PACS-integrated machine learning breast density classifier: clinical validation

To test the performance of a novel machine learning-based breast density tool. The tool utilizes a convolutional neural network to predict the BI-RADS based density assessment of a study. The clinical density assessments of 33,000 mammographic examinations (164,000 images) from one academic medical...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical imaging 2023-09, Vol.101, p.200-205
Hauptverfasser: Lewin, John, Schoenherr, Sven, Seebass, Martin, Lin, MingDe, Philpotts, Liane, Etesami, Maryam, Butler, Reni, Durand, Melissa, Heller, Samantha, Heacock, Laura, Moy, Linda, Tocino, Irena, Westerhoff, Malte
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 205
container_issue
container_start_page 200
container_title Clinical imaging
container_volume 101
creator Lewin, John
Schoenherr, Sven
Seebass, Martin
Lin, MingDe
Philpotts, Liane
Etesami, Maryam
Butler, Reni
Durand, Melissa
Heller, Samantha
Heacock, Laura
Moy, Linda
Tocino, Irena
Westerhoff, Malte
description To test the performance of a novel machine learning-based breast density tool. The tool utilizes a convolutional neural network to predict the BI-RADS based density assessment of a study. The clinical density assessments of 33,000 mammographic examinations (164,000 images) from one academic medical center (Site A) were used for training. This was an IRB approved HIPAA compliant study performed at two academic medical centers. The validation data set was composed of 500 studies from one site (Site A) and 700 from another (Site B). At Site A, each study was assessed by three breast radiologists and the majority (consensus) assessment was used as truth. At Site B, if the tool agreed with the clinical reading, then it was considered to have correctly predicted the clinical reading. In cases where the tool and the clinical reading disagreed, then the study was evaluated by three radiologists and the consensus reading was used as the clinical reading. For the classification into the four categories of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS®), the AI classifier had an accuracy of 84.6% at Site A and 89.7% at Site B. For binary classification (dense vs. non-dense), the AI classifier had an accuracy of 94.4% at Site A and 97.4% at Site B. In no case did the classifier disagree with the consensus reading by more than one category. The automated breast density tool showed high agreement with radiologists' assessments of breast density. •An automated breast density tool performed with high overall accuracy in the range of 85-90%.•The tool was more likely to agree with a consensus reading than was the original clinical reading.•The tool would improve the reproducibility of density assessments and could be used for triaging to supplemental screening.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.clinimag.2023.06.023
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2835269561</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0899707123001614</els_id><sourcerecordid>2835269561</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-7bf346984f0eeea9cb4dd1bc31993bd32294d0011e33904eaf28a6189657d02a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtPwzAQhC0EglL4C1WOXBL8ih1zAlW8JCSQgLPl2JviKnXATpH497i0cOU0h53Z2f0QmhFcEUzE-bKyvQ9-ZRYVxZRVWFRZ9tCENJKVnCu1jya4UaqUWJIjdJzSEueg4vIQHTHJKZGknqDHp6v5c-nDCItoRnDFytg3H6DowcTgw6JoI5g0Fg5C8uNXYXuTku88xIvi5wRr-uLT9N6Z0Q_hBB10pk9wutMper25fpnflQ-Pt_fzq4fSMlKPpWw7xoVqeIcBwCjbcudIm4dKsdYxShV3-V4CjCnMwXS0MYI0StTSYWrYFJ1t977H4WMNadQrnyz0vQkwrJOmDaupULUg2Sq2VhuHlCJ0-j1mcPFLE6w3MPVS_8LUG5gaC50lB2e7jnW7AvcX-6WXDZdbA-RPPzMSnayHYMH5CHbUbvD_dXwDa0WJNg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2835269561</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>PACS-integrated machine learning breast density classifier: clinical validation</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Lewin, John ; Schoenherr, Sven ; Seebass, Martin ; Lin, MingDe ; Philpotts, Liane ; Etesami, Maryam ; Butler, Reni ; Durand, Melissa ; Heller, Samantha ; Heacock, Laura ; Moy, Linda ; Tocino, Irena ; Westerhoff, Malte</creator><creatorcontrib>Lewin, John ; Schoenherr, Sven ; Seebass, Martin ; Lin, MingDe ; Philpotts, Liane ; Etesami, Maryam ; Butler, Reni ; Durand, Melissa ; Heller, Samantha ; Heacock, Laura ; Moy, Linda ; Tocino, Irena ; Westerhoff, Malte</creatorcontrib><description>To test the performance of a novel machine learning-based breast density tool. The tool utilizes a convolutional neural network to predict the BI-RADS based density assessment of a study. The clinical density assessments of 33,000 mammographic examinations (164,000 images) from one academic medical center (Site A) were used for training. This was an IRB approved HIPAA compliant study performed at two academic medical centers. The validation data set was composed of 500 studies from one site (Site A) and 700 from another (Site B). At Site A, each study was assessed by three breast radiologists and the majority (consensus) assessment was used as truth. At Site B, if the tool agreed with the clinical reading, then it was considered to have correctly predicted the clinical reading. In cases where the tool and the clinical reading disagreed, then the study was evaluated by three radiologists and the consensus reading was used as the clinical reading. For the classification into the four categories of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS®), the AI classifier had an accuracy of 84.6% at Site A and 89.7% at Site B. For binary classification (dense vs. non-dense), the AI classifier had an accuracy of 94.4% at Site A and 97.4% at Site B. In no case did the classifier disagree with the consensus reading by more than one category. The automated breast density tool showed high agreement with radiologists' assessments of breast density. •An automated breast density tool performed with high overall accuracy in the range of 85-90%.•The tool was more likely to agree with a consensus reading than was the original clinical reading.•The tool would improve the reproducibility of density assessments and could be used for triaging to supplemental screening.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0899-7071</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4499</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2023.06.023</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37421715</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Artificial intelligence ; Breast density ; Mammography</subject><ispartof>Clinical imaging, 2023-09, Vol.101, p.200-205</ispartof><rights>2023 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-7bf346984f0eeea9cb4dd1bc31993bd32294d0011e33904eaf28a6189657d02a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2023.06.023$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37421715$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lewin, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoenherr, Sven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seebass, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, MingDe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Philpotts, Liane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Etesami, Maryam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butler, Reni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durand, Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heller, Samantha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heacock, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moy, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tocino, Irena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westerhoff, Malte</creatorcontrib><title>PACS-integrated machine learning breast density classifier: clinical validation</title><title>Clinical imaging</title><addtitle>Clin Imaging</addtitle><description>To test the performance of a novel machine learning-based breast density tool. The tool utilizes a convolutional neural network to predict the BI-RADS based density assessment of a study. The clinical density assessments of 33,000 mammographic examinations (164,000 images) from one academic medical center (Site A) were used for training. This was an IRB approved HIPAA compliant study performed at two academic medical centers. The validation data set was composed of 500 studies from one site (Site A) and 700 from another (Site B). At Site A, each study was assessed by three breast radiologists and the majority (consensus) assessment was used as truth. At Site B, if the tool agreed with the clinical reading, then it was considered to have correctly predicted the clinical reading. In cases where the tool and the clinical reading disagreed, then the study was evaluated by three radiologists and the consensus reading was used as the clinical reading. For the classification into the four categories of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS®), the AI classifier had an accuracy of 84.6% at Site A and 89.7% at Site B. For binary classification (dense vs. non-dense), the AI classifier had an accuracy of 94.4% at Site A and 97.4% at Site B. In no case did the classifier disagree with the consensus reading by more than one category. The automated breast density tool showed high agreement with radiologists' assessments of breast density. •An automated breast density tool performed with high overall accuracy in the range of 85-90%.•The tool was more likely to agree with a consensus reading than was the original clinical reading.•The tool would improve the reproducibility of density assessments and could be used for triaging to supplemental screening.</description><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Breast density</subject><subject>Mammography</subject><issn>0899-7071</issn><issn>1873-4499</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtPwzAQhC0EglL4C1WOXBL8ih1zAlW8JCSQgLPl2JviKnXATpH497i0cOU0h53Z2f0QmhFcEUzE-bKyvQ9-ZRYVxZRVWFRZ9tCENJKVnCu1jya4UaqUWJIjdJzSEueg4vIQHTHJKZGknqDHp6v5c-nDCItoRnDFytg3H6DowcTgw6JoI5g0Fg5C8uNXYXuTku88xIvi5wRr-uLT9N6Z0Q_hBB10pk9wutMper25fpnflQ-Pt_fzq4fSMlKPpWw7xoVqeIcBwCjbcudIm4dKsdYxShV3-V4CjCnMwXS0MYI0StTSYWrYFJ1t977H4WMNadQrnyz0vQkwrJOmDaupULUg2Sq2VhuHlCJ0-j1mcPFLE6w3MPVS_8LUG5gaC50lB2e7jnW7AvcX-6WXDZdbA-RPPzMSnayHYMH5CHbUbvD_dXwDa0WJNg</recordid><startdate>202309</startdate><enddate>202309</enddate><creator>Lewin, John</creator><creator>Schoenherr, Sven</creator><creator>Seebass, Martin</creator><creator>Lin, MingDe</creator><creator>Philpotts, Liane</creator><creator>Etesami, Maryam</creator><creator>Butler, Reni</creator><creator>Durand, Melissa</creator><creator>Heller, Samantha</creator><creator>Heacock, Laura</creator><creator>Moy, Linda</creator><creator>Tocino, Irena</creator><creator>Westerhoff, Malte</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202309</creationdate><title>PACS-integrated machine learning breast density classifier: clinical validation</title><author>Lewin, John ; Schoenherr, Sven ; Seebass, Martin ; Lin, MingDe ; Philpotts, Liane ; Etesami, Maryam ; Butler, Reni ; Durand, Melissa ; Heller, Samantha ; Heacock, Laura ; Moy, Linda ; Tocino, Irena ; Westerhoff, Malte</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-7bf346984f0eeea9cb4dd1bc31993bd32294d0011e33904eaf28a6189657d02a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Breast density</topic><topic>Mammography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lewin, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoenherr, Sven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seebass, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, MingDe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Philpotts, Liane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Etesami, Maryam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butler, Reni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durand, Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heller, Samantha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heacock, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moy, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tocino, Irena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westerhoff, Malte</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lewin, John</au><au>Schoenherr, Sven</au><au>Seebass, Martin</au><au>Lin, MingDe</au><au>Philpotts, Liane</au><au>Etesami, Maryam</au><au>Butler, Reni</au><au>Durand, Melissa</au><au>Heller, Samantha</au><au>Heacock, Laura</au><au>Moy, Linda</au><au>Tocino, Irena</au><au>Westerhoff, Malte</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>PACS-integrated machine learning breast density classifier: clinical validation</atitle><jtitle>Clinical imaging</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Imaging</addtitle><date>2023-09</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>101</volume><spage>200</spage><epage>205</epage><pages>200-205</pages><issn>0899-7071</issn><eissn>1873-4499</eissn><abstract>To test the performance of a novel machine learning-based breast density tool. The tool utilizes a convolutional neural network to predict the BI-RADS based density assessment of a study. The clinical density assessments of 33,000 mammographic examinations (164,000 images) from one academic medical center (Site A) were used for training. This was an IRB approved HIPAA compliant study performed at two academic medical centers. The validation data set was composed of 500 studies from one site (Site A) and 700 from another (Site B). At Site A, each study was assessed by three breast radiologists and the majority (consensus) assessment was used as truth. At Site B, if the tool agreed with the clinical reading, then it was considered to have correctly predicted the clinical reading. In cases where the tool and the clinical reading disagreed, then the study was evaluated by three radiologists and the consensus reading was used as the clinical reading. For the classification into the four categories of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS®), the AI classifier had an accuracy of 84.6% at Site A and 89.7% at Site B. For binary classification (dense vs. non-dense), the AI classifier had an accuracy of 94.4% at Site A and 97.4% at Site B. In no case did the classifier disagree with the consensus reading by more than one category. The automated breast density tool showed high agreement with radiologists' assessments of breast density. •An automated breast density tool performed with high overall accuracy in the range of 85-90%.•The tool was more likely to agree with a consensus reading than was the original clinical reading.•The tool would improve the reproducibility of density assessments and could be used for triaging to supplemental screening.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>37421715</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.clinimag.2023.06.023</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0899-7071
ispartof Clinical imaging, 2023-09, Vol.101, p.200-205
issn 0899-7071
1873-4499
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2835269561
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Artificial intelligence
Breast density
Mammography
title PACS-integrated machine learning breast density classifier: clinical validation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T23%3A48%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PACS-integrated%20machine%20learning%20breast%20density%20classifier:%20clinical%20validation&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20imaging&rft.au=Lewin,%20John&rft.date=2023-09&rft.volume=101&rft.spage=200&rft.epage=205&rft.pages=200-205&rft.issn=0899-7071&rft.eissn=1873-4499&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.clinimag.2023.06.023&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2835269561%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2835269561&rft_id=info:pmid/37421715&rft_els_id=S0899707123001614&rfr_iscdi=true