The Necessity or Not of Additional Endovascular Therapy to Medical Therapy for Symptomatic Intracranial Artery Stenosis: Insights from 30-Day and 1-Year Results

The Necessity or Not of Additional Endovascular Therapy to Medical Therapy for Symptomatic Intracranial Artery Stenosis: Insights from 30-Day and 1-Year Results

The optimal treatment between endovascular therapy and medical treatment for symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis is still unclear. This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of 2 treatments based on the results from currently published randomized controlled trials (RCTs). PubMed, Cochr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of vascular surgery 2024-01, Vol.98, p.58-67
Hauptverfasser: Ai, Yunzheng, Gao, Yikuan, Chen, Ligang, Kong, Ying, Liang, Guobiao
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Arteries
Constriction, Pathologic
Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects
Endovascular Procedures - methods
Humans
Ischemic Stroke
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Stroke - etiology
Treatment Outcome
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The optimal treatment between endovascular therapy and medical treatment for symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis is still unclear. This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of 2 treatments based on the results from currently published randomized controlled trials (RCTs). PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Web of Science were used for searching the RCTs evaluating the addition of endovascular therapy to medical therapy for treating symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis from the inception of these databases to September 30, 2022. P 
ISSN:0890-5096
1615-5947
DOI:10.1016/j.avsg.2023.06.017