Magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative assessment of the mesorectal nodal status of patients with rectal cancer – Can it be trusted?

•MRI prediction of mesorectal lymph nodes status has very poor accuracy.•Sensitivity of MRI for assessing nodal involvement was 51.2%, specificity 93.4%.•New MRI criteria for nodal assessment are not associated with acceptable outcomes. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a fundamental diagnostic mo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of radiology 2023-08, Vol.165, p.110961-110961, Article 110961
Hauptverfasser: Ihnát, Peter, Židlík, Vladimír, Ihnát Rudinská, Lucia, Koscielnik, Pavel, Hanzlíková, Pavla, Škarda, Jozef
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 110961
container_issue
container_start_page 110961
container_title European journal of radiology
container_volume 165
creator Ihnát, Peter
Židlík, Vladimír
Ihnát Rudinská, Lucia
Koscielnik, Pavel
Hanzlíková, Pavla
Škarda, Jozef
description •MRI prediction of mesorectal lymph nodes status has very poor accuracy.•Sensitivity of MRI for assessing nodal involvement was 51.2%, specificity 93.4%.•New MRI criteria for nodal assessment are not associated with acceptable outcomes. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a fundamental diagnostic modality for the evaluation of primary rectal cancer, but MRI assessment of nodal involvement remains a confounding factor. This prospective cohort study was conducted to investigate the accuracy of preoperative MRI in the assessment of nodal status by comparing histopathology reports to MRI findings on a node-by-node basis in 69 patients with rectal cancer. Primary surgery was performed in 40 (58.0%) patients; 29 (42.0%) study patients underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Histopathological examination revealed T1 tumour in 8 (11.6%) patients, T2 tumour in 30 (43.5%), and T3 tumour in 25 (36.2%). In total, 897 lymph nodes (LNs) have been harvested (13.1 ± 5.4 LNs per specimen). There were 77 MRI-suspicious LNs, 21 (27.3%) of which were histologically proven malignant. The sensitivity of MRI for assessing nodal involvement was 51.2% and specificity 93.4%. Of the 28 patients with MRI-suspicious LNs the diagnosis was correct in 42.8%. The MRI accuracy was 33.3% in “primary surgery” subgroup (n = 18, malignant LNs found in 6 patients). Diagnosis of MRI-negative LNs was correct in 90.2% of study patients; malignant nodes were found in 9.8% of patients initially classified as cN0. MRI prediction of nodal status in patients with rectal cancer has very low accuracy. Decisions regarding neoadjuvant CRT should not be based on MRI assessment of nodal status, but on the MRI evaluation of tumour depth invasion (T stage and relationship between the tumour and mesorectal fascia).
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110961
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2841027243</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0720048X23002759</els_id><sourcerecordid>2841027243</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-a38dd90efd19172b3d1f982b98b7ea73e65b6b3832a919bf214681b10d913a053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kb-O1DAQxi3Eids7eAIk5JImi_9k47hACK3gQLrTNSDRWXY82fNq4wSPc4iOmvbekCfBYRdKmplift-M5vsIec7ZmjPevNqvYZ-sXwsm5Jpzphv-iKx4q0SllFCPyYopwSpWt1_OyQXinjG2qbV4Qs6lqoVkXK3Izxu7i5BDRxPgGG3sgIbB7kLc0RDplGCcINkc7oFaREAcIGY69jTfAR2KJkGX7YHG0ZeK2eYZl_FUNIVE-i3kO3qCumV_or9-PNCtjTRk6oDmNGMG_-YpOevtAeHZqV-Sz-_ffdp-qK5vrz5u315XnWQ6V1a23msGveeaK-Gk571uhdOtU2CVhGbjGidbKazm2vWC103LHWdec2nZRl6Sl8e9Uxq_zoDZDAE7OBxshHFGI9qaM6FELQsqj2iXRsQEvZlScSd9N5yZJQSzN39CMEsI5hhCUb04HZjdAP6f5q_rBXh9BKC8eR8gGeyKWR34sBhl_Bj-e-A3bxibqw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2841027243</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative assessment of the mesorectal nodal status of patients with rectal cancer – Can it be trusted?</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Ihnát, Peter ; Židlík, Vladimír ; Ihnát Rudinská, Lucia ; Koscielnik, Pavel ; Hanzlíková, Pavla ; Škarda, Jozef</creator><creatorcontrib>Ihnát, Peter ; Židlík, Vladimír ; Ihnát Rudinská, Lucia ; Koscielnik, Pavel ; Hanzlíková, Pavla ; Škarda, Jozef</creatorcontrib><description>•MRI prediction of mesorectal lymph nodes status has very poor accuracy.•Sensitivity of MRI for assessing nodal involvement was 51.2%, specificity 93.4%.•New MRI criteria for nodal assessment are not associated with acceptable outcomes. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a fundamental diagnostic modality for the evaluation of primary rectal cancer, but MRI assessment of nodal involvement remains a confounding factor. This prospective cohort study was conducted to investigate the accuracy of preoperative MRI in the assessment of nodal status by comparing histopathology reports to MRI findings on a node-by-node basis in 69 patients with rectal cancer. Primary surgery was performed in 40 (58.0%) patients; 29 (42.0%) study patients underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Histopathological examination revealed T1 tumour in 8 (11.6%) patients, T2 tumour in 30 (43.5%), and T3 tumour in 25 (36.2%). In total, 897 lymph nodes (LNs) have been harvested (13.1 ± 5.4 LNs per specimen). There were 77 MRI-suspicious LNs, 21 (27.3%) of which were histologically proven malignant. The sensitivity of MRI for assessing nodal involvement was 51.2% and specificity 93.4%. Of the 28 patients with MRI-suspicious LNs the diagnosis was correct in 42.8%. The MRI accuracy was 33.3% in “primary surgery” subgroup (n = 18, malignant LNs found in 6 patients). Diagnosis of MRI-negative LNs was correct in 90.2% of study patients; malignant nodes were found in 9.8% of patients initially classified as cN0. MRI prediction of nodal status in patients with rectal cancer has very low accuracy. Decisions regarding neoadjuvant CRT should not be based on MRI assessment of nodal status, but on the MRI evaluation of tumour depth invasion (T stage and relationship between the tumour and mesorectal fascia).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0720-048X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7727</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110961</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37423017</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Lymph nodes ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Neoadjuvant radiotherapy ; Nodal assessment ; Rectal cancer</subject><ispartof>European journal of radiology, 2023-08, Vol.165, p.110961-110961, Article 110961</ispartof><rights>2023 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-a38dd90efd19172b3d1f982b98b7ea73e65b6b3832a919bf214681b10d913a053</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110961$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,45974</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37423017$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ihnát, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Židlík, Vladimír</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ihnát Rudinská, Lucia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koscielnik, Pavel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanzlíková, Pavla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Škarda, Jozef</creatorcontrib><title>Magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative assessment of the mesorectal nodal status of patients with rectal cancer – Can it be trusted?</title><title>European journal of radiology</title><addtitle>Eur J Radiol</addtitle><description>•MRI prediction of mesorectal lymph nodes status has very poor accuracy.•Sensitivity of MRI for assessing nodal involvement was 51.2%, specificity 93.4%.•New MRI criteria for nodal assessment are not associated with acceptable outcomes. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a fundamental diagnostic modality for the evaluation of primary rectal cancer, but MRI assessment of nodal involvement remains a confounding factor. This prospective cohort study was conducted to investigate the accuracy of preoperative MRI in the assessment of nodal status by comparing histopathology reports to MRI findings on a node-by-node basis in 69 patients with rectal cancer. Primary surgery was performed in 40 (58.0%) patients; 29 (42.0%) study patients underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Histopathological examination revealed T1 tumour in 8 (11.6%) patients, T2 tumour in 30 (43.5%), and T3 tumour in 25 (36.2%). In total, 897 lymph nodes (LNs) have been harvested (13.1 ± 5.4 LNs per specimen). There were 77 MRI-suspicious LNs, 21 (27.3%) of which were histologically proven malignant. The sensitivity of MRI for assessing nodal involvement was 51.2% and specificity 93.4%. Of the 28 patients with MRI-suspicious LNs the diagnosis was correct in 42.8%. The MRI accuracy was 33.3% in “primary surgery” subgroup (n = 18, malignant LNs found in 6 patients). Diagnosis of MRI-negative LNs was correct in 90.2% of study patients; malignant nodes were found in 9.8% of patients initially classified as cN0. MRI prediction of nodal status in patients with rectal cancer has very low accuracy. Decisions regarding neoadjuvant CRT should not be based on MRI assessment of nodal status, but on the MRI evaluation of tumour depth invasion (T stage and relationship between the tumour and mesorectal fascia).</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Lymph nodes</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Neoadjuvant radiotherapy</subject><subject>Nodal assessment</subject><subject>Rectal cancer</subject><issn>0720-048X</issn><issn>1872-7727</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kb-O1DAQxi3Eids7eAIk5JImi_9k47hACK3gQLrTNSDRWXY82fNq4wSPc4iOmvbekCfBYRdKmplift-M5vsIec7ZmjPevNqvYZ-sXwsm5Jpzphv-iKx4q0SllFCPyYopwSpWt1_OyQXinjG2qbV4Qs6lqoVkXK3Izxu7i5BDRxPgGG3sgIbB7kLc0RDplGCcINkc7oFaREAcIGY69jTfAR2KJkGX7YHG0ZeK2eYZl_FUNIVE-i3kO3qCumV_or9-PNCtjTRk6oDmNGMG_-YpOevtAeHZqV-Sz-_ffdp-qK5vrz5u315XnWQ6V1a23msGveeaK-Gk571uhdOtU2CVhGbjGidbKazm2vWC103LHWdec2nZRl6Sl8e9Uxq_zoDZDAE7OBxshHFGI9qaM6FELQsqj2iXRsQEvZlScSd9N5yZJQSzN39CMEsI5hhCUb04HZjdAP6f5q_rBXh9BKC8eR8gGeyKWR34sBhl_Bj-e-A3bxibqw</recordid><startdate>202308</startdate><enddate>202308</enddate><creator>Ihnát, Peter</creator><creator>Židlík, Vladimír</creator><creator>Ihnát Rudinská, Lucia</creator><creator>Koscielnik, Pavel</creator><creator>Hanzlíková, Pavla</creator><creator>Škarda, Jozef</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202308</creationdate><title>Magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative assessment of the mesorectal nodal status of patients with rectal cancer – Can it be trusted?</title><author>Ihnát, Peter ; Židlík, Vladimír ; Ihnát Rudinská, Lucia ; Koscielnik, Pavel ; Hanzlíková, Pavla ; Škarda, Jozef</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-a38dd90efd19172b3d1f982b98b7ea73e65b6b3832a919bf214681b10d913a053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Lymph nodes</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Neoadjuvant radiotherapy</topic><topic>Nodal assessment</topic><topic>Rectal cancer</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ihnát, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Židlík, Vladimír</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ihnát Rudinská, Lucia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koscielnik, Pavel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanzlíková, Pavla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Škarda, Jozef</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ihnát, Peter</au><au>Židlík, Vladimír</au><au>Ihnát Rudinská, Lucia</au><au>Koscielnik, Pavel</au><au>Hanzlíková, Pavla</au><au>Škarda, Jozef</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative assessment of the mesorectal nodal status of patients with rectal cancer – Can it be trusted?</atitle><jtitle>European journal of radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Radiol</addtitle><date>2023-08</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>165</volume><spage>110961</spage><epage>110961</epage><pages>110961-110961</pages><artnum>110961</artnum><issn>0720-048X</issn><eissn>1872-7727</eissn><abstract>•MRI prediction of mesorectal lymph nodes status has very poor accuracy.•Sensitivity of MRI for assessing nodal involvement was 51.2%, specificity 93.4%.•New MRI criteria for nodal assessment are not associated with acceptable outcomes. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a fundamental diagnostic modality for the evaluation of primary rectal cancer, but MRI assessment of nodal involvement remains a confounding factor. This prospective cohort study was conducted to investigate the accuracy of preoperative MRI in the assessment of nodal status by comparing histopathology reports to MRI findings on a node-by-node basis in 69 patients with rectal cancer. Primary surgery was performed in 40 (58.0%) patients; 29 (42.0%) study patients underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Histopathological examination revealed T1 tumour in 8 (11.6%) patients, T2 tumour in 30 (43.5%), and T3 tumour in 25 (36.2%). In total, 897 lymph nodes (LNs) have been harvested (13.1 ± 5.4 LNs per specimen). There were 77 MRI-suspicious LNs, 21 (27.3%) of which were histologically proven malignant. The sensitivity of MRI for assessing nodal involvement was 51.2% and specificity 93.4%. Of the 28 patients with MRI-suspicious LNs the diagnosis was correct in 42.8%. The MRI accuracy was 33.3% in “primary surgery” subgroup (n = 18, malignant LNs found in 6 patients). Diagnosis of MRI-negative LNs was correct in 90.2% of study patients; malignant nodes were found in 9.8% of patients initially classified as cN0. MRI prediction of nodal status in patients with rectal cancer has very low accuracy. Decisions regarding neoadjuvant CRT should not be based on MRI assessment of nodal status, but on the MRI evaluation of tumour depth invasion (T stage and relationship between the tumour and mesorectal fascia).</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>37423017</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110961</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0720-048X
ispartof European journal of radiology, 2023-08, Vol.165, p.110961-110961, Article 110961
issn 0720-048X
1872-7727
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2841027243
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Accuracy
Lymph nodes
Magnetic resonance imaging
Neoadjuvant radiotherapy
Nodal assessment
Rectal cancer
title Magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative assessment of the mesorectal nodal status of patients with rectal cancer – Can it be trusted?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T07%3A50%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Magnetic%20resonance%20imaging%20in%20preoperative%20assessment%20of%20the%20mesorectal%20nodal%20status%20of%20patients%20with%20rectal%20cancer%20%E2%80%93%20Can%20it%20be%20trusted?&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20radiology&rft.au=Ihn%C3%A1t,%20Peter&rft.date=2023-08&rft.volume=165&rft.spage=110961&rft.epage=110961&rft.pages=110961-110961&rft.artnum=110961&rft.issn=0720-048X&rft.eissn=1872-7727&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110961&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2841027243%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2841027243&rft_id=info:pmid/37423017&rft_els_id=S0720048X23002759&rfr_iscdi=true