Efficacy of a continuously active disinfectant wipe on the environmental bioburden in the intensive care unit: A randomized controlled study

To evaluate the efficacy of a new continuously active disinfectant (CAD) to decrease bioburden on high-touch environmental surfaces compared to a standard disinfectant in the intensive care unit. A single-blind randomized controlled trial with 1:1 allocation. Medical intensive care unit (MICU) at an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Infection control and hospital epidemiology 2023-12, Vol.44 (12), p.2036-2043
Hauptverfasser: Nadimpalli, Gita, Johnson, J. Kristie, Magder, Laurence S., Haririan, Abdolreza, Stevens, Deborah, Harris, Anthony D., O’Hara, Lyndsay M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2043
container_issue 12
container_start_page 2036
container_title Infection control and hospital epidemiology
container_volume 44
creator Nadimpalli, Gita
Johnson, J. Kristie
Magder, Laurence S.
Haririan, Abdolreza
Stevens, Deborah
Harris, Anthony D.
O’Hara, Lyndsay M.
description To evaluate the efficacy of a new continuously active disinfectant (CAD) to decrease bioburden on high-touch environmental surfaces compared to a standard disinfectant in the intensive care unit. A single-blind randomized controlled trial with 1:1 allocation. Medical intensive care unit (MICU) at an urban tertiary-care hospital. Adult patients admitted to the MICU and on contact precautions. A new CAD wipe used for daily cleaning. Samples were collected from 5 high-touch environmental surfaces before cleaning and at 1, 4, and 24 hours after cleaning. The primary outcome was the mean bioburden 24 hours after cleaning. The secondary outcome was the detection of any epidemiologically important pathogen (EIP) 24 hours after cleaning. In total, 843 environmental samples were collected from 43 unique patient rooms. At 24 hours, the mean bioburden recovered from the patient rooms cleaned with the new CAD wipe (intervention) was 52 CFU/mL, and the mean bioburden was 92 CFU/mL in the rooms cleaned the standard disinfectant (control). After log transformation for multivariable analysis, the mean difference in bioburden between the intervention and control arm was -0.59 (95% CI, -1.45 to 0.27). The odds of EIP detection were 14% lower in the rooms cleaned with the CAD wipe (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.31-2.32). The bacterial bioburden and odds of detection of EIPs were not statistically different in rooms cleaned with the CAD compared to the standard disinfectant after 24 hours. Although CAD technology appears promising in vitro, larger studies may be warranted to evaluate efficacy in clinical settings.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/ice.2023.111
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2832840307</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_ice_2023_111</cupid><sourcerecordid>2906740398</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-15677e7ff4b4a979d450d44e967263e609cc148cb494eab934d40f67f3a0a2fb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkUFvFCEYQImxade2N8-GxIuHzgoDMwzemqZVkyZeNPFGGPhQmhlYgWmz_gZ_tGx31aTxBAkv7-PLQ-glJWtKqHjrDaxb0rI1pfQZWtGuk00_MP4crcggZTO07OsJepHzHSFESEmP0QkTTHaE0xX6de2cN9pscXRYYxND8WGJS562WJvi7wFbn31wYIoOBT_4DeAYcPkOGMK9TzHMEIqe8OjjuCQLAfv9sw8FQt4ZjE6Al-DLO3yJkw42zv4n2MdpKU5Tveay2O0ZOnJ6ynB-OE_Rl5vrz1cfmttP7z9eXd42hnVDaWjXCwHCOT5yLYW0vCOWc5C9aHsGPZHGUD6YkUsOepSMW05cLxzTRLduZKfozd67SfHHArmo2WcD06QD1NVVO7B24IQRUdHXT9C7uKRQf6daSXpRKTlU6mJPmRRzTuDUJvlZp62iRO0qqVpJ7SqpWqnirw7SZZzB_oX_ZKnA-uDT85i8_Qb_xv7X-BtE9p6B</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2906740398</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy of a continuously active disinfectant wipe on the environmental bioburden in the intensive care unit: A randomized controlled study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Nadimpalli, Gita ; Johnson, J. Kristie ; Magder, Laurence S. ; Haririan, Abdolreza ; Stevens, Deborah ; Harris, Anthony D. ; O’Hara, Lyndsay M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Nadimpalli, Gita ; Johnson, J. Kristie ; Magder, Laurence S. ; Haririan, Abdolreza ; Stevens, Deborah ; Harris, Anthony D. ; O’Hara, Lyndsay M.</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate the efficacy of a new continuously active disinfectant (CAD) to decrease bioburden on high-touch environmental surfaces compared to a standard disinfectant in the intensive care unit. A single-blind randomized controlled trial with 1:1 allocation. Medical intensive care unit (MICU) at an urban tertiary-care hospital. Adult patients admitted to the MICU and on contact precautions. A new CAD wipe used for daily cleaning. Samples were collected from 5 high-touch environmental surfaces before cleaning and at 1, 4, and 24 hours after cleaning. The primary outcome was the mean bioburden 24 hours after cleaning. The secondary outcome was the detection of any epidemiologically important pathogen (EIP) 24 hours after cleaning. In total, 843 environmental samples were collected from 43 unique patient rooms. At 24 hours, the mean bioburden recovered from the patient rooms cleaned with the new CAD wipe (intervention) was 52 CFU/mL, and the mean bioburden was 92 CFU/mL in the rooms cleaned the standard disinfectant (control). After log transformation for multivariable analysis, the mean difference in bioburden between the intervention and control arm was -0.59 (95% CI, -1.45 to 0.27). The odds of EIP detection were 14% lower in the rooms cleaned with the CAD wipe (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.31-2.32). The bacterial bioburden and odds of detection of EIPs were not statistically different in rooms cleaned with the CAD compared to the standard disinfectant after 24 hours. Although CAD technology appears promising in vitro, larger studies may be warranted to evaluate efficacy in clinical settings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0899-823X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1559-6834</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/ice.2023.111</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37395041</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Antimicrobial agents ; Clinical trials ; Cross Infection - microbiology ; Cross Infection - prevention &amp; control ; Disinfectants - pharmacology ; Disinfection ; Disinfection &amp; disinfectants ; Enrollments ; Humans ; Intensive care ; Intensive Care Units ; Number systems ; Original Article ; Pathogens ; Patients ; Sample size ; Single-Blind Method ; Staphylococcus infections</subject><ispartof>Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 2023-12, Vol.44 (12), p.2036-2043</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-15677e7ff4b4a979d450d44e967263e609cc148cb494eab934d40f67f3a0a2fb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-15677e7ff4b4a979d450d44e967263e609cc148cb494eab934d40f67f3a0a2fb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2906740398/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2906740398?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,21367,27901,27902,33721,33722,43781,55603,74273</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37395041$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nadimpalli, Gita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, J. Kristie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magder, Laurence S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haririan, Abdolreza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevens, Deborah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harris, Anthony D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Hara, Lyndsay M.</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy of a continuously active disinfectant wipe on the environmental bioburden in the intensive care unit: A randomized controlled study</title><title>Infection control and hospital epidemiology</title><addtitle>Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol</addtitle><description>To evaluate the efficacy of a new continuously active disinfectant (CAD) to decrease bioburden on high-touch environmental surfaces compared to a standard disinfectant in the intensive care unit. A single-blind randomized controlled trial with 1:1 allocation. Medical intensive care unit (MICU) at an urban tertiary-care hospital. Adult patients admitted to the MICU and on contact precautions. A new CAD wipe used for daily cleaning. Samples were collected from 5 high-touch environmental surfaces before cleaning and at 1, 4, and 24 hours after cleaning. The primary outcome was the mean bioburden 24 hours after cleaning. The secondary outcome was the detection of any epidemiologically important pathogen (EIP) 24 hours after cleaning. In total, 843 environmental samples were collected from 43 unique patient rooms. At 24 hours, the mean bioburden recovered from the patient rooms cleaned with the new CAD wipe (intervention) was 52 CFU/mL, and the mean bioburden was 92 CFU/mL in the rooms cleaned the standard disinfectant (control). After log transformation for multivariable analysis, the mean difference in bioburden between the intervention and control arm was -0.59 (95% CI, -1.45 to 0.27). The odds of EIP detection were 14% lower in the rooms cleaned with the CAD wipe (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.31-2.32). The bacterial bioburden and odds of detection of EIPs were not statistically different in rooms cleaned with the CAD compared to the standard disinfectant after 24 hours. Although CAD technology appears promising in vitro, larger studies may be warranted to evaluate efficacy in clinical settings.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Antimicrobial agents</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Cross Infection - microbiology</subject><subject>Cross Infection - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Disinfectants - pharmacology</subject><subject>Disinfection</subject><subject>Disinfection &amp; disinfectants</subject><subject>Enrollments</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units</subject><subject>Number systems</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Sample size</subject><subject>Single-Blind Method</subject><subject>Staphylococcus infections</subject><issn>0899-823X</issn><issn>1559-6834</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNptkUFvFCEYQImxade2N8-GxIuHzgoDMwzemqZVkyZeNPFGGPhQmhlYgWmz_gZ_tGx31aTxBAkv7-PLQ-glJWtKqHjrDaxb0rI1pfQZWtGuk00_MP4crcggZTO07OsJepHzHSFESEmP0QkTTHaE0xX6de2cN9pscXRYYxND8WGJS562WJvi7wFbn31wYIoOBT_4DeAYcPkOGMK9TzHMEIqe8OjjuCQLAfv9sw8FQt4ZjE6Al-DLO3yJkw42zv4n2MdpKU5Tveay2O0ZOnJ6ynB-OE_Rl5vrz1cfmttP7z9eXd42hnVDaWjXCwHCOT5yLYW0vCOWc5C9aHsGPZHGUD6YkUsOepSMW05cLxzTRLduZKfozd67SfHHArmo2WcD06QD1NVVO7B24IQRUdHXT9C7uKRQf6daSXpRKTlU6mJPmRRzTuDUJvlZp62iRO0qqVpJ7SqpWqnirw7SZZzB_oX_ZKnA-uDT85i8_Qb_xv7X-BtE9p6B</recordid><startdate>20231201</startdate><enddate>20231201</enddate><creator>Nadimpalli, Gita</creator><creator>Johnson, J. Kristie</creator><creator>Magder, Laurence S.</creator><creator>Haririan, Abdolreza</creator><creator>Stevens, Deborah</creator><creator>Harris, Anthony D.</creator><creator>O’Hara, Lyndsay M.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231201</creationdate><title>Efficacy of a continuously active disinfectant wipe on the environmental bioburden in the intensive care unit: A randomized controlled study</title><author>Nadimpalli, Gita ; Johnson, J. Kristie ; Magder, Laurence S. ; Haririan, Abdolreza ; Stevens, Deborah ; Harris, Anthony D. ; O’Hara, Lyndsay M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-15677e7ff4b4a979d450d44e967263e609cc148cb494eab934d40f67f3a0a2fb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Antimicrobial agents</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Cross Infection - microbiology</topic><topic>Cross Infection - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Disinfectants - pharmacology</topic><topic>Disinfection</topic><topic>Disinfection &amp; disinfectants</topic><topic>Enrollments</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units</topic><topic>Number systems</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Sample size</topic><topic>Single-Blind Method</topic><topic>Staphylococcus infections</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nadimpalli, Gita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, J. Kristie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magder, Laurence S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haririan, Abdolreza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevens, Deborah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harris, Anthony D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Hara, Lyndsay M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health &amp; Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Infection control and hospital epidemiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nadimpalli, Gita</au><au>Johnson, J. Kristie</au><au>Magder, Laurence S.</au><au>Haririan, Abdolreza</au><au>Stevens, Deborah</au><au>Harris, Anthony D.</au><au>O’Hara, Lyndsay M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy of a continuously active disinfectant wipe on the environmental bioburden in the intensive care unit: A randomized controlled study</atitle><jtitle>Infection control and hospital epidemiology</jtitle><addtitle>Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol</addtitle><date>2023-12-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2036</spage><epage>2043</epage><pages>2036-2043</pages><issn>0899-823X</issn><eissn>1559-6834</eissn><abstract>To evaluate the efficacy of a new continuously active disinfectant (CAD) to decrease bioburden on high-touch environmental surfaces compared to a standard disinfectant in the intensive care unit. A single-blind randomized controlled trial with 1:1 allocation. Medical intensive care unit (MICU) at an urban tertiary-care hospital. Adult patients admitted to the MICU and on contact precautions. A new CAD wipe used for daily cleaning. Samples were collected from 5 high-touch environmental surfaces before cleaning and at 1, 4, and 24 hours after cleaning. The primary outcome was the mean bioburden 24 hours after cleaning. The secondary outcome was the detection of any epidemiologically important pathogen (EIP) 24 hours after cleaning. In total, 843 environmental samples were collected from 43 unique patient rooms. At 24 hours, the mean bioburden recovered from the patient rooms cleaned with the new CAD wipe (intervention) was 52 CFU/mL, and the mean bioburden was 92 CFU/mL in the rooms cleaned the standard disinfectant (control). After log transformation for multivariable analysis, the mean difference in bioburden between the intervention and control arm was -0.59 (95% CI, -1.45 to 0.27). The odds of EIP detection were 14% lower in the rooms cleaned with the CAD wipe (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.31-2.32). The bacterial bioburden and odds of detection of EIPs were not statistically different in rooms cleaned with the CAD compared to the standard disinfectant after 24 hours. Although CAD technology appears promising in vitro, larger studies may be warranted to evaluate efficacy in clinical settings.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>37395041</pmid><doi>10.1017/ice.2023.111</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0899-823X
ispartof Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 2023-12, Vol.44 (12), p.2036-2043
issn 0899-823X
1559-6834
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2832840307
source MEDLINE; ProQuest Central; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Adult
Antimicrobial agents
Clinical trials
Cross Infection - microbiology
Cross Infection - prevention & control
Disinfectants - pharmacology
Disinfection
Disinfection & disinfectants
Enrollments
Humans
Intensive care
Intensive Care Units
Number systems
Original Article
Pathogens
Patients
Sample size
Single-Blind Method
Staphylococcus infections
title Efficacy of a continuously active disinfectant wipe on the environmental bioburden in the intensive care unit: A randomized controlled study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T15%3A09%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20of%20a%20continuously%20active%20disinfectant%20wipe%20on%20the%20environmental%20bioburden%20in%20the%20intensive%20care%20unit:%20A%20randomized%20controlled%20study&rft.jtitle=Infection%20control%20and%20hospital%20epidemiology&rft.au=Nadimpalli,%20Gita&rft.date=2023-12-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2036&rft.epage=2043&rft.pages=2036-2043&rft.issn=0899-823X&rft.eissn=1559-6834&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/ice.2023.111&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2906740398%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2906740398&rft_id=info:pmid/37395041&rft_cupid=10_1017_ice_2023_111&rfr_iscdi=true