Pupillary correlates of preparatory control in the Stroop task

In three experiments, individual differences in preparatory control in the Stroop task were examined. Participants performed variants of the Stroop task while pupillary responses were examined during the preparatory interval. Variation in working memory capacity was also examined. High Stroop perfor...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Attention, perception & psychophysics perception & psychophysics, 2023-10, Vol.85 (7), p.2277-2295
Hauptverfasser: Unsworth, Nash, Miller, Ashley L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2295
container_issue 7
container_start_page 2277
container_title Attention, perception & psychophysics
container_volume 85
creator Unsworth, Nash
Miller, Ashley L.
description In three experiments, individual differences in preparatory control in the Stroop task were examined. Participants performed variants of the Stroop task while pupillary responses were examined during the preparatory interval. Variation in working memory capacity was also examined. High Stroop performers tended to demonstrate larger preparatory pupillary responses than low Stroop performers. In Experiment 2, when participants were given pre-cues indicating the congruency of the upcoming trial (MATCHING vs. CONFLICTING), high Stroop performers had larger preparatory pupillary responses for incongruent trials compared to congruent trials, whereas low Stroop performers demonstrated similar preparatory pupillary responses on both incongruent and congruent trials. These results suggest that variation in Stroop performance is partially due to individual differences in the ability to ramp up and regulate the intensity of attention allocated to preparatory control processes. Additionally, there was limited evidence that preparatory control processes partially account for the relation between working memory capacity and performance on the Stroop. Overall, these results provide evidence that individual differences in Stroop performance are partialy due to variation in preparatory control.
doi_str_mv 10.3758/s13414-023-02751-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2833997956</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2833997956</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-8f1296327d76ece563fb57af36263ec64d199bb28e64c722c99cc8b50e5cee903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1PwzAMhiMEYmPwBzigHrkUkrhNmgsSmviSJoEESNyiNnWho2tK0h7YryesY0cOlm359Sv7IeSU0QuQaXbpGSQsiSmHEDJl8XqPTJlKIAYFb_u7mrMJOfJ-SakAIekhmYBMqJQqm5Krp6GrmyZ335GxzmGT9-gjW0Wdwy53eW83k7Z3tonqNuo_MHoOje2iPvefx-SgyhuPJ9s8I6-3Ny_z-3jxePcwv17EBhLZx1nFuBLAZSkFGkwFVEUq8woEF4BGJCVTqih4hiIxknOjlDFZkVJMDaKiMCPno2_n7NeAvter2hsMh7doB695BqCUVMF5RvgoNc5677DSnatX4UHNqP7lpkduOnDTG256HZbOtv5DscJyt_IHKghgFPgwat_R6aUdXBt-_s_2B1cieaE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2833997956</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pupillary correlates of preparatory control in the Stroop task</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Unsworth, Nash ; Miller, Ashley L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Unsworth, Nash ; Miller, Ashley L.</creatorcontrib><description>In three experiments, individual differences in preparatory control in the Stroop task were examined. Participants performed variants of the Stroop task while pupillary responses were examined during the preparatory interval. Variation in working memory capacity was also examined. High Stroop performers tended to demonstrate larger preparatory pupillary responses than low Stroop performers. In Experiment 2, when participants were given pre-cues indicating the congruency of the upcoming trial (MATCHING vs. CONFLICTING), high Stroop performers had larger preparatory pupillary responses for incongruent trials compared to congruent trials, whereas low Stroop performers demonstrated similar preparatory pupillary responses on both incongruent and congruent trials. These results suggest that variation in Stroop performance is partially due to individual differences in the ability to ramp up and regulate the intensity of attention allocated to preparatory control processes. Additionally, there was limited evidence that preparatory control processes partially account for the relation between working memory capacity and performance on the Stroop. Overall, these results provide evidence that individual differences in Stroop performance are partialy due to variation in preparatory control.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1943-3921</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1943-393X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-393X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3758/s13414-023-02751-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37407798</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Attention - physiology ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Cognitive Psychology ; Cues ; Humans ; Memory, Short-Term - physiology ; Psychology ; Reaction Time - physiology ; Stroop Test</subject><ispartof>Attention, perception &amp; psychophysics, 2023-10, Vol.85 (7), p.2277-2295</ispartof><rights>The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2023. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-8f1296327d76ece563fb57af36263ec64d199bb28e64c722c99cc8b50e5cee903</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-8f1296327d76ece563fb57af36263ec64d199bb28e64c722c99cc8b50e5cee903</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.3758/s13414-023-02751-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.3758/s13414-023-02751-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37407798$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Unsworth, Nash</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Ashley L.</creatorcontrib><title>Pupillary correlates of preparatory control in the Stroop task</title><title>Attention, perception &amp; psychophysics</title><addtitle>Atten Percept Psychophys</addtitle><addtitle>Atten Percept Psychophys</addtitle><description>In three experiments, individual differences in preparatory control in the Stroop task were examined. Participants performed variants of the Stroop task while pupillary responses were examined during the preparatory interval. Variation in working memory capacity was also examined. High Stroop performers tended to demonstrate larger preparatory pupillary responses than low Stroop performers. In Experiment 2, when participants were given pre-cues indicating the congruency of the upcoming trial (MATCHING vs. CONFLICTING), high Stroop performers had larger preparatory pupillary responses for incongruent trials compared to congruent trials, whereas low Stroop performers demonstrated similar preparatory pupillary responses on both incongruent and congruent trials. These results suggest that variation in Stroop performance is partially due to individual differences in the ability to ramp up and regulate the intensity of attention allocated to preparatory control processes. Additionally, there was limited evidence that preparatory control processes partially account for the relation between working memory capacity and performance on the Stroop. Overall, these results provide evidence that individual differences in Stroop performance are partialy due to variation in preparatory control.</description><subject>Attention - physiology</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Cognitive Psychology</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Memory, Short-Term - physiology</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Reaction Time - physiology</subject><subject>Stroop Test</subject><issn>1943-3921</issn><issn>1943-393X</issn><issn>1943-393X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1PwzAMhiMEYmPwBzigHrkUkrhNmgsSmviSJoEESNyiNnWho2tK0h7YryesY0cOlm359Sv7IeSU0QuQaXbpGSQsiSmHEDJl8XqPTJlKIAYFb_u7mrMJOfJ-SakAIekhmYBMqJQqm5Krp6GrmyZ335GxzmGT9-gjW0Wdwy53eW83k7Z3tonqNuo_MHoOje2iPvefx-SgyhuPJ9s8I6-3Ny_z-3jxePcwv17EBhLZx1nFuBLAZSkFGkwFVEUq8woEF4BGJCVTqih4hiIxknOjlDFZkVJMDaKiMCPno2_n7NeAvter2hsMh7doB695BqCUVMF5RvgoNc5677DSnatX4UHNqP7lpkduOnDTG256HZbOtv5DscJyt_IHKghgFPgwat_R6aUdXBt-_s_2B1cieaE</recordid><startdate>20231001</startdate><enddate>20231001</enddate><creator>Unsworth, Nash</creator><creator>Miller, Ashley L.</creator><general>Springer US</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231001</creationdate><title>Pupillary correlates of preparatory control in the Stroop task</title><author>Unsworth, Nash ; Miller, Ashley L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-8f1296327d76ece563fb57af36263ec64d199bb28e64c722c99cc8b50e5cee903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Attention - physiology</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Cognitive Psychology</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Memory, Short-Term - physiology</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Reaction Time - physiology</topic><topic>Stroop Test</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Unsworth, Nash</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Ashley L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Attention, perception &amp; psychophysics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Unsworth, Nash</au><au>Miller, Ashley L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pupillary correlates of preparatory control in the Stroop task</atitle><jtitle>Attention, perception &amp; psychophysics</jtitle><stitle>Atten Percept Psychophys</stitle><addtitle>Atten Percept Psychophys</addtitle><date>2023-10-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>85</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>2277</spage><epage>2295</epage><pages>2277-2295</pages><issn>1943-3921</issn><issn>1943-393X</issn><eissn>1943-393X</eissn><abstract>In three experiments, individual differences in preparatory control in the Stroop task were examined. Participants performed variants of the Stroop task while pupillary responses were examined during the preparatory interval. Variation in working memory capacity was also examined. High Stroop performers tended to demonstrate larger preparatory pupillary responses than low Stroop performers. In Experiment 2, when participants were given pre-cues indicating the congruency of the upcoming trial (MATCHING vs. CONFLICTING), high Stroop performers had larger preparatory pupillary responses for incongruent trials compared to congruent trials, whereas low Stroop performers demonstrated similar preparatory pupillary responses on both incongruent and congruent trials. These results suggest that variation in Stroop performance is partially due to individual differences in the ability to ramp up and regulate the intensity of attention allocated to preparatory control processes. Additionally, there was limited evidence that preparatory control processes partially account for the relation between working memory capacity and performance on the Stroop. Overall, these results provide evidence that individual differences in Stroop performance are partialy due to variation in preparatory control.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>37407798</pmid><doi>10.3758/s13414-023-02751-z</doi><tpages>19</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1943-3921
ispartof Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2023-10, Vol.85 (7), p.2277-2295
issn 1943-3921
1943-393X
1943-393X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2833997956
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Attention - physiology
Behavioral Science and Psychology
Cognitive Psychology
Cues
Humans
Memory, Short-Term - physiology
Psychology
Reaction Time - physiology
Stroop Test
title Pupillary correlates of preparatory control in the Stroop task
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T10%3A53%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pupillary%20correlates%20of%20preparatory%20control%20in%20the%20Stroop%20task&rft.jtitle=Attention,%20perception%20&%20psychophysics&rft.au=Unsworth,%20Nash&rft.date=2023-10-01&rft.volume=85&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=2277&rft.epage=2295&rft.pages=2277-2295&rft.issn=1943-3921&rft.eissn=1943-393X&rft_id=info:doi/10.3758/s13414-023-02751-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2833997956%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2833997956&rft_id=info:pmid/37407798&rfr_iscdi=true