Toxicity evaluation of a heavy‐metal‐polluted river: Pollution identification and bacterial community assessment
The Salt River is an important urban river in Kaohsiung, Taiwan. In this study, the source identification and risk and toxicity assessment of the heavy‐metal‐contaminated sediments in the Salt River were investigated. The geo‐accumulation index (Igeo), enrichment factor (EF), sediment quality guidel...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Water environment research 2023-07, Vol.95 (7), p.e10904-n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | e10904 |
container_title | Water environment research |
container_volume | 95 |
creator | Li, Jin‐Min Ou, Jiun‐Hau Verpoort, Francis Surmpalli, Rao Y. Huang, Wen‐Yen Kao, Chih‐Ming |
description | The Salt River is an important urban river in Kaohsiung, Taiwan. In this study, the source identification and risk and toxicity assessment of the heavy‐metal‐contaminated sediments in the Salt River were investigated. The geo‐accumulation index (Igeo), enrichment factor (EF), sediment quality guidelines (SQGs), potential ecological risk index (RI), pollution load index (PLI), and toxic units (TU) were applied to determine effects of heavy metals on microbial diversities and ecosystems. Results from the ecological and environmental risk assessment show that high concentrations of Zn, Cr, and Ni were detected in the midstream area and the sum of toxic units (ΣTUs) in the midstream (7.2–32.0) is higher than in the downstream (14.0–19.7) and upstream (9.2–17.1). It could be because of the continuous inputs of heavy‐metal‐contained wastewaters from adjacent industrial parks. Results also inferred that the detected heavy metals in the upstream residential and commercial areas were possibly caused by nearby vehicle emissions, non‐point source pollution, and domestic wastewater discharges. Results of metagenomic assays show that the sediments contained significant microbial diversities. Metal‐tolerant bacterial phyla (Proteobacteria: 24.4%–46.4%, Bacteroidetes: 1.3%–14.8%, and Actinobacteria: 2.3%–11.1%) and pathogenic bacterial phyla (Chlamydiae: 0.5%–37.6% and Chloroflexi: 5.8%–7.2%) with relatively high abundance were detected. Metal‐tolerant bacteria would adsorb metals and cause the increased metal concentrations in sediments. Results indicate that the bacterial composition in sediment environments was affected by anthropogenic pollution and human activities and the heavy‐metal‐polluted ecosystem caused the variations in bacterial communities.
Practitioner Points
Microbial community in sediments is highly affected by heavy metal pollution.
Wastewaters and vehicle traffic contribute to river sediments pollution by heavy metals.
Proteobacteria, Bacteroidota, and Actinobacteria are dominant heavy‐metal‐tolerant bacterial phyla in sediments.
Toxicity assessment is required to study risk levels of heavy‐metal contained sediments.
The bacterial composition in sediment environments was affected by anthropogenic pollution and human activities and the heavy‐metal‐polluted ecosystem caused the variations in bacterial communities. Metal‐tolerant bacteria and pathogenic bacteria with relatively high abundance were detected. Metal‐tolerant bacteria would adsorb metals and |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/wer.10904 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2829430346</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2841612737</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3534-7e03eb7e3eeae25e90671cecbca89130686446f9f3b692c198c4eab27743dfe43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1OwzAQhS0EoqWw4AIoEhtYFPwXp2GHKv4kJBACsYwcZyJcOXGxk5bsOAJn5CS4pLBAYjUz0uc34_cQ2if4hGBMT5fgQpNivoGGJI75OIkZ2Qw9FmTMGWYDtOP9DGNCKebbaMASFmOR8iFqHu2bVrrpIlhI08pG2zqyZSSjF5CL7vP9o4JGmlDn1pi2gSJyegHuLLr_nle4LqBudKlV_1rWRZRL1YDT0kTKVlVbrxZI78H7KrC7aKuUxsPeuo7Q0-XF4_R6fHt3dTM9vx0rFrPwC8AM8gQYgAQaQ4pFQhSoXMlJShgWE8G5KNOS5SKliqQTxUHmNEk4K0rgbISOet25s68t-CartFdgjKzBtj6jE5qu7OEioId_0JltXR2uCxQngtAkmDZCxz2lnPXeQZnNna6k6zKCs1UUWYgi-44isAdrxTavoPglf7wPwGkPLLWB7n-l7PnioZf8Ailqltw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2841612737</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Toxicity evaluation of a heavy‐metal‐polluted river: Pollution identification and bacterial community assessment</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Li, Jin‐Min ; Ou, Jiun‐Hau ; Verpoort, Francis ; Surmpalli, Rao Y. ; Huang, Wen‐Yen ; Kao, Chih‐Ming</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Jin‐Min ; Ou, Jiun‐Hau ; Verpoort, Francis ; Surmpalli, Rao Y. ; Huang, Wen‐Yen ; Kao, Chih‐Ming</creatorcontrib><description>The Salt River is an important urban river in Kaohsiung, Taiwan. In this study, the source identification and risk and toxicity assessment of the heavy‐metal‐contaminated sediments in the Salt River were investigated. The geo‐accumulation index (Igeo), enrichment factor (EF), sediment quality guidelines (SQGs), potential ecological risk index (RI), pollution load index (PLI), and toxic units (TU) were applied to determine effects of heavy metals on microbial diversities and ecosystems. Results from the ecological and environmental risk assessment show that high concentrations of Zn, Cr, and Ni were detected in the midstream area and the sum of toxic units (ΣTUs) in the midstream (7.2–32.0) is higher than in the downstream (14.0–19.7) and upstream (9.2–17.1). It could be because of the continuous inputs of heavy‐metal‐contained wastewaters from adjacent industrial parks. Results also inferred that the detected heavy metals in the upstream residential and commercial areas were possibly caused by nearby vehicle emissions, non‐point source pollution, and domestic wastewater discharges. Results of metagenomic assays show that the sediments contained significant microbial diversities. Metal‐tolerant bacterial phyla (Proteobacteria: 24.4%–46.4%, Bacteroidetes: 1.3%–14.8%, and Actinobacteria: 2.3%–11.1%) and pathogenic bacterial phyla (Chlamydiae: 0.5%–37.6% and Chloroflexi: 5.8%–7.2%) with relatively high abundance were detected. Metal‐tolerant bacteria would adsorb metals and cause the increased metal concentrations in sediments. Results indicate that the bacterial composition in sediment environments was affected by anthropogenic pollution and human activities and the heavy‐metal‐polluted ecosystem caused the variations in bacterial communities.
Practitioner Points
Microbial community in sediments is highly affected by heavy metal pollution.
Wastewaters and vehicle traffic contribute to river sediments pollution by heavy metals.
Proteobacteria, Bacteroidota, and Actinobacteria are dominant heavy‐metal‐tolerant bacterial phyla in sediments.
Toxicity assessment is required to study risk levels of heavy‐metal contained sediments.
The bacterial composition in sediment environments was affected by anthropogenic pollution and human activities and the heavy‐metal‐polluted ecosystem caused the variations in bacterial communities. Metal‐tolerant bacteria and pathogenic bacteria with relatively high abundance were detected. Metal‐tolerant bacteria would adsorb metals and cause the increased metal concentrations in sediments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1061-4303</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1554-7531</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/wer.10904</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37350694</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Actinobacteria ; Anthropogenic factors ; Bacteria ; China ; Chromium ; Contaminated sediments ; Domestic wastewater ; Ecological effects ; Ecological risk assessment ; Emissions ; Environmental assessment ; Environmental Monitoring - methods ; Environmental risk ; Fluvial sediments ; Geologic Sediments ; geo‐accumulation index (Igeo) ; heavy metal ; Heavy metals ; Human influences ; Humans ; Industrial areas ; Industrial parks ; Industrial plants ; Metagenomics ; Metal concentrations ; Metals, Heavy - analysis ; Metals, Heavy - toxicity ; microbial diversity ; Microbiota ; Microorganisms ; Pathogens ; Point source pollution ; Pollutant load ; Pollution ; Pollution index ; Pollution load ; Pollution sources ; Proteobacteria ; Risk Assessment ; Risk levels ; Rivers ; Sediment ; Sediment load ; Sediment pollution ; sediment quality guidelines (SQGs) ; Sediments ; Toxicity ; Upstream ; Vehicle emissions ; Wastewater ; Wastewater discharges ; Wastewater pollution ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - toxicity ; Water pollution ; Zinc</subject><ispartof>Water environment research, 2023-07, Vol.95 (7), p.e10904-n/a</ispartof><rights>2023 Water Environment Federation.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3534-7e03eb7e3eeae25e90671cecbca89130686446f9f3b692c198c4eab27743dfe43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3534-7e03eb7e3eeae25e90671cecbca89130686446f9f3b692c198c4eab27743dfe43</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6151-7076</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fwer.10904$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fwer.10904$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37350694$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Jin‐Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ou, Jiun‐Hau</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verpoort, Francis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Surmpalli, Rao Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Wen‐Yen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kao, Chih‐Ming</creatorcontrib><title>Toxicity evaluation of a heavy‐metal‐polluted river: Pollution identification and bacterial community assessment</title><title>Water environment research</title><addtitle>Water Environ Res</addtitle><description>The Salt River is an important urban river in Kaohsiung, Taiwan. In this study, the source identification and risk and toxicity assessment of the heavy‐metal‐contaminated sediments in the Salt River were investigated. The geo‐accumulation index (Igeo), enrichment factor (EF), sediment quality guidelines (SQGs), potential ecological risk index (RI), pollution load index (PLI), and toxic units (TU) were applied to determine effects of heavy metals on microbial diversities and ecosystems. Results from the ecological and environmental risk assessment show that high concentrations of Zn, Cr, and Ni were detected in the midstream area and the sum of toxic units (ΣTUs) in the midstream (7.2–32.0) is higher than in the downstream (14.0–19.7) and upstream (9.2–17.1). It could be because of the continuous inputs of heavy‐metal‐contained wastewaters from adjacent industrial parks. Results also inferred that the detected heavy metals in the upstream residential and commercial areas were possibly caused by nearby vehicle emissions, non‐point source pollution, and domestic wastewater discharges. Results of metagenomic assays show that the sediments contained significant microbial diversities. Metal‐tolerant bacterial phyla (Proteobacteria: 24.4%–46.4%, Bacteroidetes: 1.3%–14.8%, and Actinobacteria: 2.3%–11.1%) and pathogenic bacterial phyla (Chlamydiae: 0.5%–37.6% and Chloroflexi: 5.8%–7.2%) with relatively high abundance were detected. Metal‐tolerant bacteria would adsorb metals and cause the increased metal concentrations in sediments. Results indicate that the bacterial composition in sediment environments was affected by anthropogenic pollution and human activities and the heavy‐metal‐polluted ecosystem caused the variations in bacterial communities.
Practitioner Points
Microbial community in sediments is highly affected by heavy metal pollution.
Wastewaters and vehicle traffic contribute to river sediments pollution by heavy metals.
Proteobacteria, Bacteroidota, and Actinobacteria are dominant heavy‐metal‐tolerant bacterial phyla in sediments.
Toxicity assessment is required to study risk levels of heavy‐metal contained sediments.
The bacterial composition in sediment environments was affected by anthropogenic pollution and human activities and the heavy‐metal‐polluted ecosystem caused the variations in bacterial communities. Metal‐tolerant bacteria and pathogenic bacteria with relatively high abundance were detected. Metal‐tolerant bacteria would adsorb metals and cause the increased metal concentrations in sediments.</description><subject>Actinobacteria</subject><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Chromium</subject><subject>Contaminated sediments</subject><subject>Domestic wastewater</subject><subject>Ecological effects</subject><subject>Ecological risk assessment</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Environmental assessment</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - methods</subject><subject>Environmental risk</subject><subject>Fluvial sediments</subject><subject>Geologic Sediments</subject><subject>geo‐accumulation index (Igeo)</subject><subject>heavy metal</subject><subject>Heavy metals</subject><subject>Human influences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Industrial areas</subject><subject>Industrial parks</subject><subject>Industrial plants</subject><subject>Metagenomics</subject><subject>Metal concentrations</subject><subject>Metals, Heavy - analysis</subject><subject>Metals, Heavy - toxicity</subject><subject>microbial diversity</subject><subject>Microbiota</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Point source pollution</subject><subject>Pollutant load</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Pollution index</subject><subject>Pollution load</subject><subject>Pollution sources</subject><subject>Proteobacteria</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Risk levels</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Sediment</subject><subject>Sediment load</subject><subject>Sediment pollution</subject><subject>sediment quality guidelines (SQGs)</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><subject>Upstream</subject><subject>Vehicle emissions</subject><subject>Wastewater</subject><subject>Wastewater discharges</subject><subject>Wastewater pollution</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - toxicity</subject><subject>Water pollution</subject><subject>Zinc</subject><issn>1061-4303</issn><issn>1554-7531</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1OwzAQhS0EoqWw4AIoEhtYFPwXp2GHKv4kJBACsYwcZyJcOXGxk5bsOAJn5CS4pLBAYjUz0uc34_cQ2if4hGBMT5fgQpNivoGGJI75OIkZ2Qw9FmTMGWYDtOP9DGNCKebbaMASFmOR8iFqHu2bVrrpIlhI08pG2zqyZSSjF5CL7vP9o4JGmlDn1pi2gSJyegHuLLr_nle4LqBudKlV_1rWRZRL1YDT0kTKVlVbrxZI78H7KrC7aKuUxsPeuo7Q0-XF4_R6fHt3dTM9vx0rFrPwC8AM8gQYgAQaQ4pFQhSoXMlJShgWE8G5KNOS5SKliqQTxUHmNEk4K0rgbISOet25s68t-CartFdgjKzBtj6jE5qu7OEioId_0JltXR2uCxQngtAkmDZCxz2lnPXeQZnNna6k6zKCs1UUWYgi-44isAdrxTavoPglf7wPwGkPLLWB7n-l7PnioZf8Ailqltw</recordid><startdate>202307</startdate><enddate>202307</enddate><creator>Li, Jin‐Min</creator><creator>Ou, Jiun‐Hau</creator><creator>Verpoort, Francis</creator><creator>Surmpalli, Rao Y.</creator><creator>Huang, Wen‐Yen</creator><creator>Kao, Chih‐Ming</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6151-7076</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202307</creationdate><title>Toxicity evaluation of a heavy‐metal‐polluted river: Pollution identification and bacterial community assessment</title><author>Li, Jin‐Min ; Ou, Jiun‐Hau ; Verpoort, Francis ; Surmpalli, Rao Y. ; Huang, Wen‐Yen ; Kao, Chih‐Ming</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3534-7e03eb7e3eeae25e90671cecbca89130686446f9f3b692c198c4eab27743dfe43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Actinobacteria</topic><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Chromium</topic><topic>Contaminated sediments</topic><topic>Domestic wastewater</topic><topic>Ecological effects</topic><topic>Ecological risk assessment</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Environmental assessment</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - methods</topic><topic>Environmental risk</topic><topic>Fluvial sediments</topic><topic>Geologic Sediments</topic><topic>geo‐accumulation index (Igeo)</topic><topic>heavy metal</topic><topic>Heavy metals</topic><topic>Human influences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Industrial areas</topic><topic>Industrial parks</topic><topic>Industrial plants</topic><topic>Metagenomics</topic><topic>Metal concentrations</topic><topic>Metals, Heavy - analysis</topic><topic>Metals, Heavy - toxicity</topic><topic>microbial diversity</topic><topic>Microbiota</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Point source pollution</topic><topic>Pollutant load</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Pollution index</topic><topic>Pollution load</topic><topic>Pollution sources</topic><topic>Proteobacteria</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Risk levels</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Sediment</topic><topic>Sediment load</topic><topic>Sediment pollution</topic><topic>sediment quality guidelines (SQGs)</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><topic>Upstream</topic><topic>Vehicle emissions</topic><topic>Wastewater</topic><topic>Wastewater discharges</topic><topic>Wastewater pollution</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - toxicity</topic><topic>Water pollution</topic><topic>Zinc</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Jin‐Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ou, Jiun‐Hau</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verpoort, Francis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Surmpalli, Rao Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Wen‐Yen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kao, Chih‐Ming</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Water environment research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Jin‐Min</au><au>Ou, Jiun‐Hau</au><au>Verpoort, Francis</au><au>Surmpalli, Rao Y.</au><au>Huang, Wen‐Yen</au><au>Kao, Chih‐Ming</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Toxicity evaluation of a heavy‐metal‐polluted river: Pollution identification and bacterial community assessment</atitle><jtitle>Water environment research</jtitle><addtitle>Water Environ Res</addtitle><date>2023-07</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e10904</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e10904-n/a</pages><issn>1061-4303</issn><eissn>1554-7531</eissn><abstract>The Salt River is an important urban river in Kaohsiung, Taiwan. In this study, the source identification and risk and toxicity assessment of the heavy‐metal‐contaminated sediments in the Salt River were investigated. The geo‐accumulation index (Igeo), enrichment factor (EF), sediment quality guidelines (SQGs), potential ecological risk index (RI), pollution load index (PLI), and toxic units (TU) were applied to determine effects of heavy metals on microbial diversities and ecosystems. Results from the ecological and environmental risk assessment show that high concentrations of Zn, Cr, and Ni were detected in the midstream area and the sum of toxic units (ΣTUs) in the midstream (7.2–32.0) is higher than in the downstream (14.0–19.7) and upstream (9.2–17.1). It could be because of the continuous inputs of heavy‐metal‐contained wastewaters from adjacent industrial parks. Results also inferred that the detected heavy metals in the upstream residential and commercial areas were possibly caused by nearby vehicle emissions, non‐point source pollution, and domestic wastewater discharges. Results of metagenomic assays show that the sediments contained significant microbial diversities. Metal‐tolerant bacterial phyla (Proteobacteria: 24.4%–46.4%, Bacteroidetes: 1.3%–14.8%, and Actinobacteria: 2.3%–11.1%) and pathogenic bacterial phyla (Chlamydiae: 0.5%–37.6% and Chloroflexi: 5.8%–7.2%) with relatively high abundance were detected. Metal‐tolerant bacteria would adsorb metals and cause the increased metal concentrations in sediments. Results indicate that the bacterial composition in sediment environments was affected by anthropogenic pollution and human activities and the heavy‐metal‐polluted ecosystem caused the variations in bacterial communities.
Practitioner Points
Microbial community in sediments is highly affected by heavy metal pollution.
Wastewaters and vehicle traffic contribute to river sediments pollution by heavy metals.
Proteobacteria, Bacteroidota, and Actinobacteria are dominant heavy‐metal‐tolerant bacterial phyla in sediments.
Toxicity assessment is required to study risk levels of heavy‐metal contained sediments.
The bacterial composition in sediment environments was affected by anthropogenic pollution and human activities and the heavy‐metal‐polluted ecosystem caused the variations in bacterial communities. Metal‐tolerant bacteria and pathogenic bacteria with relatively high abundance were detected. Metal‐tolerant bacteria would adsorb metals and cause the increased metal concentrations in sediments.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>37350694</pmid><doi>10.1002/wer.10904</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6151-7076</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1061-4303 |
ispartof | Water environment research, 2023-07, Vol.95 (7), p.e10904-n/a |
issn | 1061-4303 1554-7531 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2829430346 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Actinobacteria Anthropogenic factors Bacteria China Chromium Contaminated sediments Domestic wastewater Ecological effects Ecological risk assessment Emissions Environmental assessment Environmental Monitoring - methods Environmental risk Fluvial sediments Geologic Sediments geo‐accumulation index (Igeo) heavy metal Heavy metals Human influences Humans Industrial areas Industrial parks Industrial plants Metagenomics Metal concentrations Metals, Heavy - analysis Metals, Heavy - toxicity microbial diversity Microbiota Microorganisms Pathogens Point source pollution Pollutant load Pollution Pollution index Pollution load Pollution sources Proteobacteria Risk Assessment Risk levels Rivers Sediment Sediment load Sediment pollution sediment quality guidelines (SQGs) Sediments Toxicity Upstream Vehicle emissions Wastewater Wastewater discharges Wastewater pollution Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis Water Pollutants, Chemical - toxicity Water pollution Zinc |
title | Toxicity evaluation of a heavy‐metal‐polluted river: Pollution identification and bacterial community assessment |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T10%3A25%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Toxicity%20evaluation%20of%20a%20heavy%E2%80%90metal%E2%80%90polluted%20river:%20Pollution%20identification%20and%20bacterial%20community%20assessment&rft.jtitle=Water%20environment%20research&rft.au=Li,%20Jin%E2%80%90Min&rft.date=2023-07&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e10904&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e10904-n/a&rft.issn=1061-4303&rft.eissn=1554-7531&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/wer.10904&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2841612737%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2841612737&rft_id=info:pmid/37350694&rfr_iscdi=true |