57%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Anticholinergic%20Versus%20Antihistaminic%20Treatment%20for%20Simulator%20Sickness%20Prevention&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20pharmacology&rft.au=Ben-Ari,%20Oded&rft.date=2023-10-01&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1119&rft.epage=1125&rft.pages=1119-1125&rft.issn=0091-2700&rft.eissn=1552-4604&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jcph.2319&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2862870883%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2862870883&rft_id=info:pmid/37491788&rfr_iscdi=true |