Groundwater stress induced by shale resources development in the US: Evolution, response, and mitigation
[Display omitted] •Shale-induced groundwater stress evaluation model is proposed.•Shale-induced groundwater stress remains heavy and would keep growing.•Shale development could be more competitive than agricultural planting.•Joint policies would be effective for mitigating projected intensifying str...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Applied energy 2023-06, Vol.340, p.121037, Article 121037 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 121037 |
container_title | Applied energy |
container_volume | 340 |
creator | He, Li Feng, Hushen Luo, Pengfei Luo, Yugeng Xu, Yang |
description | [Display omitted]
•Shale-induced groundwater stress evaluation model is proposed.•Shale-induced groundwater stress remains heavy and would keep growing.•Shale development could be more competitive than agricultural planting.•Joint policies would be effective for mitigating projected intensifying stress.
Unconventional shale resources development consumes a huge amount of groundwater, yet it is short of systematic research on evolution, response, and mitigation of shale-induced groundwater stress (SGS). To fill this gap, we here propose a new SGS evaluation model based on an improved concept of groundwater footprint. We find that the SGS remains heavy within the shale regions of the US in 2017–2019. The projected SGS would keep growing in 2025–2050 within the regions except Permian, owing to comprehensive stochastic response to future intensified shale development and varied precipitation and temperature. Notwithstanding, comparison of the rate of risked returns indicates that shale development could be more economically and environmentally competitive than agricultural planting, demonstrating high suitability of shale development in part of regions such as Niobrara, Anadarko, Permian, and Eagle Ford. Joint policies regulating shale production, water intensity, and groundwater supply coefficient would be effective for mitigating future intensified SGS. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121037 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2834229678</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0306261923004014</els_id><sourcerecordid>2834229678</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-bfde9a225a5844b1f1d43a75509da85abf6d1e59996e5858f3c16e97718f54d03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMFKAzEQhoMoWKuvIDl66NYku9lNPClSq1DwoD2HdDPbpmyTNclW-vZuqZ49Dcx8_w_zIXRLyZQSWt5vp7oDB2F9mDLC8illlOTVGRpRUbFMUirO0YjkpMxYSeUluopxSwhhlJER2syD75351gkCjilAjNg609dg8OqA40a3gIet70MNERvYQ-u7Hbg0YDhtAC8_HvBs79s-We8mR7bzLsIEa2fwzia71sfLNbpodBvh5neO0fJl9vn8mi3e52_PT4uszgueslVjQGrGuOaiKFa0oabIdcU5kUYLrldNaShwKWUJXHDR5DUtQVYVFQ0vDMnH6O7U2wX_1UNMamdjDW2rHfg-KibygjFZVmJAyxNaBx9jgEZ1we50OChK1FGt2qo_teqoVp3UDsHHUxCGR_YWgoq1BTc4swHqpIy3_1X8AI3ohwA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2834229678</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Groundwater stress induced by shale resources development in the US: Evolution, response, and mitigation</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>He, Li ; Feng, Hushen ; Luo, Pengfei ; Luo, Yugeng ; Xu, Yang</creator><creatorcontrib>He, Li ; Feng, Hushen ; Luo, Pengfei ; Luo, Yugeng ; Xu, Yang</creatorcontrib><description>[Display omitted]
•Shale-induced groundwater stress evaluation model is proposed.•Shale-induced groundwater stress remains heavy and would keep growing.•Shale development could be more competitive than agricultural planting.•Joint policies would be effective for mitigating projected intensifying stress.
Unconventional shale resources development consumes a huge amount of groundwater, yet it is short of systematic research on evolution, response, and mitigation of shale-induced groundwater stress (SGS). To fill this gap, we here propose a new SGS evaluation model based on an improved concept of groundwater footprint. We find that the SGS remains heavy within the shale regions of the US in 2017–2019. The projected SGS would keep growing in 2025–2050 within the regions except Permian, owing to comprehensive stochastic response to future intensified shale development and varied precipitation and temperature. Notwithstanding, comparison of the rate of risked returns indicates that shale development could be more economically and environmentally competitive than agricultural planting, demonstrating high suitability of shale development in part of regions such as Niobrara, Anadarko, Permian, and Eagle Ford. Joint policies regulating shale production, water intensity, and groundwater supply coefficient would be effective for mitigating future intensified SGS.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0306-2619</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-9118</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121037</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Climatic conditions ; energy ; groundwater ; Groundwater footprint ; Groundwater stress ; Permian period ; Rate of risked returns ; shale ; Shale production ; Shale resources development ; temperature</subject><ispartof>Applied energy, 2023-06, Vol.340, p.121037, Article 121037</ispartof><rights>2023 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-bfde9a225a5844b1f1d43a75509da85abf6d1e59996e5858f3c16e97718f54d03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-bfde9a225a5844b1f1d43a75509da85abf6d1e59996e5858f3c16e97718f54d03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261923004014$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>He, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng, Hushen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Pengfei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Yugeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Yang</creatorcontrib><title>Groundwater stress induced by shale resources development in the US: Evolution, response, and mitigation</title><title>Applied energy</title><description>[Display omitted]
•Shale-induced groundwater stress evaluation model is proposed.•Shale-induced groundwater stress remains heavy and would keep growing.•Shale development could be more competitive than agricultural planting.•Joint policies would be effective for mitigating projected intensifying stress.
Unconventional shale resources development consumes a huge amount of groundwater, yet it is short of systematic research on evolution, response, and mitigation of shale-induced groundwater stress (SGS). To fill this gap, we here propose a new SGS evaluation model based on an improved concept of groundwater footprint. We find that the SGS remains heavy within the shale regions of the US in 2017–2019. The projected SGS would keep growing in 2025–2050 within the regions except Permian, owing to comprehensive stochastic response to future intensified shale development and varied precipitation and temperature. Notwithstanding, comparison of the rate of risked returns indicates that shale development could be more economically and environmentally competitive than agricultural planting, demonstrating high suitability of shale development in part of regions such as Niobrara, Anadarko, Permian, and Eagle Ford. Joint policies regulating shale production, water intensity, and groundwater supply coefficient would be effective for mitigating future intensified SGS.</description><subject>Climatic conditions</subject><subject>energy</subject><subject>groundwater</subject><subject>Groundwater footprint</subject><subject>Groundwater stress</subject><subject>Permian period</subject><subject>Rate of risked returns</subject><subject>shale</subject><subject>Shale production</subject><subject>Shale resources development</subject><subject>temperature</subject><issn>0306-2619</issn><issn>1872-9118</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMFKAzEQhoMoWKuvIDl66NYku9lNPClSq1DwoD2HdDPbpmyTNclW-vZuqZ49Dcx8_w_zIXRLyZQSWt5vp7oDB2F9mDLC8illlOTVGRpRUbFMUirO0YjkpMxYSeUluopxSwhhlJER2syD75351gkCjilAjNg609dg8OqA40a3gIet70MNERvYQ-u7Hbg0YDhtAC8_HvBs79s-We8mR7bzLsIEa2fwzia71sfLNbpodBvh5neO0fJl9vn8mi3e52_PT4uszgueslVjQGrGuOaiKFa0oabIdcU5kUYLrldNaShwKWUJXHDR5DUtQVYVFQ0vDMnH6O7U2wX_1UNMamdjDW2rHfg-KibygjFZVmJAyxNaBx9jgEZ1we50OChK1FGt2qo_teqoVp3UDsHHUxCGR_YWgoq1BTc4swHqpIy3_1X8AI3ohwA</recordid><startdate>20230615</startdate><enddate>20230615</enddate><creator>He, Li</creator><creator>Feng, Hushen</creator><creator>Luo, Pengfei</creator><creator>Luo, Yugeng</creator><creator>Xu, Yang</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230615</creationdate><title>Groundwater stress induced by shale resources development in the US: Evolution, response, and mitigation</title><author>He, Li ; Feng, Hushen ; Luo, Pengfei ; Luo, Yugeng ; Xu, Yang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-bfde9a225a5844b1f1d43a75509da85abf6d1e59996e5858f3c16e97718f54d03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Climatic conditions</topic><topic>energy</topic><topic>groundwater</topic><topic>Groundwater footprint</topic><topic>Groundwater stress</topic><topic>Permian period</topic><topic>Rate of risked returns</topic><topic>shale</topic><topic>Shale production</topic><topic>Shale resources development</topic><topic>temperature</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>He, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng, Hushen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Pengfei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Yugeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Yang</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Applied energy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>He, Li</au><au>Feng, Hushen</au><au>Luo, Pengfei</au><au>Luo, Yugeng</au><au>Xu, Yang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Groundwater stress induced by shale resources development in the US: Evolution, response, and mitigation</atitle><jtitle>Applied energy</jtitle><date>2023-06-15</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>340</volume><spage>121037</spage><pages>121037-</pages><artnum>121037</artnum><issn>0306-2619</issn><eissn>1872-9118</eissn><abstract>[Display omitted]
•Shale-induced groundwater stress evaluation model is proposed.•Shale-induced groundwater stress remains heavy and would keep growing.•Shale development could be more competitive than agricultural planting.•Joint policies would be effective for mitigating projected intensifying stress.
Unconventional shale resources development consumes a huge amount of groundwater, yet it is short of systematic research on evolution, response, and mitigation of shale-induced groundwater stress (SGS). To fill this gap, we here propose a new SGS evaluation model based on an improved concept of groundwater footprint. We find that the SGS remains heavy within the shale regions of the US in 2017–2019. The projected SGS would keep growing in 2025–2050 within the regions except Permian, owing to comprehensive stochastic response to future intensified shale development and varied precipitation and temperature. Notwithstanding, comparison of the rate of risked returns indicates that shale development could be more economically and environmentally competitive than agricultural planting, demonstrating high suitability of shale development in part of regions such as Niobrara, Anadarko, Permian, and Eagle Ford. Joint policies regulating shale production, water intensity, and groundwater supply coefficient would be effective for mitigating future intensified SGS.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121037</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0306-2619 |
ispartof | Applied energy, 2023-06, Vol.340, p.121037, Article 121037 |
issn | 0306-2619 1872-9118 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2834229678 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Climatic conditions energy groundwater Groundwater footprint Groundwater stress Permian period Rate of risked returns shale Shale production Shale resources development temperature |
title | Groundwater stress induced by shale resources development in the US: Evolution, response, and mitigation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T22%3A39%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Groundwater%20stress%20induced%20by%20shale%20resources%20development%20in%20the%20US:%20Evolution,%20response,%20and%20mitigation&rft.jtitle=Applied%20energy&rft.au=He,%20Li&rft.date=2023-06-15&rft.volume=340&rft.spage=121037&rft.pages=121037-&rft.artnum=121037&rft.issn=0306-2619&rft.eissn=1872-9118&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121037&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2834229678%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2834229678&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0306261923004014&rfr_iscdi=true |