Interrelations of α‐ and β‐amylase activity with starch, sugars, and culinary and nutritional quality attributes in sweetpotato storage roots

BACKGROUND Little information is available on α‐ and β‐amylase activity and their associations with starch, sugars and other culinary qualities in sweetpotato. The present study aimed to assess sweetpotato storage root α‐ and β‐amylase activity in relation to starch, sugars, β‐carotene content and s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the science of food and agriculture 2024-06, Vol.104 (8), p.4662-4670
Hauptverfasser: Amankwaah, Victor A., Williamson, Sharon, Olukolu, Bode A., Truong, Van‐Den, Carey, Edward, Ssali, Reuben, Yencho, George Craig
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4670
container_issue 8
container_start_page 4662
container_title Journal of the science of food and agriculture
container_volume 104
creator Amankwaah, Victor A.
Williamson, Sharon
Olukolu, Bode A.
Truong, Van‐Den
Carey, Edward
Ssali, Reuben
Yencho, George Craig
description BACKGROUND Little information is available on α‐ and β‐amylase activity and their associations with starch, sugars and other culinary qualities in sweetpotato. The present study aimed to assess sweetpotato storage root α‐ and β‐amylase activity in relation to starch, sugars, β‐carotene content and storage root flesh color. RESULTS α‐ and β‐amylase activity (α‐AA and β‐AA) were assayed from a Tanzania (T) × Beauregard (B) genetic mapping population in their uncured (raw), cured and stored (approximately 11 weeks) forms during 2016 and 2017. Ceralpha and Betamyl methods, with modifications to suit a high‐throughput microplate assay format, were used to quantify α‐AA and β‐AA, respectively. Storage root dry matter, starch, glucose, fructose, sucrose and β‐carotene content were predicted using near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. There was little relationship (r2 = 0.02–0.08, P ≤ 0.05 in 2016 and r2 = 0.05–0.11, P ≤ 0.05 in 2017) between α‐AA and β‐AA. We observed negative linear associations between α‐AA and dry matter content and generally no correlations between β‐AA and dry matter content. β‐AA and sugars were weakly positively correlated. β‐AA and β‐carotene content were positively correlated (r = 0.3–0.4 in 2016 and 0.3–0.5 in 2017). CONCLUSION Generally, the correlation coefficient for amylase enzyme activity and sugar components of storage roots at harvest increased after curing and during post‐harvest storage. The present study is a major step forward in sweetpotato breeding in terms of providing a better understanding of how α‐ and β‐amylase activity are inter‐associated with several culinary quality attributes. © 2023 The Authors. Journal of The Science of Food and Agriculture published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jsfa.12832
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2834000849</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2834000849</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3932-fb5bc2cb82c4fa057cf7aef2025c89b8d1f2c685291568512664f0c3e198c00f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1uEzEYhi0EoqGw4QDIEhtUdcpnezwZL6uK_qBKLIC15XHs1pEzTv3TKDuOgNST0IP0ED0JTlJYsGD1-efxI_l9EXpL4IgA0I_zZNURoT2jz9CEgJg2AASeo0m9pA0nLd1Dr1KaA4AQXfcS7bFpCx3hbILuLsZsYjReZRfGhIPFD78ef_zEapzhh_u6Uou1V8lgpbO7dXmNVy5f45RV1NeHOJUrFdPhFtfFu1HF9XYzlhzdxqk8vinKb16qXM-Gkk3CbsRpZUxehqxyqLoQ1ZXBMYScXqMXVvlk3jzNffT99NO3k_Pm8svZxcnxZaOZYLSxAx801UNPdWsV8Km2U2UsBcp1L4Z-RizVXc-pILwOQruutaCZIaLXAJbtow877zKGm2JSlguXtPFejSaUJGuibc2sb0VF3_-DzkOJ9W9JMuCcdcBFW6mDHaVjSCkaK5fRLWoikoDcVCU3VcltVRV-96Qsw8LM_qJ_uqkA2QEr5836Pyr5-evp8U76GyuspD4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3055360594</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interrelations of α‐ and β‐amylase activity with starch, sugars, and culinary and nutritional quality attributes in sweetpotato storage roots</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Amankwaah, Victor A. ; Williamson, Sharon ; Olukolu, Bode A. ; Truong, Van‐Den ; Carey, Edward ; Ssali, Reuben ; Yencho, George Craig</creator><creatorcontrib>Amankwaah, Victor A. ; Williamson, Sharon ; Olukolu, Bode A. ; Truong, Van‐Den ; Carey, Edward ; Ssali, Reuben ; Yencho, George Craig</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND Little information is available on α‐ and β‐amylase activity and their associations with starch, sugars and other culinary qualities in sweetpotato. The present study aimed to assess sweetpotato storage root α‐ and β‐amylase activity in relation to starch, sugars, β‐carotene content and storage root flesh color. RESULTS α‐ and β‐amylase activity (α‐AA and β‐AA) were assayed from a Tanzania (T) × Beauregard (B) genetic mapping population in their uncured (raw), cured and stored (approximately 11 weeks) forms during 2016 and 2017. Ceralpha and Betamyl methods, with modifications to suit a high‐throughput microplate assay format, were used to quantify α‐AA and β‐AA, respectively. Storage root dry matter, starch, glucose, fructose, sucrose and β‐carotene content were predicted using near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. There was little relationship (r2 = 0.02–0.08, P ≤ 0.05 in 2016 and r2 = 0.05–0.11, P ≤ 0.05 in 2017) between α‐AA and β‐AA. We observed negative linear associations between α‐AA and dry matter content and generally no correlations between β‐AA and dry matter content. β‐AA and sugars were weakly positively correlated. β‐AA and β‐carotene content were positively correlated (r = 0.3–0.4 in 2016 and 0.3–0.5 in 2017). CONCLUSION Generally, the correlation coefficient for amylase enzyme activity and sugar components of storage roots at harvest increased after curing and during post‐harvest storage. The present study is a major step forward in sweetpotato breeding in terms of providing a better understanding of how α‐ and β‐amylase activity are inter‐associated with several culinary quality attributes. © 2023 The Authors. Journal of The Science of Food and Agriculture published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-5142</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1097-0010</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0010</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.12832</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37406153</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>alpha-Amylases - metabolism ; Amylases ; beta Carotene - analysis ; beta Carotene - metabolism ; beta-Amylase - genetics ; beta-Amylase - metabolism ; Carotene ; consumer preferences ; Correlation coefficient ; Correlation coefficients ; curing ; Dry matter ; Enzymatic activity ; Enzyme activity ; Food Storage ; Gene mapping ; Harvesting ; Infrared reflection ; Infrared spectroscopy ; Ipomoea batatas ; Ipomoea batatas - chemistry ; Ipomoea batatas - enzymology ; Ipomoea batatas - genetics ; Ipomoea batatas - metabolism ; Near infrared radiation ; Nutritive Value ; Plant breeding ; Plant Proteins - genetics ; Plant Proteins - metabolism ; Plant Roots - chemistry ; Plant Roots - metabolism ; Plant Tubers - chemistry ; Plant Tubers - metabolism ; Population genetics ; Quality management ; root quality traits ; root storage ; Roots ; Starch ; Starch - analysis ; Starch - metabolism ; Sucrose ; Sugar ; Sugars - analysis ; Sugars - metabolism ; Sweet potatoes ; sweetpotato ; Tanzania ; β-Carotene</subject><ispartof>Journal of the science of food and agriculture, 2024-06, Vol.104 (8), p.4662-4670</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.</rights><rights>2023 The Authors. Journal of The Science of Food and Agriculture published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3932-fb5bc2cb82c4fa057cf7aef2025c89b8d1f2c685291568512664f0c3e198c00f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3932-fb5bc2cb82c4fa057cf7aef2025c89b8d1f2c685291568512664f0c3e198c00f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6583-0628 ; 0000-0002-8143-6564</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjsfa.12832$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjsfa.12832$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37406153$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Amankwaah, Victor A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williamson, Sharon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olukolu, Bode A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Truong, Van‐Den</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carey, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ssali, Reuben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yencho, George Craig</creatorcontrib><title>Interrelations of α‐ and β‐amylase activity with starch, sugars, and culinary and nutritional quality attributes in sweetpotato storage roots</title><title>Journal of the science of food and agriculture</title><addtitle>J Sci Food Agric</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND Little information is available on α‐ and β‐amylase activity and their associations with starch, sugars and other culinary qualities in sweetpotato. The present study aimed to assess sweetpotato storage root α‐ and β‐amylase activity in relation to starch, sugars, β‐carotene content and storage root flesh color. RESULTS α‐ and β‐amylase activity (α‐AA and β‐AA) were assayed from a Tanzania (T) × Beauregard (B) genetic mapping population in their uncured (raw), cured and stored (approximately 11 weeks) forms during 2016 and 2017. Ceralpha and Betamyl methods, with modifications to suit a high‐throughput microplate assay format, were used to quantify α‐AA and β‐AA, respectively. Storage root dry matter, starch, glucose, fructose, sucrose and β‐carotene content were predicted using near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. There was little relationship (r2 = 0.02–0.08, P ≤ 0.05 in 2016 and r2 = 0.05–0.11, P ≤ 0.05 in 2017) between α‐AA and β‐AA. We observed negative linear associations between α‐AA and dry matter content and generally no correlations between β‐AA and dry matter content. β‐AA and sugars were weakly positively correlated. β‐AA and β‐carotene content were positively correlated (r = 0.3–0.4 in 2016 and 0.3–0.5 in 2017). CONCLUSION Generally, the correlation coefficient for amylase enzyme activity and sugar components of storage roots at harvest increased after curing and during post‐harvest storage. The present study is a major step forward in sweetpotato breeding in terms of providing a better understanding of how α‐ and β‐amylase activity are inter‐associated with several culinary quality attributes. © 2023 The Authors. Journal of The Science of Food and Agriculture published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.</description><subject>alpha-Amylases - metabolism</subject><subject>Amylases</subject><subject>beta Carotene - analysis</subject><subject>beta Carotene - metabolism</subject><subject>beta-Amylase - genetics</subject><subject>beta-Amylase - metabolism</subject><subject>Carotene</subject><subject>consumer preferences</subject><subject>Correlation coefficient</subject><subject>Correlation coefficients</subject><subject>curing</subject><subject>Dry matter</subject><subject>Enzymatic activity</subject><subject>Enzyme activity</subject><subject>Food Storage</subject><subject>Gene mapping</subject><subject>Harvesting</subject><subject>Infrared reflection</subject><subject>Infrared spectroscopy</subject><subject>Ipomoea batatas</subject><subject>Ipomoea batatas - chemistry</subject><subject>Ipomoea batatas - enzymology</subject><subject>Ipomoea batatas - genetics</subject><subject>Ipomoea batatas - metabolism</subject><subject>Near infrared radiation</subject><subject>Nutritive Value</subject><subject>Plant breeding</subject><subject>Plant Proteins - genetics</subject><subject>Plant Proteins - metabolism</subject><subject>Plant Roots - chemistry</subject><subject>Plant Roots - metabolism</subject><subject>Plant Tubers - chemistry</subject><subject>Plant Tubers - metabolism</subject><subject>Population genetics</subject><subject>Quality management</subject><subject>root quality traits</subject><subject>root storage</subject><subject>Roots</subject><subject>Starch</subject><subject>Starch - analysis</subject><subject>Starch - metabolism</subject><subject>Sucrose</subject><subject>Sugar</subject><subject>Sugars - analysis</subject><subject>Sugars - metabolism</subject><subject>Sweet potatoes</subject><subject>sweetpotato</subject><subject>Tanzania</subject><subject>β-Carotene</subject><issn>0022-5142</issn><issn>1097-0010</issn><issn>1097-0010</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1uEzEYhi0EoqGw4QDIEhtUdcpnezwZL6uK_qBKLIC15XHs1pEzTv3TKDuOgNST0IP0ED0JTlJYsGD1-efxI_l9EXpL4IgA0I_zZNURoT2jz9CEgJg2AASeo0m9pA0nLd1Dr1KaA4AQXfcS7bFpCx3hbILuLsZsYjReZRfGhIPFD78ef_zEapzhh_u6Uou1V8lgpbO7dXmNVy5f45RV1NeHOJUrFdPhFtfFu1HF9XYzlhzdxqk8vinKb16qXM-Gkk3CbsRpZUxehqxyqLoQ1ZXBMYScXqMXVvlk3jzNffT99NO3k_Pm8svZxcnxZaOZYLSxAx801UNPdWsV8Km2U2UsBcp1L4Z-RizVXc-pILwOQruutaCZIaLXAJbtow877zKGm2JSlguXtPFejSaUJGuibc2sb0VF3_-DzkOJ9W9JMuCcdcBFW6mDHaVjSCkaK5fRLWoikoDcVCU3VcltVRV-96Qsw8LM_qJ_uqkA2QEr5836Pyr5-evp8U76GyuspD4</recordid><startdate>202406</startdate><enddate>202406</enddate><creator>Amankwaah, Victor A.</creator><creator>Williamson, Sharon</creator><creator>Olukolu, Bode A.</creator><creator>Truong, Van‐Den</creator><creator>Carey, Edward</creator><creator>Ssali, Reuben</creator><creator>Yencho, George Craig</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>John Wiley and Sons, Limited</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6583-0628</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8143-6564</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202406</creationdate><title>Interrelations of α‐ and β‐amylase activity with starch, sugars, and culinary and nutritional quality attributes in sweetpotato storage roots</title><author>Amankwaah, Victor A. ; Williamson, Sharon ; Olukolu, Bode A. ; Truong, Van‐Den ; Carey, Edward ; Ssali, Reuben ; Yencho, George Craig</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3932-fb5bc2cb82c4fa057cf7aef2025c89b8d1f2c685291568512664f0c3e198c00f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>alpha-Amylases - metabolism</topic><topic>Amylases</topic><topic>beta Carotene - analysis</topic><topic>beta Carotene - metabolism</topic><topic>beta-Amylase - genetics</topic><topic>beta-Amylase - metabolism</topic><topic>Carotene</topic><topic>consumer preferences</topic><topic>Correlation coefficient</topic><topic>Correlation coefficients</topic><topic>curing</topic><topic>Dry matter</topic><topic>Enzymatic activity</topic><topic>Enzyme activity</topic><topic>Food Storage</topic><topic>Gene mapping</topic><topic>Harvesting</topic><topic>Infrared reflection</topic><topic>Infrared spectroscopy</topic><topic>Ipomoea batatas</topic><topic>Ipomoea batatas - chemistry</topic><topic>Ipomoea batatas - enzymology</topic><topic>Ipomoea batatas - genetics</topic><topic>Ipomoea batatas - metabolism</topic><topic>Near infrared radiation</topic><topic>Nutritive Value</topic><topic>Plant breeding</topic><topic>Plant Proteins - genetics</topic><topic>Plant Proteins - metabolism</topic><topic>Plant Roots - chemistry</topic><topic>Plant Roots - metabolism</topic><topic>Plant Tubers - chemistry</topic><topic>Plant Tubers - metabolism</topic><topic>Population genetics</topic><topic>Quality management</topic><topic>root quality traits</topic><topic>root storage</topic><topic>Roots</topic><topic>Starch</topic><topic>Starch - analysis</topic><topic>Starch - metabolism</topic><topic>Sucrose</topic><topic>Sugar</topic><topic>Sugars - analysis</topic><topic>Sugars - metabolism</topic><topic>Sweet potatoes</topic><topic>sweetpotato</topic><topic>Tanzania</topic><topic>β-Carotene</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Amankwaah, Victor A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williamson, Sharon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olukolu, Bode A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Truong, Van‐Den</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carey, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ssali, Reuben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yencho, George Craig</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the science of food and agriculture</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Amankwaah, Victor A.</au><au>Williamson, Sharon</au><au>Olukolu, Bode A.</au><au>Truong, Van‐Den</au><au>Carey, Edward</au><au>Ssali, Reuben</au><au>Yencho, George Craig</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interrelations of α‐ and β‐amylase activity with starch, sugars, and culinary and nutritional quality attributes in sweetpotato storage roots</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the science of food and agriculture</jtitle><addtitle>J Sci Food Agric</addtitle><date>2024-06</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>104</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>4662</spage><epage>4670</epage><pages>4662-4670</pages><issn>0022-5142</issn><issn>1097-0010</issn><eissn>1097-0010</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND Little information is available on α‐ and β‐amylase activity and their associations with starch, sugars and other culinary qualities in sweetpotato. The present study aimed to assess sweetpotato storage root α‐ and β‐amylase activity in relation to starch, sugars, β‐carotene content and storage root flesh color. RESULTS α‐ and β‐amylase activity (α‐AA and β‐AA) were assayed from a Tanzania (T) × Beauregard (B) genetic mapping population in their uncured (raw), cured and stored (approximately 11 weeks) forms during 2016 and 2017. Ceralpha and Betamyl methods, with modifications to suit a high‐throughput microplate assay format, were used to quantify α‐AA and β‐AA, respectively. Storage root dry matter, starch, glucose, fructose, sucrose and β‐carotene content were predicted using near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. There was little relationship (r2 = 0.02–0.08, P ≤ 0.05 in 2016 and r2 = 0.05–0.11, P ≤ 0.05 in 2017) between α‐AA and β‐AA. We observed negative linear associations between α‐AA and dry matter content and generally no correlations between β‐AA and dry matter content. β‐AA and sugars were weakly positively correlated. β‐AA and β‐carotene content were positively correlated (r = 0.3–0.4 in 2016 and 0.3–0.5 in 2017). CONCLUSION Generally, the correlation coefficient for amylase enzyme activity and sugar components of storage roots at harvest increased after curing and during post‐harvest storage. The present study is a major step forward in sweetpotato breeding in terms of providing a better understanding of how α‐ and β‐amylase activity are inter‐associated with several culinary quality attributes. © 2023 The Authors. Journal of The Science of Food and Agriculture published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><pmid>37406153</pmid><doi>10.1002/jsfa.12832</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6583-0628</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8143-6564</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-5142
ispartof Journal of the science of food and agriculture, 2024-06, Vol.104 (8), p.4662-4670
issn 0022-5142
1097-0010
1097-0010
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2834000849
source MEDLINE; Wiley Journals
subjects alpha-Amylases - metabolism
Amylases
beta Carotene - analysis
beta Carotene - metabolism
beta-Amylase - genetics
beta-Amylase - metabolism
Carotene
consumer preferences
Correlation coefficient
Correlation coefficients
curing
Dry matter
Enzymatic activity
Enzyme activity
Food Storage
Gene mapping
Harvesting
Infrared reflection
Infrared spectroscopy
Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas - chemistry
Ipomoea batatas - enzymology
Ipomoea batatas - genetics
Ipomoea batatas - metabolism
Near infrared radiation
Nutritive Value
Plant breeding
Plant Proteins - genetics
Plant Proteins - metabolism
Plant Roots - chemistry
Plant Roots - metabolism
Plant Tubers - chemistry
Plant Tubers - metabolism
Population genetics
Quality management
root quality traits
root storage
Roots
Starch
Starch - analysis
Starch - metabolism
Sucrose
Sugar
Sugars - analysis
Sugars - metabolism
Sweet potatoes
sweetpotato
Tanzania
β-Carotene
title Interrelations of α‐ and β‐amylase activity with starch, sugars, and culinary and nutritional quality attributes in sweetpotato storage roots
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T05%3A51%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interrelations%20of%20%CE%B1%E2%80%90%20and%20%CE%B2%E2%80%90amylase%20activity%20with%20starch,%20sugars,%20and%20culinary%20and%20nutritional%20quality%20attributes%20in%20sweetpotato%20storage%20roots&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20science%20of%20food%20and%20agriculture&rft.au=Amankwaah,%20Victor%20A.&rft.date=2024-06&rft.volume=104&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=4662&rft.epage=4670&rft.pages=4662-4670&rft.issn=0022-5142&rft.eissn=1097-0010&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jsfa.12832&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2834000849%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3055360594&rft_id=info:pmid/37406153&rfr_iscdi=true