The nutritional impact of CD19-targeted CAR-T therapy versus BEAM chemotherapy for adult patients with lymphoma
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy is a novel therapy demonstrating durable remissions in patients with refractory or relapsing non-Hodgkin's B-cell lymphoma. Maintaining a patient's nutritional status has been demonstrated to improve outcomes in cancer treatment. However, no...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of human nutrition and dietetics 2023-10, Vol.36 (5), p.2099-2107 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2107 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 2099 |
container_title | Journal of human nutrition and dietetics |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | Ahern, Katie Pham, James Sanderson, Robin Correia De Farias, Madson Walsh, Kevin |
description | Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy is a novel therapy demonstrating durable remissions in patients with refractory or relapsing non-Hodgkin's B-cell lymphoma. Maintaining a patient's nutritional status has been demonstrated to improve outcomes in cancer treatment. However, no studies have investigated how CAR-T therapy affects nutritional status, nor compared its impact with other cancer treatments for this patient group. The primary aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of CAR-T therapy on the prevalence of nutrition impact symptoms (NIS) and nutritional status within 30 days post-treatment of patients with lymphoma compared to a conditioning regimen for autologous haematopoetic stem cell transplant (carmustine/BCNU, Etoposide, cytarabine/Ara-C, Melphalan [BEAM] auto-haematopoetic stem cell transplant [HSCT]).
Clinical notes of patients with lymphoma who underwent either CAR-T therapy or BEAM auto-HSCT between 2018 and 2021 were reviewed. Data extracted included body weight measurements and NIS, including decreased appetite, nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, constipation, mucositis, cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity at baseline and 30 ± 7 days post-treatment.
In total, 129 adults with lymphoma (n = 88 CAR-T vs. n = 41 BEAM) were included. Nutritional status was assessed in both groups at baseline prior to treatment. Mean absolute weight change was significantly different between groups (3.05 kg in CAR-T, -5.9 kg in BEAM, p ≤ 0.001). This was also significant when weight loss was categorised into percentage weight loss (p = 0.01). CAR-T patients experienced a significantly lower prevalence of decreased appetite (52.3% vs. 97.6%) nausea (25% vs. 78%,) vomiting (10.2% vs. 53.7%), diarrhoea (43.2% vs. 96.7%) and mucositis (5.7% vs. 75.6%) combined across all levels of severity compared to BEAM chemotherapy (all p ≤ 0.01). CRS and neurotoxicity, which are specific side effects of CAR-T therapy, were moderately positively associated with weight loss.
Weight loss, percentage weight loss and NIS were significantly reduced in CAR-T compared to BEAM treatment. However, patients who experienced neurotoxicity during treatment did have significant weight loss. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jhn.13210 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2841881091</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2866621879</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c313t-d88bf4747784458321cd2cdac06f1ef996e8733ca723248025bb2b0bc482849b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0T1PwzAQBmALgWgpDPwBZIkFhhR_JXbGEsqHVISEisQWOY5DUiVxsB1Q_z0pbRm45YZ7dNLdC8A5RlM81M2qbKeYEowOwBjTKAwI5--HYIzikARUcDwCJ86tEEIRRugYjChnIg4ZHgOzLDVse28rX5lW1rBqOqk8NAVM7nAceGk_tNc5TGavwRL6UlvZreGXtq538HY-e4aq1I3ZDwpjocz72sNO-kq33sHvypewXjddaRp5Co4KWTt9tusT8HY_XyaPweLl4SmZLQJFMfVBLkRWMM44F4yFYrhN5UTlUqGowLqI40gLTqmSnFDCBCJhlpEMZYoJIlic0Qm42u7trPnstfNpUzml61q22vQuHRQWAqMYD_TyH12Z3g6_2KgoiggWPB7U9VYpa5yzukg7WzXSrlOM0k0K6ZBC-pvCYC92G_us0fmf3L-d_gAJGoE7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2866621879</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The nutritional impact of CD19-targeted CAR-T therapy versus BEAM chemotherapy for adult patients with lymphoma</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Ahern, Katie ; Pham, James ; Sanderson, Robin ; Correia De Farias, Madson ; Walsh, Kevin</creator><creatorcontrib>Ahern, Katie ; Pham, James ; Sanderson, Robin ; Correia De Farias, Madson ; Walsh, Kevin</creatorcontrib><description>Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy is a novel therapy demonstrating durable remissions in patients with refractory or relapsing non-Hodgkin's B-cell lymphoma. Maintaining a patient's nutritional status has been demonstrated to improve outcomes in cancer treatment. However, no studies have investigated how CAR-T therapy affects nutritional status, nor compared its impact with other cancer treatments for this patient group. The primary aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of CAR-T therapy on the prevalence of nutrition impact symptoms (NIS) and nutritional status within 30 days post-treatment of patients with lymphoma compared to a conditioning regimen for autologous haematopoetic stem cell transplant (carmustine/BCNU, Etoposide, cytarabine/Ara-C, Melphalan [BEAM] auto-haematopoetic stem cell transplant [HSCT]).
Clinical notes of patients with lymphoma who underwent either CAR-T therapy or BEAM auto-HSCT between 2018 and 2021 were reviewed. Data extracted included body weight measurements and NIS, including decreased appetite, nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, constipation, mucositis, cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity at baseline and 30 ± 7 days post-treatment.
In total, 129 adults with lymphoma (n = 88 CAR-T vs. n = 41 BEAM) were included. Nutritional status was assessed in both groups at baseline prior to treatment. Mean absolute weight change was significantly different between groups (3.05 kg in CAR-T, -5.9 kg in BEAM, p ≤ 0.001). This was also significant when weight loss was categorised into percentage weight loss (p = 0.01). CAR-T patients experienced a significantly lower prevalence of decreased appetite (52.3% vs. 97.6%) nausea (25% vs. 78%,) vomiting (10.2% vs. 53.7%), diarrhoea (43.2% vs. 96.7%) and mucositis (5.7% vs. 75.6%) combined across all levels of severity compared to BEAM chemotherapy (all p ≤ 0.01). CRS and neurotoxicity, which are specific side effects of CAR-T therapy, were moderately positively associated with weight loss.
Weight loss, percentage weight loss and NIS were significantly reduced in CAR-T compared to BEAM treatment. However, patients who experienced neurotoxicity during treatment did have significant weight loss.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0952-3871</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-277X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jhn.13210</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37489541</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adults ; Antigens ; Appetite loss ; Autografts ; Body weight ; Body weight loss ; Cancer ; Cancer therapies ; CD19 antigen ; Cell therapy ; Chemotherapy ; Chimeric antigen receptors ; Constipation ; Cytarabine ; Diarrhea ; Etoposide ; Health services ; Lymphoma ; Melphalan ; Mucositis ; Nausea ; Neurotoxicity ; Nutrition ; Nutritional status ; Patients ; Receptors ; Side effects ; Stem cell transplantation ; Stem cells ; Vomiting ; Weight loss</subject><ispartof>Journal of human nutrition and dietetics, 2023-10, Vol.36 (5), p.2099-2107</ispartof><rights>2023 British Dietetic Association.</rights><rights>2023 The British Dietetic Association Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c313t-d88bf4747784458321cd2cdac06f1ef996e8733ca723248025bb2b0bc482849b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c313t-d88bf4747784458321cd2cdac06f1ef996e8733ca723248025bb2b0bc482849b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4915-2833</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37489541$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ahern, Katie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pham, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanderson, Robin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Correia De Farias, Madson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walsh, Kevin</creatorcontrib><title>The nutritional impact of CD19-targeted CAR-T therapy versus BEAM chemotherapy for adult patients with lymphoma</title><title>Journal of human nutrition and dietetics</title><addtitle>J Hum Nutr Diet</addtitle><description>Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy is a novel therapy demonstrating durable remissions in patients with refractory or relapsing non-Hodgkin's B-cell lymphoma. Maintaining a patient's nutritional status has been demonstrated to improve outcomes in cancer treatment. However, no studies have investigated how CAR-T therapy affects nutritional status, nor compared its impact with other cancer treatments for this patient group. The primary aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of CAR-T therapy on the prevalence of nutrition impact symptoms (NIS) and nutritional status within 30 days post-treatment of patients with lymphoma compared to a conditioning regimen for autologous haematopoetic stem cell transplant (carmustine/BCNU, Etoposide, cytarabine/Ara-C, Melphalan [BEAM] auto-haematopoetic stem cell transplant [HSCT]).
Clinical notes of patients with lymphoma who underwent either CAR-T therapy or BEAM auto-HSCT between 2018 and 2021 were reviewed. Data extracted included body weight measurements and NIS, including decreased appetite, nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, constipation, mucositis, cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity at baseline and 30 ± 7 days post-treatment.
In total, 129 adults with lymphoma (n = 88 CAR-T vs. n = 41 BEAM) were included. Nutritional status was assessed in both groups at baseline prior to treatment. Mean absolute weight change was significantly different between groups (3.05 kg in CAR-T, -5.9 kg in BEAM, p ≤ 0.001). This was also significant when weight loss was categorised into percentage weight loss (p = 0.01). CAR-T patients experienced a significantly lower prevalence of decreased appetite (52.3% vs. 97.6%) nausea (25% vs. 78%,) vomiting (10.2% vs. 53.7%), diarrhoea (43.2% vs. 96.7%) and mucositis (5.7% vs. 75.6%) combined across all levels of severity compared to BEAM chemotherapy (all p ≤ 0.01). CRS and neurotoxicity, which are specific side effects of CAR-T therapy, were moderately positively associated with weight loss.
Weight loss, percentage weight loss and NIS were significantly reduced in CAR-T compared to BEAM treatment. However, patients who experienced neurotoxicity during treatment did have significant weight loss.</description><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Antigens</subject><subject>Appetite loss</subject><subject>Autografts</subject><subject>Body weight</subject><subject>Body weight loss</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>CD19 antigen</subject><subject>Cell therapy</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Chimeric antigen receptors</subject><subject>Constipation</subject><subject>Cytarabine</subject><subject>Diarrhea</subject><subject>Etoposide</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Lymphoma</subject><subject>Melphalan</subject><subject>Mucositis</subject><subject>Nausea</subject><subject>Neurotoxicity</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Nutritional status</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Receptors</subject><subject>Side effects</subject><subject>Stem cell transplantation</subject><subject>Stem cells</subject><subject>Vomiting</subject><subject>Weight loss</subject><issn>0952-3871</issn><issn>1365-277X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpd0T1PwzAQBmALgWgpDPwBZIkFhhR_JXbGEsqHVISEisQWOY5DUiVxsB1Q_z0pbRm45YZ7dNLdC8A5RlM81M2qbKeYEowOwBjTKAwI5--HYIzikARUcDwCJ86tEEIRRugYjChnIg4ZHgOzLDVse28rX5lW1rBqOqk8NAVM7nAceGk_tNc5TGavwRL6UlvZreGXtq538HY-e4aq1I3ZDwpjocz72sNO-kq33sHvypewXjddaRp5Co4KWTt9tusT8HY_XyaPweLl4SmZLQJFMfVBLkRWMM44F4yFYrhN5UTlUqGowLqI40gLTqmSnFDCBCJhlpEMZYoJIlic0Qm42u7trPnstfNpUzml61q22vQuHRQWAqMYD_TyH12Z3g6_2KgoiggWPB7U9VYpa5yzukg7WzXSrlOM0k0K6ZBC-pvCYC92G_us0fmf3L-d_gAJGoE7</recordid><startdate>20231001</startdate><enddate>20231001</enddate><creator>Ahern, Katie</creator><creator>Pham, James</creator><creator>Sanderson, Robin</creator><creator>Correia De Farias, Madson</creator><creator>Walsh, Kevin</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4915-2833</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231001</creationdate><title>The nutritional impact of CD19-targeted CAR-T therapy versus BEAM chemotherapy for adult patients with lymphoma</title><author>Ahern, Katie ; Pham, James ; Sanderson, Robin ; Correia De Farias, Madson ; Walsh, Kevin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c313t-d88bf4747784458321cd2cdac06f1ef996e8733ca723248025bb2b0bc482849b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Antigens</topic><topic>Appetite loss</topic><topic>Autografts</topic><topic>Body weight</topic><topic>Body weight loss</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>CD19 antigen</topic><topic>Cell therapy</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Chimeric antigen receptors</topic><topic>Constipation</topic><topic>Cytarabine</topic><topic>Diarrhea</topic><topic>Etoposide</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Lymphoma</topic><topic>Melphalan</topic><topic>Mucositis</topic><topic>Nausea</topic><topic>Neurotoxicity</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Nutritional status</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Receptors</topic><topic>Side effects</topic><topic>Stem cell transplantation</topic><topic>Stem cells</topic><topic>Vomiting</topic><topic>Weight loss</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ahern, Katie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pham, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanderson, Robin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Correia De Farias, Madson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walsh, Kevin</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of human nutrition and dietetics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ahern, Katie</au><au>Pham, James</au><au>Sanderson, Robin</au><au>Correia De Farias, Madson</au><au>Walsh, Kevin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The nutritional impact of CD19-targeted CAR-T therapy versus BEAM chemotherapy for adult patients with lymphoma</atitle><jtitle>Journal of human nutrition and dietetics</jtitle><addtitle>J Hum Nutr Diet</addtitle><date>2023-10-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>2099</spage><epage>2107</epage><pages>2099-2107</pages><issn>0952-3871</issn><eissn>1365-277X</eissn><abstract>Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy is a novel therapy demonstrating durable remissions in patients with refractory or relapsing non-Hodgkin's B-cell lymphoma. Maintaining a patient's nutritional status has been demonstrated to improve outcomes in cancer treatment. However, no studies have investigated how CAR-T therapy affects nutritional status, nor compared its impact with other cancer treatments for this patient group. The primary aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of CAR-T therapy on the prevalence of nutrition impact symptoms (NIS) and nutritional status within 30 days post-treatment of patients with lymphoma compared to a conditioning regimen for autologous haematopoetic stem cell transplant (carmustine/BCNU, Etoposide, cytarabine/Ara-C, Melphalan [BEAM] auto-haematopoetic stem cell transplant [HSCT]).
Clinical notes of patients with lymphoma who underwent either CAR-T therapy or BEAM auto-HSCT between 2018 and 2021 were reviewed. Data extracted included body weight measurements and NIS, including decreased appetite, nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, constipation, mucositis, cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity at baseline and 30 ± 7 days post-treatment.
In total, 129 adults with lymphoma (n = 88 CAR-T vs. n = 41 BEAM) were included. Nutritional status was assessed in both groups at baseline prior to treatment. Mean absolute weight change was significantly different between groups (3.05 kg in CAR-T, -5.9 kg in BEAM, p ≤ 0.001). This was also significant when weight loss was categorised into percentage weight loss (p = 0.01). CAR-T patients experienced a significantly lower prevalence of decreased appetite (52.3% vs. 97.6%) nausea (25% vs. 78%,) vomiting (10.2% vs. 53.7%), diarrhoea (43.2% vs. 96.7%) and mucositis (5.7% vs. 75.6%) combined across all levels of severity compared to BEAM chemotherapy (all p ≤ 0.01). CRS and neurotoxicity, which are specific side effects of CAR-T therapy, were moderately positively associated with weight loss.
Weight loss, percentage weight loss and NIS were significantly reduced in CAR-T compared to BEAM treatment. However, patients who experienced neurotoxicity during treatment did have significant weight loss.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>37489541</pmid><doi>10.1111/jhn.13210</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4915-2833</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0952-3871 |
ispartof | Journal of human nutrition and dietetics, 2023-10, Vol.36 (5), p.2099-2107 |
issn | 0952-3871 1365-277X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2841881091 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Adults Antigens Appetite loss Autografts Body weight Body weight loss Cancer Cancer therapies CD19 antigen Cell therapy Chemotherapy Chimeric antigen receptors Constipation Cytarabine Diarrhea Etoposide Health services Lymphoma Melphalan Mucositis Nausea Neurotoxicity Nutrition Nutritional status Patients Receptors Side effects Stem cell transplantation Stem cells Vomiting Weight loss |
title | The nutritional impact of CD19-targeted CAR-T therapy versus BEAM chemotherapy for adult patients with lymphoma |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T08%3A53%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20nutritional%20impact%20of%20CD19-targeted%20CAR-T%20therapy%20versus%20BEAM%20chemotherapy%20for%20adult%20patients%20with%20lymphoma&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20human%20nutrition%20and%20dietetics&rft.au=Ahern,%20Katie&rft.date=2023-10-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2099&rft.epage=2107&rft.pages=2099-2107&rft.issn=0952-3871&rft.eissn=1365-277X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jhn.13210&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2866621879%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2866621879&rft_id=info:pmid/37489541&rfr_iscdi=true |