Meta-Analysis of Publicly Available Clinical and Preclinical Microbiome Data From Studies of Burn Injury

Abstract Following burn injury, alterations in host commensal microbiota across body spaces may leave patients susceptible to opportunistic pathogens and serious sequelae such as sepsis. Generally, studies examining the microbiome postburn have had a limited sample size and lack of longitudinal data...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of burn care & research 2023-09, Vol.44 (5), p.1041-1050
Hauptverfasser: Horseman, Timothy S, Frank, Andrew M, Shupp, Jeffrey W, Burmeister, David M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1050
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1041
container_title Journal of burn care & research
container_volume 44
creator Horseman, Timothy S
Frank, Andrew M
Shupp, Jeffrey W
Burmeister, David M
description Abstract Following burn injury, alterations in host commensal microbiota across body spaces may leave patients susceptible to opportunistic pathogens and serious sequelae such as sepsis. Generally, studies examining the microbiome postburn have had a limited sample size and lack of longitudinal data, which coupled with experimental and analytic variation, impacts overall interpretation. We performed a meta-analysis of publicly available sequencing data from preclinical and clinical burn studies to determine if there were consistent alterations in the microbiome across various anatomical sites and hosts. Ten human and animal 16S rRNA sequencing studies spanning respiratory, urinary, cutaneous, and gastrointestinal microbiomes were included. Taxonomic classification and alpha and beta diversity metrics were analyzed using QIIME2 v2021.8. Alpha diversity was consistently higher in control samples compared to burn-injured samples which were also different based on host and anatomical location; however, phylogenetic evaluation (ie, Faith PD) elucidated more significant differences compared to taxonomic metrics (ie, Shannon entropy). Beta diversity analysis based on weighted UniFrac showed that rodent specimens clustered less closely to humans than pig samples for both rectal and skin sources. Host species and performing institute were found to have a significant impact on community structure. In rectal samples, bacterial composition in pig and human burn samples included Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, and Proteobacteria, while rodent samples were dominated by Firmicutes. Proteobacteria and Firmicutes increased on burned skin in each host species. Our results suggest that host species and the performing institute strongly influence microbiome structure. Burn-induced alterations in microbiome diversity and taxa exist across hosts, with phylogenetic metrics more valuable than others. Coordinated, multicenter studies, both clinical and preclinical, within the burn community are needed to more completely realize the diagnostic and therapeutic potential of the microbiome for improving outcomes postburn.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jbcr/irad098
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2829428199</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/jbcr/irad098</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2829428199</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-df87b77af7f4c27fe0fd15a3c84710484cc7e7c4deaf9ab04e06ccf4c61775823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFLwzAUgIMobk5vniU3PViXtOmSHud0OthwoIK38pommJG2M2mE_Xs7N3f09N6Djw_eh9AlJXeUZMlwVUg3NA5Kkokj1KdpmkWECXF82PlHD515vyKEMcLTU9RLeJLGhNI--lyoFqJxDXbjjceNxstQWCPtBo-_wVgorMITa2ojwWKoS7x0Sv7dCyNdU5imUvgBWsBT11T4tQ2lUb-u--BqPKtXwW3O0YkG69XFfg7Q-_TxbfIczV-eZpPxPJLJiLZRqQUvOAfNNZMx14rokqaQSME47d5iUnLFJSsV6AwKwhQZSdmxI8p5KuJkgG523rVrvoLybV4ZL5W1UKsm-DwWccZiQbOsQ293aPeE907pfO1MBW6TU5Jv2-bbtvm-bYdf7c2hqFR5gP9idsD1DmjC-n_VD8nhhN4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2829428199</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Meta-Analysis of Publicly Available Clinical and Preclinical Microbiome Data From Studies of Burn Injury</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Horseman, Timothy S ; Frank, Andrew M ; Shupp, Jeffrey W ; Burmeister, David M</creator><creatorcontrib>Horseman, Timothy S ; Frank, Andrew M ; Shupp, Jeffrey W ; Burmeister, David M</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Following burn injury, alterations in host commensal microbiota across body spaces may leave patients susceptible to opportunistic pathogens and serious sequelae such as sepsis. Generally, studies examining the microbiome postburn have had a limited sample size and lack of longitudinal data, which coupled with experimental and analytic variation, impacts overall interpretation. We performed a meta-analysis of publicly available sequencing data from preclinical and clinical burn studies to determine if there were consistent alterations in the microbiome across various anatomical sites and hosts. Ten human and animal 16S rRNA sequencing studies spanning respiratory, urinary, cutaneous, and gastrointestinal microbiomes were included. Taxonomic classification and alpha and beta diversity metrics were analyzed using QIIME2 v2021.8. Alpha diversity was consistently higher in control samples compared to burn-injured samples which were also different based on host and anatomical location; however, phylogenetic evaluation (ie, Faith PD) elucidated more significant differences compared to taxonomic metrics (ie, Shannon entropy). Beta diversity analysis based on weighted UniFrac showed that rodent specimens clustered less closely to humans than pig samples for both rectal and skin sources. Host species and performing institute were found to have a significant impact on community structure. In rectal samples, bacterial composition in pig and human burn samples included Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, and Proteobacteria, while rodent samples were dominated by Firmicutes. Proteobacteria and Firmicutes increased on burned skin in each host species. Our results suggest that host species and the performing institute strongly influence microbiome structure. Burn-induced alterations in microbiome diversity and taxa exist across hosts, with phylogenetic metrics more valuable than others. Coordinated, multicenter studies, both clinical and preclinical, within the burn community are needed to more completely realize the diagnostic and therapeutic potential of the microbiome for improving outcomes postburn.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1559-047X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1559-0488</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jbcr/irad098</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37352011</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>Journal of burn care &amp; research, 2023-09, Vol.44 (5), p.1041-1050</ispartof><rights>Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Burn Association 2023. 2023</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Burn Association. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-df87b77af7f4c27fe0fd15a3c84710484cc7e7c4deaf9ab04e06ccf4c61775823</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-df87b77af7f4c27fe0fd15a3c84710484cc7e7c4deaf9ab04e06ccf4c61775823</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0411-7102 ; 0000-0002-1256-0158</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1578,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37352011$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Horseman, Timothy S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frank, Andrew M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shupp, Jeffrey W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burmeister, David M</creatorcontrib><title>Meta-Analysis of Publicly Available Clinical and Preclinical Microbiome Data From Studies of Burn Injury</title><title>Journal of burn care &amp; research</title><addtitle>J Burn Care Res</addtitle><description>Abstract Following burn injury, alterations in host commensal microbiota across body spaces may leave patients susceptible to opportunistic pathogens and serious sequelae such as sepsis. Generally, studies examining the microbiome postburn have had a limited sample size and lack of longitudinal data, which coupled with experimental and analytic variation, impacts overall interpretation. We performed a meta-analysis of publicly available sequencing data from preclinical and clinical burn studies to determine if there were consistent alterations in the microbiome across various anatomical sites and hosts. Ten human and animal 16S rRNA sequencing studies spanning respiratory, urinary, cutaneous, and gastrointestinal microbiomes were included. Taxonomic classification and alpha and beta diversity metrics were analyzed using QIIME2 v2021.8. Alpha diversity was consistently higher in control samples compared to burn-injured samples which were also different based on host and anatomical location; however, phylogenetic evaluation (ie, Faith PD) elucidated more significant differences compared to taxonomic metrics (ie, Shannon entropy). Beta diversity analysis based on weighted UniFrac showed that rodent specimens clustered less closely to humans than pig samples for both rectal and skin sources. Host species and performing institute were found to have a significant impact on community structure. In rectal samples, bacterial composition in pig and human burn samples included Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, and Proteobacteria, while rodent samples were dominated by Firmicutes. Proteobacteria and Firmicutes increased on burned skin in each host species. Our results suggest that host species and the performing institute strongly influence microbiome structure. Burn-induced alterations in microbiome diversity and taxa exist across hosts, with phylogenetic metrics more valuable than others. Coordinated, multicenter studies, both clinical and preclinical, within the burn community are needed to more completely realize the diagnostic and therapeutic potential of the microbiome for improving outcomes postburn.</description><issn>1559-047X</issn><issn>1559-0488</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEFLwzAUgIMobk5vniU3PViXtOmSHud0OthwoIK38pommJG2M2mE_Xs7N3f09N6Djw_eh9AlJXeUZMlwVUg3NA5Kkokj1KdpmkWECXF82PlHD515vyKEMcLTU9RLeJLGhNI--lyoFqJxDXbjjceNxstQWCPtBo-_wVgorMITa2ojwWKoS7x0Sv7dCyNdU5imUvgBWsBT11T4tQ2lUb-u--BqPKtXwW3O0YkG69XFfg7Q-_TxbfIczV-eZpPxPJLJiLZRqQUvOAfNNZMx14rokqaQSME47d5iUnLFJSsV6AwKwhQZSdmxI8p5KuJkgG523rVrvoLybV4ZL5W1UKsm-DwWccZiQbOsQ293aPeE907pfO1MBW6TU5Jv2-bbtvm-bYdf7c2hqFR5gP9idsD1DmjC-n_VD8nhhN4</recordid><startdate>20230907</startdate><enddate>20230907</enddate><creator>Horseman, Timothy S</creator><creator>Frank, Andrew M</creator><creator>Shupp, Jeffrey W</creator><creator>Burmeister, David M</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0411-7102</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1256-0158</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230907</creationdate><title>Meta-Analysis of Publicly Available Clinical and Preclinical Microbiome Data From Studies of Burn Injury</title><author>Horseman, Timothy S ; Frank, Andrew M ; Shupp, Jeffrey W ; Burmeister, David M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-df87b77af7f4c27fe0fd15a3c84710484cc7e7c4deaf9ab04e06ccf4c61775823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Horseman, Timothy S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frank, Andrew M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shupp, Jeffrey W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burmeister, David M</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of burn care &amp; research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Horseman, Timothy S</au><au>Frank, Andrew M</au><au>Shupp, Jeffrey W</au><au>Burmeister, David M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Meta-Analysis of Publicly Available Clinical and Preclinical Microbiome Data From Studies of Burn Injury</atitle><jtitle>Journal of burn care &amp; research</jtitle><addtitle>J Burn Care Res</addtitle><date>2023-09-07</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1041</spage><epage>1050</epage><pages>1041-1050</pages><issn>1559-047X</issn><eissn>1559-0488</eissn><abstract>Abstract Following burn injury, alterations in host commensal microbiota across body spaces may leave patients susceptible to opportunistic pathogens and serious sequelae such as sepsis. Generally, studies examining the microbiome postburn have had a limited sample size and lack of longitudinal data, which coupled with experimental and analytic variation, impacts overall interpretation. We performed a meta-analysis of publicly available sequencing data from preclinical and clinical burn studies to determine if there were consistent alterations in the microbiome across various anatomical sites and hosts. Ten human and animal 16S rRNA sequencing studies spanning respiratory, urinary, cutaneous, and gastrointestinal microbiomes were included. Taxonomic classification and alpha and beta diversity metrics were analyzed using QIIME2 v2021.8. Alpha diversity was consistently higher in control samples compared to burn-injured samples which were also different based on host and anatomical location; however, phylogenetic evaluation (ie, Faith PD) elucidated more significant differences compared to taxonomic metrics (ie, Shannon entropy). Beta diversity analysis based on weighted UniFrac showed that rodent specimens clustered less closely to humans than pig samples for both rectal and skin sources. Host species and performing institute were found to have a significant impact on community structure. In rectal samples, bacterial composition in pig and human burn samples included Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, and Proteobacteria, while rodent samples were dominated by Firmicutes. Proteobacteria and Firmicutes increased on burned skin in each host species. Our results suggest that host species and the performing institute strongly influence microbiome structure. Burn-induced alterations in microbiome diversity and taxa exist across hosts, with phylogenetic metrics more valuable than others. Coordinated, multicenter studies, both clinical and preclinical, within the burn community are needed to more completely realize the diagnostic and therapeutic potential of the microbiome for improving outcomes postburn.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>37352011</pmid><doi>10.1093/jbcr/irad098</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0411-7102</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1256-0158</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1559-047X
ispartof Journal of burn care & research, 2023-09, Vol.44 (5), p.1041-1050
issn 1559-047X
1559-0488
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2829428199
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
title Meta-Analysis of Publicly Available Clinical and Preclinical Microbiome Data From Studies of Burn Injury
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T02%3A00%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Meta-Analysis%20of%20Publicly%20Available%20Clinical%20and%20Preclinical%20Microbiome%20Data%20From%20Studies%20of%20Burn%20Injury&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20burn%20care%20&%20research&rft.au=Horseman,%20Timothy%20S&rft.date=2023-09-07&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1041&rft.epage=1050&rft.pages=1041-1050&rft.issn=1559-047X&rft.eissn=1559-0488&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jbcr/irad098&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2829428199%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2829428199&rft_id=info:pmid/37352011&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jbcr/irad098&rfr_iscdi=true