Preoperative prophylactic antibiotics administration does not influence culture yield in revision shoulder arthroplasty

The importance of administrating prophylactic antibiotics prior to a surgical procedure is well established. Given the difficulty in diagnosing shoulder periprosthetic infections, which are more indolent in nature, some advocate holding prophylactic antibiotics prior to obtaining cultures as there i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery 2023-11, Vol.32 (11), p.2366-2370
Hauptverfasser: Stoll, Kurt, Alfonsi, Samuel, Khan, Adam Z., Vaughan, Alayna, Namdari, Surena
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2370
container_issue 11
container_start_page 2366
container_title Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery
container_volume 32
creator Stoll, Kurt
Alfonsi, Samuel
Khan, Adam Z.
Vaughan, Alayna
Namdari, Surena
description The importance of administrating prophylactic antibiotics prior to a surgical procedure is well established. Given the difficulty in diagnosing shoulder periprosthetic infections, which are more indolent in nature, some advocate holding prophylactic antibiotics prior to obtaining cultures as there is a concern antibiotics may lead to a false negative culture result. The purpose of this study is to determine whether administration of antibiotics prior to obtaining cultures in revision shoulder arthroplasty influences culture yield. This was a retrospective analysis of revision shoulder arthroplasty cases performed at a single institution between 2015 and 2021. During the study period, each surgeon had a standardized protocol that dictated whether antibiotics were given or held prior to each revision surgery. Each case was categorized into either a Preculture antibiotic group, if antibiotics were administered prior to incision, or a Postculture antibiotic group if antibiotics were administered after incision and obtaining cultures. The International Consensus Meeting (ICM) scoring criteria provided by the Musculoskeletal Infection Society was used to categorize the probability of periprosthetic joint infection for each case. Culture positivity was calculated as the ratio of positive cultures and total number of cultures obtained. One hundred twenty-four patients met inclusion criteria. There were 48 patients in the Preculture group and 76 patients in the Postculture group. No significant difference in patient demographics or ICM criteria (P = .09) was observed between the 2 groups. With regard to culture positivity, there was no difference between the Preculture antibiotic group and the Postculture antibiotic group (16% vs. 15%, P = .82, confidence interval = 8%-25% vs. 10%-20%, respectively). In the setting of revision shoulder arthroplasty, timing of antibiotic administration did not significantly influence culture yield. This study supports the use of prophylactic antibiotics prior to obtaining cultures in revision shoulder arthroplasty.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jse.2023.05.005
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2825159222</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1058274623004366</els_id><sourcerecordid>2825159222</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-39521a72de01a06d4048f2060692c14382233414ee503c052db60b092fa6177e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMGO0zAQhi0EYncLD8AF-cglYTyOnUac0ApYpJXgAGfLtSeqqzQutlPUt8dRF46cZjT65h_Nx9gbAa0Aod8f2kOmFgFlC6oFUM_YrVASG60Antce1LbBvtM37C7nAwAMHeBLdiN7CagRb9nv74niiZIt4Uz8lOJpf5msK8FxO5ewC7G2mVt_DHPIZeXizH2kzOdYeJjHaaHZEXfLVJZE_BJo8nXOE51DXuG8j8vkKXGbyr4emGwul1fsxWinTK-f6ob9_Pzpx_1D8_jty9f7j4-Nk6BKIweFwvboCYQF7TvotiOCBj2gE53cIkrZiY5IgXSg0O807GDA0WrR9yQ37N01t772a6FczDFkR9NkZ4pLNrhFJdSANWfDxBV1KeacaDSnFI42XYwAs_o2B1N9m9W3AWWq77rz9il-2R3J_9v4K7gCH64A1SfPgZLJLqzCfEjkivEx_Cf-D-DMkns</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2825159222</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Preoperative prophylactic antibiotics administration does not influence culture yield in revision shoulder arthroplasty</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Stoll, Kurt ; Alfonsi, Samuel ; Khan, Adam Z. ; Vaughan, Alayna ; Namdari, Surena</creator><creatorcontrib>Stoll, Kurt ; Alfonsi, Samuel ; Khan, Adam Z. ; Vaughan, Alayna ; Namdari, Surena</creatorcontrib><description>The importance of administrating prophylactic antibiotics prior to a surgical procedure is well established. Given the difficulty in diagnosing shoulder periprosthetic infections, which are more indolent in nature, some advocate holding prophylactic antibiotics prior to obtaining cultures as there is a concern antibiotics may lead to a false negative culture result. The purpose of this study is to determine whether administration of antibiotics prior to obtaining cultures in revision shoulder arthroplasty influences culture yield. This was a retrospective analysis of revision shoulder arthroplasty cases performed at a single institution between 2015 and 2021. During the study period, each surgeon had a standardized protocol that dictated whether antibiotics were given or held prior to each revision surgery. Each case was categorized into either a Preculture antibiotic group, if antibiotics were administered prior to incision, or a Postculture antibiotic group if antibiotics were administered after incision and obtaining cultures. The International Consensus Meeting (ICM) scoring criteria provided by the Musculoskeletal Infection Society was used to categorize the probability of periprosthetic joint infection for each case. Culture positivity was calculated as the ratio of positive cultures and total number of cultures obtained. One hundred twenty-four patients met inclusion criteria. There were 48 patients in the Preculture group and 76 patients in the Postculture group. No significant difference in patient demographics or ICM criteria (P = .09) was observed between the 2 groups. With regard to culture positivity, there was no difference between the Preculture antibiotic group and the Postculture antibiotic group (16% vs. 15%, P = .82, confidence interval = 8%-25% vs. 10%-20%, respectively). In the setting of revision shoulder arthroplasty, timing of antibiotic administration did not significantly influence culture yield. This study supports the use of prophylactic antibiotics prior to obtaining cultures in revision shoulder arthroplasty.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-2746</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-6500</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.05.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37302622</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>antibiotic timing ; culture positivity ; periprosthetic infection ; Prophylactic antibiotics ; revision shoulder arthroplasty</subject><ispartof>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 2023-11, Vol.32 (11), p.2366-2370</ispartof><rights>2023 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-39521a72de01a06d4048f2060692c14382233414ee503c052db60b092fa6177e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7422-8479 ; 0000-0002-8222-554X ; 0000-0002-7251-6503 ; 0000-0001-9100-9948</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1058274623004366$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37302622$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stoll, Kurt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alfonsi, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Adam Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaughan, Alayna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Namdari, Surena</creatorcontrib><title>Preoperative prophylactic antibiotics administration does not influence culture yield in revision shoulder arthroplasty</title><title>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery</title><addtitle>J Shoulder Elbow Surg</addtitle><description>The importance of administrating prophylactic antibiotics prior to a surgical procedure is well established. Given the difficulty in diagnosing shoulder periprosthetic infections, which are more indolent in nature, some advocate holding prophylactic antibiotics prior to obtaining cultures as there is a concern antibiotics may lead to a false negative culture result. The purpose of this study is to determine whether administration of antibiotics prior to obtaining cultures in revision shoulder arthroplasty influences culture yield. This was a retrospective analysis of revision shoulder arthroplasty cases performed at a single institution between 2015 and 2021. During the study period, each surgeon had a standardized protocol that dictated whether antibiotics were given or held prior to each revision surgery. Each case was categorized into either a Preculture antibiotic group, if antibiotics were administered prior to incision, or a Postculture antibiotic group if antibiotics were administered after incision and obtaining cultures. The International Consensus Meeting (ICM) scoring criteria provided by the Musculoskeletal Infection Society was used to categorize the probability of periprosthetic joint infection for each case. Culture positivity was calculated as the ratio of positive cultures and total number of cultures obtained. One hundred twenty-four patients met inclusion criteria. There were 48 patients in the Preculture group and 76 patients in the Postculture group. No significant difference in patient demographics or ICM criteria (P = .09) was observed between the 2 groups. With regard to culture positivity, there was no difference between the Preculture antibiotic group and the Postculture antibiotic group (16% vs. 15%, P = .82, confidence interval = 8%-25% vs. 10%-20%, respectively). In the setting of revision shoulder arthroplasty, timing of antibiotic administration did not significantly influence culture yield. This study supports the use of prophylactic antibiotics prior to obtaining cultures in revision shoulder arthroplasty.</description><subject>antibiotic timing</subject><subject>culture positivity</subject><subject>periprosthetic infection</subject><subject>Prophylactic antibiotics</subject><subject>revision shoulder arthroplasty</subject><issn>1058-2746</issn><issn>1532-6500</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMGO0zAQhi0EYncLD8AF-cglYTyOnUac0ApYpJXgAGfLtSeqqzQutlPUt8dRF46cZjT65h_Nx9gbAa0Aod8f2kOmFgFlC6oFUM_YrVASG60Antce1LbBvtM37C7nAwAMHeBLdiN7CagRb9nv74niiZIt4Uz8lOJpf5msK8FxO5ewC7G2mVt_DHPIZeXizH2kzOdYeJjHaaHZEXfLVJZE_BJo8nXOE51DXuG8j8vkKXGbyr4emGwul1fsxWinTK-f6ob9_Pzpx_1D8_jty9f7j4-Nk6BKIweFwvboCYQF7TvotiOCBj2gE53cIkrZiY5IgXSg0O807GDA0WrR9yQ37N01t772a6FczDFkR9NkZ4pLNrhFJdSANWfDxBV1KeacaDSnFI42XYwAs_o2B1N9m9W3AWWq77rz9il-2R3J_9v4K7gCH64A1SfPgZLJLqzCfEjkivEx_Cf-D-DMkns</recordid><startdate>20231101</startdate><enddate>20231101</enddate><creator>Stoll, Kurt</creator><creator>Alfonsi, Samuel</creator><creator>Khan, Adam Z.</creator><creator>Vaughan, Alayna</creator><creator>Namdari, Surena</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7422-8479</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8222-554X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7251-6503</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9100-9948</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231101</creationdate><title>Preoperative prophylactic antibiotics administration does not influence culture yield in revision shoulder arthroplasty</title><author>Stoll, Kurt ; Alfonsi, Samuel ; Khan, Adam Z. ; Vaughan, Alayna ; Namdari, Surena</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-39521a72de01a06d4048f2060692c14382233414ee503c052db60b092fa6177e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>antibiotic timing</topic><topic>culture positivity</topic><topic>periprosthetic infection</topic><topic>Prophylactic antibiotics</topic><topic>revision shoulder arthroplasty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stoll, Kurt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alfonsi, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Adam Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaughan, Alayna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Namdari, Surena</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stoll, Kurt</au><au>Alfonsi, Samuel</au><au>Khan, Adam Z.</au><au>Vaughan, Alayna</au><au>Namdari, Surena</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Preoperative prophylactic antibiotics administration does not influence culture yield in revision shoulder arthroplasty</atitle><jtitle>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Shoulder Elbow Surg</addtitle><date>2023-11-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2366</spage><epage>2370</epage><pages>2366-2370</pages><issn>1058-2746</issn><eissn>1532-6500</eissn><abstract>The importance of administrating prophylactic antibiotics prior to a surgical procedure is well established. Given the difficulty in diagnosing shoulder periprosthetic infections, which are more indolent in nature, some advocate holding prophylactic antibiotics prior to obtaining cultures as there is a concern antibiotics may lead to a false negative culture result. The purpose of this study is to determine whether administration of antibiotics prior to obtaining cultures in revision shoulder arthroplasty influences culture yield. This was a retrospective analysis of revision shoulder arthroplasty cases performed at a single institution between 2015 and 2021. During the study period, each surgeon had a standardized protocol that dictated whether antibiotics were given or held prior to each revision surgery. Each case was categorized into either a Preculture antibiotic group, if antibiotics were administered prior to incision, or a Postculture antibiotic group if antibiotics were administered after incision and obtaining cultures. The International Consensus Meeting (ICM) scoring criteria provided by the Musculoskeletal Infection Society was used to categorize the probability of periprosthetic joint infection for each case. Culture positivity was calculated as the ratio of positive cultures and total number of cultures obtained. One hundred twenty-four patients met inclusion criteria. There were 48 patients in the Preculture group and 76 patients in the Postculture group. No significant difference in patient demographics or ICM criteria (P = .09) was observed between the 2 groups. With regard to culture positivity, there was no difference between the Preculture antibiotic group and the Postculture antibiotic group (16% vs. 15%, P = .82, confidence interval = 8%-25% vs. 10%-20%, respectively). In the setting of revision shoulder arthroplasty, timing of antibiotic administration did not significantly influence culture yield. This study supports the use of prophylactic antibiotics prior to obtaining cultures in revision shoulder arthroplasty.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>37302622</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jse.2023.05.005</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7422-8479</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8222-554X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7251-6503</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9100-9948</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1058-2746
ispartof Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 2023-11, Vol.32 (11), p.2366-2370
issn 1058-2746
1532-6500
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2825159222
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects antibiotic timing
culture positivity
periprosthetic infection
Prophylactic antibiotics
revision shoulder arthroplasty
title Preoperative prophylactic antibiotics administration does not influence culture yield in revision shoulder arthroplasty
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T23%3A18%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Preoperative%20prophylactic%20antibiotics%20administration%20does%20not%20influence%20culture%20yield%20in%20revision%20shoulder%20arthroplasty&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20shoulder%20and%20elbow%20surgery&rft.au=Stoll,%20Kurt&rft.date=2023-11-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2366&rft.epage=2370&rft.pages=2366-2370&rft.issn=1058-2746&rft.eissn=1532-6500&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jse.2023.05.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2825159222%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2825159222&rft_id=info:pmid/37302622&rft_els_id=S1058274623004366&rfr_iscdi=true