Bioprosthetic versus mechanical valves for mitral valve replacement in patients < 70 years: an updated pairwise meta-analysis

Bioprosthetic versus mechanical valves for mitral valve replacement in patients < 70 years: an updated pairwise meta-analysis

Background The ideal conduit for mitral valve replacement (MVR) remains elusive, particularly among younger patients due to increased life expectancy. We perform a pairwise meta-analysis comparing the use of bioprosthetic valves (BPV) and mechanical mitral valves (MMV) in patients 

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2024-02, Vol.72 (2), p.95-103
Hauptverfasser: Ahmed, Adham, Awad, Ahmed K., Varghese, Kathryn S., Sehgal, Viren S., Hisham, Kenzy, George, Jerrin, Pandey, Roshan, Vega, Eamon, Polizzi, Mia, Mathew, Dave M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Aged
Aortic Valve - surgery
Bioprosthesis - adverse effects
Cardiac Surgery
Cardiology
Heart Valve Prosthesis - adverse effects
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - methods
Hemorrhage - etiology
Humans
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Mitral Valve - surgery
Original Article
Prospective Studies
Reoperation
Stroke - etiology
Surgical Oncology
Thoracic Surgery
Treatment Outcome
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background The ideal conduit for mitral valve replacement (MVR) remains elusive, particularly among younger patients due to increased life expectancy. We perform a pairwise meta-analysis comparing the use of bioprosthetic valves (BPV) and mechanical mitral valves (MMV) in patients 
ISSN:1863-6705
1863-6713
DOI:10.1007/s11748-023-01956-1