Comparison of cone-beam and fan-beam computed tomography and low-field magnetic resonance imaging for detection of proximal phalanx dorsoproximal osteochondral defects

Dorsoproximal osteochondral defects commonly affect the proximal phalanx, but information about diagnosis on computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is limited. To assess CT and MRI diagnoses of osteochondral defects, describe the lesions and compare sensitivity and specificity...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Equine veterinary journal 2024-05, Vol.56 (3), p.484-493
Hauptverfasser: Lin, Szu-Ting, Bolas, Nicholas M, Sargan, David R, Restif, Olivier, Peter, Vanessa G, Pokora, Rachel, Patrick, Hayley, Foote, Alastair K, Murray, Rachel C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 493
container_issue 3
container_start_page 484
container_title Equine veterinary journal
container_volume 56
creator Lin, Szu-Ting
Bolas, Nicholas M
Sargan, David R
Restif, Olivier
Peter, Vanessa G
Pokora, Rachel
Patrick, Hayley
Foote, Alastair K
Murray, Rachel C
description Dorsoproximal osteochondral defects commonly affect the proximal phalanx, but information about diagnosis on computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is limited. To assess CT and MRI diagnoses of osteochondral defects, describe the lesions and compare sensitivity and specificity of the modalities using macroscopic pathology as gold standard. Cross-sectional study. Thirty-five equine cadaver limbs underwent standing cone-beam CT (CBCT), fan-beam CT (FBCT), low-field MRI and pathological examination. CT and MR images were examined for proximal phalanx dorsomedial and dorsolateral eminence osteochondral defects. Defect dimensions were measured. Imaging diagnoses and measurements were compared with macroscopic examination. Fifty-six defects were seen over 70 potential locations. On CBCT and FBCT, osteochondral defects appeared as subchondral irregularity/saucer-shaped defects. On MRI, osteochondral defects were a combination of articular cartilage defect on dorsal images and subchondral flattening/irregularity on sagittal images. Subchondral thickening and osseous short tau inversion recovery hyperintensity were found concurrent with osteochondral defects. Compared with pathological examination, the sensitivity and specificity of diagnosis were 86% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 75%-93%) and 64% (95% CI 38%-85%) for FBCT; 64% (95% CI 51%-76%) and 71% (95% CI 46%-90%) for CBCT; and 52% (95% CI 39%-65%) and 71% (95% CI 46%-90%) for MRI. Sensitivity of all modalities increased with defect size. Macroscopic defect dimensions were strongly correlated with CBCT (r = 0.76, p 
doi_str_mv 10.1111/evj.13973
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2841882077</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3033003703</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-23a38929b74a698636bc7a7f14692e1cc8a66ffdb8109172857c2eb792cd71db3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc9O3DAQxq2qVdkuPfQFKku90EMg_oPtHNGqtJWQuJRz5Njj3awSO7UTCk_EazKwlAO-jGf88-fxfIR8YfUpw3UGt_tTJhot3pEVryWvhKjVe7LC7XnFlJRH5FMp-7oWgkv-kRwJLY1R2qzIwyaNk819SZGmQF2KUHVgR2qjp8HGQ-IQWmbwdE5j2mY77e6fgSH9q0IPg6ej3UaYe0czoJSNDmiPtT5uaUiZepjBzf3hkSmnOzwc6LSzg4131Kdc0ms1lRmS26XoM2YeAt4sx-RDsEOBzy9xTW4uf_zZ_Kqurn_-3lxcVU5IM1dcWGEa3nRaWtUYJVTntNWBSdVwYM4Zq1QIvjOsbpjm5lw7Dp1uuPOa-U6syclBF9v5u0CZ27EvDgbsE9JSWm4kM4bXWiP67Q26T0uO2F0rcNI4bY1hTb4fKJdTKRlCO2X8Zr5vWd0-udeie-2ze8h-fVFcuhH8K_nfLvEIS96Ygg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3033003703</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of cone-beam and fan-beam computed tomography and low-field magnetic resonance imaging for detection of proximal phalanx dorsoproximal osteochondral defects</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Lin, Szu-Ting ; Bolas, Nicholas M ; Sargan, David R ; Restif, Olivier ; Peter, Vanessa G ; Pokora, Rachel ; Patrick, Hayley ; Foote, Alastair K ; Murray, Rachel C</creator><creatorcontrib>Lin, Szu-Ting ; Bolas, Nicholas M ; Sargan, David R ; Restif, Olivier ; Peter, Vanessa G ; Pokora, Rachel ; Patrick, Hayley ; Foote, Alastair K ; Murray, Rachel C</creatorcontrib><description>Dorsoproximal osteochondral defects commonly affect the proximal phalanx, but information about diagnosis on computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is limited. To assess CT and MRI diagnoses of osteochondral defects, describe the lesions and compare sensitivity and specificity of the modalities using macroscopic pathology as gold standard. Cross-sectional study. Thirty-five equine cadaver limbs underwent standing cone-beam CT (CBCT), fan-beam CT (FBCT), low-field MRI and pathological examination. CT and MR images were examined for proximal phalanx dorsomedial and dorsolateral eminence osteochondral defects. Defect dimensions were measured. Imaging diagnoses and measurements were compared with macroscopic examination. Fifty-six defects were seen over 70 potential locations. On CBCT and FBCT, osteochondral defects appeared as subchondral irregularity/saucer-shaped defects. On MRI, osteochondral defects were a combination of articular cartilage defect on dorsal images and subchondral flattening/irregularity on sagittal images. Subchondral thickening and osseous short tau inversion recovery hyperintensity were found concurrent with osteochondral defects. Compared with pathological examination, the sensitivity and specificity of diagnosis were 86% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 75%-93%) and 64% (95% CI 38%-85%) for FBCT; 64% (95% CI 51%-76%) and 71% (95% CI 46%-90%) for CBCT; and 52% (95% CI 39%-65%) and 71% (95% CI 46%-90%) for MRI. Sensitivity of all modalities increased with defect size. Macroscopic defect dimensions were strongly correlated with CBCT (r = 0.76, p &lt; 0.001) and moderately correlated with FBCT and MRI (r = 0.65, p &lt; 0.001). Macroscopic measurements were significantly greater than all imaging modality dimensions (p &lt; 0.001), potentially because macroscopy included articular cartilage pathology. Influence of motion artefact could not be assessed. Osteochondral defects could be visualised using both CT and MRI with sensitivity increasing with defect size. Diagnostic performance was best using FBCT, followed by CBCT then MRI, but CBCT-measured defect size best correlated with macroscopic examination. MRI provided useful information on fluid signal associated with defects, which could represent active pathology.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0425-1644</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2042-3306</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/evj.13973</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37488678</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Cartilage ; Defects ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Pathology ; Tomography</subject><ispartof>Equine veterinary journal, 2024-05, Vol.56 (3), p.484-493</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. Equine Veterinary Journal published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of EVJ Ltd.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-23a38929b74a698636bc7a7f14692e1cc8a66ffdb8109172857c2eb792cd71db3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-23a38929b74a698636bc7a7f14692e1cc8a66ffdb8109172857c2eb792cd71db3</cites><orcidid>0009-0008-6048-1092</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37488678$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lin, Szu-Ting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolas, Nicholas M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sargan, David R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Restif, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peter, Vanessa G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pokora, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patrick, Hayley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foote, Alastair K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, Rachel C</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of cone-beam and fan-beam computed tomography and low-field magnetic resonance imaging for detection of proximal phalanx dorsoproximal osteochondral defects</title><title>Equine veterinary journal</title><addtitle>Equine Vet J</addtitle><description>Dorsoproximal osteochondral defects commonly affect the proximal phalanx, but information about diagnosis on computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is limited. To assess CT and MRI diagnoses of osteochondral defects, describe the lesions and compare sensitivity and specificity of the modalities using macroscopic pathology as gold standard. Cross-sectional study. Thirty-five equine cadaver limbs underwent standing cone-beam CT (CBCT), fan-beam CT (FBCT), low-field MRI and pathological examination. CT and MR images were examined for proximal phalanx dorsomedial and dorsolateral eminence osteochondral defects. Defect dimensions were measured. Imaging diagnoses and measurements were compared with macroscopic examination. Fifty-six defects were seen over 70 potential locations. On CBCT and FBCT, osteochondral defects appeared as subchondral irregularity/saucer-shaped defects. On MRI, osteochondral defects were a combination of articular cartilage defect on dorsal images and subchondral flattening/irregularity on sagittal images. Subchondral thickening and osseous short tau inversion recovery hyperintensity were found concurrent with osteochondral defects. Compared with pathological examination, the sensitivity and specificity of diagnosis were 86% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 75%-93%) and 64% (95% CI 38%-85%) for FBCT; 64% (95% CI 51%-76%) and 71% (95% CI 46%-90%) for CBCT; and 52% (95% CI 39%-65%) and 71% (95% CI 46%-90%) for MRI. Sensitivity of all modalities increased with defect size. Macroscopic defect dimensions were strongly correlated with CBCT (r = 0.76, p &lt; 0.001) and moderately correlated with FBCT and MRI (r = 0.65, p &lt; 0.001). Macroscopic measurements were significantly greater than all imaging modality dimensions (p &lt; 0.001), potentially because macroscopy included articular cartilage pathology. Influence of motion artefact could not be assessed. Osteochondral defects could be visualised using both CT and MRI with sensitivity increasing with defect size. Diagnostic performance was best using FBCT, followed by CBCT then MRI, but CBCT-measured defect size best correlated with macroscopic examination. MRI provided useful information on fluid signal associated with defects, which could represent active pathology.</description><subject>Cartilage</subject><subject>Defects</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Pathology</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><issn>0425-1644</issn><issn>2042-3306</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkc9O3DAQxq2qVdkuPfQFKku90EMg_oPtHNGqtJWQuJRz5Njj3awSO7UTCk_EazKwlAO-jGf88-fxfIR8YfUpw3UGt_tTJhot3pEVryWvhKjVe7LC7XnFlJRH5FMp-7oWgkv-kRwJLY1R2qzIwyaNk819SZGmQF2KUHVgR2qjp8HGQ-IQWmbwdE5j2mY77e6fgSH9q0IPg6ej3UaYe0czoJSNDmiPtT5uaUiZepjBzf3hkSmnOzwc6LSzg4131Kdc0ms1lRmS26XoM2YeAt4sx-RDsEOBzy9xTW4uf_zZ_Kqurn_-3lxcVU5IM1dcWGEa3nRaWtUYJVTntNWBSdVwYM4Zq1QIvjOsbpjm5lw7Dp1uuPOa-U6syclBF9v5u0CZ27EvDgbsE9JSWm4kM4bXWiP67Q26T0uO2F0rcNI4bY1hTb4fKJdTKRlCO2X8Zr5vWd0-udeie-2ze8h-fVFcuhH8K_nfLvEIS96Ygg</recordid><startdate>20240501</startdate><enddate>20240501</enddate><creator>Lin, Szu-Ting</creator><creator>Bolas, Nicholas M</creator><creator>Sargan, David R</creator><creator>Restif, Olivier</creator><creator>Peter, Vanessa G</creator><creator>Pokora, Rachel</creator><creator>Patrick, Hayley</creator><creator>Foote, Alastair K</creator><creator>Murray, Rachel C</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6048-1092</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240501</creationdate><title>Comparison of cone-beam and fan-beam computed tomography and low-field magnetic resonance imaging for detection of proximal phalanx dorsoproximal osteochondral defects</title><author>Lin, Szu-Ting ; Bolas, Nicholas M ; Sargan, David R ; Restif, Olivier ; Peter, Vanessa G ; Pokora, Rachel ; Patrick, Hayley ; Foote, Alastair K ; Murray, Rachel C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-23a38929b74a698636bc7a7f14692e1cc8a66ffdb8109172857c2eb792cd71db3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Cartilage</topic><topic>Defects</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Pathology</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lin, Szu-Ting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolas, Nicholas M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sargan, David R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Restif, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peter, Vanessa G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pokora, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patrick, Hayley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foote, Alastair K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, Rachel C</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Equine veterinary journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lin, Szu-Ting</au><au>Bolas, Nicholas M</au><au>Sargan, David R</au><au>Restif, Olivier</au><au>Peter, Vanessa G</au><au>Pokora, Rachel</au><au>Patrick, Hayley</au><au>Foote, Alastair K</au><au>Murray, Rachel C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of cone-beam and fan-beam computed tomography and low-field magnetic resonance imaging for detection of proximal phalanx dorsoproximal osteochondral defects</atitle><jtitle>Equine veterinary journal</jtitle><addtitle>Equine Vet J</addtitle><date>2024-05-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>484</spage><epage>493</epage><pages>484-493</pages><issn>0425-1644</issn><eissn>2042-3306</eissn><abstract>Dorsoproximal osteochondral defects commonly affect the proximal phalanx, but information about diagnosis on computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is limited. To assess CT and MRI diagnoses of osteochondral defects, describe the lesions and compare sensitivity and specificity of the modalities using macroscopic pathology as gold standard. Cross-sectional study. Thirty-five equine cadaver limbs underwent standing cone-beam CT (CBCT), fan-beam CT (FBCT), low-field MRI and pathological examination. CT and MR images were examined for proximal phalanx dorsomedial and dorsolateral eminence osteochondral defects. Defect dimensions were measured. Imaging diagnoses and measurements were compared with macroscopic examination. Fifty-six defects were seen over 70 potential locations. On CBCT and FBCT, osteochondral defects appeared as subchondral irregularity/saucer-shaped defects. On MRI, osteochondral defects were a combination of articular cartilage defect on dorsal images and subchondral flattening/irregularity on sagittal images. Subchondral thickening and osseous short tau inversion recovery hyperintensity were found concurrent with osteochondral defects. Compared with pathological examination, the sensitivity and specificity of diagnosis were 86% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 75%-93%) and 64% (95% CI 38%-85%) for FBCT; 64% (95% CI 51%-76%) and 71% (95% CI 46%-90%) for CBCT; and 52% (95% CI 39%-65%) and 71% (95% CI 46%-90%) for MRI. Sensitivity of all modalities increased with defect size. Macroscopic defect dimensions were strongly correlated with CBCT (r = 0.76, p &lt; 0.001) and moderately correlated with FBCT and MRI (r = 0.65, p &lt; 0.001). Macroscopic measurements were significantly greater than all imaging modality dimensions (p &lt; 0.001), potentially because macroscopy included articular cartilage pathology. Influence of motion artefact could not be assessed. Osteochondral defects could be visualised using both CT and MRI with sensitivity increasing with defect size. Diagnostic performance was best using FBCT, followed by CBCT then MRI, but CBCT-measured defect size best correlated with macroscopic examination. MRI provided useful information on fluid signal associated with defects, which could represent active pathology.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>37488678</pmid><doi>10.1111/evj.13973</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6048-1092</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0425-1644
ispartof Equine veterinary journal, 2024-05, Vol.56 (3), p.484-493
issn 0425-1644
2042-3306
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2841882077
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Cartilage
Defects
Magnetic resonance imaging
Pathology
Tomography
title Comparison of cone-beam and fan-beam computed tomography and low-field magnetic resonance imaging for detection of proximal phalanx dorsoproximal osteochondral defects
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T03%3A38%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20cone-beam%20and%20fan-beam%20computed%20tomography%20and%20low-field%20magnetic%20resonance%20imaging%20for%20detection%20of%20proximal%20phalanx%20dorsoproximal%20osteochondral%20defects&rft.jtitle=Equine%20veterinary%20journal&rft.au=Lin,%20Szu-Ting&rft.date=2024-05-01&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=484&rft.epage=493&rft.pages=484-493&rft.issn=0425-1644&rft.eissn=2042-3306&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/evj.13973&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3033003703%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3033003703&rft_id=info:pmid/37488678&rfr_iscdi=true