Dry eye clinical practice patterns of UK optometrists

In light of the increased roles of optometrists working in primary care in the UK, this research study aimed to gain an insight into perceptions of dry eye disease (DED), knowledge and confidence in diagnosis and management, and satisfaction with currently available treatment options. Links to an on...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Contact lens & anterior eye 2023-10, Vol.46 (5), p.101889-101889, Article 101889
Hauptverfasser: Casemore, Rachel K., Wolffsohn, James S., Dutta, Debarun
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 101889
container_issue 5
container_start_page 101889
container_title Contact lens & anterior eye
container_volume 46
creator Casemore, Rachel K.
Wolffsohn, James S.
Dutta, Debarun
description In light of the increased roles of optometrists working in primary care in the UK, this research study aimed to gain an insight into perceptions of dry eye disease (DED), knowledge and confidence in diagnosis and management, and satisfaction with currently available treatment options. Links to an online survey were distributed to optometrists across the UK via optometry websites newsletters, conferences, and local optical committee data bases, between October 2021 and July 2022. The anonymous questionnaire contained a variety of question types including multiple choice, likert-type scale, and free text questions. The survey was completed by 131 optometrists, with a broad range of experience, who reported examining 33.3 ± 31.0 dry eye patients per month. Forty-eight percent of respondents were involved in the provision of an extended service. Fluorescein tear breakup time, corneal fluorescein staining, and anterior lid assessment were the most used clinical procedures, both for diagnosis and monitoring purposes. Sixty percent of respondents reported that they believed their patients were satisfied/managed with artificial tear alone, with the availability of a preservative free option being the top consideration, particularly with increasing severity. Of the 18.7% of respondents who held Independent prescriber status, 68% felt this had widened their ability to diagnose and treat DED. This was evidenced by an increase in steroid recommendation for moderate and severe disease. Although dry eye disease was perceived to be an important condition, opinions varied widely regarding knowledge and confidence in diagnosis and management. Involvement in an extended service did not alter patient management. However, an increase in therapeutic management and the employment of a stepwise approach to management has been identified.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.clae.2023.101889
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2838645017</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1367048423001133</els_id><sourcerecordid>2838645017</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-ea601eae1279c777bc0d79741408540d94a4b5b1b0160aae432f66c247232bc33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKxDAUhoMozjj6Ai6kSzetubVpwY2MVxxw46xDenoKGXozyQjz9rZ0dOkqh_D9P-d8hFwzmjDKsrtdAo3BhFMupo88L07IkkmVxalk7HScRaZiKnO5IBfe7-gYKgp6ThZCyTRlKl-S9NEdIjxgBI3tLJgmGpyBYAGjwYSArvNRX0fb96gfQt9icNYHf0nOatN4vDq-K7J9fvpcv8abj5e39cMmBklpiNFklKFBxlUBSqkSaKUKJZmkeSppVUgjy7Rk5bgYNQal4HWWAZeKC16CECtyO_cOrv_aow-6tR6waUyH_d5rnos8kyllakT5jILrvXdY68HZ1riDZlRPuvROT7r0pEvPusbQzbF_X7ZY_UV-_YzA_QzgeOW3Rac9WOwAK-sQgq56-1__D_YmeYU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2838645017</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dry eye clinical practice patterns of UK optometrists</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Casemore, Rachel K. ; Wolffsohn, James S. ; Dutta, Debarun</creator><creatorcontrib>Casemore, Rachel K. ; Wolffsohn, James S. ; Dutta, Debarun</creatorcontrib><description>In light of the increased roles of optometrists working in primary care in the UK, this research study aimed to gain an insight into perceptions of dry eye disease (DED), knowledge and confidence in diagnosis and management, and satisfaction with currently available treatment options. Links to an online survey were distributed to optometrists across the UK via optometry websites newsletters, conferences, and local optical committee data bases, between October 2021 and July 2022. The anonymous questionnaire contained a variety of question types including multiple choice, likert-type scale, and free text questions. The survey was completed by 131 optometrists, with a broad range of experience, who reported examining 33.3 ± 31.0 dry eye patients per month. Forty-eight percent of respondents were involved in the provision of an extended service. Fluorescein tear breakup time, corneal fluorescein staining, and anterior lid assessment were the most used clinical procedures, both for diagnosis and monitoring purposes. Sixty percent of respondents reported that they believed their patients were satisfied/managed with artificial tear alone, with the availability of a preservative free option being the top consideration, particularly with increasing severity. Of the 18.7% of respondents who held Independent prescriber status, 68% felt this had widened their ability to diagnose and treat DED. This was evidenced by an increase in steroid recommendation for moderate and severe disease. Although dry eye disease was perceived to be an important condition, opinions varied widely regarding knowledge and confidence in diagnosis and management. Involvement in an extended service did not alter patient management. However, an increase in therapeutic management and the employment of a stepwise approach to management has been identified.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1367-0484</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-5411</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.clae.2023.101889</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37455178</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Clinical practice ; Dry eye ; Management ; Tear film ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>Contact lens &amp; anterior eye, 2023-10, Vol.46 (5), p.101889-101889, Article 101889</ispartof><rights>2023</rights><rights>Crown Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-ea601eae1279c777bc0d79741408540d94a4b5b1b0160aae432f66c247232bc33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-ea601eae1279c777bc0d79741408540d94a4b5b1b0160aae432f66c247232bc33</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2204-5272</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2023.101889$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37455178$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Casemore, Rachel K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolffsohn, James S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dutta, Debarun</creatorcontrib><title>Dry eye clinical practice patterns of UK optometrists</title><title>Contact lens &amp; anterior eye</title><addtitle>Cont Lens Anterior Eye</addtitle><description>In light of the increased roles of optometrists working in primary care in the UK, this research study aimed to gain an insight into perceptions of dry eye disease (DED), knowledge and confidence in diagnosis and management, and satisfaction with currently available treatment options. Links to an online survey were distributed to optometrists across the UK via optometry websites newsletters, conferences, and local optical committee data bases, between October 2021 and July 2022. The anonymous questionnaire contained a variety of question types including multiple choice, likert-type scale, and free text questions. The survey was completed by 131 optometrists, with a broad range of experience, who reported examining 33.3 ± 31.0 dry eye patients per month. Forty-eight percent of respondents were involved in the provision of an extended service. Fluorescein tear breakup time, corneal fluorescein staining, and anterior lid assessment were the most used clinical procedures, both for diagnosis and monitoring purposes. Sixty percent of respondents reported that they believed their patients were satisfied/managed with artificial tear alone, with the availability of a preservative free option being the top consideration, particularly with increasing severity. Of the 18.7% of respondents who held Independent prescriber status, 68% felt this had widened their ability to diagnose and treat DED. This was evidenced by an increase in steroid recommendation for moderate and severe disease. Although dry eye disease was perceived to be an important condition, opinions varied widely regarding knowledge and confidence in diagnosis and management. Involvement in an extended service did not alter patient management. However, an increase in therapeutic management and the employment of a stepwise approach to management has been identified.</description><subject>Clinical practice</subject><subject>Dry eye</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Tear film</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>1367-0484</issn><issn>1476-5411</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtKxDAUhoMozjj6Ai6kSzetubVpwY2MVxxw46xDenoKGXozyQjz9rZ0dOkqh_D9P-d8hFwzmjDKsrtdAo3BhFMupo88L07IkkmVxalk7HScRaZiKnO5IBfe7-gYKgp6ThZCyTRlKl-S9NEdIjxgBI3tLJgmGpyBYAGjwYSArvNRX0fb96gfQt9icNYHf0nOatN4vDq-K7J9fvpcv8abj5e39cMmBklpiNFklKFBxlUBSqkSaKUKJZmkeSppVUgjy7Rk5bgYNQal4HWWAZeKC16CECtyO_cOrv_aow-6tR6waUyH_d5rnos8kyllakT5jILrvXdY68HZ1riDZlRPuvROT7r0pEvPusbQzbF_X7ZY_UV-_YzA_QzgeOW3Rac9WOwAK-sQgq56-1__D_YmeYU</recordid><startdate>20231001</startdate><enddate>20231001</enddate><creator>Casemore, Rachel K.</creator><creator>Wolffsohn, James S.</creator><creator>Dutta, Debarun</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2204-5272</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231001</creationdate><title>Dry eye clinical practice patterns of UK optometrists</title><author>Casemore, Rachel K. ; Wolffsohn, James S. ; Dutta, Debarun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-ea601eae1279c777bc0d79741408540d94a4b5b1b0160aae432f66c247232bc33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Clinical practice</topic><topic>Dry eye</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Tear film</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Casemore, Rachel K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolffsohn, James S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dutta, Debarun</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Contact lens &amp; anterior eye</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Casemore, Rachel K.</au><au>Wolffsohn, James S.</au><au>Dutta, Debarun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dry eye clinical practice patterns of UK optometrists</atitle><jtitle>Contact lens &amp; anterior eye</jtitle><addtitle>Cont Lens Anterior Eye</addtitle><date>2023-10-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>101889</spage><epage>101889</epage><pages>101889-101889</pages><artnum>101889</artnum><issn>1367-0484</issn><eissn>1476-5411</eissn><abstract>In light of the increased roles of optometrists working in primary care in the UK, this research study aimed to gain an insight into perceptions of dry eye disease (DED), knowledge and confidence in diagnosis and management, and satisfaction with currently available treatment options. Links to an online survey were distributed to optometrists across the UK via optometry websites newsletters, conferences, and local optical committee data bases, between October 2021 and July 2022. The anonymous questionnaire contained a variety of question types including multiple choice, likert-type scale, and free text questions. The survey was completed by 131 optometrists, with a broad range of experience, who reported examining 33.3 ± 31.0 dry eye patients per month. Forty-eight percent of respondents were involved in the provision of an extended service. Fluorescein tear breakup time, corneal fluorescein staining, and anterior lid assessment were the most used clinical procedures, both for diagnosis and monitoring purposes. Sixty percent of respondents reported that they believed their patients were satisfied/managed with artificial tear alone, with the availability of a preservative free option being the top consideration, particularly with increasing severity. Of the 18.7% of respondents who held Independent prescriber status, 68% felt this had widened their ability to diagnose and treat DED. This was evidenced by an increase in steroid recommendation for moderate and severe disease. Although dry eye disease was perceived to be an important condition, opinions varied widely regarding knowledge and confidence in diagnosis and management. Involvement in an extended service did not alter patient management. However, an increase in therapeutic management and the employment of a stepwise approach to management has been identified.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>37455178</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.clae.2023.101889</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2204-5272</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1367-0484
ispartof Contact lens & anterior eye, 2023-10, Vol.46 (5), p.101889-101889, Article 101889
issn 1367-0484
1476-5411
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2838645017
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Clinical practice
Dry eye
Management
Tear film
United Kingdom
title Dry eye clinical practice patterns of UK optometrists
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T03%3A23%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dry%20eye%20clinical%20practice%20patterns%20of%20UK%20optometrists&rft.jtitle=Contact%20lens%20&%20anterior%20eye&rft.au=Casemore,%20Rachel%20K.&rft.date=2023-10-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=101889&rft.epage=101889&rft.pages=101889-101889&rft.artnum=101889&rft.issn=1367-0484&rft.eissn=1476-5411&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.clae.2023.101889&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2838645017%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2838645017&rft_id=info:pmid/37455178&rft_els_id=S1367048423001133&rfr_iscdi=true