Groundwater stress induced by shale resources development in the US: Evolution, response, and mitigation

[Display omitted] •Shale-induced groundwater stress evaluation model is proposed.•Shale-induced groundwater stress remains heavy and would keep growing.•Shale development could be more competitive than agricultural planting.•Joint policies would be effective for mitigating projected intensifying str...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Applied energy 2023-06, Vol.340, p.121037, Article 121037
Hauptverfasser: He, Li, Feng, Hushen, Luo, Pengfei, Luo, Yugeng, Xu, Yang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 121037
container_title Applied energy
container_volume 340
creator He, Li
Feng, Hushen
Luo, Pengfei
Luo, Yugeng
Xu, Yang
description [Display omitted] •Shale-induced groundwater stress evaluation model is proposed.•Shale-induced groundwater stress remains heavy and would keep growing.•Shale development could be more competitive than agricultural planting.•Joint policies would be effective for mitigating projected intensifying stress. Unconventional shale resources development consumes a huge amount of groundwater, yet it is short of systematic research on evolution, response, and mitigation of shale-induced groundwater stress (SGS). To fill this gap, we here propose a new SGS evaluation model based on an improved concept of groundwater footprint. We find that the SGS remains heavy within the shale regions of the US in 2017–2019. The projected SGS would keep growing in 2025–2050 within the regions except Permian, owing to comprehensive stochastic response to future intensified shale development and varied precipitation and temperature. Notwithstanding, comparison of the rate of risked returns indicates that shale development could be more economically and environmentally competitive than agricultural planting, demonstrating high suitability of shale development in part of regions such as Niobrara, Anadarko, Permian, and Eagle Ford. Joint policies regulating shale production, water intensity, and groundwater supply coefficient would be effective for mitigating future intensified SGS.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121037
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2834229678</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0306261923004014</els_id><sourcerecordid>2834229678</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-bfde9a225a5844b1f1d43a75509da85abf6d1e59996e5858f3c16e97718f54d03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMFKAzEQhoMoWKuvIDl66NYku9lNPClSq1DwoD2HdDPbpmyTNclW-vZuqZ49Dcx8_w_zIXRLyZQSWt5vp7oDB2F9mDLC8illlOTVGRpRUbFMUirO0YjkpMxYSeUluopxSwhhlJER2syD75351gkCjilAjNg609dg8OqA40a3gIet70MNERvYQ-u7Hbg0YDhtAC8_HvBs79s-We8mR7bzLsIEa2fwzia71sfLNbpodBvh5neO0fJl9vn8mi3e52_PT4uszgueslVjQGrGuOaiKFa0oabIdcU5kUYLrldNaShwKWUJXHDR5DUtQVYVFQ0vDMnH6O7U2wX_1UNMamdjDW2rHfg-KibygjFZVmJAyxNaBx9jgEZ1we50OChK1FGt2qo_teqoVp3UDsHHUxCGR_YWgoq1BTc4swHqpIy3_1X8AI3ohwA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2834229678</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Groundwater stress induced by shale resources development in the US: Evolution, response, and mitigation</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>He, Li ; Feng, Hushen ; Luo, Pengfei ; Luo, Yugeng ; Xu, Yang</creator><creatorcontrib>He, Li ; Feng, Hushen ; Luo, Pengfei ; Luo, Yugeng ; Xu, Yang</creatorcontrib><description>[Display omitted] •Shale-induced groundwater stress evaluation model is proposed.•Shale-induced groundwater stress remains heavy and would keep growing.•Shale development could be more competitive than agricultural planting.•Joint policies would be effective for mitigating projected intensifying stress. Unconventional shale resources development consumes a huge amount of groundwater, yet it is short of systematic research on evolution, response, and mitigation of shale-induced groundwater stress (SGS). To fill this gap, we here propose a new SGS evaluation model based on an improved concept of groundwater footprint. We find that the SGS remains heavy within the shale regions of the US in 2017–2019. The projected SGS would keep growing in 2025–2050 within the regions except Permian, owing to comprehensive stochastic response to future intensified shale development and varied precipitation and temperature. Notwithstanding, comparison of the rate of risked returns indicates that shale development could be more economically and environmentally competitive than agricultural planting, demonstrating high suitability of shale development in part of regions such as Niobrara, Anadarko, Permian, and Eagle Ford. Joint policies regulating shale production, water intensity, and groundwater supply coefficient would be effective for mitigating future intensified SGS.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0306-2619</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-9118</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121037</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Climatic conditions ; energy ; groundwater ; Groundwater footprint ; Groundwater stress ; Permian period ; Rate of risked returns ; shale ; Shale production ; Shale resources development ; temperature</subject><ispartof>Applied energy, 2023-06, Vol.340, p.121037, Article 121037</ispartof><rights>2023 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-bfde9a225a5844b1f1d43a75509da85abf6d1e59996e5858f3c16e97718f54d03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-bfde9a225a5844b1f1d43a75509da85abf6d1e59996e5858f3c16e97718f54d03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261923004014$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>He, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng, Hushen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Pengfei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Yugeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Yang</creatorcontrib><title>Groundwater stress induced by shale resources development in the US: Evolution, response, and mitigation</title><title>Applied energy</title><description>[Display omitted] •Shale-induced groundwater stress evaluation model is proposed.•Shale-induced groundwater stress remains heavy and would keep growing.•Shale development could be more competitive than agricultural planting.•Joint policies would be effective for mitigating projected intensifying stress. Unconventional shale resources development consumes a huge amount of groundwater, yet it is short of systematic research on evolution, response, and mitigation of shale-induced groundwater stress (SGS). To fill this gap, we here propose a new SGS evaluation model based on an improved concept of groundwater footprint. We find that the SGS remains heavy within the shale regions of the US in 2017–2019. The projected SGS would keep growing in 2025–2050 within the regions except Permian, owing to comprehensive stochastic response to future intensified shale development and varied precipitation and temperature. Notwithstanding, comparison of the rate of risked returns indicates that shale development could be more economically and environmentally competitive than agricultural planting, demonstrating high suitability of shale development in part of regions such as Niobrara, Anadarko, Permian, and Eagle Ford. Joint policies regulating shale production, water intensity, and groundwater supply coefficient would be effective for mitigating future intensified SGS.</description><subject>Climatic conditions</subject><subject>energy</subject><subject>groundwater</subject><subject>Groundwater footprint</subject><subject>Groundwater stress</subject><subject>Permian period</subject><subject>Rate of risked returns</subject><subject>shale</subject><subject>Shale production</subject><subject>Shale resources development</subject><subject>temperature</subject><issn>0306-2619</issn><issn>1872-9118</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMFKAzEQhoMoWKuvIDl66NYku9lNPClSq1DwoD2HdDPbpmyTNclW-vZuqZ49Dcx8_w_zIXRLyZQSWt5vp7oDB2F9mDLC8illlOTVGRpRUbFMUirO0YjkpMxYSeUluopxSwhhlJER2syD75351gkCjilAjNg609dg8OqA40a3gIet70MNERvYQ-u7Hbg0YDhtAC8_HvBs79s-We8mR7bzLsIEa2fwzia71sfLNbpodBvh5neO0fJl9vn8mi3e52_PT4uszgueslVjQGrGuOaiKFa0oabIdcU5kUYLrldNaShwKWUJXHDR5DUtQVYVFQ0vDMnH6O7U2wX_1UNMamdjDW2rHfg-KibygjFZVmJAyxNaBx9jgEZ1we50OChK1FGt2qo_teqoVp3UDsHHUxCGR_YWgoq1BTc4swHqpIy3_1X8AI3ohwA</recordid><startdate>20230615</startdate><enddate>20230615</enddate><creator>He, Li</creator><creator>Feng, Hushen</creator><creator>Luo, Pengfei</creator><creator>Luo, Yugeng</creator><creator>Xu, Yang</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230615</creationdate><title>Groundwater stress induced by shale resources development in the US: Evolution, response, and mitigation</title><author>He, Li ; Feng, Hushen ; Luo, Pengfei ; Luo, Yugeng ; Xu, Yang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-bfde9a225a5844b1f1d43a75509da85abf6d1e59996e5858f3c16e97718f54d03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Climatic conditions</topic><topic>energy</topic><topic>groundwater</topic><topic>Groundwater footprint</topic><topic>Groundwater stress</topic><topic>Permian period</topic><topic>Rate of risked returns</topic><topic>shale</topic><topic>Shale production</topic><topic>Shale resources development</topic><topic>temperature</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>He, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng, Hushen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Pengfei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Yugeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Yang</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Applied energy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>He, Li</au><au>Feng, Hushen</au><au>Luo, Pengfei</au><au>Luo, Yugeng</au><au>Xu, Yang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Groundwater stress induced by shale resources development in the US: Evolution, response, and mitigation</atitle><jtitle>Applied energy</jtitle><date>2023-06-15</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>340</volume><spage>121037</spage><pages>121037-</pages><artnum>121037</artnum><issn>0306-2619</issn><eissn>1872-9118</eissn><abstract>[Display omitted] •Shale-induced groundwater stress evaluation model is proposed.•Shale-induced groundwater stress remains heavy and would keep growing.•Shale development could be more competitive than agricultural planting.•Joint policies would be effective for mitigating projected intensifying stress. Unconventional shale resources development consumes a huge amount of groundwater, yet it is short of systematic research on evolution, response, and mitigation of shale-induced groundwater stress (SGS). To fill this gap, we here propose a new SGS evaluation model based on an improved concept of groundwater footprint. We find that the SGS remains heavy within the shale regions of the US in 2017–2019. The projected SGS would keep growing in 2025–2050 within the regions except Permian, owing to comprehensive stochastic response to future intensified shale development and varied precipitation and temperature. Notwithstanding, comparison of the rate of risked returns indicates that shale development could be more economically and environmentally competitive than agricultural planting, demonstrating high suitability of shale development in part of regions such as Niobrara, Anadarko, Permian, and Eagle Ford. Joint policies regulating shale production, water intensity, and groundwater supply coefficient would be effective for mitigating future intensified SGS.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121037</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0306-2619
ispartof Applied energy, 2023-06, Vol.340, p.121037, Article 121037
issn 0306-2619
1872-9118
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2834229678
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Climatic conditions
energy
groundwater
Groundwater footprint
Groundwater stress
Permian period
Rate of risked returns
shale
Shale production
Shale resources development
temperature
title Groundwater stress induced by shale resources development in the US: Evolution, response, and mitigation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T22%3A39%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Groundwater%20stress%20induced%20by%20shale%20resources%20development%20in%20the%20US:%20Evolution,%20response,%20and%20mitigation&rft.jtitle=Applied%20energy&rft.au=He,%20Li&rft.date=2023-06-15&rft.volume=340&rft.spage=121037&rft.pages=121037-&rft.artnum=121037&rft.issn=0306-2619&rft.eissn=1872-9118&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121037&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2834229678%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2834229678&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0306261923004014&rfr_iscdi=true