Erosion of Peer Review and Quality Assurance Privilege
An organizational culture that values open discussion of potential problems, near misses, and errors without fear of retribution is crucial for safety science and culture. Examples such as the Andon cord at Toyota and the Challenger explosion highlight the importance of such a culture. In healthcare...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of surgery (Chicago. 1960) 2023-09, Vol.158 (9), p.899-900 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 900 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 9 |
| container_start_page | 899 |
| container_title | Archives of surgery (Chicago. 1960) |
| container_volume | 158 |
| creator | Mehta, Vikas Sharkey, Melinda S |
| description | An organizational culture that values open discussion of potential problems, near misses, and errors without fear of retribution is crucial for safety science and culture. Examples such as the Andon cord at Toyota and the Challenger explosion highlight the importance of such a culture. In healthcare, the concept of tracking procedure outcomes for quality improvement has been introduced but not fully realized. Overall, promoting systems-based improvements in patient safety and healthcare quality requires open and nonpunitive discussion of errors and problems. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.1583 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2825808973</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ama_id>2806262</ama_id><sourcerecordid>2825808973</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a301t-ec816d1b6bc51beb3d5c95165781c4c1ed5b3915b6be88e9ecfce70f2b5e344d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkctqwzAQRUVpaUKaH8iiGLrpxqlGsmR5GUL6gEDT0q6NLI-Dgx-pFKfk7yuTx6LaSDDnjjRHhEyAToFSeNroWrvOrqeMMj4FofgVGTKQKpRMsuvLWUQDMnZuQ_1SlEY8uSUDHnOIYimHRC5s68q2CdoiWCHa4BP3Jf4GusmDj05X5e4QzJy_SDcGg5Ut92WFa7wjN4WuHI5P-4h8Py--5q_h8v3lbT5bhppT2IVoFMgcMpkZARlmPBcmESBFrMBEBjAXGU9AeACVwgRNYTCmBcsE8ijK-Yg8HvtubfvToduldekMVpVusO1cyhQTiqok5h59-Idu2s42_nWekjIScQyJp9iRMn5uZ7FIt7astT2kQNNebHoWm_Zi016sD92fWndZjfklctbogckR8NlLlSnafwX_A5jsfOo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2866457719</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Erosion of Peer Review and Quality Assurance Privilege</title><source>American Medical Association Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Mehta, Vikas ; Sharkey, Melinda S</creator><creatorcontrib>Mehta, Vikas ; Sharkey, Melinda S</creatorcontrib><description>An organizational culture that values open discussion of potential problems, near misses, and errors without fear of retribution is crucial for safety science and culture. Examples such as the Andon cord at Toyota and the Challenger explosion highlight the importance of such a culture. In healthcare, the concept of tracking procedure outcomes for quality improvement has been introduced but not fully realized. Overall, promoting systems-based improvements in patient safety and healthcare quality requires open and nonpunitive discussion of errors and problems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2168-6254</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-6262</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.1583</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37314766</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Medical Association</publisher><subject>Culture ; Occupational safety ; Peer review ; Quality control ; Safety management</subject><ispartof>Archives of surgery (Chicago. 1960), 2023-09, Vol.158 (9), p.899-900</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Medical Association Sep 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a301t-ec816d1b6bc51beb3d5c95165781c4c1ed5b3915b6be88e9ecfce70f2b5e344d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamasurgery/articlepdf/10.1001/jamasurg.2023.1583$$EPDF$$P50$$Gama$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamasurgery/fullarticle/10.1001/jamasurg.2023.1583$$EHTML$$P50$$Gama$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>64,314,776,780,3327,27901,27902,76231,76234</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37314766$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mehta, Vikas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharkey, Melinda S</creatorcontrib><title>Erosion of Peer Review and Quality Assurance Privilege</title><title>Archives of surgery (Chicago. 1960)</title><addtitle>JAMA Surg</addtitle><description>An organizational culture that values open discussion of potential problems, near misses, and errors without fear of retribution is crucial for safety science and culture. Examples such as the Andon cord at Toyota and the Challenger explosion highlight the importance of such a culture. In healthcare, the concept of tracking procedure outcomes for quality improvement has been introduced but not fully realized. Overall, promoting systems-based improvements in patient safety and healthcare quality requires open and nonpunitive discussion of errors and problems.</description><subject>Culture</subject><subject>Occupational safety</subject><subject>Peer review</subject><subject>Quality control</subject><subject>Safety management</subject><issn>2168-6254</issn><issn>2168-6262</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkctqwzAQRUVpaUKaH8iiGLrpxqlGsmR5GUL6gEDT0q6NLI-Dgx-pFKfk7yuTx6LaSDDnjjRHhEyAToFSeNroWrvOrqeMMj4FofgVGTKQKpRMsuvLWUQDMnZuQ_1SlEY8uSUDHnOIYimHRC5s68q2CdoiWCHa4BP3Jf4GusmDj05X5e4QzJy_SDcGg5Ut92WFa7wjN4WuHI5P-4h8Py--5q_h8v3lbT5bhppT2IVoFMgcMpkZARlmPBcmESBFrMBEBjAXGU9AeACVwgRNYTCmBcsE8ijK-Yg8HvtubfvToduldekMVpVusO1cyhQTiqok5h59-Idu2s42_nWekjIScQyJp9iRMn5uZ7FIt7astT2kQNNebHoWm_Zi016sD92fWndZjfklctbogckR8NlLlSnafwX_A5jsfOo</recordid><startdate>20230901</startdate><enddate>20230901</enddate><creator>Mehta, Vikas</creator><creator>Sharkey, Melinda S</creator><general>American Medical Association</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230901</creationdate><title>Erosion of Peer Review and Quality Assurance Privilege</title><author>Mehta, Vikas ; Sharkey, Melinda S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a301t-ec816d1b6bc51beb3d5c95165781c4c1ed5b3915b6be88e9ecfce70f2b5e344d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Culture</topic><topic>Occupational safety</topic><topic>Peer review</topic><topic>Quality control</topic><topic>Safety management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mehta, Vikas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharkey, Melinda S</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of surgery (Chicago. 1960)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mehta, Vikas</au><au>Sharkey, Melinda S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Erosion of Peer Review and Quality Assurance Privilege</atitle><jtitle>Archives of surgery (Chicago. 1960)</jtitle><addtitle>JAMA Surg</addtitle><date>2023-09-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>158</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>899</spage><epage>900</epage><pages>899-900</pages><issn>2168-6254</issn><eissn>2168-6262</eissn><abstract>An organizational culture that values open discussion of potential problems, near misses, and errors without fear of retribution is crucial for safety science and culture. Examples such as the Andon cord at Toyota and the Challenger explosion highlight the importance of such a culture. In healthcare, the concept of tracking procedure outcomes for quality improvement has been introduced but not fully realized. Overall, promoting systems-based improvements in patient safety and healthcare quality requires open and nonpunitive discussion of errors and problems.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Medical Association</pub><pmid>37314766</pmid><doi>10.1001/jamasurg.2023.1583</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2168-6254 |
| ispartof | Archives of surgery (Chicago. 1960), 2023-09, Vol.158 (9), p.899-900 |
| issn | 2168-6254 2168-6262 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2825808973 |
| source | American Medical Association Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Culture Occupational safety Peer review Quality control Safety management |
| title | Erosion of Peer Review and Quality Assurance Privilege |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T05%3A35%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Erosion%20of%20Peer%20Review%20and%20Quality%20Assurance%20Privilege&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20surgery%20(Chicago.%201960)&rft.au=Mehta,%20Vikas&rft.date=2023-09-01&rft.volume=158&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=899&rft.epage=900&rft.pages=899-900&rft.issn=2168-6254&rft.eissn=2168-6262&rft_id=info:doi/10.1001/jamasurg.2023.1583&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2825808973%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2866457719&rft_id=info:pmid/37314766&rft_ama_id=2806262&rfr_iscdi=true |