Magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative assessment of the mesorectal nodal status of patients with rectal cancer – Can it be trusted?
•MRI prediction of mesorectal lymph nodes status has very poor accuracy.•Sensitivity of MRI for assessing nodal involvement was 51.2%, specificity 93.4%.•New MRI criteria for nodal assessment are not associated with acceptable outcomes. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a fundamental diagnostic mo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of radiology 2023-08, Vol.165, p.110961-110961, Article 110961 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 110961 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 110961 |
container_title | European journal of radiology |
container_volume | 165 |
creator | Ihnát, Peter Židlík, Vladimír Ihnát Rudinská, Lucia Koscielnik, Pavel Hanzlíková, Pavla Škarda, Jozef |
description | •MRI prediction of mesorectal lymph nodes status has very poor accuracy.•Sensitivity of MRI for assessing nodal involvement was 51.2%, specificity 93.4%.•New MRI criteria for nodal assessment are not associated with acceptable outcomes.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a fundamental diagnostic modality for the evaluation of primary rectal cancer, but MRI assessment of nodal involvement remains a confounding factor.
This prospective cohort study was conducted to investigate the accuracy of preoperative MRI in the assessment of nodal status by comparing histopathology reports to MRI findings on a node-by-node basis in 69 patients with rectal cancer.
Primary surgery was performed in 40 (58.0%) patients; 29 (42.0%) study patients underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Histopathological examination revealed T1 tumour in 8 (11.6%) patients, T2 tumour in 30 (43.5%), and T3 tumour in 25 (36.2%). In total, 897 lymph nodes (LNs) have been harvested (13.1 ± 5.4 LNs per specimen). There were 77 MRI-suspicious LNs, 21 (27.3%) of which were histologically proven malignant.
The sensitivity of MRI for assessing nodal involvement was 51.2% and specificity 93.4%. Of the 28 patients with MRI-suspicious LNs the diagnosis was correct in 42.8%. The MRI accuracy was 33.3% in “primary surgery” subgroup (n = 18, malignant LNs found in 6 patients). Diagnosis of MRI-negative LNs was correct in 90.2% of study patients; malignant nodes were found in 9.8% of patients initially classified as cN0.
MRI prediction of nodal status in patients with rectal cancer has very low accuracy. Decisions regarding neoadjuvant CRT should not be based on MRI assessment of nodal status, but on the MRI evaluation of tumour depth invasion (T stage and relationship between the tumour and mesorectal fascia). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110961 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2841027243</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0720048X23002759</els_id><sourcerecordid>2841027243</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-a38dd90efd19172b3d1f982b98b7ea73e65b6b3832a919bf214681b10d913a053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kb-O1DAQxi3Eids7eAIk5JImi_9k47hACK3gQLrTNSDRWXY82fNq4wSPc4iOmvbekCfBYRdKmplift-M5vsIec7ZmjPevNqvYZ-sXwsm5Jpzphv-iKx4q0SllFCPyYopwSpWt1_OyQXinjG2qbV4Qs6lqoVkXK3Izxu7i5BDRxPgGG3sgIbB7kLc0RDplGCcINkc7oFaREAcIGY69jTfAR2KJkGX7YHG0ZeK2eYZl_FUNIVE-i3kO3qCumV_or9-PNCtjTRk6oDmNGMG_-YpOevtAeHZqV-Sz-_ffdp-qK5vrz5u315XnWQ6V1a23msGveeaK-Gk571uhdOtU2CVhGbjGidbKazm2vWC103LHWdec2nZRl6Sl8e9Uxq_zoDZDAE7OBxshHFGI9qaM6FELQsqj2iXRsQEvZlScSd9N5yZJQSzN39CMEsI5hhCUb04HZjdAP6f5q_rBXh9BKC8eR8gGeyKWR34sBhl_Bj-e-A3bxibqw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2841027243</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative assessment of the mesorectal nodal status of patients with rectal cancer – Can it be trusted?</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Ihnát, Peter ; Židlík, Vladimír ; Ihnát Rudinská, Lucia ; Koscielnik, Pavel ; Hanzlíková, Pavla ; Škarda, Jozef</creator><creatorcontrib>Ihnát, Peter ; Židlík, Vladimír ; Ihnát Rudinská, Lucia ; Koscielnik, Pavel ; Hanzlíková, Pavla ; Škarda, Jozef</creatorcontrib><description>•MRI prediction of mesorectal lymph nodes status has very poor accuracy.•Sensitivity of MRI for assessing nodal involvement was 51.2%, specificity 93.4%.•New MRI criteria for nodal assessment are not associated with acceptable outcomes.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a fundamental diagnostic modality for the evaluation of primary rectal cancer, but MRI assessment of nodal involvement remains a confounding factor.
This prospective cohort study was conducted to investigate the accuracy of preoperative MRI in the assessment of nodal status by comparing histopathology reports to MRI findings on a node-by-node basis in 69 patients with rectal cancer.
Primary surgery was performed in 40 (58.0%) patients; 29 (42.0%) study patients underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Histopathological examination revealed T1 tumour in 8 (11.6%) patients, T2 tumour in 30 (43.5%), and T3 tumour in 25 (36.2%). In total, 897 lymph nodes (LNs) have been harvested (13.1 ± 5.4 LNs per specimen). There were 77 MRI-suspicious LNs, 21 (27.3%) of which were histologically proven malignant.
The sensitivity of MRI for assessing nodal involvement was 51.2% and specificity 93.4%. Of the 28 patients with MRI-suspicious LNs the diagnosis was correct in 42.8%. The MRI accuracy was 33.3% in “primary surgery” subgroup (n = 18, malignant LNs found in 6 patients). Diagnosis of MRI-negative LNs was correct in 90.2% of study patients; malignant nodes were found in 9.8% of patients initially classified as cN0.
MRI prediction of nodal status in patients with rectal cancer has very low accuracy. Decisions regarding neoadjuvant CRT should not be based on MRI assessment of nodal status, but on the MRI evaluation of tumour depth invasion (T stage and relationship between the tumour and mesorectal fascia).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0720-048X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7727</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110961</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37423017</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Lymph nodes ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Neoadjuvant radiotherapy ; Nodal assessment ; Rectal cancer</subject><ispartof>European journal of radiology, 2023-08, Vol.165, p.110961-110961, Article 110961</ispartof><rights>2023 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-a38dd90efd19172b3d1f982b98b7ea73e65b6b3832a919bf214681b10d913a053</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110961$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,45974</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37423017$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ihnát, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Židlík, Vladimír</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ihnát Rudinská, Lucia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koscielnik, Pavel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanzlíková, Pavla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Škarda, Jozef</creatorcontrib><title>Magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative assessment of the mesorectal nodal status of patients with rectal cancer – Can it be trusted?</title><title>European journal of radiology</title><addtitle>Eur J Radiol</addtitle><description>•MRI prediction of mesorectal lymph nodes status has very poor accuracy.•Sensitivity of MRI for assessing nodal involvement was 51.2%, specificity 93.4%.•New MRI criteria for nodal assessment are not associated with acceptable outcomes.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a fundamental diagnostic modality for the evaluation of primary rectal cancer, but MRI assessment of nodal involvement remains a confounding factor.
This prospective cohort study was conducted to investigate the accuracy of preoperative MRI in the assessment of nodal status by comparing histopathology reports to MRI findings on a node-by-node basis in 69 patients with rectal cancer.
Primary surgery was performed in 40 (58.0%) patients; 29 (42.0%) study patients underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Histopathological examination revealed T1 tumour in 8 (11.6%) patients, T2 tumour in 30 (43.5%), and T3 tumour in 25 (36.2%). In total, 897 lymph nodes (LNs) have been harvested (13.1 ± 5.4 LNs per specimen). There were 77 MRI-suspicious LNs, 21 (27.3%) of which were histologically proven malignant.
The sensitivity of MRI for assessing nodal involvement was 51.2% and specificity 93.4%. Of the 28 patients with MRI-suspicious LNs the diagnosis was correct in 42.8%. The MRI accuracy was 33.3% in “primary surgery” subgroup (n = 18, malignant LNs found in 6 patients). Diagnosis of MRI-negative LNs was correct in 90.2% of study patients; malignant nodes were found in 9.8% of patients initially classified as cN0.
MRI prediction of nodal status in patients with rectal cancer has very low accuracy. Decisions regarding neoadjuvant CRT should not be based on MRI assessment of nodal status, but on the MRI evaluation of tumour depth invasion (T stage and relationship between the tumour and mesorectal fascia).</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Lymph nodes</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Neoadjuvant radiotherapy</subject><subject>Nodal assessment</subject><subject>Rectal cancer</subject><issn>0720-048X</issn><issn>1872-7727</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kb-O1DAQxi3Eids7eAIk5JImi_9k47hACK3gQLrTNSDRWXY82fNq4wSPc4iOmvbekCfBYRdKmplift-M5vsIec7ZmjPevNqvYZ-sXwsm5Jpzphv-iKx4q0SllFCPyYopwSpWt1_OyQXinjG2qbV4Qs6lqoVkXK3Izxu7i5BDRxPgGG3sgIbB7kLc0RDplGCcINkc7oFaREAcIGY69jTfAR2KJkGX7YHG0ZeK2eYZl_FUNIVE-i3kO3qCumV_or9-PNCtjTRk6oDmNGMG_-YpOevtAeHZqV-Sz-_ffdp-qK5vrz5u315XnWQ6V1a23msGveeaK-Gk571uhdOtU2CVhGbjGidbKazm2vWC103LHWdec2nZRl6Sl8e9Uxq_zoDZDAE7OBxshHFGI9qaM6FELQsqj2iXRsQEvZlScSd9N5yZJQSzN39CMEsI5hhCUb04HZjdAP6f5q_rBXh9BKC8eR8gGeyKWR34sBhl_Bj-e-A3bxibqw</recordid><startdate>202308</startdate><enddate>202308</enddate><creator>Ihnát, Peter</creator><creator>Židlík, Vladimír</creator><creator>Ihnát Rudinská, Lucia</creator><creator>Koscielnik, Pavel</creator><creator>Hanzlíková, Pavla</creator><creator>Škarda, Jozef</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202308</creationdate><title>Magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative assessment of the mesorectal nodal status of patients with rectal cancer – Can it be trusted?</title><author>Ihnát, Peter ; Židlík, Vladimír ; Ihnát Rudinská, Lucia ; Koscielnik, Pavel ; Hanzlíková, Pavla ; Škarda, Jozef</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-a38dd90efd19172b3d1f982b98b7ea73e65b6b3832a919bf214681b10d913a053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Lymph nodes</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Neoadjuvant radiotherapy</topic><topic>Nodal assessment</topic><topic>Rectal cancer</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ihnát, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Židlík, Vladimír</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ihnát Rudinská, Lucia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koscielnik, Pavel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanzlíková, Pavla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Škarda, Jozef</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ihnát, Peter</au><au>Židlík, Vladimír</au><au>Ihnát Rudinská, Lucia</au><au>Koscielnik, Pavel</au><au>Hanzlíková, Pavla</au><au>Škarda, Jozef</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative assessment of the mesorectal nodal status of patients with rectal cancer – Can it be trusted?</atitle><jtitle>European journal of radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Radiol</addtitle><date>2023-08</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>165</volume><spage>110961</spage><epage>110961</epage><pages>110961-110961</pages><artnum>110961</artnum><issn>0720-048X</issn><eissn>1872-7727</eissn><abstract>•MRI prediction of mesorectal lymph nodes status has very poor accuracy.•Sensitivity of MRI for assessing nodal involvement was 51.2%, specificity 93.4%.•New MRI criteria for nodal assessment are not associated with acceptable outcomes.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a fundamental diagnostic modality for the evaluation of primary rectal cancer, but MRI assessment of nodal involvement remains a confounding factor.
This prospective cohort study was conducted to investigate the accuracy of preoperative MRI in the assessment of nodal status by comparing histopathology reports to MRI findings on a node-by-node basis in 69 patients with rectal cancer.
Primary surgery was performed in 40 (58.0%) patients; 29 (42.0%) study patients underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Histopathological examination revealed T1 tumour in 8 (11.6%) patients, T2 tumour in 30 (43.5%), and T3 tumour in 25 (36.2%). In total, 897 lymph nodes (LNs) have been harvested (13.1 ± 5.4 LNs per specimen). There were 77 MRI-suspicious LNs, 21 (27.3%) of which were histologically proven malignant.
The sensitivity of MRI for assessing nodal involvement was 51.2% and specificity 93.4%. Of the 28 patients with MRI-suspicious LNs the diagnosis was correct in 42.8%. The MRI accuracy was 33.3% in “primary surgery” subgroup (n = 18, malignant LNs found in 6 patients). Diagnosis of MRI-negative LNs was correct in 90.2% of study patients; malignant nodes were found in 9.8% of patients initially classified as cN0.
MRI prediction of nodal status in patients with rectal cancer has very low accuracy. Decisions regarding neoadjuvant CRT should not be based on MRI assessment of nodal status, but on the MRI evaluation of tumour depth invasion (T stage and relationship between the tumour and mesorectal fascia).</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>37423017</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110961</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0720-048X |
ispartof | European journal of radiology, 2023-08, Vol.165, p.110961-110961, Article 110961 |
issn | 0720-048X 1872-7727 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2841027243 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Accuracy Lymph nodes Magnetic resonance imaging Neoadjuvant radiotherapy Nodal assessment Rectal cancer |
title | Magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative assessment of the mesorectal nodal status of patients with rectal cancer – Can it be trusted? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T07%3A50%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Magnetic%20resonance%20imaging%20in%20preoperative%20assessment%20of%20the%20mesorectal%20nodal%20status%20of%20patients%20with%20rectal%20cancer%20%E2%80%93%20Can%20it%20be%20trusted?&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20radiology&rft.au=Ihn%C3%A1t,%20Peter&rft.date=2023-08&rft.volume=165&rft.spage=110961&rft.epage=110961&rft.pages=110961-110961&rft.artnum=110961&rft.issn=0720-048X&rft.eissn=1872-7727&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110961&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2841027243%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2841027243&rft_id=info:pmid/37423017&rft_els_id=S0720048X23002759&rfr_iscdi=true |