From farm sustainability to ecosystem sustainability: Exploring the limitations of farm-applied aquaculture eco-certification schemes
Aquaculture eco-certification schemes provide standards against which individual farms are assessed, and those farms that comply with eco-certification criteria receive certified status. These schemes aim to improve aquaculture sustainability, but the site-by-site approach of eco-certification can b...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of environmental management 2023-08, Vol.339, p.117869-117869, Article 117869 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 117869 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 117869 |
container_title | Journal of environmental management |
container_volume | 339 |
creator | Rector, M.E. Filgueira, R. Grant, J. |
description | Aquaculture eco-certification schemes provide standards against which individual farms are assessed, and those farms that comply with eco-certification criteria receive certified status. These schemes aim to improve aquaculture sustainability, but the site-by-site approach of eco-certification can be a barrier to the inclusion of ecosystem perspectives in the evaluation of farm sustainability. However, the ecosystem approach to aquaculture demands a management approach that considers broader scale ecosystem impacts. This study explored how eco-certification schemes and processes account for potential ecosystem impacts of salmon farms. Interviews with eco-certification auditors, salmon producers, and eco-certification staff were conducted. The experience of participants and information from eco-certification scheme criteria and other eco-certification scheme documents were used to identify thematic challenges associated with the consideration of ecosystem impacts including: assessing far-field impacts, managing cumulative effects, and anticipating ecosystem risks. Results indicate that eco-certification schemes work within the limitations of farm-scale application of global eco-certification standards to address potential ecosystem impacts by: (1) including eco-certification scheme criteria that address ecosystem impacts, (2) relying on the experience, expertise, and judgement of eco-certification auditors, and (3) referencing and deferring to local regulations. Results indicate that eco-certification schemes can address ecosystem impacts to some degree, despite their site-by-site approach. The integration of additional tools while supporting the capacity of farms to apply those tools, as well as increasing transparency during compliance assessment could help eco-certification schemes shift from providing assurance of farm sustainability to providing assurance of ecosystem sustainability.
•Eco-certification schemes (EC) aim to provide assurance of farm sustainability.•A site-by-site approach may limit application of EC to ecosystem management.•EC should address far-field impacts, cumulative effects, and ecosystem risk.•EC relies on scheme criteria, auditors, and local regulations to address ecosystem impacts.•There are limits to the capacity of EC to assure ecosystem sustainability. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117869 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2834228605</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301479723006576</els_id><sourcerecordid>2834228605</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-7bea819bc2e9dbcaa26a3c9c0f3965c111e254f8d1fa548ff32deb3db680ce283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1v1DAQhi0EokvhJxT5yCXL2M6H3UtVrVpaqRIXOFuOM6ZeJXFqO1X3B_C_yXa3HHqB0xzmed-R5iHkjMGaAau_btdbHB8HM645cLFmrJG1ekNWDFRVyFrAW7ICAawoG9WckA8pbQFAcNa8JyeigaqsFKzI7-sYBupMHGiaUzZ-NK3vfd7RHCjakHYp4-vdOb16mvoQ_fiL5nukvR98NtmHMdHgntsKM029x46ah9nYuc9zxH1fYTFm77x9xmmy9zhg-kjeOdMn_HScp-Tn9dWPzU1x9_3b7ebyrrBCyVw0LRrJVGs5qq61xvDaCKssOKHqyjLGkFelkx1zpiqlc4J32IqurSVY5FKcki-H3imGhxlT1oNPFvvejBjmpBek5FzWUP0HCkzJUjRiQasDamNIKaLTU_SDiTvNQO9l6a0-ytJ7Wfoga8l9Pp6Y2wG7v6kXOwtwcQBw-cmjx6iT9Tha7HxEm3UX_D9O_AG7l6y8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2801984373</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>From farm sustainability to ecosystem sustainability: Exploring the limitations of farm-applied aquaculture eco-certification schemes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Rector, M.E. ; Filgueira, R. ; Grant, J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rector, M.E. ; Filgueira, R. ; Grant, J.</creatorcontrib><description>Aquaculture eco-certification schemes provide standards against which individual farms are assessed, and those farms that comply with eco-certification criteria receive certified status. These schemes aim to improve aquaculture sustainability, but the site-by-site approach of eco-certification can be a barrier to the inclusion of ecosystem perspectives in the evaluation of farm sustainability. However, the ecosystem approach to aquaculture demands a management approach that considers broader scale ecosystem impacts. This study explored how eco-certification schemes and processes account for potential ecosystem impacts of salmon farms. Interviews with eco-certification auditors, salmon producers, and eco-certification staff were conducted. The experience of participants and information from eco-certification scheme criteria and other eco-certification scheme documents were used to identify thematic challenges associated with the consideration of ecosystem impacts including: assessing far-field impacts, managing cumulative effects, and anticipating ecosystem risks. Results indicate that eco-certification schemes work within the limitations of farm-scale application of global eco-certification standards to address potential ecosystem impacts by: (1) including eco-certification scheme criteria that address ecosystem impacts, (2) relying on the experience, expertise, and judgement of eco-certification auditors, and (3) referencing and deferring to local regulations. Results indicate that eco-certification schemes can address ecosystem impacts to some degree, despite their site-by-site approach. The integration of additional tools while supporting the capacity of farms to apply those tools, as well as increasing transparency during compliance assessment could help eco-certification schemes shift from providing assurance of farm sustainability to providing assurance of ecosystem sustainability.
•Eco-certification schemes (EC) aim to provide assurance of farm sustainability.•A site-by-site approach may limit application of EC to ecosystem management.•EC should address far-field impacts, cumulative effects, and ecosystem risk.•EC relies on scheme criteria, auditors, and local regulations to address ecosystem impacts.•There are limits to the capacity of EC to assure ecosystem sustainability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4797</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8630</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117869</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37054590</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Aquaculture ; Aquaculture - methods ; Aquaculture Stewardship Council ; Best Aquaculture Practices ; Certification ; compliance ; Eco-certification ; Ecosystem ; ecosystems ; environmental management ; Farms ; Humans ; Salmon ; Sustainability</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental management, 2023-08, Vol.339, p.117869-117869, Article 117869</ispartof><rights>2023 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-7bea819bc2e9dbcaa26a3c9c0f3965c111e254f8d1fa548ff32deb3db680ce283</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-7bea819bc2e9dbcaa26a3c9c0f3965c111e254f8d1fa548ff32deb3db680ce283</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2473-7184 ; 0000-0002-3332-8649</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117869$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37054590$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rector, M.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filgueira, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grant, J.</creatorcontrib><title>From farm sustainability to ecosystem sustainability: Exploring the limitations of farm-applied aquaculture eco-certification schemes</title><title>Journal of environmental management</title><addtitle>J Environ Manage</addtitle><description>Aquaculture eco-certification schemes provide standards against which individual farms are assessed, and those farms that comply with eco-certification criteria receive certified status. These schemes aim to improve aquaculture sustainability, but the site-by-site approach of eco-certification can be a barrier to the inclusion of ecosystem perspectives in the evaluation of farm sustainability. However, the ecosystem approach to aquaculture demands a management approach that considers broader scale ecosystem impacts. This study explored how eco-certification schemes and processes account for potential ecosystem impacts of salmon farms. Interviews with eco-certification auditors, salmon producers, and eco-certification staff were conducted. The experience of participants and information from eco-certification scheme criteria and other eco-certification scheme documents were used to identify thematic challenges associated with the consideration of ecosystem impacts including: assessing far-field impacts, managing cumulative effects, and anticipating ecosystem risks. Results indicate that eco-certification schemes work within the limitations of farm-scale application of global eco-certification standards to address potential ecosystem impacts by: (1) including eco-certification scheme criteria that address ecosystem impacts, (2) relying on the experience, expertise, and judgement of eco-certification auditors, and (3) referencing and deferring to local regulations. Results indicate that eco-certification schemes can address ecosystem impacts to some degree, despite their site-by-site approach. The integration of additional tools while supporting the capacity of farms to apply those tools, as well as increasing transparency during compliance assessment could help eco-certification schemes shift from providing assurance of farm sustainability to providing assurance of ecosystem sustainability.
•Eco-certification schemes (EC) aim to provide assurance of farm sustainability.•A site-by-site approach may limit application of EC to ecosystem management.•EC should address far-field impacts, cumulative effects, and ecosystem risk.•EC relies on scheme criteria, auditors, and local regulations to address ecosystem impacts.•There are limits to the capacity of EC to assure ecosystem sustainability.</description><subject>Aquaculture</subject><subject>Aquaculture - methods</subject><subject>Aquaculture Stewardship Council</subject><subject>Best Aquaculture Practices</subject><subject>Certification</subject><subject>compliance</subject><subject>Eco-certification</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>ecosystems</subject><subject>environmental management</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Salmon</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><issn>0301-4797</issn><issn>1095-8630</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1v1DAQhi0EokvhJxT5yCXL2M6H3UtVrVpaqRIXOFuOM6ZeJXFqO1X3B_C_yXa3HHqB0xzmed-R5iHkjMGaAau_btdbHB8HM645cLFmrJG1ekNWDFRVyFrAW7ICAawoG9WckA8pbQFAcNa8JyeigaqsFKzI7-sYBupMHGiaUzZ-NK3vfd7RHCjakHYp4-vdOb16mvoQ_fiL5nukvR98NtmHMdHgntsKM029x46ah9nYuc9zxH1fYTFm77x9xmmy9zhg-kjeOdMn_HScp-Tn9dWPzU1x9_3b7ebyrrBCyVw0LRrJVGs5qq61xvDaCKssOKHqyjLGkFelkx1zpiqlc4J32IqurSVY5FKcki-H3imGhxlT1oNPFvvejBjmpBek5FzWUP0HCkzJUjRiQasDamNIKaLTU_SDiTvNQO9l6a0-ytJ7Wfoga8l9Pp6Y2wG7v6kXOwtwcQBw-cmjx6iT9Tha7HxEm3UX_D9O_AG7l6y8</recordid><startdate>20230801</startdate><enddate>20230801</enddate><creator>Rector, M.E.</creator><creator>Filgueira, R.</creator><creator>Grant, J.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2473-7184</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3332-8649</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230801</creationdate><title>From farm sustainability to ecosystem sustainability: Exploring the limitations of farm-applied aquaculture eco-certification schemes</title><author>Rector, M.E. ; Filgueira, R. ; Grant, J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-7bea819bc2e9dbcaa26a3c9c0f3965c111e254f8d1fa548ff32deb3db680ce283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Aquaculture</topic><topic>Aquaculture - methods</topic><topic>Aquaculture Stewardship Council</topic><topic>Best Aquaculture Practices</topic><topic>Certification</topic><topic>compliance</topic><topic>Eco-certification</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>ecosystems</topic><topic>environmental management</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Salmon</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rector, M.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filgueira, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grant, J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rector, M.E.</au><au>Filgueira, R.</au><au>Grant, J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>From farm sustainability to ecosystem sustainability: Exploring the limitations of farm-applied aquaculture eco-certification schemes</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle><addtitle>J Environ Manage</addtitle><date>2023-08-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>339</volume><spage>117869</spage><epage>117869</epage><pages>117869-117869</pages><artnum>117869</artnum><issn>0301-4797</issn><eissn>1095-8630</eissn><abstract>Aquaculture eco-certification schemes provide standards against which individual farms are assessed, and those farms that comply with eco-certification criteria receive certified status. These schemes aim to improve aquaculture sustainability, but the site-by-site approach of eco-certification can be a barrier to the inclusion of ecosystem perspectives in the evaluation of farm sustainability. However, the ecosystem approach to aquaculture demands a management approach that considers broader scale ecosystem impacts. This study explored how eco-certification schemes and processes account for potential ecosystem impacts of salmon farms. Interviews with eco-certification auditors, salmon producers, and eco-certification staff were conducted. The experience of participants and information from eco-certification scheme criteria and other eco-certification scheme documents were used to identify thematic challenges associated with the consideration of ecosystem impacts including: assessing far-field impacts, managing cumulative effects, and anticipating ecosystem risks. Results indicate that eco-certification schemes work within the limitations of farm-scale application of global eco-certification standards to address potential ecosystem impacts by: (1) including eco-certification scheme criteria that address ecosystem impacts, (2) relying on the experience, expertise, and judgement of eco-certification auditors, and (3) referencing and deferring to local regulations. Results indicate that eco-certification schemes can address ecosystem impacts to some degree, despite their site-by-site approach. The integration of additional tools while supporting the capacity of farms to apply those tools, as well as increasing transparency during compliance assessment could help eco-certification schemes shift from providing assurance of farm sustainability to providing assurance of ecosystem sustainability.
•Eco-certification schemes (EC) aim to provide assurance of farm sustainability.•A site-by-site approach may limit application of EC to ecosystem management.•EC should address far-field impacts, cumulative effects, and ecosystem risk.•EC relies on scheme criteria, auditors, and local regulations to address ecosystem impacts.•There are limits to the capacity of EC to assure ecosystem sustainability.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>37054590</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117869</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2473-7184</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3332-8649</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0301-4797 |
ispartof | Journal of environmental management, 2023-08, Vol.339, p.117869-117869, Article 117869 |
issn | 0301-4797 1095-8630 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2834228605 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Aquaculture Aquaculture - methods Aquaculture Stewardship Council Best Aquaculture Practices Certification compliance Eco-certification Ecosystem ecosystems environmental management Farms Humans Salmon Sustainability |
title | From farm sustainability to ecosystem sustainability: Exploring the limitations of farm-applied aquaculture eco-certification schemes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T11%3A03%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=From%20farm%20sustainability%20to%20ecosystem%20sustainability:%20Exploring%20the%20limitations%20of%20farm-applied%20aquaculture%20eco-certification%20schemes&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20management&rft.au=Rector,%20M.E.&rft.date=2023-08-01&rft.volume=339&rft.spage=117869&rft.epage=117869&rft.pages=117869-117869&rft.artnum=117869&rft.issn=0301-4797&rft.eissn=1095-8630&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117869&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2834228605%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2801984373&rft_id=info:pmid/37054590&rft_els_id=S0301479723006576&rfr_iscdi=true |