Toxicity evaluation of a heavy‐metal‐polluted river: Pollution identification and bacterial community assessment

The Salt River is an important urban river in Kaohsiung, Taiwan. In this study, the source identification and risk and toxicity assessment of the heavy‐metal‐contaminated sediments in the Salt River were investigated. The geo‐accumulation index (Igeo), enrichment factor (EF), sediment quality guidel...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water environment research 2023-07, Vol.95 (7), p.e10904-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Li, Jin‐Min, Ou, Jiun‐Hau, Verpoort, Francis, Surmpalli, Rao Y., Huang, Wen‐Yen, Kao, Chih‐Ming
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 7
container_start_page e10904
container_title Water environment research
container_volume 95
creator Li, Jin‐Min
Ou, Jiun‐Hau
Verpoort, Francis
Surmpalli, Rao Y.
Huang, Wen‐Yen
Kao, Chih‐Ming
description The Salt River is an important urban river in Kaohsiung, Taiwan. In this study, the source identification and risk and toxicity assessment of the heavy‐metal‐contaminated sediments in the Salt River were investigated. The geo‐accumulation index (Igeo), enrichment factor (EF), sediment quality guidelines (SQGs), potential ecological risk index (RI), pollution load index (PLI), and toxic units (TU) were applied to determine effects of heavy metals on microbial diversities and ecosystems. Results from the ecological and environmental risk assessment show that high concentrations of Zn, Cr, and Ni were detected in the midstream area and the sum of toxic units (ΣTUs) in the midstream (7.2–32.0) is higher than in the downstream (14.0–19.7) and upstream (9.2–17.1). It could be because of the continuous inputs of heavy‐metal‐contained wastewaters from adjacent industrial parks. Results also inferred that the detected heavy metals in the upstream residential and commercial areas were possibly caused by nearby vehicle emissions, non‐point source pollution, and domestic wastewater discharges. Results of metagenomic assays show that the sediments contained significant microbial diversities. Metal‐tolerant bacterial phyla (Proteobacteria: 24.4%–46.4%, Bacteroidetes: 1.3%–14.8%, and Actinobacteria: 2.3%–11.1%) and pathogenic bacterial phyla (Chlamydiae: 0.5%–37.6% and Chloroflexi: 5.8%–7.2%) with relatively high abundance were detected. Metal‐tolerant bacteria would adsorb metals and cause the increased metal concentrations in sediments. Results indicate that the bacterial composition in sediment environments was affected by anthropogenic pollution and human activities and the heavy‐metal‐polluted ecosystem caused the variations in bacterial communities. Practitioner Points Microbial community in sediments is highly affected by heavy metal pollution. Wastewaters and vehicle traffic contribute to river sediments pollution by heavy metals. Proteobacteria, Bacteroidota, and Actinobacteria are dominant heavy‐metal‐tolerant bacterial phyla in sediments. Toxicity assessment is required to study risk levels of heavy‐metal contained sediments. The bacterial composition in sediment environments was affected by anthropogenic pollution and human activities and the heavy‐metal‐polluted ecosystem caused the variations in bacterial communities. Metal‐tolerant bacteria and pathogenic bacteria with relatively high abundance were detected. Metal‐tolerant bacteria would adsorb metals and
doi_str_mv 10.1002/wer.10904
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2829430346</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2841612737</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3534-7e03eb7e3eeae25e90671cecbca89130686446f9f3b692c198c4eab27743dfe43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1OwzAQhS0EoqWw4AIoEhtYFPwXp2GHKv4kJBACsYwcZyJcOXGxk5bsOAJn5CS4pLBAYjUz0uc34_cQ2if4hGBMT5fgQpNivoGGJI75OIkZ2Qw9FmTMGWYDtOP9DGNCKebbaMASFmOR8iFqHu2bVrrpIlhI08pG2zqyZSSjF5CL7vP9o4JGmlDn1pi2gSJyegHuLLr_nle4LqBudKlV_1rWRZRL1YDT0kTKVlVbrxZI78H7KrC7aKuUxsPeuo7Q0-XF4_R6fHt3dTM9vx0rFrPwC8AM8gQYgAQaQ4pFQhSoXMlJShgWE8G5KNOS5SKliqQTxUHmNEk4K0rgbISOet25s68t-CartFdgjKzBtj6jE5qu7OEioId_0JltXR2uCxQngtAkmDZCxz2lnPXeQZnNna6k6zKCs1UUWYgi-44isAdrxTavoPglf7wPwGkPLLWB7n-l7PnioZf8Ailqltw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2841612737</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Toxicity evaluation of a heavy‐metal‐polluted river: Pollution identification and bacterial community assessment</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Li, Jin‐Min ; Ou, Jiun‐Hau ; Verpoort, Francis ; Surmpalli, Rao Y. ; Huang, Wen‐Yen ; Kao, Chih‐Ming</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Jin‐Min ; Ou, Jiun‐Hau ; Verpoort, Francis ; Surmpalli, Rao Y. ; Huang, Wen‐Yen ; Kao, Chih‐Ming</creatorcontrib><description>The Salt River is an important urban river in Kaohsiung, Taiwan. In this study, the source identification and risk and toxicity assessment of the heavy‐metal‐contaminated sediments in the Salt River were investigated. The geo‐accumulation index (Igeo), enrichment factor (EF), sediment quality guidelines (SQGs), potential ecological risk index (RI), pollution load index (PLI), and toxic units (TU) were applied to determine effects of heavy metals on microbial diversities and ecosystems. Results from the ecological and environmental risk assessment show that high concentrations of Zn, Cr, and Ni were detected in the midstream area and the sum of toxic units (ΣTUs) in the midstream (7.2–32.0) is higher than in the downstream (14.0–19.7) and upstream (9.2–17.1). It could be because of the continuous inputs of heavy‐metal‐contained wastewaters from adjacent industrial parks. Results also inferred that the detected heavy metals in the upstream residential and commercial areas were possibly caused by nearby vehicle emissions, non‐point source pollution, and domestic wastewater discharges. Results of metagenomic assays show that the sediments contained significant microbial diversities. Metal‐tolerant bacterial phyla (Proteobacteria: 24.4%–46.4%, Bacteroidetes: 1.3%–14.8%, and Actinobacteria: 2.3%–11.1%) and pathogenic bacterial phyla (Chlamydiae: 0.5%–37.6% and Chloroflexi: 5.8%–7.2%) with relatively high abundance were detected. Metal‐tolerant bacteria would adsorb metals and cause the increased metal concentrations in sediments. Results indicate that the bacterial composition in sediment environments was affected by anthropogenic pollution and human activities and the heavy‐metal‐polluted ecosystem caused the variations in bacterial communities. Practitioner Points Microbial community in sediments is highly affected by heavy metal pollution. Wastewaters and vehicle traffic contribute to river sediments pollution by heavy metals. Proteobacteria, Bacteroidota, and Actinobacteria are dominant heavy‐metal‐tolerant bacterial phyla in sediments. Toxicity assessment is required to study risk levels of heavy‐metal contained sediments. The bacterial composition in sediment environments was affected by anthropogenic pollution and human activities and the heavy‐metal‐polluted ecosystem caused the variations in bacterial communities. Metal‐tolerant bacteria and pathogenic bacteria with relatively high abundance were detected. Metal‐tolerant bacteria would adsorb metals and cause the increased metal concentrations in sediments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1061-4303</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1554-7531</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/wer.10904</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37350694</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Actinobacteria ; Anthropogenic factors ; Bacteria ; China ; Chromium ; Contaminated sediments ; Domestic wastewater ; Ecological effects ; Ecological risk assessment ; Emissions ; Environmental assessment ; Environmental Monitoring - methods ; Environmental risk ; Fluvial sediments ; Geologic Sediments ; geo‐accumulation index (Igeo) ; heavy metal ; Heavy metals ; Human influences ; Humans ; Industrial areas ; Industrial parks ; Industrial plants ; Metagenomics ; Metal concentrations ; Metals, Heavy - analysis ; Metals, Heavy - toxicity ; microbial diversity ; Microbiota ; Microorganisms ; Pathogens ; Point source pollution ; Pollutant load ; Pollution ; Pollution index ; Pollution load ; Pollution sources ; Proteobacteria ; Risk Assessment ; Risk levels ; Rivers ; Sediment ; Sediment load ; Sediment pollution ; sediment quality guidelines (SQGs) ; Sediments ; Toxicity ; Upstream ; Vehicle emissions ; Wastewater ; Wastewater discharges ; Wastewater pollution ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - toxicity ; Water pollution ; Zinc</subject><ispartof>Water environment research, 2023-07, Vol.95 (7), p.e10904-n/a</ispartof><rights>2023 Water Environment Federation.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3534-7e03eb7e3eeae25e90671cecbca89130686446f9f3b692c198c4eab27743dfe43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3534-7e03eb7e3eeae25e90671cecbca89130686446f9f3b692c198c4eab27743dfe43</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6151-7076</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fwer.10904$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fwer.10904$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37350694$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Jin‐Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ou, Jiun‐Hau</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verpoort, Francis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Surmpalli, Rao Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Wen‐Yen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kao, Chih‐Ming</creatorcontrib><title>Toxicity evaluation of a heavy‐metal‐polluted river: Pollution identification and bacterial community assessment</title><title>Water environment research</title><addtitle>Water Environ Res</addtitle><description>The Salt River is an important urban river in Kaohsiung, Taiwan. In this study, the source identification and risk and toxicity assessment of the heavy‐metal‐contaminated sediments in the Salt River were investigated. The geo‐accumulation index (Igeo), enrichment factor (EF), sediment quality guidelines (SQGs), potential ecological risk index (RI), pollution load index (PLI), and toxic units (TU) were applied to determine effects of heavy metals on microbial diversities and ecosystems. Results from the ecological and environmental risk assessment show that high concentrations of Zn, Cr, and Ni were detected in the midstream area and the sum of toxic units (ΣTUs) in the midstream (7.2–32.0) is higher than in the downstream (14.0–19.7) and upstream (9.2–17.1). It could be because of the continuous inputs of heavy‐metal‐contained wastewaters from adjacent industrial parks. Results also inferred that the detected heavy metals in the upstream residential and commercial areas were possibly caused by nearby vehicle emissions, non‐point source pollution, and domestic wastewater discharges. Results of metagenomic assays show that the sediments contained significant microbial diversities. Metal‐tolerant bacterial phyla (Proteobacteria: 24.4%–46.4%, Bacteroidetes: 1.3%–14.8%, and Actinobacteria: 2.3%–11.1%) and pathogenic bacterial phyla (Chlamydiae: 0.5%–37.6% and Chloroflexi: 5.8%–7.2%) with relatively high abundance were detected. Metal‐tolerant bacteria would adsorb metals and cause the increased metal concentrations in sediments. Results indicate that the bacterial composition in sediment environments was affected by anthropogenic pollution and human activities and the heavy‐metal‐polluted ecosystem caused the variations in bacterial communities. Practitioner Points Microbial community in sediments is highly affected by heavy metal pollution. Wastewaters and vehicle traffic contribute to river sediments pollution by heavy metals. Proteobacteria, Bacteroidota, and Actinobacteria are dominant heavy‐metal‐tolerant bacterial phyla in sediments. Toxicity assessment is required to study risk levels of heavy‐metal contained sediments. The bacterial composition in sediment environments was affected by anthropogenic pollution and human activities and the heavy‐metal‐polluted ecosystem caused the variations in bacterial communities. Metal‐tolerant bacteria and pathogenic bacteria with relatively high abundance were detected. Metal‐tolerant bacteria would adsorb metals and cause the increased metal concentrations in sediments.</description><subject>Actinobacteria</subject><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Chromium</subject><subject>Contaminated sediments</subject><subject>Domestic wastewater</subject><subject>Ecological effects</subject><subject>Ecological risk assessment</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Environmental assessment</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - methods</subject><subject>Environmental risk</subject><subject>Fluvial sediments</subject><subject>Geologic Sediments</subject><subject>geo‐accumulation index (Igeo)</subject><subject>heavy metal</subject><subject>Heavy metals</subject><subject>Human influences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Industrial areas</subject><subject>Industrial parks</subject><subject>Industrial plants</subject><subject>Metagenomics</subject><subject>Metal concentrations</subject><subject>Metals, Heavy - analysis</subject><subject>Metals, Heavy - toxicity</subject><subject>microbial diversity</subject><subject>Microbiota</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Point source pollution</subject><subject>Pollutant load</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Pollution index</subject><subject>Pollution load</subject><subject>Pollution sources</subject><subject>Proteobacteria</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Risk levels</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Sediment</subject><subject>Sediment load</subject><subject>Sediment pollution</subject><subject>sediment quality guidelines (SQGs)</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><subject>Upstream</subject><subject>Vehicle emissions</subject><subject>Wastewater</subject><subject>Wastewater discharges</subject><subject>Wastewater pollution</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - toxicity</subject><subject>Water pollution</subject><subject>Zinc</subject><issn>1061-4303</issn><issn>1554-7531</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1OwzAQhS0EoqWw4AIoEhtYFPwXp2GHKv4kJBACsYwcZyJcOXGxk5bsOAJn5CS4pLBAYjUz0uc34_cQ2if4hGBMT5fgQpNivoGGJI75OIkZ2Qw9FmTMGWYDtOP9DGNCKebbaMASFmOR8iFqHu2bVrrpIlhI08pG2zqyZSSjF5CL7vP9o4JGmlDn1pi2gSJyegHuLLr_nle4LqBudKlV_1rWRZRL1YDT0kTKVlVbrxZI78H7KrC7aKuUxsPeuo7Q0-XF4_R6fHt3dTM9vx0rFrPwC8AM8gQYgAQaQ4pFQhSoXMlJShgWE8G5KNOS5SKliqQTxUHmNEk4K0rgbISOet25s68t-CartFdgjKzBtj6jE5qu7OEioId_0JltXR2uCxQngtAkmDZCxz2lnPXeQZnNna6k6zKCs1UUWYgi-44isAdrxTavoPglf7wPwGkPLLWB7n-l7PnioZf8Ailqltw</recordid><startdate>202307</startdate><enddate>202307</enddate><creator>Li, Jin‐Min</creator><creator>Ou, Jiun‐Hau</creator><creator>Verpoort, Francis</creator><creator>Surmpalli, Rao Y.</creator><creator>Huang, Wen‐Yen</creator><creator>Kao, Chih‐Ming</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6151-7076</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202307</creationdate><title>Toxicity evaluation of a heavy‐metal‐polluted river: Pollution identification and bacterial community assessment</title><author>Li, Jin‐Min ; Ou, Jiun‐Hau ; Verpoort, Francis ; Surmpalli, Rao Y. ; Huang, Wen‐Yen ; Kao, Chih‐Ming</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3534-7e03eb7e3eeae25e90671cecbca89130686446f9f3b692c198c4eab27743dfe43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Actinobacteria</topic><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Chromium</topic><topic>Contaminated sediments</topic><topic>Domestic wastewater</topic><topic>Ecological effects</topic><topic>Ecological risk assessment</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Environmental assessment</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - methods</topic><topic>Environmental risk</topic><topic>Fluvial sediments</topic><topic>Geologic Sediments</topic><topic>geo‐accumulation index (Igeo)</topic><topic>heavy metal</topic><topic>Heavy metals</topic><topic>Human influences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Industrial areas</topic><topic>Industrial parks</topic><topic>Industrial plants</topic><topic>Metagenomics</topic><topic>Metal concentrations</topic><topic>Metals, Heavy - analysis</topic><topic>Metals, Heavy - toxicity</topic><topic>microbial diversity</topic><topic>Microbiota</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Point source pollution</topic><topic>Pollutant load</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Pollution index</topic><topic>Pollution load</topic><topic>Pollution sources</topic><topic>Proteobacteria</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Risk levels</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Sediment</topic><topic>Sediment load</topic><topic>Sediment pollution</topic><topic>sediment quality guidelines (SQGs)</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><topic>Upstream</topic><topic>Vehicle emissions</topic><topic>Wastewater</topic><topic>Wastewater discharges</topic><topic>Wastewater pollution</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - toxicity</topic><topic>Water pollution</topic><topic>Zinc</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Jin‐Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ou, Jiun‐Hau</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verpoort, Francis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Surmpalli, Rao Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Wen‐Yen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kao, Chih‐Ming</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Water environment research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Jin‐Min</au><au>Ou, Jiun‐Hau</au><au>Verpoort, Francis</au><au>Surmpalli, Rao Y.</au><au>Huang, Wen‐Yen</au><au>Kao, Chih‐Ming</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Toxicity evaluation of a heavy‐metal‐polluted river: Pollution identification and bacterial community assessment</atitle><jtitle>Water environment research</jtitle><addtitle>Water Environ Res</addtitle><date>2023-07</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e10904</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e10904-n/a</pages><issn>1061-4303</issn><eissn>1554-7531</eissn><abstract>The Salt River is an important urban river in Kaohsiung, Taiwan. In this study, the source identification and risk and toxicity assessment of the heavy‐metal‐contaminated sediments in the Salt River were investigated. The geo‐accumulation index (Igeo), enrichment factor (EF), sediment quality guidelines (SQGs), potential ecological risk index (RI), pollution load index (PLI), and toxic units (TU) were applied to determine effects of heavy metals on microbial diversities and ecosystems. Results from the ecological and environmental risk assessment show that high concentrations of Zn, Cr, and Ni were detected in the midstream area and the sum of toxic units (ΣTUs) in the midstream (7.2–32.0) is higher than in the downstream (14.0–19.7) and upstream (9.2–17.1). It could be because of the continuous inputs of heavy‐metal‐contained wastewaters from adjacent industrial parks. Results also inferred that the detected heavy metals in the upstream residential and commercial areas were possibly caused by nearby vehicle emissions, non‐point source pollution, and domestic wastewater discharges. Results of metagenomic assays show that the sediments contained significant microbial diversities. Metal‐tolerant bacterial phyla (Proteobacteria: 24.4%–46.4%, Bacteroidetes: 1.3%–14.8%, and Actinobacteria: 2.3%–11.1%) and pathogenic bacterial phyla (Chlamydiae: 0.5%–37.6% and Chloroflexi: 5.8%–7.2%) with relatively high abundance were detected. Metal‐tolerant bacteria would adsorb metals and cause the increased metal concentrations in sediments. Results indicate that the bacterial composition in sediment environments was affected by anthropogenic pollution and human activities and the heavy‐metal‐polluted ecosystem caused the variations in bacterial communities. Practitioner Points Microbial community in sediments is highly affected by heavy metal pollution. Wastewaters and vehicle traffic contribute to river sediments pollution by heavy metals. Proteobacteria, Bacteroidota, and Actinobacteria are dominant heavy‐metal‐tolerant bacterial phyla in sediments. Toxicity assessment is required to study risk levels of heavy‐metal contained sediments. The bacterial composition in sediment environments was affected by anthropogenic pollution and human activities and the heavy‐metal‐polluted ecosystem caused the variations in bacterial communities. Metal‐tolerant bacteria and pathogenic bacteria with relatively high abundance were detected. Metal‐tolerant bacteria would adsorb metals and cause the increased metal concentrations in sediments.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>37350694</pmid><doi>10.1002/wer.10904</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6151-7076</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1061-4303
ispartof Water environment research, 2023-07, Vol.95 (7), p.e10904-n/a
issn 1061-4303
1554-7531
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2829430346
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Actinobacteria
Anthropogenic factors
Bacteria
China
Chromium
Contaminated sediments
Domestic wastewater
Ecological effects
Ecological risk assessment
Emissions
Environmental assessment
Environmental Monitoring - methods
Environmental risk
Fluvial sediments
Geologic Sediments
geo‐accumulation index (Igeo)
heavy metal
Heavy metals
Human influences
Humans
Industrial areas
Industrial parks
Industrial plants
Metagenomics
Metal concentrations
Metals, Heavy - analysis
Metals, Heavy - toxicity
microbial diversity
Microbiota
Microorganisms
Pathogens
Point source pollution
Pollutant load
Pollution
Pollution index
Pollution load
Pollution sources
Proteobacteria
Risk Assessment
Risk levels
Rivers
Sediment
Sediment load
Sediment pollution
sediment quality guidelines (SQGs)
Sediments
Toxicity
Upstream
Vehicle emissions
Wastewater
Wastewater discharges
Wastewater pollution
Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis
Water Pollutants, Chemical - toxicity
Water pollution
Zinc
title Toxicity evaluation of a heavy‐metal‐polluted river: Pollution identification and bacterial community assessment
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T10%3A25%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Toxicity%20evaluation%20of%20a%20heavy%E2%80%90metal%E2%80%90polluted%20river:%20Pollution%20identification%20and%20bacterial%20community%20assessment&rft.jtitle=Water%20environment%20research&rft.au=Li,%20Jin%E2%80%90Min&rft.date=2023-07&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e10904&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e10904-n/a&rft.issn=1061-4303&rft.eissn=1554-7531&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/wer.10904&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2841612737%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2841612737&rft_id=info:pmid/37350694&rfr_iscdi=true