Factors that contribute to the recurrence of mucinous ovarian cancer: Monocenter retrospective evaluation

Purpose: In this study, we aimed to put forth the factors that contribute to the recurrence of mucinous ovarian cancer. Materials and Methods: Forty-four mucinous ovarian cancer patients who have presented to our clinic between February 2006 and May 2018 took part in the study. In order to predict t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cancer research and therapeutics 2023-07, Vol.19 (3), p.610-616
Hauptverfasser: Birge, Ozer, Bakır, Mehmet, Karadag, Ceyda, Doğan, Selen, Tuncer, Hasan, Simsek, Tayup
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 616
container_issue 3
container_start_page 610
container_title Journal of cancer research and therapeutics
container_volume 19
creator Birge, Ozer
Bakır, Mehmet
Karadag, Ceyda
Doğan, Selen
Tuncer, Hasan
Simsek, Tayup
description Purpose: In this study, we aimed to put forth the factors that contribute to the recurrence of mucinous ovarian cancer. Materials and Methods: Forty-four mucinous ovarian cancer patients who have presented to our clinic between February 2006 and May 2018 took part in the study. In order to predict the factors that contribute to recurrence, the univariate and the multivariate logistic regressions were utilized. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was utilized for survival and the log-rank test was used for the discrepancies between the groups. In the analysis of the data, the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences 22 program was used. It was acknowledged to have statistical meaning when the P value in all the tests was lower than 0.05. Findings: Recurrence was detected in 20 out of 44 patients who participated in the study. The ages of the patients who did not experience recurrence were significantly lower ( P = 0.001). The patients were detected mostly in Stage 1 (36.4%). In the group of patients without recurrence, systemic lymphadenectomy (43.2%) was greater ( P = 0.019). Lymph node metastasis was three times higher in the group that experienced recurrence ( P = 0.047). When the two groups were compared, the platinum resistance was considerably greater in the group with recurrence ( P = 0.005). In terms of residual tumor, the rate of complete resection was (9%) better in the group that experienced recurrence compared to the group that did not experience recurrence, with a rate of 45.5%. While 12 patients who experienced recurrence died, 6 people died in the other group. From the factors that contribute to recurrence, in terms of residual tumor quantity, this was grouped as complete (R0) resection and optimal + suboptimal (R1 + R2) resection and the following were determined: odds ratio (OR) - 5.7 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.56-20.9) and P = 0.008 for R1 + R2. In univariate analysis, the OR was determined as 1.16 (95% CI: 1.06-1.27) for age. Possessing a Stage 2 and higher disease statistically contributed considerably to the recurrence compared to Stage 1 disease (OR: 6.33; 95% CI: 1.59-25.22; P = 0.009). Age was determined as an independent prognostic risk factor in the multivariate analysis (OR: 1.10 [95% CI: 1.04-1.25]), P = 0.018. Furthermore, the OR for the advanced-stage (Stage 2 or higher) patients in the multivariate analysis was determined as 7.88 (95% CI: 0.78-78.8) and was found to be statistically significant at limits ( P = 0.079).
doi_str_mv 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_109_21
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2840245148</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A760029101</galeid><sourcerecordid>A760029101</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c632u-5d492dd95a2b5090c18a501c2671d64696e42bd53c96d23833fbc78ac892de063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNks9v0zAYhi0EYt3gzglZ4sIlxb-S2NymiQ2koV3gbDnOl-EutYtjt9p_j0s7VFCZpkiOZD_v-1nWg9AbSuaCEv5hYWOabxdNidKMPkMzqpSsBOXyOZoR1fKKCslO0Ok0LQipW8bkS3TCW9GSWvIZcpfGphAnnH6YhG3wKbouJ8AplC3AEWyOEbwFHAa8zNb5kCcc1iY647E15SR-xF-DDxZ8glgSKYZpBTa5NWBYmzGb5IJ_hV4MZpzg9f5_hr5ffvp28bm6vrn6cnF-XdmGs1zVvVCs71VtWFcTRSyVpibUsqalfSMa1YBgXV9zq5qeccn50NlWGitLDEjDz9D7Xe8qhp8ZpqSXbrIwjsZDubpmUhAm6vIsBX33D7oIOfpyO80ppUJw8jhVulrW1uyQujUjaOeHkKKx29H6XFLJCJeUP0q1DSFMUUILVR2hbsFDNGPwMLiy_VfrU_jD_vkRvnw9LJ09OuBJgcMJZBewxYUpwqBX0S1NvC-i6q26-re1B-qWyNv9M-duCf2fwIOrBbjZAZswFtGmuzFvIOrC3vmw-W-xbsrJ3nK9tVw_WM5_AeYrBNY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2847275248</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Factors that contribute to the recurrence of mucinous ovarian cancer: Monocenter retrospective evaluation</title><source>Medknow Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Birge, Ozer ; Bakır, Mehmet ; Karadag, Ceyda ; Doğan, Selen ; Tuncer, Hasan ; Simsek, Tayup</creator><creatorcontrib>Birge, Ozer ; Bakır, Mehmet ; Karadag, Ceyda ; Doğan, Selen ; Tuncer, Hasan ; Simsek, Tayup</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: In this study, we aimed to put forth the factors that contribute to the recurrence of mucinous ovarian cancer. Materials and Methods: Forty-four mucinous ovarian cancer patients who have presented to our clinic between February 2006 and May 2018 took part in the study. In order to predict the factors that contribute to recurrence, the univariate and the multivariate logistic regressions were utilized. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was utilized for survival and the log-rank test was used for the discrepancies between the groups. In the analysis of the data, the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences 22 program was used. It was acknowledged to have statistical meaning when the P value in all the tests was lower than 0.05. Findings: Recurrence was detected in 20 out of 44 patients who participated in the study. The ages of the patients who did not experience recurrence were significantly lower ( P = 0.001). The patients were detected mostly in Stage 1 (36.4%). In the group of patients without recurrence, systemic lymphadenectomy (43.2%) was greater ( P = 0.019). Lymph node metastasis was three times higher in the group that experienced recurrence ( P = 0.047). When the two groups were compared, the platinum resistance was considerably greater in the group with recurrence ( P = 0.005). In terms of residual tumor, the rate of complete resection was (9%) better in the group that experienced recurrence compared to the group that did not experience recurrence, with a rate of 45.5%. While 12 patients who experienced recurrence died, 6 people died in the other group. From the factors that contribute to recurrence, in terms of residual tumor quantity, this was grouped as complete (R0) resection and optimal + suboptimal (R1 + R2) resection and the following were determined: odds ratio (OR) - 5.7 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.56-20.9) and P = 0.008 for R1 + R2. In univariate analysis, the OR was determined as 1.16 (95% CI: 1.06-1.27) for age. Possessing a Stage 2 and higher disease statistically contributed considerably to the recurrence compared to Stage 1 disease (OR: 6.33; 95% CI: 1.59-25.22; P = 0.009). Age was determined as an independent prognostic risk factor in the multivariate analysis (OR: 1.10 [95% CI: 1.04-1.25]), P = 0.018. Furthermore, the OR for the advanced-stage (Stage 2 or higher) patients in the multivariate analysis was determined as 7.88 (95% CI: 0.78-78.8) and was found to be statistically significant at limits ( P = 0.079). Results: We have put forth that the genetic, biological, and clinical characteristics of mucinous ovarian cancers differ from that of other epithelial ovarian cancers, and that age, advanced stage, and residual tumor quantity are prognostic risk factors in terms of recurrence, and that age is an independent prognostic risk factor. Conclusion: Biological and clinical characteristics of mucinous ovarian cancers differ from those of other epithelial ovarian cancers, and we observed that the age, advanced stage, and the amount of residual tumor regarding recurrence are prognostic risk factors, while age was determined as an independent prognostic risk factor.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0973-1482</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1998-4138</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_109_21</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37470583</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>India: Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Age ; Analysis ; Cancer ; Care and treatment ; Development and progression ; Diagnosis ; Diseases ; Multivariate analysis ; Ovarian cancer ; Patient outcomes ; Prognosis ; Relapse ; Risk factors ; Survival analysis</subject><ispartof>Journal of cancer research and therapeutics, 2023-07, Vol.19 (3), p.610-616</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/) (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c632u-5d492dd95a2b5090c18a501c2671d64696e42bd53c96d23833fbc78ac892de063</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27435,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37470583$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Birge, Ozer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bakır, Mehmet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karadag, Ceyda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doğan, Selen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuncer, Hasan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simsek, Tayup</creatorcontrib><title>Factors that contribute to the recurrence of mucinous ovarian cancer: Monocenter retrospective evaluation</title><title>Journal of cancer research and therapeutics</title><addtitle>J Cancer Res Ther</addtitle><description>Purpose: In this study, we aimed to put forth the factors that contribute to the recurrence of mucinous ovarian cancer. Materials and Methods: Forty-four mucinous ovarian cancer patients who have presented to our clinic between February 2006 and May 2018 took part in the study. In order to predict the factors that contribute to recurrence, the univariate and the multivariate logistic regressions were utilized. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was utilized for survival and the log-rank test was used for the discrepancies between the groups. In the analysis of the data, the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences 22 program was used. It was acknowledged to have statistical meaning when the P value in all the tests was lower than 0.05. Findings: Recurrence was detected in 20 out of 44 patients who participated in the study. The ages of the patients who did not experience recurrence were significantly lower ( P = 0.001). The patients were detected mostly in Stage 1 (36.4%). In the group of patients without recurrence, systemic lymphadenectomy (43.2%) was greater ( P = 0.019). Lymph node metastasis was three times higher in the group that experienced recurrence ( P = 0.047). When the two groups were compared, the platinum resistance was considerably greater in the group with recurrence ( P = 0.005). In terms of residual tumor, the rate of complete resection was (9%) better in the group that experienced recurrence compared to the group that did not experience recurrence, with a rate of 45.5%. While 12 patients who experienced recurrence died, 6 people died in the other group. From the factors that contribute to recurrence, in terms of residual tumor quantity, this was grouped as complete (R0) resection and optimal + suboptimal (R1 + R2) resection and the following were determined: odds ratio (OR) - 5.7 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.56-20.9) and P = 0.008 for R1 + R2. In univariate analysis, the OR was determined as 1.16 (95% CI: 1.06-1.27) for age. Possessing a Stage 2 and higher disease statistically contributed considerably to the recurrence compared to Stage 1 disease (OR: 6.33; 95% CI: 1.59-25.22; P = 0.009). Age was determined as an independent prognostic risk factor in the multivariate analysis (OR: 1.10 [95% CI: 1.04-1.25]), P = 0.018. Furthermore, the OR for the advanced-stage (Stage 2 or higher) patients in the multivariate analysis was determined as 7.88 (95% CI: 0.78-78.8) and was found to be statistically significant at limits ( P = 0.079). Results: We have put forth that the genetic, biological, and clinical characteristics of mucinous ovarian cancers differ from that of other epithelial ovarian cancers, and that age, advanced stage, and residual tumor quantity are prognostic risk factors in terms of recurrence, and that age is an independent prognostic risk factor. Conclusion: Biological and clinical characteristics of mucinous ovarian cancers differ from those of other epithelial ovarian cancers, and we observed that the age, advanced stage, and the amount of residual tumor regarding recurrence are prognostic risk factors, while age was determined as an independent prognostic risk factor.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Development and progression</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Diseases</subject><subject>Multivariate analysis</subject><subject>Ovarian cancer</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Relapse</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Survival analysis</subject><issn>0973-1482</issn><issn>1998-4138</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNks9v0zAYhi0EYt3gzglZ4sIlxb-S2NymiQ2koV3gbDnOl-EutYtjt9p_j0s7VFCZpkiOZD_v-1nWg9AbSuaCEv5hYWOabxdNidKMPkMzqpSsBOXyOZoR1fKKCslO0Ok0LQipW8bkS3TCW9GSWvIZcpfGphAnnH6YhG3wKbouJ8AplC3AEWyOEbwFHAa8zNb5kCcc1iY647E15SR-xF-DDxZ8glgSKYZpBTa5NWBYmzGb5IJ_hV4MZpzg9f5_hr5ffvp28bm6vrn6cnF-XdmGs1zVvVCs71VtWFcTRSyVpibUsqalfSMa1YBgXV9zq5qeccn50NlWGitLDEjDz9D7Xe8qhp8ZpqSXbrIwjsZDubpmUhAm6vIsBX33D7oIOfpyO80ppUJw8jhVulrW1uyQujUjaOeHkKKx29H6XFLJCJeUP0q1DSFMUUILVR2hbsFDNGPwMLiy_VfrU_jD_vkRvnw9LJ09OuBJgcMJZBewxYUpwqBX0S1NvC-i6q26-re1B-qWyNv9M-duCf2fwIOrBbjZAZswFtGmuzFvIOrC3vmw-W-xbsrJ3nK9tVw_WM5_AeYrBNY</recordid><startdate>20230701</startdate><enddate>20230701</enddate><creator>Birge, Ozer</creator><creator>Bakır, Mehmet</creator><creator>Karadag, Ceyda</creator><creator>Doğan, Selen</creator><creator>Tuncer, Hasan</creator><creator>Simsek, Tayup</creator><general>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications &amp; Media Pvt. Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230701</creationdate><title>Factors that contribute to the recurrence of mucinous ovarian cancer: Monocenter retrospective evaluation</title><author>Birge, Ozer ; Bakır, Mehmet ; Karadag, Ceyda ; Doğan, Selen ; Tuncer, Hasan ; Simsek, Tayup</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c632u-5d492dd95a2b5090c18a501c2671d64696e42bd53c96d23833fbc78ac892de063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Development and progression</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Diseases</topic><topic>Multivariate analysis</topic><topic>Ovarian cancer</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Relapse</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Survival analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Birge, Ozer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bakır, Mehmet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karadag, Ceyda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doğan, Selen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuncer, Hasan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simsek, Tayup</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of cancer research and therapeutics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Birge, Ozer</au><au>Bakır, Mehmet</au><au>Karadag, Ceyda</au><au>Doğan, Selen</au><au>Tuncer, Hasan</au><au>Simsek, Tayup</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Factors that contribute to the recurrence of mucinous ovarian cancer: Monocenter retrospective evaluation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cancer research and therapeutics</jtitle><addtitle>J Cancer Res Ther</addtitle><date>2023-07-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>610</spage><epage>616</epage><pages>610-616</pages><issn>0973-1482</issn><eissn>1998-4138</eissn><abstract>Purpose: In this study, we aimed to put forth the factors that contribute to the recurrence of mucinous ovarian cancer. Materials and Methods: Forty-four mucinous ovarian cancer patients who have presented to our clinic between February 2006 and May 2018 took part in the study. In order to predict the factors that contribute to recurrence, the univariate and the multivariate logistic regressions were utilized. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was utilized for survival and the log-rank test was used for the discrepancies between the groups. In the analysis of the data, the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences 22 program was used. It was acknowledged to have statistical meaning when the P value in all the tests was lower than 0.05. Findings: Recurrence was detected in 20 out of 44 patients who participated in the study. The ages of the patients who did not experience recurrence were significantly lower ( P = 0.001). The patients were detected mostly in Stage 1 (36.4%). In the group of patients without recurrence, systemic lymphadenectomy (43.2%) was greater ( P = 0.019). Lymph node metastasis was three times higher in the group that experienced recurrence ( P = 0.047). When the two groups were compared, the platinum resistance was considerably greater in the group with recurrence ( P = 0.005). In terms of residual tumor, the rate of complete resection was (9%) better in the group that experienced recurrence compared to the group that did not experience recurrence, with a rate of 45.5%. While 12 patients who experienced recurrence died, 6 people died in the other group. From the factors that contribute to recurrence, in terms of residual tumor quantity, this was grouped as complete (R0) resection and optimal + suboptimal (R1 + R2) resection and the following were determined: odds ratio (OR) - 5.7 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.56-20.9) and P = 0.008 for R1 + R2. In univariate analysis, the OR was determined as 1.16 (95% CI: 1.06-1.27) for age. Possessing a Stage 2 and higher disease statistically contributed considerably to the recurrence compared to Stage 1 disease (OR: 6.33; 95% CI: 1.59-25.22; P = 0.009). Age was determined as an independent prognostic risk factor in the multivariate analysis (OR: 1.10 [95% CI: 1.04-1.25]), P = 0.018. Furthermore, the OR for the advanced-stage (Stage 2 or higher) patients in the multivariate analysis was determined as 7.88 (95% CI: 0.78-78.8) and was found to be statistically significant at limits ( P = 0.079). Results: We have put forth that the genetic, biological, and clinical characteristics of mucinous ovarian cancers differ from that of other epithelial ovarian cancers, and that age, advanced stage, and residual tumor quantity are prognostic risk factors in terms of recurrence, and that age is an independent prognostic risk factor. Conclusion: Biological and clinical characteristics of mucinous ovarian cancers differ from those of other epithelial ovarian cancers, and we observed that the age, advanced stage, and the amount of residual tumor regarding recurrence are prognostic risk factors, while age was determined as an independent prognostic risk factor.</abstract><cop>India</cop><pub>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</pub><pmid>37470583</pmid><doi>10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_109_21</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0973-1482
ispartof Journal of cancer research and therapeutics, 2023-07, Vol.19 (3), p.610-616
issn 0973-1482
1998-4138
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2840245148
source Medknow Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Age
Analysis
Cancer
Care and treatment
Development and progression
Diagnosis
Diseases
Multivariate analysis
Ovarian cancer
Patient outcomes
Prognosis
Relapse
Risk factors
Survival analysis
title Factors that contribute to the recurrence of mucinous ovarian cancer: Monocenter retrospective evaluation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T11%3A00%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Factors%20that%20contribute%20to%20the%20recurrence%20of%20mucinous%20ovarian%20cancer:%20Monocenter%20retrospective%20evaluation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cancer%20research%20and%20therapeutics&rft.au=Birge,%20Ozer&rft.date=2023-07-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=610&rft.epage=616&rft.pages=610-616&rft.issn=0973-1482&rft.eissn=1998-4138&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_109_21&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA760029101%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2847275248&rft_id=info:pmid/37470583&rft_galeid=A760029101&rfr_iscdi=true