Occurrence and chemical control strategy of wheat brown foot rot caused by Microdochium majus

Wheat brown foot rot (WBFR) caused by a variety of phytopathogenic fungi, is an important soil-borne and seed-borne disease of wheat. WBFR causes wheat lodging and seedling dieback, which seriously affects the yield and quality of wheat. In this study, 64 isolates of WBFR were isolated from differen...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Plant disease 2023-11, Vol.107 (11), p.3523-3530
Hauptverfasser: Mao, Yushuai, Wu, Jian, Song, Wen, Zhao, Baoquan, Zhao, Huahua, Cai, Yiqiang, Wang, Jian-Xin, Zhou, Mingguo, Duan, Yabing
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3530
container_issue 11
container_start_page 3523
container_title Plant disease
container_volume 107
creator Mao, Yushuai
Wu, Jian
Song, Wen
Zhao, Baoquan
Zhao, Huahua
Cai, Yiqiang
Wang, Jian-Xin
Zhou, Mingguo
Duan, Yabing
description Wheat brown foot rot (WBFR) caused by a variety of phytopathogenic fungi, is an important soil-borne and seed-borne disease of wheat. WBFR causes wheat lodging and seedling dieback, which seriously affects the yield and quality of wheat. In this study, 64 isolates of WBFR were isolated from different wheat fields in Yancheng city, Jiangsu Province, China. Three pairs of primers were used to amplify the fragments of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS), elongation factor 1 alpha (EF-1α) and RNA polymerase II subunit (RPB2) respectively, and the sequencing results of the fragments were analyzed with BLAST on NCBI. Through morphological and molecular identification, all the isolates were identified as Microdochium majus (Wollenweber) Glynn & Edwards. Koch's postulates verification confirmed that M. majus was the pathogen causing WBFR. Moreover, the antifungal activities of prochloraz and fludioxonil against 64 isolates of M. majus were determined based on the mycelial growth inhibition method. The results showed that fludioxonil and prochloraz had good antifungal activity against M. majus. The mean EC50 values of fludioxonil and prochloraz against M. majus were 0.2956±0.1285 μg/mL and 0.0422±0.0157 μg/mL, respectively. Pot experiments indicated that M. majus severely damaged the normal growth of wheat, while seed coating with prochloraz and fludioxonil significantly reduced the disease incidence and improved the seedling survival rates. At doses of 7.5g/100kg of fludioxonil and 15g/100kg of prochloraz, the incidence was reduced by 22.26% and 25.33%, seedling survival rates increased by 25.37% and 22.66%, and the control efficacy reached 70.02% and 72.30%, respectively. These findings provide vital references for accurate diagnosis and effective management of WBFR.
doi_str_mv 10.1094/PDIS-02-23-0392-RE
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2841405510</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2841405510</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-3f3ab1d8a84361b777f7d6f08fd1b6dd7588be51dd4481fe3e36fbc82b224c6e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEtLAzEAhIMotj7-gAfJ0Us0rybZo9SqhYpS9SghT7uyu9Fkl9J_b4uPwzCXmWH4ADgj-JLgil893cyfEaaIMoRZRdFytgfGpOIMSVHRfTDGpCKIVkSOwFEpHxhjzoU6BCMmuRJU8jF4e3RuyDl0LkDTeehWoa2daaBLXZ9TA0ufTR_eNzBFuF4F00Ob07qDMaUe5q2cGUrw0G7gQ-1y8smt6qGFrfkYygk4iKYp4fTXj8Hr7exleo8Wj3fz6fUCOYZZj1hkxhKvjOJMECuljNKLiFX0xArv5UQpGybEe84ViYEFJqJ1ilpKuROBHYOLn93PnL6GUHrd1sWFpjFdSEPRVHHC8WRC8DZKf6Lbr6XkEPVnrluTN5pgvcOqd1g1ppoyvcOql7Nt6fx3f7Bt8P-VP47sG-ocdRw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2841405510</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Occurrence and chemical control strategy of wheat brown foot rot caused by Microdochium majus</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>American Phytopathological Society Journal Back Issues</source><creator>Mao, Yushuai ; Wu, Jian ; Song, Wen ; Zhao, Baoquan ; Zhao, Huahua ; Cai, Yiqiang ; Wang, Jian-Xin ; Zhou, Mingguo ; Duan, Yabing</creator><creatorcontrib>Mao, Yushuai ; Wu, Jian ; Song, Wen ; Zhao, Baoquan ; Zhao, Huahua ; Cai, Yiqiang ; Wang, Jian-Xin ; Zhou, Mingguo ; Duan, Yabing</creatorcontrib><description>Wheat brown foot rot (WBFR) caused by a variety of phytopathogenic fungi, is an important soil-borne and seed-borne disease of wheat. WBFR causes wheat lodging and seedling dieback, which seriously affects the yield and quality of wheat. In this study, 64 isolates of WBFR were isolated from different wheat fields in Yancheng city, Jiangsu Province, China. Three pairs of primers were used to amplify the fragments of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS), elongation factor 1 alpha (EF-1α) and RNA polymerase II subunit (RPB2) respectively, and the sequencing results of the fragments were analyzed with BLAST on NCBI. Through morphological and molecular identification, all the isolates were identified as Microdochium majus (Wollenweber) Glynn &amp; Edwards. Koch's postulates verification confirmed that M. majus was the pathogen causing WBFR. Moreover, the antifungal activities of prochloraz and fludioxonil against 64 isolates of M. majus were determined based on the mycelial growth inhibition method. The results showed that fludioxonil and prochloraz had good antifungal activity against M. majus. The mean EC50 values of fludioxonil and prochloraz against M. majus were 0.2956±0.1285 μg/mL and 0.0422±0.0157 μg/mL, respectively. Pot experiments indicated that M. majus severely damaged the normal growth of wheat, while seed coating with prochloraz and fludioxonil significantly reduced the disease incidence and improved the seedling survival rates. At doses of 7.5g/100kg of fludioxonil and 15g/100kg of prochloraz, the incidence was reduced by 22.26% and 25.33%, seedling survival rates increased by 25.37% and 22.66%, and the control efficacy reached 70.02% and 72.30%, respectively. These findings provide vital references for accurate diagnosis and effective management of WBFR.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0191-2917</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-7692</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1094/PDIS-02-23-0392-RE</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37486274</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><ispartof>Plant disease, 2023-11, Vol.107 (11), p.3523-3530</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-3f3ab1d8a84361b777f7d6f08fd1b6dd7588be51dd4481fe3e36fbc82b224c6e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-3f3ab1d8a84361b777f7d6f08fd1b6dd7588be51dd4481fe3e36fbc82b224c6e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6244-0376 ; 0000-0002-4183-8729 ; 0000-0001-9612-9228</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3724,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37486274$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mao, Yushuai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Jian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Wen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Baoquan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Huahua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cai, Yiqiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jian-Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Mingguo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duan, Yabing</creatorcontrib><title>Occurrence and chemical control strategy of wheat brown foot rot caused by Microdochium majus</title><title>Plant disease</title><addtitle>Plant Dis</addtitle><description>Wheat brown foot rot (WBFR) caused by a variety of phytopathogenic fungi, is an important soil-borne and seed-borne disease of wheat. WBFR causes wheat lodging and seedling dieback, which seriously affects the yield and quality of wheat. In this study, 64 isolates of WBFR were isolated from different wheat fields in Yancheng city, Jiangsu Province, China. Three pairs of primers were used to amplify the fragments of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS), elongation factor 1 alpha (EF-1α) and RNA polymerase II subunit (RPB2) respectively, and the sequencing results of the fragments were analyzed with BLAST on NCBI. Through morphological and molecular identification, all the isolates were identified as Microdochium majus (Wollenweber) Glynn &amp; Edwards. Koch's postulates verification confirmed that M. majus was the pathogen causing WBFR. Moreover, the antifungal activities of prochloraz and fludioxonil against 64 isolates of M. majus were determined based on the mycelial growth inhibition method. The results showed that fludioxonil and prochloraz had good antifungal activity against M. majus. The mean EC50 values of fludioxonil and prochloraz against M. majus were 0.2956±0.1285 μg/mL and 0.0422±0.0157 μg/mL, respectively. Pot experiments indicated that M. majus severely damaged the normal growth of wheat, while seed coating with prochloraz and fludioxonil significantly reduced the disease incidence and improved the seedling survival rates. At doses of 7.5g/100kg of fludioxonil and 15g/100kg of prochloraz, the incidence was reduced by 22.26% and 25.33%, seedling survival rates increased by 25.37% and 22.66%, and the control efficacy reached 70.02% and 72.30%, respectively. These findings provide vital references for accurate diagnosis and effective management of WBFR.</description><issn>0191-2917</issn><issn>1943-7692</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kEtLAzEAhIMotj7-gAfJ0Us0rybZo9SqhYpS9SghT7uyu9Fkl9J_b4uPwzCXmWH4ADgj-JLgil893cyfEaaIMoRZRdFytgfGpOIMSVHRfTDGpCKIVkSOwFEpHxhjzoU6BCMmuRJU8jF4e3RuyDl0LkDTeehWoa2daaBLXZ9TA0ufTR_eNzBFuF4F00Ob07qDMaUe5q2cGUrw0G7gQ-1y8smt6qGFrfkYygk4iKYp4fTXj8Hr7exleo8Wj3fz6fUCOYZZj1hkxhKvjOJMECuljNKLiFX0xArv5UQpGybEe84ViYEFJqJ1ilpKuROBHYOLn93PnL6GUHrd1sWFpjFdSEPRVHHC8WRC8DZKf6Lbr6XkEPVnrluTN5pgvcOqd1g1ppoyvcOql7Nt6fx3f7Bt8P-VP47sG-ocdRw</recordid><startdate>20231101</startdate><enddate>20231101</enddate><creator>Mao, Yushuai</creator><creator>Wu, Jian</creator><creator>Song, Wen</creator><creator>Zhao, Baoquan</creator><creator>Zhao, Huahua</creator><creator>Cai, Yiqiang</creator><creator>Wang, Jian-Xin</creator><creator>Zhou, Mingguo</creator><creator>Duan, Yabing</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6244-0376</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4183-8729</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9612-9228</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231101</creationdate><title>Occurrence and chemical control strategy of wheat brown foot rot caused by Microdochium majus</title><author>Mao, Yushuai ; Wu, Jian ; Song, Wen ; Zhao, Baoquan ; Zhao, Huahua ; Cai, Yiqiang ; Wang, Jian-Xin ; Zhou, Mingguo ; Duan, Yabing</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-3f3ab1d8a84361b777f7d6f08fd1b6dd7588be51dd4481fe3e36fbc82b224c6e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mao, Yushuai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Jian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Wen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Baoquan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Huahua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cai, Yiqiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jian-Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Mingguo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duan, Yabing</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Plant disease</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mao, Yushuai</au><au>Wu, Jian</au><au>Song, Wen</au><au>Zhao, Baoquan</au><au>Zhao, Huahua</au><au>Cai, Yiqiang</au><au>Wang, Jian-Xin</au><au>Zhou, Mingguo</au><au>Duan, Yabing</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Occurrence and chemical control strategy of wheat brown foot rot caused by Microdochium majus</atitle><jtitle>Plant disease</jtitle><addtitle>Plant Dis</addtitle><date>2023-11-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>107</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>3523</spage><epage>3530</epage><pages>3523-3530</pages><issn>0191-2917</issn><eissn>1943-7692</eissn><abstract>Wheat brown foot rot (WBFR) caused by a variety of phytopathogenic fungi, is an important soil-borne and seed-borne disease of wheat. WBFR causes wheat lodging and seedling dieback, which seriously affects the yield and quality of wheat. In this study, 64 isolates of WBFR were isolated from different wheat fields in Yancheng city, Jiangsu Province, China. Three pairs of primers were used to amplify the fragments of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS), elongation factor 1 alpha (EF-1α) and RNA polymerase II subunit (RPB2) respectively, and the sequencing results of the fragments were analyzed with BLAST on NCBI. Through morphological and molecular identification, all the isolates were identified as Microdochium majus (Wollenweber) Glynn &amp; Edwards. Koch's postulates verification confirmed that M. majus was the pathogen causing WBFR. Moreover, the antifungal activities of prochloraz and fludioxonil against 64 isolates of M. majus were determined based on the mycelial growth inhibition method. The results showed that fludioxonil and prochloraz had good antifungal activity against M. majus. The mean EC50 values of fludioxonil and prochloraz against M. majus were 0.2956±0.1285 μg/mL and 0.0422±0.0157 μg/mL, respectively. Pot experiments indicated that M. majus severely damaged the normal growth of wheat, while seed coating with prochloraz and fludioxonil significantly reduced the disease incidence and improved the seedling survival rates. At doses of 7.5g/100kg of fludioxonil and 15g/100kg of prochloraz, the incidence was reduced by 22.26% and 25.33%, seedling survival rates increased by 25.37% and 22.66%, and the control efficacy reached 70.02% and 72.30%, respectively. These findings provide vital references for accurate diagnosis and effective management of WBFR.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>37486274</pmid><doi>10.1094/PDIS-02-23-0392-RE</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6244-0376</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4183-8729</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9612-9228</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0191-2917
ispartof Plant disease, 2023-11, Vol.107 (11), p.3523-3530
issn 0191-2917
1943-7692
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2841405510
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection; American Phytopathological Society Journal Back Issues
title Occurrence and chemical control strategy of wheat brown foot rot caused by Microdochium majus
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T01%3A06%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Occurrence%20and%20chemical%20control%20strategy%20of%20wheat%20brown%20foot%20rot%20caused%20by%20Microdochium%20majus&rft.jtitle=Plant%20disease&rft.au=Mao,%20Yushuai&rft.date=2023-11-01&rft.volume=107&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=3523&rft.epage=3530&rft.pages=3523-3530&rft.issn=0191-2917&rft.eissn=1943-7692&rft_id=info:doi/10.1094/PDIS-02-23-0392-RE&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2841405510%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2841405510&rft_id=info:pmid/37486274&rfr_iscdi=true