DeepFittingNet: A deep neural network‐based approach for simplifying cardiac T1 and T2 estimation with improved robustness
Purpose To develop and evaluate a deep neural network (DeepFittingNet) for T1/T2 estimation of the most commonly used cardiovascular MR mapping sequences to simplify data processing and improve robustness. Theory and Methods DeepFittingNet is a 1D neural network composed of a recurrent neural networ...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Magnetic resonance in medicine 2023-11, Vol.90 (5), p.1979-1989 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1989 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1979 |
container_title | Magnetic resonance in medicine |
container_volume | 90 |
creator | Guo, Rui Si, Dongyue Fan, Yingwei Qian, Xiaofeng Zhang, Haina Ding, Haiyan Tang, Xiaoying |
description | Purpose
To develop and evaluate a deep neural network (DeepFittingNet) for T1/T2 estimation of the most commonly used cardiovascular MR mapping sequences to simplify data processing and improve robustness.
Theory and Methods
DeepFittingNet is a 1D neural network composed of a recurrent neural network (RNN) and a fully connected (FCNN) neural network, in which RNN adapts to the different number of input signals from various sequences and FCNN subsequently predicts A, B, and Tx of a three‐parameter model. DeepFittingNet was trained using Bloch‐equation simulations of MOLLI and saturation‐recovery single‐shot acquisition (SASHA) T1 mapping sequences, and T2‐prepared balanced SSFP (T2‐prep bSSFP) T2 mapping sequence, with reference values from the curve‐fitting method. Several imaging confounders were simulated to improve robustness. The trained DeepFittingNet was tested using phantom and in‐vivo signals, and compared to the curve‐fitting algorithm.
Results
In testing, DeepFittingNet performed T1/T2 estimation of four sequences with improved robustness in inversion‐recovery T1 estimation. The mean bias in phantom T1 and T2 between the curve‐fitting and DeepFittingNet was smaller than 30 and 1 ms, respectively. Excellent agreements between both methods was found in the left ventricle and septum T1/T2 with a mean bias |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/mrm.29782 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2835281419</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2835281419</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p2282-ddd9620e966315bef8d7e7904c1ecbf0c3917584100cbdb2dea185299de1c9d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkE1OwzAQhS0EEqWw4AZesklrO0kTs6sKBaQWJJS95dgTasgftkNViQVH4IycBNOyeqPRm6c3H0KXlEwoIWza2GbCeJazIzSiKWMRS3lyjEYkS0gUU56cojPnXgkhnGfJCH3eAPRL471pXx7BX-M51mGDWxisrIP4bWfffr6-S-lAY9n3tpNqg6vOYmeavjbVLpxiJa02UuGCYtlqXDAMzptGetO1eGv8Bgez7T5Chu3KwfkWnDtHJ5WsHVz86xgVy9ticR-tnu4eFvNV1DOWs0hrzWeMAJ_NYpqWUOU6g4yTRFFQZUVUzGmW5kkAoEpdMg2S5injXANVXMdjdHWIDQXeh9BLNMYpqGvZQjc4wfI4ZTlNKA_W6cG6NTXsRG_DC3YnKBF_dEWgK_Z0xfp5vR_iX3BnclU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2835281419</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>DeepFittingNet: A deep neural network‐based approach for simplifying cardiac T1 and T2 estimation with improved robustness</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Guo, Rui ; Si, Dongyue ; Fan, Yingwei ; Qian, Xiaofeng ; Zhang, Haina ; Ding, Haiyan ; Tang, Xiaoying</creator><creatorcontrib>Guo, Rui ; Si, Dongyue ; Fan, Yingwei ; Qian, Xiaofeng ; Zhang, Haina ; Ding, Haiyan ; Tang, Xiaoying</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
To develop and evaluate a deep neural network (DeepFittingNet) for T1/T2 estimation of the most commonly used cardiovascular MR mapping sequences to simplify data processing and improve robustness.
Theory and Methods
DeepFittingNet is a 1D neural network composed of a recurrent neural network (RNN) and a fully connected (FCNN) neural network, in which RNN adapts to the different number of input signals from various sequences and FCNN subsequently predicts A, B, and Tx of a three‐parameter model. DeepFittingNet was trained using Bloch‐equation simulations of MOLLI and saturation‐recovery single‐shot acquisition (SASHA) T1 mapping sequences, and T2‐prepared balanced SSFP (T2‐prep bSSFP) T2 mapping sequence, with reference values from the curve‐fitting method. Several imaging confounders were simulated to improve robustness. The trained DeepFittingNet was tested using phantom and in‐vivo signals, and compared to the curve‐fitting algorithm.
Results
In testing, DeepFittingNet performed T1/T2 estimation of four sequences with improved robustness in inversion‐recovery T1 estimation. The mean bias in phantom T1 and T2 between the curve‐fitting and DeepFittingNet was smaller than 30 and 1 ms, respectively. Excellent agreements between both methods was found in the left ventricle and septum T1/T2 with a mean bias <6 ms. There was no significant difference in the SD of both the left ventricle and septum T1/T2 between the two methods.
Conclusion
DeepFittingNet trained with simulations of MOLLI, SASHA, and T2‐prep bSSFP performed T1/T2 estimation tasks for all these most used sequences. Compared with the curve‐fitting algorithm, DeepFittingNet improved the robustness for inversion‐recovery T1 estimation and had comparable performance in terms of accuracy and precision.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0740-3194</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-2594</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/mrm.29782</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>curve‐fitting algorithm ; map reconstruction ; myocardial T1 and T2 mapping ; neural network</subject><ispartof>Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2023-11, Vol.90 (5), p.1979-1989</ispartof><rights>2023 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-5188-6281 ; 0000-0002-0080-3052</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fmrm.29782$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fmrm.29782$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guo, Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Si, Dongyue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fan, Yingwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qian, Xiaofeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Haina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ding, Haiyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Xiaoying</creatorcontrib><title>DeepFittingNet: A deep neural network‐based approach for simplifying cardiac T1 and T2 estimation with improved robustness</title><title>Magnetic resonance in medicine</title><description>Purpose
To develop and evaluate a deep neural network (DeepFittingNet) for T1/T2 estimation of the most commonly used cardiovascular MR mapping sequences to simplify data processing and improve robustness.
Theory and Methods
DeepFittingNet is a 1D neural network composed of a recurrent neural network (RNN) and a fully connected (FCNN) neural network, in which RNN adapts to the different number of input signals from various sequences and FCNN subsequently predicts A, B, and Tx of a three‐parameter model. DeepFittingNet was trained using Bloch‐equation simulations of MOLLI and saturation‐recovery single‐shot acquisition (SASHA) T1 mapping sequences, and T2‐prepared balanced SSFP (T2‐prep bSSFP) T2 mapping sequence, with reference values from the curve‐fitting method. Several imaging confounders were simulated to improve robustness. The trained DeepFittingNet was tested using phantom and in‐vivo signals, and compared to the curve‐fitting algorithm.
Results
In testing, DeepFittingNet performed T1/T2 estimation of four sequences with improved robustness in inversion‐recovery T1 estimation. The mean bias in phantom T1 and T2 between the curve‐fitting and DeepFittingNet was smaller than 30 and 1 ms, respectively. Excellent agreements between both methods was found in the left ventricle and septum T1/T2 with a mean bias <6 ms. There was no significant difference in the SD of both the left ventricle and septum T1/T2 between the two methods.
Conclusion
DeepFittingNet trained with simulations of MOLLI, SASHA, and T2‐prep bSSFP performed T1/T2 estimation tasks for all these most used sequences. Compared with the curve‐fitting algorithm, DeepFittingNet improved the robustness for inversion‐recovery T1 estimation and had comparable performance in terms of accuracy and precision.</description><subject>curve‐fitting algorithm</subject><subject>map reconstruction</subject><subject>myocardial T1 and T2 mapping</subject><subject>neural network</subject><issn>0740-3194</issn><issn>1522-2594</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkE1OwzAQhS0EEqWw4AZesklrO0kTs6sKBaQWJJS95dgTasgftkNViQVH4IycBNOyeqPRm6c3H0KXlEwoIWza2GbCeJazIzSiKWMRS3lyjEYkS0gUU56cojPnXgkhnGfJCH3eAPRL471pXx7BX-M51mGDWxisrIP4bWfffr6-S-lAY9n3tpNqg6vOYmeavjbVLpxiJa02UuGCYtlqXDAMzptGetO1eGv8Bgez7T5Chu3KwfkWnDtHJ5WsHVz86xgVy9ticR-tnu4eFvNV1DOWs0hrzWeMAJ_NYpqWUOU6g4yTRFFQZUVUzGmW5kkAoEpdMg2S5injXANVXMdjdHWIDQXeh9BLNMYpqGvZQjc4wfI4ZTlNKA_W6cG6NTXsRG_DC3YnKBF_dEWgK_Z0xfp5vR_iX3BnclU</recordid><startdate>202311</startdate><enddate>202311</enddate><creator>Guo, Rui</creator><creator>Si, Dongyue</creator><creator>Fan, Yingwei</creator><creator>Qian, Xiaofeng</creator><creator>Zhang, Haina</creator><creator>Ding, Haiyan</creator><creator>Tang, Xiaoying</creator><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5188-6281</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0080-3052</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202311</creationdate><title>DeepFittingNet: A deep neural network‐based approach for simplifying cardiac T1 and T2 estimation with improved robustness</title><author>Guo, Rui ; Si, Dongyue ; Fan, Yingwei ; Qian, Xiaofeng ; Zhang, Haina ; Ding, Haiyan ; Tang, Xiaoying</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p2282-ddd9620e966315bef8d7e7904c1ecbf0c3917584100cbdb2dea185299de1c9d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>curve‐fitting algorithm</topic><topic>map reconstruction</topic><topic>myocardial T1 and T2 mapping</topic><topic>neural network</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guo, Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Si, Dongyue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fan, Yingwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qian, Xiaofeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Haina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ding, Haiyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Xiaoying</creatorcontrib><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Magnetic resonance in medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guo, Rui</au><au>Si, Dongyue</au><au>Fan, Yingwei</au><au>Qian, Xiaofeng</au><au>Zhang, Haina</au><au>Ding, Haiyan</au><au>Tang, Xiaoying</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>DeepFittingNet: A deep neural network‐based approach for simplifying cardiac T1 and T2 estimation with improved robustness</atitle><jtitle>Magnetic resonance in medicine</jtitle><date>2023-11</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>90</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1979</spage><epage>1989</epage><pages>1979-1989</pages><issn>0740-3194</issn><eissn>1522-2594</eissn><abstract>Purpose
To develop and evaluate a deep neural network (DeepFittingNet) for T1/T2 estimation of the most commonly used cardiovascular MR mapping sequences to simplify data processing and improve robustness.
Theory and Methods
DeepFittingNet is a 1D neural network composed of a recurrent neural network (RNN) and a fully connected (FCNN) neural network, in which RNN adapts to the different number of input signals from various sequences and FCNN subsequently predicts A, B, and Tx of a three‐parameter model. DeepFittingNet was trained using Bloch‐equation simulations of MOLLI and saturation‐recovery single‐shot acquisition (SASHA) T1 mapping sequences, and T2‐prepared balanced SSFP (T2‐prep bSSFP) T2 mapping sequence, with reference values from the curve‐fitting method. Several imaging confounders were simulated to improve robustness. The trained DeepFittingNet was tested using phantom and in‐vivo signals, and compared to the curve‐fitting algorithm.
Results
In testing, DeepFittingNet performed T1/T2 estimation of four sequences with improved robustness in inversion‐recovery T1 estimation. The mean bias in phantom T1 and T2 between the curve‐fitting and DeepFittingNet was smaller than 30 and 1 ms, respectively. Excellent agreements between both methods was found in the left ventricle and septum T1/T2 with a mean bias <6 ms. There was no significant difference in the SD of both the left ventricle and septum T1/T2 between the two methods.
Conclusion
DeepFittingNet trained with simulations of MOLLI, SASHA, and T2‐prep bSSFP performed T1/T2 estimation tasks for all these most used sequences. Compared with the curve‐fitting algorithm, DeepFittingNet improved the robustness for inversion‐recovery T1 estimation and had comparable performance in terms of accuracy and precision.</abstract><doi>10.1002/mrm.29782</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5188-6281</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0080-3052</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0740-3194 |
ispartof | Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2023-11, Vol.90 (5), p.1979-1989 |
issn | 0740-3194 1522-2594 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2835281419 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | curve‐fitting algorithm map reconstruction myocardial T1 and T2 mapping neural network |
title | DeepFittingNet: A deep neural network‐based approach for simplifying cardiac T1 and T2 estimation with improved robustness |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T01%3A55%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=DeepFittingNet:%20A%20deep%20neural%20network%E2%80%90based%20approach%20for%20simplifying%20cardiac%20T1%20and%20T2%20estimation%20with%20improved%20robustness&rft.jtitle=Magnetic%20resonance%20in%20medicine&rft.au=Guo,%20Rui&rft.date=2023-11&rft.volume=90&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1979&rft.epage=1989&rft.pages=1979-1989&rft.issn=0740-3194&rft.eissn=1522-2594&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/mrm.29782&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E2835281419%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2835281419&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |