Characteristics and practical treatment technologies of winery wastewater: A review for wastewater management at small wineries

The wine-making industry drives tourism and rural revitalization in several countries. Meanwhile, winemaking generates wastewater at all production stages, mainly from cleaning of equipment, floors, vessels, and bottles. This review presents a comprehensive analysis with statistical characteristics...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of environmental management 2023-09, Vol.342, p.118343-118343, Article 118343
Hauptverfasser: Latessa, Sara H., Hanley, Liam, Tao, Wendong
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 118343
container_issue
container_start_page 118343
container_title Journal of environmental management
container_volume 342
creator Latessa, Sara H.
Hanley, Liam
Tao, Wendong
description The wine-making industry drives tourism and rural revitalization in several countries. Meanwhile, winemaking generates wastewater at all production stages, mainly from cleaning of equipment, floors, vessels, and bottles. This review presents a comprehensive analysis with statistical characteristics on the overall quality and generation rate of winery wastewater since 2007, identifies the technologies used by wineries in pilot- and full-scale wastewater treatment systems, and offers insights on practical wastewater treatment at small wineries. The median wastewater generation rate has been reduced to 1.58 L/L-wine, with a weekly peaking factor of 1.6–3.4 and monthly peaking factor of 2.1–2.7. Winery wastewater is acidic and of high organic strength. The organic substances are largely biodegradable and constituent concentrations do not exceed 50% inhibitory levels for biological treatment. However, the small ratios of nitrogen and phosphorus to biochemical oxygen demand indicate substantial needs to supplement nutrients for aerobic biological treatment. The frequency of processes used to pretreat winery wastewater was in the order of sedimentation > coarse screening > equalization > neutralization. The most frequently reported treatment methods were constructed wetland, activated sludge process, membrane bioreactor, and anaerobic digestion. Advanced oxidation processes have been pilot tested for polishing. The best wastewater management practice at small wineries is physical pretreatment, followed by land-based treatment systems. Covered anaerobic lagoons and underground digesters are practicable anaerobic digestion designs to reduce organic loading to land-based treatment systems. Research is needed to develop sufficient design criteria for the best practicable treatment processes and compare land-based treatment systems at pilot and full scales. •Water quality and generation rate of winery wastewater are statistically visualized.•Practical pretreatment & treatment technologies at pilot & full scale are assessed.•Winery wastewater generation rate decreased to a median of 1.58 L/L-wine after 2007.•Winery wastewater is acidic and of high strength in readily biodegradable organics.•Physical pretreatment & land-based treatment is most practicable for small wineries.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118343
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2825500852</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301479723011313</els_id><sourcerecordid>2825500852</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-693d426a17ceb82a80fcd3ed6d4c24a70f17756a8769438fc3d31bcf0989cc8d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1vEzEQhi0EomnhJ4B85LLBH7trLxdURUCRKnGBszUZz7aO9iPYTqOe-Ot12IC4cRpp5n3fmXkYeyPFWgrZvt-tdzQ9jDCtlVB6LaXVtX7GVlJ0TWVbLZ6zldBCVrXpzAW7TGknhNBKmpfsQhstTNs1K_Zrcw8RMFMMKQdMHCbP96dOQBh4jgR5pCnzTHg_zcN8FyjxuefHMFF85EdImY5Q_B_4NY_0EOjI-zn-M-DlSLij3ymQeRphGBZ7iXrFXvQwJHp9rlfsx-dP3zc31e23L18317cV6rbJVdtpX6sWpEHaWgVW9Og1-dbXqGowopfGNC3Y8lWtbY_aa7nFXnS2Q7ReX7F3S-4-zj8PlLIbQ0IaBphoPiSnrGoaIWyjirRZpBjnlCL1bh_DCPHRSeFO7N3Ondm7E3u3sC--t-cVh-1I_q_rD-wi-LgIqDxaQEWXMNCE5EMkzM7P4T8rngDlr5s8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2825500852</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Characteristics and practical treatment technologies of winery wastewater: A review for wastewater management at small wineries</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Latessa, Sara H. ; Hanley, Liam ; Tao, Wendong</creator><creatorcontrib>Latessa, Sara H. ; Hanley, Liam ; Tao, Wendong</creatorcontrib><description>The wine-making industry drives tourism and rural revitalization in several countries. Meanwhile, winemaking generates wastewater at all production stages, mainly from cleaning of equipment, floors, vessels, and bottles. This review presents a comprehensive analysis with statistical characteristics on the overall quality and generation rate of winery wastewater since 2007, identifies the technologies used by wineries in pilot- and full-scale wastewater treatment systems, and offers insights on practical wastewater treatment at small wineries. The median wastewater generation rate has been reduced to 1.58 L/L-wine, with a weekly peaking factor of 1.6–3.4 and monthly peaking factor of 2.1–2.7. Winery wastewater is acidic and of high organic strength. The organic substances are largely biodegradable and constituent concentrations do not exceed 50% inhibitory levels for biological treatment. However, the small ratios of nitrogen and phosphorus to biochemical oxygen demand indicate substantial needs to supplement nutrients for aerobic biological treatment. The frequency of processes used to pretreat winery wastewater was in the order of sedimentation &gt; coarse screening &gt; equalization &gt; neutralization. The most frequently reported treatment methods were constructed wetland, activated sludge process, membrane bioreactor, and anaerobic digestion. Advanced oxidation processes have been pilot tested for polishing. The best wastewater management practice at small wineries is physical pretreatment, followed by land-based treatment systems. Covered anaerobic lagoons and underground digesters are practicable anaerobic digestion designs to reduce organic loading to land-based treatment systems. Research is needed to develop sufficient design criteria for the best practicable treatment processes and compare land-based treatment systems at pilot and full scales. •Water quality and generation rate of winery wastewater are statistically visualized.•Practical pretreatment &amp; treatment technologies at pilot &amp; full scale are assessed.•Winery wastewater generation rate decreased to a median of 1.58 L/L-wine after 2007.•Winery wastewater is acidic and of high strength in readily biodegradable organics.•Physical pretreatment &amp; land-based treatment is most practicable for small wineries.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4797</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8630</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118343</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37307695</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Best available treatment technology ; Discharge permit ; Land-based wastewater treatment ; Nature-based wastewater treatment ; Wastewater generation rate ; Winemaking</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental management, 2023-09, Vol.342, p.118343-118343, Article 118343</ispartof><rights>2023 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-693d426a17ceb82a80fcd3ed6d4c24a70f17756a8769438fc3d31bcf0989cc8d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-693d426a17ceb82a80fcd3ed6d4c24a70f17756a8769438fc3d31bcf0989cc8d3</cites><orcidid>0009-0001-3440-4703 ; 0000-0003-3893-1313</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118343$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37307695$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Latessa, Sara H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanley, Liam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tao, Wendong</creatorcontrib><title>Characteristics and practical treatment technologies of winery wastewater: A review for wastewater management at small wineries</title><title>Journal of environmental management</title><addtitle>J Environ Manage</addtitle><description>The wine-making industry drives tourism and rural revitalization in several countries. Meanwhile, winemaking generates wastewater at all production stages, mainly from cleaning of equipment, floors, vessels, and bottles. This review presents a comprehensive analysis with statistical characteristics on the overall quality and generation rate of winery wastewater since 2007, identifies the technologies used by wineries in pilot- and full-scale wastewater treatment systems, and offers insights on practical wastewater treatment at small wineries. The median wastewater generation rate has been reduced to 1.58 L/L-wine, with a weekly peaking factor of 1.6–3.4 and monthly peaking factor of 2.1–2.7. Winery wastewater is acidic and of high organic strength. The organic substances are largely biodegradable and constituent concentrations do not exceed 50% inhibitory levels for biological treatment. However, the small ratios of nitrogen and phosphorus to biochemical oxygen demand indicate substantial needs to supplement nutrients for aerobic biological treatment. The frequency of processes used to pretreat winery wastewater was in the order of sedimentation &gt; coarse screening &gt; equalization &gt; neutralization. The most frequently reported treatment methods were constructed wetland, activated sludge process, membrane bioreactor, and anaerobic digestion. Advanced oxidation processes have been pilot tested for polishing. The best wastewater management practice at small wineries is physical pretreatment, followed by land-based treatment systems. Covered anaerobic lagoons and underground digesters are practicable anaerobic digestion designs to reduce organic loading to land-based treatment systems. Research is needed to develop sufficient design criteria for the best practicable treatment processes and compare land-based treatment systems at pilot and full scales. •Water quality and generation rate of winery wastewater are statistically visualized.•Practical pretreatment &amp; treatment technologies at pilot &amp; full scale are assessed.•Winery wastewater generation rate decreased to a median of 1.58 L/L-wine after 2007.•Winery wastewater is acidic and of high strength in readily biodegradable organics.•Physical pretreatment &amp; land-based treatment is most practicable for small wineries.</description><subject>Best available treatment technology</subject><subject>Discharge permit</subject><subject>Land-based wastewater treatment</subject><subject>Nature-based wastewater treatment</subject><subject>Wastewater generation rate</subject><subject>Winemaking</subject><issn>0301-4797</issn><issn>1095-8630</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1vEzEQhi0EomnhJ4B85LLBH7trLxdURUCRKnGBszUZz7aO9iPYTqOe-Ot12IC4cRpp5n3fmXkYeyPFWgrZvt-tdzQ9jDCtlVB6LaXVtX7GVlJ0TWVbLZ6zldBCVrXpzAW7TGknhNBKmpfsQhstTNs1K_Zrcw8RMFMMKQdMHCbP96dOQBh4jgR5pCnzTHg_zcN8FyjxuefHMFF85EdImY5Q_B_4NY_0EOjI-zn-M-DlSLij3ymQeRphGBZ7iXrFXvQwJHp9rlfsx-dP3zc31e23L18317cV6rbJVdtpX6sWpEHaWgVW9Og1-dbXqGowopfGNC3Y8lWtbY_aa7nFXnS2Q7ReX7F3S-4-zj8PlLIbQ0IaBphoPiSnrGoaIWyjirRZpBjnlCL1bh_DCPHRSeFO7N3Ondm7E3u3sC--t-cVh-1I_q_rD-wi-LgIqDxaQEWXMNCE5EMkzM7P4T8rngDlr5s8</recordid><startdate>20230915</startdate><enddate>20230915</enddate><creator>Latessa, Sara H.</creator><creator>Hanley, Liam</creator><creator>Tao, Wendong</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3440-4703</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3893-1313</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230915</creationdate><title>Characteristics and practical treatment technologies of winery wastewater: A review for wastewater management at small wineries</title><author>Latessa, Sara H. ; Hanley, Liam ; Tao, Wendong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-693d426a17ceb82a80fcd3ed6d4c24a70f17756a8769438fc3d31bcf0989cc8d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Best available treatment technology</topic><topic>Discharge permit</topic><topic>Land-based wastewater treatment</topic><topic>Nature-based wastewater treatment</topic><topic>Wastewater generation rate</topic><topic>Winemaking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Latessa, Sara H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanley, Liam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tao, Wendong</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Latessa, Sara H.</au><au>Hanley, Liam</au><au>Tao, Wendong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Characteristics and practical treatment technologies of winery wastewater: A review for wastewater management at small wineries</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle><addtitle>J Environ Manage</addtitle><date>2023-09-15</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>342</volume><spage>118343</spage><epage>118343</epage><pages>118343-118343</pages><artnum>118343</artnum><issn>0301-4797</issn><eissn>1095-8630</eissn><abstract>The wine-making industry drives tourism and rural revitalization in several countries. Meanwhile, winemaking generates wastewater at all production stages, mainly from cleaning of equipment, floors, vessels, and bottles. This review presents a comprehensive analysis with statistical characteristics on the overall quality and generation rate of winery wastewater since 2007, identifies the technologies used by wineries in pilot- and full-scale wastewater treatment systems, and offers insights on practical wastewater treatment at small wineries. The median wastewater generation rate has been reduced to 1.58 L/L-wine, with a weekly peaking factor of 1.6–3.4 and monthly peaking factor of 2.1–2.7. Winery wastewater is acidic and of high organic strength. The organic substances are largely biodegradable and constituent concentrations do not exceed 50% inhibitory levels for biological treatment. However, the small ratios of nitrogen and phosphorus to biochemical oxygen demand indicate substantial needs to supplement nutrients for aerobic biological treatment. The frequency of processes used to pretreat winery wastewater was in the order of sedimentation &gt; coarse screening &gt; equalization &gt; neutralization. The most frequently reported treatment methods were constructed wetland, activated sludge process, membrane bioreactor, and anaerobic digestion. Advanced oxidation processes have been pilot tested for polishing. The best wastewater management practice at small wineries is physical pretreatment, followed by land-based treatment systems. Covered anaerobic lagoons and underground digesters are practicable anaerobic digestion designs to reduce organic loading to land-based treatment systems. Research is needed to develop sufficient design criteria for the best practicable treatment processes and compare land-based treatment systems at pilot and full scales. •Water quality and generation rate of winery wastewater are statistically visualized.•Practical pretreatment &amp; treatment technologies at pilot &amp; full scale are assessed.•Winery wastewater generation rate decreased to a median of 1.58 L/L-wine after 2007.•Winery wastewater is acidic and of high strength in readily biodegradable organics.•Physical pretreatment &amp; land-based treatment is most practicable for small wineries.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>37307695</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118343</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3440-4703</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3893-1313</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-4797
ispartof Journal of environmental management, 2023-09, Vol.342, p.118343-118343, Article 118343
issn 0301-4797
1095-8630
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2825500852
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Best available treatment technology
Discharge permit
Land-based wastewater treatment
Nature-based wastewater treatment
Wastewater generation rate
Winemaking
title Characteristics and practical treatment technologies of winery wastewater: A review for wastewater management at small wineries
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T23%3A54%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Characteristics%20and%20practical%20treatment%20technologies%20of%20winery%20wastewater:%20A%20review%20for%20wastewater%20management%20at%20small%20wineries&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20management&rft.au=Latessa,%20Sara%20H.&rft.date=2023-09-15&rft.volume=342&rft.spage=118343&rft.epage=118343&rft.pages=118343-118343&rft.artnum=118343&rft.issn=0301-4797&rft.eissn=1095-8630&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118343&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2825500852%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2825500852&rft_id=info:pmid/37307695&rft_els_id=S0301479723011313&rfr_iscdi=true