Sociodemographic Factors and Screening CT Colonography Use Among Medicare Beneficiaries

Approximately one-third of the eligible U.S. population have not undergone guideline-compliant colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Guidelines recognize various screening strategies to increase adherence. CMS provides coverage for all recommended screening tests except CT colonography (CTC). The purpo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of roentgenology (1976) 2024-01, Vol.222 (1), p.e2329703-10
Hauptverfasser: Christensen, Eric W, Sanelli, Pina C, Rula, Elizabeth Y, Chang, Kevin J, Moreno, Courtney C, Bruining, David H, Yee, Judy
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 10
container_issue 1
container_start_page e2329703
container_title American journal of roentgenology (1976)
container_volume 222
creator Christensen, Eric W
Sanelli, Pina C
Rula, Elizabeth Y
Chang, Kevin J
Moreno, Courtney C
Bruining, David H
Yee, Judy
description Approximately one-third of the eligible U.S. population have not undergone guideline-compliant colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Guidelines recognize various screening strategies to increase adherence. CMS provides coverage for all recommended screening tests except CT colonography (CTC). The purpose of this study was to compare CTC and other CRC screening tests in terms of associations of utilization with income, race and ethnicity, and urbanicity in Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries. This retrospective study used CMS Research Identifiable Files from January 1, 2011, through December 31, 2020. These files contain claims information for 5% of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries. Data were extracted for individuals 45-85 years old, and individuals with high CRC risk were excluded. Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to determine the likelihood of undergoing CRC screening tests (as well as of undergoing diagnostic CTC, a CMS-covered test with similar physical access as screening CTC) as a function of income, race and ethnicity, and urbanicity while controlling for sex, age, Charlson comorbidity index, U.S. census region, screening year, and related conditions and procedures. For 12,273,363 beneficiary years (mean age, 70.5 ± 8.2 [SD] years; 2,436,849 unique beneficiaries: 6,774,837 female beneficiaries, 5,498,526 male beneficiaries), there were 785,103 CRC screenings events, including 645 for screening CTC. Compared with individuals living in communities with per capita income of less than US$25,000, individuals in communities with income of US$100,000 or more had OR for undergoing screening CTC of 5.73, optical colonoscopy (OC) of 1.36, sigmoidoscopy of 1.03, guaiac fecal occult blood test or fecal immunochemical test of 1.50, stool DNA of 1.43, and diagnostic CTC of 2.00. The OR for undergoing screening CTC was 1.00 for Hispanic individuals and 1.08 for non-Hispanic Black individuals compared with non-Hispanic White individuals. Compared with the OR for undergoing screening CTC for residents of metropolitan areas, the OR was 0.51 for residents of micropolitan areas and 0.65 for residents of small or rural areas. The association with income was substantially larger for screening CTC than for other CRC screening tests or for diagnostic CTC. Medicare's noncoverage for screening CTC may contribute to lower adherence with CRC screening guidelines for lower-income beneficiaries. Medicare coverage of CTC could reduce income-based di
doi_str_mv 10.2214/AJR.23.29703
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2839742181</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2839742181</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-c0dccd5683a676a07fb0537a1d1626d7313b64d887d791e41a81873d054ba75c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo90DtPwzAUhmELgWi5bMzIIwMpPnZiO2OJKBcVIdFWsEWO7RSjJC52O_TfE2hhOsN59A0vQhdARpRCejN-eh1RNqK5IOwADSFLecIghUM0JIxDIgl7H6CTGD8JIULm4hgNmEg5h5wM0dvMa-eNbf0yqNWH03ii9NqHiFVn8EwHazvXLXExx4VvfLdjW7yIFo9b33-erXFaBYtvbWdrp50KzsYzdFSrJtrz_T1Fi8ndvHhIpi_3j8V4mmiawzrRxGhtMi6Z4oIrIuqKZEwoMMApN4IBq3hqpBRG5GBTUBKkYIZkaaVEptkputrtroL_2ti4LlsXtW0a1Vm_iSWVLBcpBQk9vd5RHXyMwdblKrhWhW0JpPxJWfYpS8rK35Q9v9wvb6rWmn_81459A7PmbeU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2839742181</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sociodemographic Factors and Screening CT Colonography Use Among Medicare Beneficiaries</title><source>American Roentgen Ray Society</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Christensen, Eric W ; Sanelli, Pina C ; Rula, Elizabeth Y ; Chang, Kevin J ; Moreno, Courtney C ; Bruining, David H ; Yee, Judy</creator><creatorcontrib>Christensen, Eric W ; Sanelli, Pina C ; Rula, Elizabeth Y ; Chang, Kevin J ; Moreno, Courtney C ; Bruining, David H ; Yee, Judy</creatorcontrib><description>Approximately one-third of the eligible U.S. population have not undergone guideline-compliant colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Guidelines recognize various screening strategies to increase adherence. CMS provides coverage for all recommended screening tests except CT colonography (CTC). The purpose of this study was to compare CTC and other CRC screening tests in terms of associations of utilization with income, race and ethnicity, and urbanicity in Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries. This retrospective study used CMS Research Identifiable Files from January 1, 2011, through December 31, 2020. These files contain claims information for 5% of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries. Data were extracted for individuals 45-85 years old, and individuals with high CRC risk were excluded. Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to determine the likelihood of undergoing CRC screening tests (as well as of undergoing diagnostic CTC, a CMS-covered test with similar physical access as screening CTC) as a function of income, race and ethnicity, and urbanicity while controlling for sex, age, Charlson comorbidity index, U.S. census region, screening year, and related conditions and procedures. For 12,273,363 beneficiary years (mean age, 70.5 ± 8.2 [SD] years; 2,436,849 unique beneficiaries: 6,774,837 female beneficiaries, 5,498,526 male beneficiaries), there were 785,103 CRC screenings events, including 645 for screening CTC. Compared with individuals living in communities with per capita income of less than US$25,000, individuals in communities with income of US$100,000 or more had OR for undergoing screening CTC of 5.73, optical colonoscopy (OC) of 1.36, sigmoidoscopy of 1.03, guaiac fecal occult blood test or fecal immunochemical test of 1.50, stool DNA of 1.43, and diagnostic CTC of 2.00. The OR for undergoing screening CTC was 1.00 for Hispanic individuals and 1.08 for non-Hispanic Black individuals compared with non-Hispanic White individuals. Compared with the OR for undergoing screening CTC for residents of metropolitan areas, the OR was 0.51 for residents of micropolitan areas and 0.65 for residents of small or rural areas. The association with income was substantially larger for screening CTC than for other CRC screening tests or for diagnostic CTC. Medicare's noncoverage for screening CTC may contribute to lower adherence with CRC screening guidelines for lower-income beneficiaries. Medicare coverage of CTC could reduce income-based disparities for individuals avoiding OC owing to invasiveness, need for anesthesia, or complication risk.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0361-803X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1546-3141</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1546-3141</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2214/AJR.23.29703</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37466190</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><ispartof>American journal of roentgenology (1976), 2024-01, Vol.222 (1), p.e2329703-10</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-c0dccd5683a676a07fb0537a1d1626d7313b64d887d791e41a81873d054ba75c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-c0dccd5683a676a07fb0537a1d1626d7313b64d887d791e41a81873d054ba75c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4118,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37466190$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Christensen, Eric W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanelli, Pina C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rula, Elizabeth Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Kevin J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moreno, Courtney C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruining, David H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yee, Judy</creatorcontrib><title>Sociodemographic Factors and Screening CT Colonography Use Among Medicare Beneficiaries</title><title>American journal of roentgenology (1976)</title><addtitle>AJR Am J Roentgenol</addtitle><description>Approximately one-third of the eligible U.S. population have not undergone guideline-compliant colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Guidelines recognize various screening strategies to increase adherence. CMS provides coverage for all recommended screening tests except CT colonography (CTC). The purpose of this study was to compare CTC and other CRC screening tests in terms of associations of utilization with income, race and ethnicity, and urbanicity in Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries. This retrospective study used CMS Research Identifiable Files from January 1, 2011, through December 31, 2020. These files contain claims information for 5% of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries. Data were extracted for individuals 45-85 years old, and individuals with high CRC risk were excluded. Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to determine the likelihood of undergoing CRC screening tests (as well as of undergoing diagnostic CTC, a CMS-covered test with similar physical access as screening CTC) as a function of income, race and ethnicity, and urbanicity while controlling for sex, age, Charlson comorbidity index, U.S. census region, screening year, and related conditions and procedures. For 12,273,363 beneficiary years (mean age, 70.5 ± 8.2 [SD] years; 2,436,849 unique beneficiaries: 6,774,837 female beneficiaries, 5,498,526 male beneficiaries), there were 785,103 CRC screenings events, including 645 for screening CTC. Compared with individuals living in communities with per capita income of less than US$25,000, individuals in communities with income of US$100,000 or more had OR for undergoing screening CTC of 5.73, optical colonoscopy (OC) of 1.36, sigmoidoscopy of 1.03, guaiac fecal occult blood test or fecal immunochemical test of 1.50, stool DNA of 1.43, and diagnostic CTC of 2.00. The OR for undergoing screening CTC was 1.00 for Hispanic individuals and 1.08 for non-Hispanic Black individuals compared with non-Hispanic White individuals. Compared with the OR for undergoing screening CTC for residents of metropolitan areas, the OR was 0.51 for residents of micropolitan areas and 0.65 for residents of small or rural areas. The association with income was substantially larger for screening CTC than for other CRC screening tests or for diagnostic CTC. Medicare's noncoverage for screening CTC may contribute to lower adherence with CRC screening guidelines for lower-income beneficiaries. Medicare coverage of CTC could reduce income-based disparities for individuals avoiding OC owing to invasiveness, need for anesthesia, or complication risk.</description><issn>0361-803X</issn><issn>1546-3141</issn><issn>1546-3141</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo90DtPwzAUhmELgWi5bMzIIwMpPnZiO2OJKBcVIdFWsEWO7RSjJC52O_TfE2hhOsN59A0vQhdARpRCejN-eh1RNqK5IOwADSFLecIghUM0JIxDIgl7H6CTGD8JIULm4hgNmEg5h5wM0dvMa-eNbf0yqNWH03ii9NqHiFVn8EwHazvXLXExx4VvfLdjW7yIFo9b33-erXFaBYtvbWdrp50KzsYzdFSrJtrz_T1Fi8ndvHhIpi_3j8V4mmiawzrRxGhtMi6Z4oIrIuqKZEwoMMApN4IBq3hqpBRG5GBTUBKkYIZkaaVEptkputrtroL_2ti4LlsXtW0a1Vm_iSWVLBcpBQk9vd5RHXyMwdblKrhWhW0JpPxJWfYpS8rK35Q9v9wvb6rWmn_81459A7PmbeU</recordid><startdate>20240101</startdate><enddate>20240101</enddate><creator>Christensen, Eric W</creator><creator>Sanelli, Pina C</creator><creator>Rula, Elizabeth Y</creator><creator>Chang, Kevin J</creator><creator>Moreno, Courtney C</creator><creator>Bruining, David H</creator><creator>Yee, Judy</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240101</creationdate><title>Sociodemographic Factors and Screening CT Colonography Use Among Medicare Beneficiaries</title><author>Christensen, Eric W ; Sanelli, Pina C ; Rula, Elizabeth Y ; Chang, Kevin J ; Moreno, Courtney C ; Bruining, David H ; Yee, Judy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-c0dccd5683a676a07fb0537a1d1626d7313b64d887d791e41a81873d054ba75c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Christensen, Eric W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanelli, Pina C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rula, Elizabeth Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Kevin J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moreno, Courtney C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruining, David H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yee, Judy</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of roentgenology (1976)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Christensen, Eric W</au><au>Sanelli, Pina C</au><au>Rula, Elizabeth Y</au><au>Chang, Kevin J</au><au>Moreno, Courtney C</au><au>Bruining, David H</au><au>Yee, Judy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sociodemographic Factors and Screening CT Colonography Use Among Medicare Beneficiaries</atitle><jtitle>American journal of roentgenology (1976)</jtitle><addtitle>AJR Am J Roentgenol</addtitle><date>2024-01-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>222</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e2329703</spage><epage>10</epage><pages>e2329703-10</pages><issn>0361-803X</issn><issn>1546-3141</issn><eissn>1546-3141</eissn><abstract>Approximately one-third of the eligible U.S. population have not undergone guideline-compliant colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Guidelines recognize various screening strategies to increase adherence. CMS provides coverage for all recommended screening tests except CT colonography (CTC). The purpose of this study was to compare CTC and other CRC screening tests in terms of associations of utilization with income, race and ethnicity, and urbanicity in Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries. This retrospective study used CMS Research Identifiable Files from January 1, 2011, through December 31, 2020. These files contain claims information for 5% of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries. Data were extracted for individuals 45-85 years old, and individuals with high CRC risk were excluded. Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to determine the likelihood of undergoing CRC screening tests (as well as of undergoing diagnostic CTC, a CMS-covered test with similar physical access as screening CTC) as a function of income, race and ethnicity, and urbanicity while controlling for sex, age, Charlson comorbidity index, U.S. census region, screening year, and related conditions and procedures. For 12,273,363 beneficiary years (mean age, 70.5 ± 8.2 [SD] years; 2,436,849 unique beneficiaries: 6,774,837 female beneficiaries, 5,498,526 male beneficiaries), there were 785,103 CRC screenings events, including 645 for screening CTC. Compared with individuals living in communities with per capita income of less than US$25,000, individuals in communities with income of US$100,000 or more had OR for undergoing screening CTC of 5.73, optical colonoscopy (OC) of 1.36, sigmoidoscopy of 1.03, guaiac fecal occult blood test or fecal immunochemical test of 1.50, stool DNA of 1.43, and diagnostic CTC of 2.00. The OR for undergoing screening CTC was 1.00 for Hispanic individuals and 1.08 for non-Hispanic Black individuals compared with non-Hispanic White individuals. Compared with the OR for undergoing screening CTC for residents of metropolitan areas, the OR was 0.51 for residents of micropolitan areas and 0.65 for residents of small or rural areas. The association with income was substantially larger for screening CTC than for other CRC screening tests or for diagnostic CTC. Medicare's noncoverage for screening CTC may contribute to lower adherence with CRC screening guidelines for lower-income beneficiaries. Medicare coverage of CTC could reduce income-based disparities for individuals avoiding OC owing to invasiveness, need for anesthesia, or complication risk.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>37466190</pmid><doi>10.2214/AJR.23.29703</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0361-803X
ispartof American journal of roentgenology (1976), 2024-01, Vol.222 (1), p.e2329703-10
issn 0361-803X
1546-3141
1546-3141
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2839742181
source American Roentgen Ray Society; Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Sociodemographic Factors and Screening CT Colonography Use Among Medicare Beneficiaries
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T01%3A59%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sociodemographic%20Factors%20and%20Screening%20CT%20Colonography%20Use%20Among%20Medicare%20Beneficiaries&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20roentgenology%20(1976)&rft.au=Christensen,%20Eric%20W&rft.date=2024-01-01&rft.volume=222&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e2329703&rft.epage=10&rft.pages=e2329703-10&rft.issn=0361-803X&rft.eissn=1546-3141&rft_id=info:doi/10.2214/AJR.23.29703&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2839742181%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2839742181&rft_id=info:pmid/37466190&rfr_iscdi=true