From farm sustainability to ecosystem sustainability: Exploring the limitations of farm-applied aquaculture eco-certification schemes

Aquaculture eco-certification schemes provide standards against which individual farms are assessed, and those farms that comply with eco-certification criteria receive certified status. These schemes aim to improve aquaculture sustainability, but the site-by-site approach of eco-certification can b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of environmental management 2023-08, Vol.339, p.117869-117869, Article 117869
Hauptverfasser: Rector, M.E., Filgueira, R., Grant, J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 117869
container_issue
container_start_page 117869
container_title Journal of environmental management
container_volume 339
creator Rector, M.E.
Filgueira, R.
Grant, J.
description Aquaculture eco-certification schemes provide standards against which individual farms are assessed, and those farms that comply with eco-certification criteria receive certified status. These schemes aim to improve aquaculture sustainability, but the site-by-site approach of eco-certification can be a barrier to the inclusion of ecosystem perspectives in the evaluation of farm sustainability. However, the ecosystem approach to aquaculture demands a management approach that considers broader scale ecosystem impacts. This study explored how eco-certification schemes and processes account for potential ecosystem impacts of salmon farms. Interviews with eco-certification auditors, salmon producers, and eco-certification staff were conducted. The experience of participants and information from eco-certification scheme criteria and other eco-certification scheme documents were used to identify thematic challenges associated with the consideration of ecosystem impacts including: assessing far-field impacts, managing cumulative effects, and anticipating ecosystem risks. Results indicate that eco-certification schemes work within the limitations of farm-scale application of global eco-certification standards to address potential ecosystem impacts by: (1) including eco-certification scheme criteria that address ecosystem impacts, (2) relying on the experience, expertise, and judgement of eco-certification auditors, and (3) referencing and deferring to local regulations. Results indicate that eco-certification schemes can address ecosystem impacts to some degree, despite their site-by-site approach. The integration of additional tools while supporting the capacity of farms to apply those tools, as well as increasing transparency during compliance assessment could help eco-certification schemes shift from providing assurance of farm sustainability to providing assurance of ecosystem sustainability. •Eco-certification schemes (EC) aim to provide assurance of farm sustainability.•A site-by-site approach may limit application of EC to ecosystem management.•EC should address far-field impacts, cumulative effects, and ecosystem risk.•EC relies on scheme criteria, auditors, and local regulations to address ecosystem impacts.•There are limits to the capacity of EC to assure ecosystem sustainability.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117869
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2834228605</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301479723006576</els_id><sourcerecordid>2834228605</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-7bea819bc2e9dbcaa26a3c9c0f3965c111e254f8d1fa548ff32deb3db680ce283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1v1DAQhi0EokvhJxT5yCXL2M6H3UtVrVpaqRIXOFuOM6ZeJXFqO1X3B_C_yXa3HHqB0xzmed-R5iHkjMGaAau_btdbHB8HM645cLFmrJG1ekNWDFRVyFrAW7ICAawoG9WckA8pbQFAcNa8JyeigaqsFKzI7-sYBupMHGiaUzZ-NK3vfd7RHCjakHYp4-vdOb16mvoQ_fiL5nukvR98NtmHMdHgntsKM029x46ah9nYuc9zxH1fYTFm77x9xmmy9zhg-kjeOdMn_HScp-Tn9dWPzU1x9_3b7ebyrrBCyVw0LRrJVGs5qq61xvDaCKssOKHqyjLGkFelkx1zpiqlc4J32IqurSVY5FKcki-H3imGhxlT1oNPFvvejBjmpBek5FzWUP0HCkzJUjRiQasDamNIKaLTU_SDiTvNQO9l6a0-ytJ7Wfoga8l9Pp6Y2wG7v6kXOwtwcQBw-cmjx6iT9Tha7HxEm3UX_D9O_AG7l6y8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2801984373</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>From farm sustainability to ecosystem sustainability: Exploring the limitations of farm-applied aquaculture eco-certification schemes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Rector, M.E. ; Filgueira, R. ; Grant, J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rector, M.E. ; Filgueira, R. ; Grant, J.</creatorcontrib><description>Aquaculture eco-certification schemes provide standards against which individual farms are assessed, and those farms that comply with eco-certification criteria receive certified status. These schemes aim to improve aquaculture sustainability, but the site-by-site approach of eco-certification can be a barrier to the inclusion of ecosystem perspectives in the evaluation of farm sustainability. However, the ecosystem approach to aquaculture demands a management approach that considers broader scale ecosystem impacts. This study explored how eco-certification schemes and processes account for potential ecosystem impacts of salmon farms. Interviews with eco-certification auditors, salmon producers, and eco-certification staff were conducted. The experience of participants and information from eco-certification scheme criteria and other eco-certification scheme documents were used to identify thematic challenges associated with the consideration of ecosystem impacts including: assessing far-field impacts, managing cumulative effects, and anticipating ecosystem risks. Results indicate that eco-certification schemes work within the limitations of farm-scale application of global eco-certification standards to address potential ecosystem impacts by: (1) including eco-certification scheme criteria that address ecosystem impacts, (2) relying on the experience, expertise, and judgement of eco-certification auditors, and (3) referencing and deferring to local regulations. Results indicate that eco-certification schemes can address ecosystem impacts to some degree, despite their site-by-site approach. The integration of additional tools while supporting the capacity of farms to apply those tools, as well as increasing transparency during compliance assessment could help eco-certification schemes shift from providing assurance of farm sustainability to providing assurance of ecosystem sustainability. •Eco-certification schemes (EC) aim to provide assurance of farm sustainability.•A site-by-site approach may limit application of EC to ecosystem management.•EC should address far-field impacts, cumulative effects, and ecosystem risk.•EC relies on scheme criteria, auditors, and local regulations to address ecosystem impacts.•There are limits to the capacity of EC to assure ecosystem sustainability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4797</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8630</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117869</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37054590</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Aquaculture ; Aquaculture - methods ; Aquaculture Stewardship Council ; Best Aquaculture Practices ; Certification ; compliance ; Eco-certification ; Ecosystem ; ecosystems ; environmental management ; Farms ; Humans ; Salmon ; Sustainability</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental management, 2023-08, Vol.339, p.117869-117869, Article 117869</ispartof><rights>2023 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-7bea819bc2e9dbcaa26a3c9c0f3965c111e254f8d1fa548ff32deb3db680ce283</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-7bea819bc2e9dbcaa26a3c9c0f3965c111e254f8d1fa548ff32deb3db680ce283</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2473-7184 ; 0000-0002-3332-8649</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117869$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37054590$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rector, M.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filgueira, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grant, J.</creatorcontrib><title>From farm sustainability to ecosystem sustainability: Exploring the limitations of farm-applied aquaculture eco-certification schemes</title><title>Journal of environmental management</title><addtitle>J Environ Manage</addtitle><description>Aquaculture eco-certification schemes provide standards against which individual farms are assessed, and those farms that comply with eco-certification criteria receive certified status. These schemes aim to improve aquaculture sustainability, but the site-by-site approach of eco-certification can be a barrier to the inclusion of ecosystem perspectives in the evaluation of farm sustainability. However, the ecosystem approach to aquaculture demands a management approach that considers broader scale ecosystem impacts. This study explored how eco-certification schemes and processes account for potential ecosystem impacts of salmon farms. Interviews with eco-certification auditors, salmon producers, and eco-certification staff were conducted. The experience of participants and information from eco-certification scheme criteria and other eco-certification scheme documents were used to identify thematic challenges associated with the consideration of ecosystem impacts including: assessing far-field impacts, managing cumulative effects, and anticipating ecosystem risks. Results indicate that eco-certification schemes work within the limitations of farm-scale application of global eco-certification standards to address potential ecosystem impacts by: (1) including eco-certification scheme criteria that address ecosystem impacts, (2) relying on the experience, expertise, and judgement of eco-certification auditors, and (3) referencing and deferring to local regulations. Results indicate that eco-certification schemes can address ecosystem impacts to some degree, despite their site-by-site approach. The integration of additional tools while supporting the capacity of farms to apply those tools, as well as increasing transparency during compliance assessment could help eco-certification schemes shift from providing assurance of farm sustainability to providing assurance of ecosystem sustainability. •Eco-certification schemes (EC) aim to provide assurance of farm sustainability.•A site-by-site approach may limit application of EC to ecosystem management.•EC should address far-field impacts, cumulative effects, and ecosystem risk.•EC relies on scheme criteria, auditors, and local regulations to address ecosystem impacts.•There are limits to the capacity of EC to assure ecosystem sustainability.</description><subject>Aquaculture</subject><subject>Aquaculture - methods</subject><subject>Aquaculture Stewardship Council</subject><subject>Best Aquaculture Practices</subject><subject>Certification</subject><subject>compliance</subject><subject>Eco-certification</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>ecosystems</subject><subject>environmental management</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Salmon</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><issn>0301-4797</issn><issn>1095-8630</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1v1DAQhi0EokvhJxT5yCXL2M6H3UtVrVpaqRIXOFuOM6ZeJXFqO1X3B_C_yXa3HHqB0xzmed-R5iHkjMGaAau_btdbHB8HM645cLFmrJG1ekNWDFRVyFrAW7ICAawoG9WckA8pbQFAcNa8JyeigaqsFKzI7-sYBupMHGiaUzZ-NK3vfd7RHCjakHYp4-vdOb16mvoQ_fiL5nukvR98NtmHMdHgntsKM029x46ah9nYuc9zxH1fYTFm77x9xmmy9zhg-kjeOdMn_HScp-Tn9dWPzU1x9_3b7ebyrrBCyVw0LRrJVGs5qq61xvDaCKssOKHqyjLGkFelkx1zpiqlc4J32IqurSVY5FKcki-H3imGhxlT1oNPFvvejBjmpBek5FzWUP0HCkzJUjRiQasDamNIKaLTU_SDiTvNQO9l6a0-ytJ7Wfoga8l9Pp6Y2wG7v6kXOwtwcQBw-cmjx6iT9Tha7HxEm3UX_D9O_AG7l6y8</recordid><startdate>20230801</startdate><enddate>20230801</enddate><creator>Rector, M.E.</creator><creator>Filgueira, R.</creator><creator>Grant, J.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2473-7184</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3332-8649</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230801</creationdate><title>From farm sustainability to ecosystem sustainability: Exploring the limitations of farm-applied aquaculture eco-certification schemes</title><author>Rector, M.E. ; Filgueira, R. ; Grant, J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-7bea819bc2e9dbcaa26a3c9c0f3965c111e254f8d1fa548ff32deb3db680ce283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Aquaculture</topic><topic>Aquaculture - methods</topic><topic>Aquaculture Stewardship Council</topic><topic>Best Aquaculture Practices</topic><topic>Certification</topic><topic>compliance</topic><topic>Eco-certification</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>ecosystems</topic><topic>environmental management</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Salmon</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rector, M.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filgueira, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grant, J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rector, M.E.</au><au>Filgueira, R.</au><au>Grant, J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>From farm sustainability to ecosystem sustainability: Exploring the limitations of farm-applied aquaculture eco-certification schemes</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle><addtitle>J Environ Manage</addtitle><date>2023-08-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>339</volume><spage>117869</spage><epage>117869</epage><pages>117869-117869</pages><artnum>117869</artnum><issn>0301-4797</issn><eissn>1095-8630</eissn><abstract>Aquaculture eco-certification schemes provide standards against which individual farms are assessed, and those farms that comply with eco-certification criteria receive certified status. These schemes aim to improve aquaculture sustainability, but the site-by-site approach of eco-certification can be a barrier to the inclusion of ecosystem perspectives in the evaluation of farm sustainability. However, the ecosystem approach to aquaculture demands a management approach that considers broader scale ecosystem impacts. This study explored how eco-certification schemes and processes account for potential ecosystem impacts of salmon farms. Interviews with eco-certification auditors, salmon producers, and eco-certification staff were conducted. The experience of participants and information from eco-certification scheme criteria and other eco-certification scheme documents were used to identify thematic challenges associated with the consideration of ecosystem impacts including: assessing far-field impacts, managing cumulative effects, and anticipating ecosystem risks. Results indicate that eco-certification schemes work within the limitations of farm-scale application of global eco-certification standards to address potential ecosystem impacts by: (1) including eco-certification scheme criteria that address ecosystem impacts, (2) relying on the experience, expertise, and judgement of eco-certification auditors, and (3) referencing and deferring to local regulations. Results indicate that eco-certification schemes can address ecosystem impacts to some degree, despite their site-by-site approach. The integration of additional tools while supporting the capacity of farms to apply those tools, as well as increasing transparency during compliance assessment could help eco-certification schemes shift from providing assurance of farm sustainability to providing assurance of ecosystem sustainability. •Eco-certification schemes (EC) aim to provide assurance of farm sustainability.•A site-by-site approach may limit application of EC to ecosystem management.•EC should address far-field impacts, cumulative effects, and ecosystem risk.•EC relies on scheme criteria, auditors, and local regulations to address ecosystem impacts.•There are limits to the capacity of EC to assure ecosystem sustainability.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>37054590</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117869</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2473-7184</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3332-8649</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-4797
ispartof Journal of environmental management, 2023-08, Vol.339, p.117869-117869, Article 117869
issn 0301-4797
1095-8630
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2834228605
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Aquaculture
Aquaculture - methods
Aquaculture Stewardship Council
Best Aquaculture Practices
Certification
compliance
Eco-certification
Ecosystem
ecosystems
environmental management
Farms
Humans
Salmon
Sustainability
title From farm sustainability to ecosystem sustainability: Exploring the limitations of farm-applied aquaculture eco-certification schemes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T11%3A03%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=From%20farm%20sustainability%20to%20ecosystem%20sustainability:%20Exploring%20the%20limitations%20of%20farm-applied%20aquaculture%20eco-certification%20schemes&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20management&rft.au=Rector,%20M.E.&rft.date=2023-08-01&rft.volume=339&rft.spage=117869&rft.epage=117869&rft.pages=117869-117869&rft.artnum=117869&rft.issn=0301-4797&rft.eissn=1095-8630&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117869&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2834228605%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2801984373&rft_id=info:pmid/37054590&rft_els_id=S0301479723006576&rfr_iscdi=true