Should we touch tricuspid valve at the time of LVAD implantation? A young patient series

Background: The aim of the study is to compare the results of patients who had moderate or severe tricuspid insufficiency (TI) at the time of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation that did not undergo intervention. Methods: Between October 2013 and December 2019, 144 patients who did no...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of artificial organs 2023-09, Vol.46 (8-9), p.514-519
Hauptverfasser: Yavas, Soner, Kervan, Umit, Karahan, Mehmet, Kocabeyoglu, Sinan Sabit, Sert, Dogan Emre, Ersoy, Ozgur, Demirkan, Burcu, Temizhan, Ahmet, Ozatik, Mehmet Ali
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 519
container_issue 8-9
container_start_page 514
container_title International journal of artificial organs
container_volume 46
creator Yavas, Soner
Kervan, Umit
Karahan, Mehmet
Kocabeyoglu, Sinan Sabit
Sert, Dogan Emre
Ersoy, Ozgur
Demirkan, Burcu
Temizhan, Ahmet
Ozatik, Mehmet Ali
description Background: The aim of the study is to compare the results of patients who had moderate or severe tricuspid insufficiency (TI) at the time of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation that did not undergo intervention. Methods: Between October 2013 and December 2019, 144 patients who did not undergo tricuspid valve repair (TVR) during LVAD implantation in our department were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups according to the TI grade; Group 1: 106 patients (73.6%) with moderate TI and Group 2: 38 patients (26.4%) with severe TI. All patients were evaluated for mortality, need of inotrope, blood product transfusion, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, and early and late right ventricular failure (RVF). Minimally invasive technique was favored in patients with worse right ventricular (RV) function to prevent the need for postoperative RV support and bleeding. Results: The mean ages of the patients in the Group 1 and Group 2 were 46 ± 15 years (82% male), and 45 ± 11.2 years (81.5% males), respectively. Post-operative duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU stay, blood loss, and reoperations were similar (p > 0.05). There was no significant difference in early RVF, pump thrombosis, stroke, bleeding, and 30-day mortality between groups (p > 0.05). Incidence of late RVF was higher in Group 2 (p 
doi_str_mv 10.1177/03913988231181604
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2827663460</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_03913988231181604</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2869057373</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-3315e11b2fbfcd9a18133b3b5b085020b9660643516835466df5e93eb1cf66743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1PwzAMhiMEYmPwA7igSFy4dMR1mrYnNI1PaRIHPsSt6ke6dWqb0iRD-_dk2gAJxMm2_Pi1_RJyCmwMEIaXDGPAOIp8BIhAML5HhhD63HMp2yfDTd_bAANypPWSMRCcB4dkgCEiDyMYkrenhbJ1QT8kNcrmC2r6Kre6qwq6SuuVpKmhZuGaVSOpKunsdXJNq6ar09akplLtFZ3QtbLtnHaulq2hWvaV1MfkoExrLU92cURebm-ep_fe7PHuYTqZeTn6zHiIEEiAzC-zMi_i1P2BmGEWZCwKmM-yWAgmOAYgIgy4EEUZyBhlBnkpRMhxRC62ul2v3q3UJmkqncvaHSiV1Ykf-aEQyAVz6PkvdKls37rrHCViFoQbX0YEtlTeK617WSZdXzVpv06AJRvbkz-2u5mznbLNGll8T3z57IDxFtDpXP6s_V_xEwCHh4w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2869057373</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Should we touch tricuspid valve at the time of LVAD implantation? A young patient series</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Yavas, Soner ; Kervan, Umit ; Karahan, Mehmet ; Kocabeyoglu, Sinan Sabit ; Sert, Dogan Emre ; Ersoy, Ozgur ; Demirkan, Burcu ; Temizhan, Ahmet ; Ozatik, Mehmet Ali</creator><creatorcontrib>Yavas, Soner ; Kervan, Umit ; Karahan, Mehmet ; Kocabeyoglu, Sinan Sabit ; Sert, Dogan Emre ; Ersoy, Ozgur ; Demirkan, Burcu ; Temizhan, Ahmet ; Ozatik, Mehmet Ali</creatorcontrib><description>Background: The aim of the study is to compare the results of patients who had moderate or severe tricuspid insufficiency (TI) at the time of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation that did not undergo intervention. Methods: Between October 2013 and December 2019, 144 patients who did not undergo tricuspid valve repair (TVR) during LVAD implantation in our department were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups according to the TI grade; Group 1: 106 patients (73.6%) with moderate TI and Group 2: 38 patients (26.4%) with severe TI. All patients were evaluated for mortality, need of inotrope, blood product transfusion, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, and early and late right ventricular failure (RVF). Minimally invasive technique was favored in patients with worse right ventricular (RV) function to prevent the need for postoperative RV support and bleeding. Results: The mean ages of the patients in the Group 1 and Group 2 were 46 ± 15 years (82% male), and 45 ± 11.2 years (81.5% males), respectively. Post-operative duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU stay, blood loss, and reoperations were similar (p &gt; 0.05). There was no significant difference in early RVF, pump thrombosis, stroke, bleeding, and 30-day mortality between groups (p &gt; 0.05). Incidence of late RVF was higher in Group 2 (p &lt; 0.05). Conclusion: Although the risk of late RVF may increase in patients with preoperative severe TI, not intervening in TI during LVAD implantation does not cause adverse clinical outcomes in the early period.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0391-3988</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1724-6040</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/03913988231181604</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37334781</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Bleeding ; Blood ; Blood transfusion ; Heart ; Implantation ; Mechanical ventilation ; Mortality ; Right ventricular failure ; Thromboembolism ; Thrombosis ; Tricuspid valve ; Ventilation ; Ventilators ; Ventricle ; Ventricular assist devices</subject><ispartof>International journal of artificial organs, 2023-09, Vol.46 (8-9), p.514-519</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><rights>Copyright Wichtig Editore s.r.l. Sep 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-3315e11b2fbfcd9a18133b3b5b085020b9660643516835466df5e93eb1cf66743</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7312-830X ; 0000-0003-1705-4999 ; 0000-0001-7198-069X ; 0000-0001-5492-4004</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/03913988231181604$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03913988231181604$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37334781$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yavas, Soner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kervan, Umit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karahan, Mehmet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kocabeyoglu, Sinan Sabit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sert, Dogan Emre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ersoy, Ozgur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demirkan, Burcu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Temizhan, Ahmet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozatik, Mehmet Ali</creatorcontrib><title>Should we touch tricuspid valve at the time of LVAD implantation? A young patient series</title><title>International journal of artificial organs</title><addtitle>Int J Artif Organs</addtitle><description>Background: The aim of the study is to compare the results of patients who had moderate or severe tricuspid insufficiency (TI) at the time of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation that did not undergo intervention. Methods: Between October 2013 and December 2019, 144 patients who did not undergo tricuspid valve repair (TVR) during LVAD implantation in our department were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups according to the TI grade; Group 1: 106 patients (73.6%) with moderate TI and Group 2: 38 patients (26.4%) with severe TI. All patients were evaluated for mortality, need of inotrope, blood product transfusion, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, and early and late right ventricular failure (RVF). Minimally invasive technique was favored in patients with worse right ventricular (RV) function to prevent the need for postoperative RV support and bleeding. Results: The mean ages of the patients in the Group 1 and Group 2 were 46 ± 15 years (82% male), and 45 ± 11.2 years (81.5% males), respectively. Post-operative duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU stay, blood loss, and reoperations were similar (p &gt; 0.05). There was no significant difference in early RVF, pump thrombosis, stroke, bleeding, and 30-day mortality between groups (p &gt; 0.05). Incidence of late RVF was higher in Group 2 (p &lt; 0.05). Conclusion: Although the risk of late RVF may increase in patients with preoperative severe TI, not intervening in TI during LVAD implantation does not cause adverse clinical outcomes in the early period.</description><subject>Bleeding</subject><subject>Blood</subject><subject>Blood transfusion</subject><subject>Heart</subject><subject>Implantation</subject><subject>Mechanical ventilation</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Right ventricular failure</subject><subject>Thromboembolism</subject><subject>Thrombosis</subject><subject>Tricuspid valve</subject><subject>Ventilation</subject><subject>Ventilators</subject><subject>Ventricle</subject><subject>Ventricular assist devices</subject><issn>0391-3988</issn><issn>1724-6040</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1PwzAMhiMEYmPwA7igSFy4dMR1mrYnNI1PaRIHPsSt6ke6dWqb0iRD-_dk2gAJxMm2_Pi1_RJyCmwMEIaXDGPAOIp8BIhAML5HhhD63HMp2yfDTd_bAANypPWSMRCcB4dkgCEiDyMYkrenhbJ1QT8kNcrmC2r6Kre6qwq6SuuVpKmhZuGaVSOpKunsdXJNq6ar09akplLtFZ3QtbLtnHaulq2hWvaV1MfkoExrLU92cURebm-ep_fe7PHuYTqZeTn6zHiIEEiAzC-zMi_i1P2BmGEWZCwKmM-yWAgmOAYgIgy4EEUZyBhlBnkpRMhxRC62ul2v3q3UJmkqncvaHSiV1Ykf-aEQyAVz6PkvdKls37rrHCViFoQbX0YEtlTeK617WSZdXzVpv06AJRvbkz-2u5mznbLNGll8T3z57IDxFtDpXP6s_V_xEwCHh4w</recordid><startdate>20230901</startdate><enddate>20230901</enddate><creator>Yavas, Soner</creator><creator>Kervan, Umit</creator><creator>Karahan, Mehmet</creator><creator>Kocabeyoglu, Sinan Sabit</creator><creator>Sert, Dogan Emre</creator><creator>Ersoy, Ozgur</creator><creator>Demirkan, Burcu</creator><creator>Temizhan, Ahmet</creator><creator>Ozatik, Mehmet Ali</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Wichtig Editore s.r.l</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7312-830X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1705-4999</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7198-069X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5492-4004</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230901</creationdate><title>Should we touch tricuspid valve at the time of LVAD implantation? A young patient series</title><author>Yavas, Soner ; Kervan, Umit ; Karahan, Mehmet ; Kocabeyoglu, Sinan Sabit ; Sert, Dogan Emre ; Ersoy, Ozgur ; Demirkan, Burcu ; Temizhan, Ahmet ; Ozatik, Mehmet Ali</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-3315e11b2fbfcd9a18133b3b5b085020b9660643516835466df5e93eb1cf66743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Bleeding</topic><topic>Blood</topic><topic>Blood transfusion</topic><topic>Heart</topic><topic>Implantation</topic><topic>Mechanical ventilation</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Right ventricular failure</topic><topic>Thromboembolism</topic><topic>Thrombosis</topic><topic>Tricuspid valve</topic><topic>Ventilation</topic><topic>Ventilators</topic><topic>Ventricle</topic><topic>Ventricular assist devices</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yavas, Soner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kervan, Umit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karahan, Mehmet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kocabeyoglu, Sinan Sabit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sert, Dogan Emre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ersoy, Ozgur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demirkan, Burcu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Temizhan, Ahmet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozatik, Mehmet Ali</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of artificial organs</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yavas, Soner</au><au>Kervan, Umit</au><au>Karahan, Mehmet</au><au>Kocabeyoglu, Sinan Sabit</au><au>Sert, Dogan Emre</au><au>Ersoy, Ozgur</au><au>Demirkan, Burcu</au><au>Temizhan, Ahmet</au><au>Ozatik, Mehmet Ali</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Should we touch tricuspid valve at the time of LVAD implantation? A young patient series</atitle><jtitle>International journal of artificial organs</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Artif Organs</addtitle><date>2023-09-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>8-9</issue><spage>514</spage><epage>519</epage><pages>514-519</pages><issn>0391-3988</issn><eissn>1724-6040</eissn><abstract>Background: The aim of the study is to compare the results of patients who had moderate or severe tricuspid insufficiency (TI) at the time of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation that did not undergo intervention. Methods: Between October 2013 and December 2019, 144 patients who did not undergo tricuspid valve repair (TVR) during LVAD implantation in our department were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups according to the TI grade; Group 1: 106 patients (73.6%) with moderate TI and Group 2: 38 patients (26.4%) with severe TI. All patients were evaluated for mortality, need of inotrope, blood product transfusion, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, and early and late right ventricular failure (RVF). Minimally invasive technique was favored in patients with worse right ventricular (RV) function to prevent the need for postoperative RV support and bleeding. Results: The mean ages of the patients in the Group 1 and Group 2 were 46 ± 15 years (82% male), and 45 ± 11.2 years (81.5% males), respectively. Post-operative duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU stay, blood loss, and reoperations were similar (p &gt; 0.05). There was no significant difference in early RVF, pump thrombosis, stroke, bleeding, and 30-day mortality between groups (p &gt; 0.05). Incidence of late RVF was higher in Group 2 (p &lt; 0.05). Conclusion: Although the risk of late RVF may increase in patients with preoperative severe TI, not intervening in TI during LVAD implantation does not cause adverse clinical outcomes in the early period.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>37334781</pmid><doi>10.1177/03913988231181604</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7312-830X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1705-4999</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7198-069X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5492-4004</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0391-3988
ispartof International journal of artificial organs, 2023-09, Vol.46 (8-9), p.514-519
issn 0391-3988
1724-6040
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2827663460
source SAGE Complete A-Z List
subjects Bleeding
Blood
Blood transfusion
Heart
Implantation
Mechanical ventilation
Mortality
Right ventricular failure
Thromboembolism
Thrombosis
Tricuspid valve
Ventilation
Ventilators
Ventricle
Ventricular assist devices
title Should we touch tricuspid valve at the time of LVAD implantation? A young patient series
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T02%3A38%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Should%20we%20touch%20tricuspid%20valve%20at%20the%20time%20of%20LVAD%20implantation?%20A%20young%20patient%20series&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20artificial%20organs&rft.au=Yavas,%20Soner&rft.date=2023-09-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=8-9&rft.spage=514&rft.epage=519&rft.pages=514-519&rft.issn=0391-3988&rft.eissn=1724-6040&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/03913988231181604&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2869057373%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2869057373&rft_id=info:pmid/37334781&rft_sage_id=10.1177_03913988231181604&rfr_iscdi=true