Pancreas-sparing partial duodenectomy as an alternative to emergency pancreaticoduodenectomy for a major duodenal perforation: a case report
A 71-year-old woman underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection for early duodenal cancer at the second portion of the duodenum and developed acute peritonitis due to delayed duodenal perforation. Emergency laparotomy was performed. A huge perforation formed at the descending duodenum without ampulla...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical journal of gastroenterology 2023-10, Vol.16 (5), p.761-766 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 766 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 761 |
container_title | Clinical journal of gastroenterology |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Watanabe, Genki Satou, Shouichi Tsuru, Mao Momiyama, Masashi Nakajima, Kentaro Nagao, Atsuki Satodate, Hitoshi Muramoto, Takashi Ohata, Ken Noie, Tamaki |
description | A 71-year-old woman underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection for early duodenal cancer at the second portion of the duodenum and developed acute peritonitis due to delayed duodenal perforation. Emergency laparotomy was performed. A huge perforation formed at the descending duodenum without ampulla involvement. Pancreas-sparing partial duodenectomy (PPD) with gastrojejunostomy was performed (250 min operative time) with 50 mL of intraoperative blood loss. She required intensive care for 3 days and was discharged on postoperative day 21 with no severe complications. Emergency treatment for a major duodenal injury or perforation remains challenging because of high morbidity and mortality. An appropriate treatment should be considered according to the nature of the defect. Although PPD is an acceptable procedure for patients with a duodenal neoplasm, its use in emergency surgery is rarely reported. PPD is more reliable than primary repair or anastomosis using a jejunal wall, and less invasive than pancreaticoduodenectomy, for emergency treatment. We performed PPD in this patient because the duodenal perforation was too large to reconstruct and did not involve the ampulla. PPD can be a safe and feasible alternative surgical procedure to pancreaticoduodenectomy for a major duodenal perforation, especially in patients with a duodenal perforation that does not involve the ampulla. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12328-023-01823-9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2832574307</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2832574307</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-f29ae82bd8e40f988c91b16a2286342ed38e017c714dc522ee72056c549c4d9f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UctO5DAQtFasFhj4AQ7IRy4Bu53ENjc04iUh7R52z5bH6aCMkjjYDtL8Ax-9hgASFy5dre6qOlQRcsLZOWdMXkQOAlTBQBSMqzz1D3LAVV0VEupq73Ov5D45jHHLWA1Mil9kX0ihtNT6gLz8saMLaGMRJxu68ZFmSJ3taTP7Bkd0yQ87aiO1I7V9wjDa1D0jTZ7igOERR7fLmjeT1Dn_Rdb6QC0d7Dbj8sjGE4Z8z2Q_XuavsxFpwMmHdER-traPePyOK_Lv5vrv-q54-H17v756KJwASEUL2qKCTaOwZK1Wymm-4bUFULUoARuhkHHpJC8bVwEgSmBV7apSu7LRrViRs8V3Cv5pxpjM0EWHfW9H9HM0oEQOrRQ5rBWBheqCjzFga6bQDTbsDGfmtQWztGByC-atBaOz6PTdf94M2HxKPmLPBLEQ4vSaOQaz9XNOto_f2f4H5GOV7g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2832574307</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pancreas-sparing partial duodenectomy as an alternative to emergency pancreaticoduodenectomy for a major duodenal perforation: a case report</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Watanabe, Genki ; Satou, Shouichi ; Tsuru, Mao ; Momiyama, Masashi ; Nakajima, Kentaro ; Nagao, Atsuki ; Satodate, Hitoshi ; Muramoto, Takashi ; Ohata, Ken ; Noie, Tamaki</creator><creatorcontrib>Watanabe, Genki ; Satou, Shouichi ; Tsuru, Mao ; Momiyama, Masashi ; Nakajima, Kentaro ; Nagao, Atsuki ; Satodate, Hitoshi ; Muramoto, Takashi ; Ohata, Ken ; Noie, Tamaki</creatorcontrib><description>A 71-year-old woman underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection for early duodenal cancer at the second portion of the duodenum and developed acute peritonitis due to delayed duodenal perforation. Emergency laparotomy was performed. A huge perforation formed at the descending duodenum without ampulla involvement. Pancreas-sparing partial duodenectomy (PPD) with gastrojejunostomy was performed (250 min operative time) with 50 mL of intraoperative blood loss. She required intensive care for 3 days and was discharged on postoperative day 21 with no severe complications. Emergency treatment for a major duodenal injury or perforation remains challenging because of high morbidity and mortality. An appropriate treatment should be considered according to the nature of the defect. Although PPD is an acceptable procedure for patients with a duodenal neoplasm, its use in emergency surgery is rarely reported. PPD is more reliable than primary repair or anastomosis using a jejunal wall, and less invasive than pancreaticoduodenectomy, for emergency treatment. We performed PPD in this patient because the duodenal perforation was too large to reconstruct and did not involve the ampulla. PPD can be a safe and feasible alternative surgical procedure to pancreaticoduodenectomy for a major duodenal perforation, especially in patients with a duodenal perforation that does not involve the ampulla.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1865-7257</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1865-7265</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12328-023-01823-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37389799</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore</publisher><subject>Abdominal Surgery ; Case Report ; Colorectal Surgery ; Gastroenterology ; Hepatology ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Surgical Oncology</subject><ispartof>Clinical journal of gastroenterology, 2023-10, Vol.16 (5), p.761-766</ispartof><rights>Japanese Society of Gastroenterology 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2023. Japanese Society of Gastroenterology.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-f29ae82bd8e40f988c91b16a2286342ed38e017c714dc522ee72056c549c4d9f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7559-2811</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12328-023-01823-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12328-023-01823-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37389799$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Watanabe, Genki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Satou, Shouichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsuru, Mao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Momiyama, Masashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakajima, Kentaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagao, Atsuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Satodate, Hitoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muramoto, Takashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohata, Ken</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noie, Tamaki</creatorcontrib><title>Pancreas-sparing partial duodenectomy as an alternative to emergency pancreaticoduodenectomy for a major duodenal perforation: a case report</title><title>Clinical journal of gastroenterology</title><addtitle>Clin J Gastroenterol</addtitle><addtitle>Clin J Gastroenterol</addtitle><description>A 71-year-old woman underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection for early duodenal cancer at the second portion of the duodenum and developed acute peritonitis due to delayed duodenal perforation. Emergency laparotomy was performed. A huge perforation formed at the descending duodenum without ampulla involvement. Pancreas-sparing partial duodenectomy (PPD) with gastrojejunostomy was performed (250 min operative time) with 50 mL of intraoperative blood loss. She required intensive care for 3 days and was discharged on postoperative day 21 with no severe complications. Emergency treatment for a major duodenal injury or perforation remains challenging because of high morbidity and mortality. An appropriate treatment should be considered according to the nature of the defect. Although PPD is an acceptable procedure for patients with a duodenal neoplasm, its use in emergency surgery is rarely reported. PPD is more reliable than primary repair or anastomosis using a jejunal wall, and less invasive than pancreaticoduodenectomy, for emergency treatment. We performed PPD in this patient because the duodenal perforation was too large to reconstruct and did not involve the ampulla. PPD can be a safe and feasible alternative surgical procedure to pancreaticoduodenectomy for a major duodenal perforation, especially in patients with a duodenal perforation that does not involve the ampulla.</description><subject>Abdominal Surgery</subject><subject>Case Report</subject><subject>Colorectal Surgery</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Hepatology</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Surgical Oncology</subject><issn>1865-7257</issn><issn>1865-7265</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UctO5DAQtFasFhj4AQ7IRy4Bu53ENjc04iUh7R52z5bH6aCMkjjYDtL8Ax-9hgASFy5dre6qOlQRcsLZOWdMXkQOAlTBQBSMqzz1D3LAVV0VEupq73Ov5D45jHHLWA1Mil9kX0ihtNT6gLz8saMLaGMRJxu68ZFmSJ3taTP7Bkd0yQ87aiO1I7V9wjDa1D0jTZ7igOERR7fLmjeT1Dn_Rdb6QC0d7Dbj8sjGE4Z8z2Q_XuavsxFpwMmHdER-traPePyOK_Lv5vrv-q54-H17v756KJwASEUL2qKCTaOwZK1Wymm-4bUFULUoARuhkHHpJC8bVwEgSmBV7apSu7LRrViRs8V3Cv5pxpjM0EWHfW9H9HM0oEQOrRQ5rBWBheqCjzFga6bQDTbsDGfmtQWztGByC-atBaOz6PTdf94M2HxKPmLPBLEQ4vSaOQaz9XNOto_f2f4H5GOV7g</recordid><startdate>20231001</startdate><enddate>20231001</enddate><creator>Watanabe, Genki</creator><creator>Satou, Shouichi</creator><creator>Tsuru, Mao</creator><creator>Momiyama, Masashi</creator><creator>Nakajima, Kentaro</creator><creator>Nagao, Atsuki</creator><creator>Satodate, Hitoshi</creator><creator>Muramoto, Takashi</creator><creator>Ohata, Ken</creator><creator>Noie, Tamaki</creator><general>Springer Nature Singapore</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7559-2811</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231001</creationdate><title>Pancreas-sparing partial duodenectomy as an alternative to emergency pancreaticoduodenectomy for a major duodenal perforation: a case report</title><author>Watanabe, Genki ; Satou, Shouichi ; Tsuru, Mao ; Momiyama, Masashi ; Nakajima, Kentaro ; Nagao, Atsuki ; Satodate, Hitoshi ; Muramoto, Takashi ; Ohata, Ken ; Noie, Tamaki</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-f29ae82bd8e40f988c91b16a2286342ed38e017c714dc522ee72056c549c4d9f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Abdominal Surgery</topic><topic>Case Report</topic><topic>Colorectal Surgery</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Hepatology</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Surgical Oncology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Watanabe, Genki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Satou, Shouichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsuru, Mao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Momiyama, Masashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakajima, Kentaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagao, Atsuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Satodate, Hitoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muramoto, Takashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohata, Ken</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noie, Tamaki</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical journal of gastroenterology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Watanabe, Genki</au><au>Satou, Shouichi</au><au>Tsuru, Mao</au><au>Momiyama, Masashi</au><au>Nakajima, Kentaro</au><au>Nagao, Atsuki</au><au>Satodate, Hitoshi</au><au>Muramoto, Takashi</au><au>Ohata, Ken</au><au>Noie, Tamaki</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pancreas-sparing partial duodenectomy as an alternative to emergency pancreaticoduodenectomy for a major duodenal perforation: a case report</atitle><jtitle>Clinical journal of gastroenterology</jtitle><stitle>Clin J Gastroenterol</stitle><addtitle>Clin J Gastroenterol</addtitle><date>2023-10-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>761</spage><epage>766</epage><pages>761-766</pages><issn>1865-7257</issn><eissn>1865-7265</eissn><abstract>A 71-year-old woman underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection for early duodenal cancer at the second portion of the duodenum and developed acute peritonitis due to delayed duodenal perforation. Emergency laparotomy was performed. A huge perforation formed at the descending duodenum without ampulla involvement. Pancreas-sparing partial duodenectomy (PPD) with gastrojejunostomy was performed (250 min operative time) with 50 mL of intraoperative blood loss. She required intensive care for 3 days and was discharged on postoperative day 21 with no severe complications. Emergency treatment for a major duodenal injury or perforation remains challenging because of high morbidity and mortality. An appropriate treatment should be considered according to the nature of the defect. Although PPD is an acceptable procedure for patients with a duodenal neoplasm, its use in emergency surgery is rarely reported. PPD is more reliable than primary repair or anastomosis using a jejunal wall, and less invasive than pancreaticoduodenectomy, for emergency treatment. We performed PPD in this patient because the duodenal perforation was too large to reconstruct and did not involve the ampulla. PPD can be a safe and feasible alternative surgical procedure to pancreaticoduodenectomy for a major duodenal perforation, especially in patients with a duodenal perforation that does not involve the ampulla.</abstract><cop>Singapore</cop><pub>Springer Nature Singapore</pub><pmid>37389799</pmid><doi>10.1007/s12328-023-01823-9</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7559-2811</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1865-7257 |
ispartof | Clinical journal of gastroenterology, 2023-10, Vol.16 (5), p.761-766 |
issn | 1865-7257 1865-7265 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2832574307 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Abdominal Surgery Case Report Colorectal Surgery Gastroenterology Hepatology Medicine Medicine & Public Health Surgical Oncology |
title | Pancreas-sparing partial duodenectomy as an alternative to emergency pancreaticoduodenectomy for a major duodenal perforation: a case report |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T17%3A33%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pancreas-sparing%20partial%20duodenectomy%20as%20an%20alternative%20to%20emergency%20pancreaticoduodenectomy%20for%20a%20major%20duodenal%20perforation:%20a%20case%20report&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20journal%20of%20gastroenterology&rft.au=Watanabe,%20Genki&rft.date=2023-10-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=761&rft.epage=766&rft.pages=761-766&rft.issn=1865-7257&rft.eissn=1865-7265&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12328-023-01823-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2832574307%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2832574307&rft_id=info:pmid/37389799&rfr_iscdi=true |