Intraoperative ultrasonography (IOUS)‐guided vs conventional laparoscopic nephrectomy: a randomised control trial

Objectives To assess the efficacy of routine use of intraoperative ultrasonography (IOUS) in improving perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing IOUS‐guided laparoscopic nephrectomy (IOUS‐LN) and conventional laparoscopic nephrectomy (C‐LN). Patients and Methods This was a parallel‐arm, single‐b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BJU international 2024-01, Vol.133 (1), p.71-78
Hauptverfasser: Das, Manoj K., Rohith, Gorrepati, Mandal, Swarnendu, Gaur, Abhay Singh, Nayak, Prasant, Kumaraswamy, Santosh, Tarigopula, Vivek, Dheroo, Dheeraj Kumar, Tripathy, Sambit
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 78
container_issue 1
container_start_page 71
container_title BJU international
container_volume 133
creator Das, Manoj K.
Rohith, Gorrepati
Mandal, Swarnendu
Gaur, Abhay Singh
Nayak, Prasant
Kumaraswamy, Santosh
Tarigopula, Vivek
Dheroo, Dheeraj Kumar
Tripathy, Sambit
description Objectives To assess the efficacy of routine use of intraoperative ultrasonography (IOUS) in improving perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing IOUS‐guided laparoscopic nephrectomy (IOUS‐LN) and conventional laparoscopic nephrectomy (C‐LN). Patients and Methods This was a parallel‐arm, single‐blinded, randomised controlled trial (CTRI/2021/12/038906). All patients undergoing LN, either for benign or malignant causes, were included. Patients undergoing partial/cytoreductive nephrectomy, with venous thrombus were excluded. In the study arm, IOUS‐guided renal vascular assessment was performed after colon mobilisation and a standard LN was performed in the control arm. The primary outcome was intraoperative duration. The secondary outcomes were blood loss, need for open conversion, blood transfusion, perioperative complications, duration of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stay and length of hospitalisation (LOH). The patients were followed for 3 months after surgery. Results A total of 104 patients were included, with 52 in each arm. Demographic characteristics were comparable in both arms. A significant reduction in the operative duration (mean [sd] 181.69 [40.8] vs 199.7 [41.8] min, P = 0.02) was seen in the IOUS‐LN group. The difference in blood loss showed no significant difference when compared between both groups (median [interquartile range] 84.55 [74–105.5] vs 99.95 [78.5–111] mL, P = 0.08). On subgroup analysis, the reduction in the operative duration was significant in patients who underwent laparoscopic simple nephrectomy (LSN; mean [sd] 194.4 [42.5] vs 221.2 [36.4] min, P = 0.01), whereas comparable operative durations were seen in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN; mean [sd] 168.96 [35.3] vs 178.3 [35.9] min, P = 0.34). Similar conversion rates were seen in both groups (P = 0.98) along with blood transfusions (P = 0.78). The LOH, ICU stay, and complications were similar in both groups. Significantly less blood loss (P = 0.03) was noted with IOUS in patients undergoing LSN. IOUS did not influence any outcomes in patients undergoing LRN. Conclusion Intraoperative ultrasonography significantly reduced the operative duration in LN, but with no significant reduction in the volume of blood loss. Significant reduction in intraoperative duration and blood loss was seen in patients who underwent LSN on subgroup analysis.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/bju.16136
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2840245555</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2903056145</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3536-53409bda72c3a84fb7f57618412e19c9ff47b79e334810591cb87c9e7541a4c33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kb9OwzAQxi0EoqUw8ALIEks7tLVjJ07YoOJPEVIHqMQWOY7TpnLiYCdF3XgEnpEnwSUtAxK32Hf63ae7-wA4x2iEXYyTVTPCASbBAehiGtAhxej1cP9HUdABJ9auEHKFwD8GHcIoQ9iLusBOy9pwXUnD63wtYaNcanWpF4ZXyw3sT2fz58HXx-eiyVOZwrWFQpdrWda5LrmCilfcaCt0lQtYympppKh1sbmCHBpeprrIrWtzPbXRCtYm5-oUHGVcWXm2e3tgfnf7MnkYPs3up5Prp6EgPgmGPnGjJylnniA8pFnCMp8FOKTYkzgSUZZRlrBIEkJDjPwIiyRkIpLMp5hTQUgP9Fvdyui3Rto6dsMIqRQvpW5s7IUUedR34dDLP-hKN8Yt6KgIEeQHmG6pQUsJt7I1MosrkxfcbGKM4q0TsXMi_nHCsRc7xSYpZPpL7k_vgHELvOdKbv5Xim8e563kN9nzlB8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2903056145</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intraoperative ultrasonography (IOUS)‐guided vs conventional laparoscopic nephrectomy: a randomised control trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Das, Manoj K. ; Rohith, Gorrepati ; Mandal, Swarnendu ; Gaur, Abhay Singh ; Nayak, Prasant ; Kumaraswamy, Santosh ; Tarigopula, Vivek ; Dheroo, Dheeraj Kumar ; Tripathy, Sambit</creator><creatorcontrib>Das, Manoj K. ; Rohith, Gorrepati ; Mandal, Swarnendu ; Gaur, Abhay Singh ; Nayak, Prasant ; Kumaraswamy, Santosh ; Tarigopula, Vivek ; Dheroo, Dheeraj Kumar ; Tripathy, Sambit</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives To assess the efficacy of routine use of intraoperative ultrasonography (IOUS) in improving perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing IOUS‐guided laparoscopic nephrectomy (IOUS‐LN) and conventional laparoscopic nephrectomy (C‐LN). Patients and Methods This was a parallel‐arm, single‐blinded, randomised controlled trial (CTRI/2021/12/038906). All patients undergoing LN, either for benign or malignant causes, were included. Patients undergoing partial/cytoreductive nephrectomy, with venous thrombus were excluded. In the study arm, IOUS‐guided renal vascular assessment was performed after colon mobilisation and a standard LN was performed in the control arm. The primary outcome was intraoperative duration. The secondary outcomes were blood loss, need for open conversion, blood transfusion, perioperative complications, duration of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stay and length of hospitalisation (LOH). The patients were followed for 3 months after surgery. Results A total of 104 patients were included, with 52 in each arm. Demographic characteristics were comparable in both arms. A significant reduction in the operative duration (mean [sd] 181.69 [40.8] vs 199.7 [41.8] min, P = 0.02) was seen in the IOUS‐LN group. The difference in blood loss showed no significant difference when compared between both groups (median [interquartile range] 84.55 [74–105.5] vs 99.95 [78.5–111] mL, P = 0.08). On subgroup analysis, the reduction in the operative duration was significant in patients who underwent laparoscopic simple nephrectomy (LSN; mean [sd] 194.4 [42.5] vs 221.2 [36.4] min, P = 0.01), whereas comparable operative durations were seen in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN; mean [sd] 168.96 [35.3] vs 178.3 [35.9] min, P = 0.34). Similar conversion rates were seen in both groups (P = 0.98) along with blood transfusions (P = 0.78). The LOH, ICU stay, and complications were similar in both groups. Significantly less blood loss (P = 0.03) was noted with IOUS in patients undergoing LSN. IOUS did not influence any outcomes in patients undergoing LRN. Conclusion Intraoperative ultrasonography significantly reduced the operative duration in LN, but with no significant reduction in the volume of blood loss. Significant reduction in intraoperative duration and blood loss was seen in patients who underwent LSN on subgroup analysis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1464-4096</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-410X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/bju.16136</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37470129</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Blood transfusion ; Blood transfusions ; Humans ; intraoperative blood loss ; intraoperative duration ; intraoperative ultrasonography ; Kidney Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Kidney Neoplasms - etiology ; Kidney Neoplasms - surgery ; laparoscopic nephrectomy ; Laparoscopy ; Laparoscopy - adverse effects ; length of hospitalisation ; Nephrectomy ; Nephrectomy - adverse effects ; radical nephrectomy ; Retrospective Studies ; simple nephrectomy ; Thrombosis ; Treatment Outcome ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasonography</subject><ispartof>BJU international, 2024-01, Vol.133 (1), p.71-78</ispartof><rights>2023 BJU International.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 BJU International</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3536-53409bda72c3a84fb7f57618412e19c9ff47b79e334810591cb87c9e7541a4c33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3536-53409bda72c3a84fb7f57618412e19c9ff47b79e334810591cb87c9e7541a4c33</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6076-1504 ; 0000-0002-1209-3131 ; 0000-0003-1081-027X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fbju.16136$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fbju.16136$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27926,27927,45576,45577</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37470129$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Das, Manoj K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rohith, Gorrepati</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mandal, Swarnendu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaur, Abhay Singh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nayak, Prasant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumaraswamy, Santosh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarigopula, Vivek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dheroo, Dheeraj Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tripathy, Sambit</creatorcontrib><title>Intraoperative ultrasonography (IOUS)‐guided vs conventional laparoscopic nephrectomy: a randomised control trial</title><title>BJU international</title><addtitle>BJU Int</addtitle><description>Objectives To assess the efficacy of routine use of intraoperative ultrasonography (IOUS) in improving perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing IOUS‐guided laparoscopic nephrectomy (IOUS‐LN) and conventional laparoscopic nephrectomy (C‐LN). Patients and Methods This was a parallel‐arm, single‐blinded, randomised controlled trial (CTRI/2021/12/038906). All patients undergoing LN, either for benign or malignant causes, were included. Patients undergoing partial/cytoreductive nephrectomy, with venous thrombus were excluded. In the study arm, IOUS‐guided renal vascular assessment was performed after colon mobilisation and a standard LN was performed in the control arm. The primary outcome was intraoperative duration. The secondary outcomes were blood loss, need for open conversion, blood transfusion, perioperative complications, duration of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stay and length of hospitalisation (LOH). The patients were followed for 3 months after surgery. Results A total of 104 patients were included, with 52 in each arm. Demographic characteristics were comparable in both arms. A significant reduction in the operative duration (mean [sd] 181.69 [40.8] vs 199.7 [41.8] min, P = 0.02) was seen in the IOUS‐LN group. The difference in blood loss showed no significant difference when compared between both groups (median [interquartile range] 84.55 [74–105.5] vs 99.95 [78.5–111] mL, P = 0.08). On subgroup analysis, the reduction in the operative duration was significant in patients who underwent laparoscopic simple nephrectomy (LSN; mean [sd] 194.4 [42.5] vs 221.2 [36.4] min, P = 0.01), whereas comparable operative durations were seen in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN; mean [sd] 168.96 [35.3] vs 178.3 [35.9] min, P = 0.34). Similar conversion rates were seen in both groups (P = 0.98) along with blood transfusions (P = 0.78). The LOH, ICU stay, and complications were similar in both groups. Significantly less blood loss (P = 0.03) was noted with IOUS in patients undergoing LSN. IOUS did not influence any outcomes in patients undergoing LRN. Conclusion Intraoperative ultrasonography significantly reduced the operative duration in LN, but with no significant reduction in the volume of blood loss. Significant reduction in intraoperative duration and blood loss was seen in patients who underwent LSN on subgroup analysis.</description><subject>Blood transfusion</subject><subject>Blood transfusions</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>intraoperative blood loss</subject><subject>intraoperative duration</subject><subject>intraoperative ultrasonography</subject><subject>Kidney Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Kidney Neoplasms - etiology</subject><subject>Kidney Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>laparoscopic nephrectomy</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - adverse effects</subject><subject>length of hospitalisation</subject><subject>Nephrectomy</subject><subject>Nephrectomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>radical nephrectomy</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>simple nephrectomy</subject><subject>Thrombosis</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><issn>1464-4096</issn><issn>1464-410X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kb9OwzAQxi0EoqUw8ALIEks7tLVjJ07YoOJPEVIHqMQWOY7TpnLiYCdF3XgEnpEnwSUtAxK32Hf63ae7-wA4x2iEXYyTVTPCASbBAehiGtAhxej1cP9HUdABJ9auEHKFwD8GHcIoQ9iLusBOy9pwXUnD63wtYaNcanWpF4ZXyw3sT2fz58HXx-eiyVOZwrWFQpdrWda5LrmCilfcaCt0lQtYympppKh1sbmCHBpeprrIrWtzPbXRCtYm5-oUHGVcWXm2e3tgfnf7MnkYPs3up5Prp6EgPgmGPnGjJylnniA8pFnCMp8FOKTYkzgSUZZRlrBIEkJDjPwIiyRkIpLMp5hTQUgP9Fvdyui3Rto6dsMIqRQvpW5s7IUUedR34dDLP-hKN8Yt6KgIEeQHmG6pQUsJt7I1MosrkxfcbGKM4q0TsXMi_nHCsRc7xSYpZPpL7k_vgHELvOdKbv5Xim8e563kN9nzlB8</recordid><startdate>202401</startdate><enddate>202401</enddate><creator>Das, Manoj K.</creator><creator>Rohith, Gorrepati</creator><creator>Mandal, Swarnendu</creator><creator>Gaur, Abhay Singh</creator><creator>Nayak, Prasant</creator><creator>Kumaraswamy, Santosh</creator><creator>Tarigopula, Vivek</creator><creator>Dheroo, Dheeraj Kumar</creator><creator>Tripathy, Sambit</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6076-1504</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1209-3131</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1081-027X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202401</creationdate><title>Intraoperative ultrasonography (IOUS)‐guided vs conventional laparoscopic nephrectomy: a randomised control trial</title><author>Das, Manoj K. ; Rohith, Gorrepati ; Mandal, Swarnendu ; Gaur, Abhay Singh ; Nayak, Prasant ; Kumaraswamy, Santosh ; Tarigopula, Vivek ; Dheroo, Dheeraj Kumar ; Tripathy, Sambit</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3536-53409bda72c3a84fb7f57618412e19c9ff47b79e334810591cb87c9e7541a4c33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Blood transfusion</topic><topic>Blood transfusions</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>intraoperative blood loss</topic><topic>intraoperative duration</topic><topic>intraoperative ultrasonography</topic><topic>Kidney Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Kidney Neoplasms - etiology</topic><topic>Kidney Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>laparoscopic nephrectomy</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - adverse effects</topic><topic>length of hospitalisation</topic><topic>Nephrectomy</topic><topic>Nephrectomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>radical nephrectomy</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>simple nephrectomy</topic><topic>Thrombosis</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Das, Manoj K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rohith, Gorrepati</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mandal, Swarnendu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaur, Abhay Singh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nayak, Prasant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumaraswamy, Santosh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarigopula, Vivek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dheroo, Dheeraj Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tripathy, Sambit</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>BJU international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Das, Manoj K.</au><au>Rohith, Gorrepati</au><au>Mandal, Swarnendu</au><au>Gaur, Abhay Singh</au><au>Nayak, Prasant</au><au>Kumaraswamy, Santosh</au><au>Tarigopula, Vivek</au><au>Dheroo, Dheeraj Kumar</au><au>Tripathy, Sambit</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intraoperative ultrasonography (IOUS)‐guided vs conventional laparoscopic nephrectomy: a randomised control trial</atitle><jtitle>BJU international</jtitle><addtitle>BJU Int</addtitle><date>2024-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>133</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>71</spage><epage>78</epage><pages>71-78</pages><issn>1464-4096</issn><eissn>1464-410X</eissn><abstract>Objectives To assess the efficacy of routine use of intraoperative ultrasonography (IOUS) in improving perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing IOUS‐guided laparoscopic nephrectomy (IOUS‐LN) and conventional laparoscopic nephrectomy (C‐LN). Patients and Methods This was a parallel‐arm, single‐blinded, randomised controlled trial (CTRI/2021/12/038906). All patients undergoing LN, either for benign or malignant causes, were included. Patients undergoing partial/cytoreductive nephrectomy, with venous thrombus were excluded. In the study arm, IOUS‐guided renal vascular assessment was performed after colon mobilisation and a standard LN was performed in the control arm. The primary outcome was intraoperative duration. The secondary outcomes were blood loss, need for open conversion, blood transfusion, perioperative complications, duration of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stay and length of hospitalisation (LOH). The patients were followed for 3 months after surgery. Results A total of 104 patients were included, with 52 in each arm. Demographic characteristics were comparable in both arms. A significant reduction in the operative duration (mean [sd] 181.69 [40.8] vs 199.7 [41.8] min, P = 0.02) was seen in the IOUS‐LN group. The difference in blood loss showed no significant difference when compared between both groups (median [interquartile range] 84.55 [74–105.5] vs 99.95 [78.5–111] mL, P = 0.08). On subgroup analysis, the reduction in the operative duration was significant in patients who underwent laparoscopic simple nephrectomy (LSN; mean [sd] 194.4 [42.5] vs 221.2 [36.4] min, P = 0.01), whereas comparable operative durations were seen in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN; mean [sd] 168.96 [35.3] vs 178.3 [35.9] min, P = 0.34). Similar conversion rates were seen in both groups (P = 0.98) along with blood transfusions (P = 0.78). The LOH, ICU stay, and complications were similar in both groups. Significantly less blood loss (P = 0.03) was noted with IOUS in patients undergoing LSN. IOUS did not influence any outcomes in patients undergoing LRN. Conclusion Intraoperative ultrasonography significantly reduced the operative duration in LN, but with no significant reduction in the volume of blood loss. Significant reduction in intraoperative duration and blood loss was seen in patients who underwent LSN on subgroup analysis.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>37470129</pmid><doi>10.1111/bju.16136</doi><tpages>78</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6076-1504</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1209-3131</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1081-027X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1464-4096
ispartof BJU international, 2024-01, Vol.133 (1), p.71-78
issn 1464-4096
1464-410X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2840245555
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Blood transfusion
Blood transfusions
Humans
intraoperative blood loss
intraoperative duration
intraoperative ultrasonography
Kidney Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Kidney Neoplasms - etiology
Kidney Neoplasms - surgery
laparoscopic nephrectomy
Laparoscopy
Laparoscopy - adverse effects
length of hospitalisation
Nephrectomy
Nephrectomy - adverse effects
radical nephrectomy
Retrospective Studies
simple nephrectomy
Thrombosis
Treatment Outcome
Ultrasonic imaging
Ultrasonography
title Intraoperative ultrasonography (IOUS)‐guided vs conventional laparoscopic nephrectomy: a randomised control trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T12%3A35%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intraoperative%20ultrasonography%20(IOUS)%E2%80%90guided%20vs%20conventional%20laparoscopic%20nephrectomy:%20a%20randomised%20control%20trial&rft.jtitle=BJU%20international&rft.au=Das,%20Manoj%20K.&rft.date=2024-01&rft.volume=133&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=71&rft.epage=78&rft.pages=71-78&rft.issn=1464-4096&rft.eissn=1464-410X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/bju.16136&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2903056145%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2903056145&rft_id=info:pmid/37470129&rfr_iscdi=true