Effects of grating stimulation on vision in individuals with amblyopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Purpose To investigate the effects of Cambridge Stimulator with grating element stimulation on visual acuity (VA), grating acuity (GA), and contrast sensitivity (CS) in patients with amblyopia. Methods Three electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library) were searched for studies publis...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology 2024-02, Vol.262 (2), p.395-410 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 410 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 395 |
| container_title | Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology |
| container_volume | 262 |
| creator | Yeh, Wen-Hsiu Ju, Ya-Ju Hsieh, Tzu-Han Liu, Yu-Ting |
| description | Purpose
To investigate the effects of Cambridge Stimulator with grating element stimulation on visual acuity (VA), grating acuity (GA), and contrast sensitivity (CS) in patients with amblyopia.
Methods
Three electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library) were searched for studies published from January 1970 to November 2022. The searched studies were reviewed and extracted independently by two authors. The included studies were evaluated by the Cochrane risk of bias. A meta-analysis calculating Hedges’
g
effect-size metric with 95% confidence intervals using random-effects DerSimonian-Laird model was employed. Heterogeneity was estimated using
I
2
statistics. Outcomes of interest included VA, GA, and CS.
Results
A total of 1221 studies were identified. Twenty-four studies including 900 subjects met the inclusion criteria. The outcome measure of all visual indexes (VA: Hedges’
g
of − 0.43, 95% CI = − 0.81 to − 0.05,
I
2
= 86%,
p
= 0.02; GA: Hedges’
g
of 3.79, 95% CI = 1.05 to 6.54,
I
2
= 98%,
p
= 0.01; CS: Hedges’
g
of 0.64, 95% CI = 0.19 to 1.09,
I
2
= 41%,
p
= 0.00) significantly favored in the grating group.
Conclusions
Grating stimulation may be a positive help for visual functions in patients with amblyopia. The effects of grating stimulation on VA and CS appear to be opposite. This study is registered with
www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/
(CRD42022366259). |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00417-023-06142-w |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2825154529</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2922308777</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-56332a890405c67030f03d1eae15e7e0f26998859b00d1390013004edc14cf183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1r3DAQhkVpabZp_0APRdBLL2pHGsuyeysh_YBALgnkJrT2eKvgj63G3mX_fbTdtIUeAgMamOd9pdErxFsNHzWA-8QAhXYKDCoodWHU_plY6QKtcmDunosVOKNVhebuTLxivofMo9UvxRk6hNKhXonhsuuomVlOndykMMdxI3mOw9Lnfhplrl3kYxeP1cZdbJfQs9zH-acMw7o_TNsYPssg-cAzDVnWyES7SHsZxlYONAcVxtAfOPJr8aLLYnrzeJ6L26-XNxff1dX1tx8XX65Ug6aclS0RTahqKMA2pQOEDrDVFEhbcgSdKeu6qmy9Bmg11gAa827UNrpoOl3hufhw8t2m6ddCPPshckN9H0aaFvamMlbbwpo6o-__Q--nJeX3Zqo2BqFyzmXKnKgmTcyJOr9NcQjp4DX4Yxj-FIbPYfjfYfh9Fr17tF7WA7V_JX9-PwN4AjiPxg2lf3c_YfsAlPSU-w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2922308777</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of grating stimulation on vision in individuals with amblyopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Yeh, Wen-Hsiu ; Ju, Ya-Ju ; Hsieh, Tzu-Han ; Liu, Yu-Ting</creator><creatorcontrib>Yeh, Wen-Hsiu ; Ju, Ya-Ju ; Hsieh, Tzu-Han ; Liu, Yu-Ting</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
To investigate the effects of Cambridge Stimulator with grating element stimulation on visual acuity (VA), grating acuity (GA), and contrast sensitivity (CS) in patients with amblyopia.
Methods
Three electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library) were searched for studies published from January 1970 to November 2022. The searched studies were reviewed and extracted independently by two authors. The included studies were evaluated by the Cochrane risk of bias. A meta-analysis calculating Hedges’
g
effect-size metric with 95% confidence intervals using random-effects DerSimonian-Laird model was employed. Heterogeneity was estimated using
I
2
statistics. Outcomes of interest included VA, GA, and CS.
Results
A total of 1221 studies were identified. Twenty-four studies including 900 subjects met the inclusion criteria. The outcome measure of all visual indexes (VA: Hedges’
g
of − 0.43, 95% CI = − 0.81 to − 0.05,
I
2
= 86%,
p
= 0.02; GA: Hedges’
g
of 3.79, 95% CI = 1.05 to 6.54,
I
2
= 98%,
p
= 0.01; CS: Hedges’
g
of 0.64, 95% CI = 0.19 to 1.09,
I
2
= 41%,
p
= 0.00) significantly favored in the grating group.
Conclusions
Grating stimulation may be a positive help for visual functions in patients with amblyopia. The effects of grating stimulation on VA and CS appear to be opposite. This study is registered with
www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/
(CRD42022366259).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0721-832X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1435-702X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-702X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00417-023-06142-w</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37306731</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Acuity ; Archives & records ; Citation management software ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Meta-analysis ; Ophthalmology ; Patients ; Retina ; Review Article ; Statistical analysis ; Systematic review ; Visual acuity ; Visual stimuli</subject><ispartof>Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology, 2024-02, Vol.262 (2), p.395-410</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-56332a890405c67030f03d1eae15e7e0f26998859b00d1390013004edc14cf183</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5777-8700</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00417-023-06142-w$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00417-023-06142-w$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37306731$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yeh, Wen-Hsiu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ju, Ya-Ju</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsieh, Tzu-Han</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yu-Ting</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of grating stimulation on vision in individuals with amblyopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol</addtitle><addtitle>Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>Purpose
To investigate the effects of Cambridge Stimulator with grating element stimulation on visual acuity (VA), grating acuity (GA), and contrast sensitivity (CS) in patients with amblyopia.
Methods
Three electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library) were searched for studies published from January 1970 to November 2022. The searched studies were reviewed and extracted independently by two authors. The included studies were evaluated by the Cochrane risk of bias. A meta-analysis calculating Hedges’
g
effect-size metric with 95% confidence intervals using random-effects DerSimonian-Laird model was employed. Heterogeneity was estimated using
I
2
statistics. Outcomes of interest included VA, GA, and CS.
Results
A total of 1221 studies were identified. Twenty-four studies including 900 subjects met the inclusion criteria. The outcome measure of all visual indexes (VA: Hedges’
g
of − 0.43, 95% CI = − 0.81 to − 0.05,
I
2
= 86%,
p
= 0.02; GA: Hedges’
g
of 3.79, 95% CI = 1.05 to 6.54,
I
2
= 98%,
p
= 0.01; CS: Hedges’
g
of 0.64, 95% CI = 0.19 to 1.09,
I
2
= 41%,
p
= 0.00) significantly favored in the grating group.
Conclusions
Grating stimulation may be a positive help for visual functions in patients with amblyopia. The effects of grating stimulation on VA and CS appear to be opposite. This study is registered with
www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/
(CRD42022366259).</description><subject>Acuity</subject><subject>Archives & records</subject><subject>Citation management software</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Retina</subject><subject>Review Article</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Visual acuity</subject><subject>Visual stimuli</subject><issn>0721-832X</issn><issn>1435-702X</issn><issn>1435-702X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU1r3DAQhkVpabZp_0APRdBLL2pHGsuyeysh_YBALgnkJrT2eKvgj63G3mX_fbTdtIUeAgMamOd9pdErxFsNHzWA-8QAhXYKDCoodWHU_plY6QKtcmDunosVOKNVhebuTLxivofMo9UvxRk6hNKhXonhsuuomVlOndykMMdxI3mOw9Lnfhplrl3kYxeP1cZdbJfQs9zH-acMw7o_TNsYPssg-cAzDVnWyES7SHsZxlYONAcVxtAfOPJr8aLLYnrzeJ6L26-XNxff1dX1tx8XX65Ug6aclS0RTahqKMA2pQOEDrDVFEhbcgSdKeu6qmy9Bmg11gAa827UNrpoOl3hufhw8t2m6ddCPPshckN9H0aaFvamMlbbwpo6o-__Q--nJeX3Zqo2BqFyzmXKnKgmTcyJOr9NcQjp4DX4Yxj-FIbPYfjfYfh9Fr17tF7WA7V_JX9-PwN4AjiPxg2lf3c_YfsAlPSU-w</recordid><startdate>20240201</startdate><enddate>20240201</enddate><creator>Yeh, Wen-Hsiu</creator><creator>Ju, Ya-Ju</creator><creator>Hsieh, Tzu-Han</creator><creator>Liu, Yu-Ting</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5777-8700</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240201</creationdate><title>Effects of grating stimulation on vision in individuals with amblyopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>Yeh, Wen-Hsiu ; Ju, Ya-Ju ; Hsieh, Tzu-Han ; Liu, Yu-Ting</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-56332a890405c67030f03d1eae15e7e0f26998859b00d1390013004edc14cf183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Acuity</topic><topic>Archives & records</topic><topic>Citation management software</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Retina</topic><topic>Review Article</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Visual acuity</topic><topic>Visual stimuli</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yeh, Wen-Hsiu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ju, Ya-Ju</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsieh, Tzu-Han</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yu-Ting</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yeh, Wen-Hsiu</au><au>Ju, Ya-Ju</au><au>Hsieh, Tzu-Han</au><au>Liu, Yu-Ting</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of grating stimulation on vision in individuals with amblyopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology</jtitle><stitle>Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol</stitle><addtitle>Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2024-02-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>262</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>395</spage><epage>410</epage><pages>395-410</pages><issn>0721-832X</issn><issn>1435-702X</issn><eissn>1435-702X</eissn><abstract>Purpose
To investigate the effects of Cambridge Stimulator with grating element stimulation on visual acuity (VA), grating acuity (GA), and contrast sensitivity (CS) in patients with amblyopia.
Methods
Three electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library) were searched for studies published from January 1970 to November 2022. The searched studies were reviewed and extracted independently by two authors. The included studies were evaluated by the Cochrane risk of bias. A meta-analysis calculating Hedges’
g
effect-size metric with 95% confidence intervals using random-effects DerSimonian-Laird model was employed. Heterogeneity was estimated using
I
2
statistics. Outcomes of interest included VA, GA, and CS.
Results
A total of 1221 studies were identified. Twenty-four studies including 900 subjects met the inclusion criteria. The outcome measure of all visual indexes (VA: Hedges’
g
of − 0.43, 95% CI = − 0.81 to − 0.05,
I
2
= 86%,
p
= 0.02; GA: Hedges’
g
of 3.79, 95% CI = 1.05 to 6.54,
I
2
= 98%,
p
= 0.01; CS: Hedges’
g
of 0.64, 95% CI = 0.19 to 1.09,
I
2
= 41%,
p
= 0.00) significantly favored in the grating group.
Conclusions
Grating stimulation may be a positive help for visual functions in patients with amblyopia. The effects of grating stimulation on VA and CS appear to be opposite. This study is registered with
www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/
(CRD42022366259).</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>37306731</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00417-023-06142-w</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5777-8700</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0721-832X |
| ispartof | Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology, 2024-02, Vol.262 (2), p.395-410 |
| issn | 0721-832X 1435-702X 1435-702X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2825154529 |
| source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Acuity Archives & records Citation management software Medicine Medicine & Public Health Meta-analysis Ophthalmology Patients Retina Review Article Statistical analysis Systematic review Visual acuity Visual stimuli |
| title | Effects of grating stimulation on vision in individuals with amblyopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T06%3A46%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20grating%20stimulation%20on%20vision%20in%20individuals%20with%20amblyopia:%20a%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Graefe's%20archive%20for%20clinical%20and%20experimental%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Yeh,%20Wen-Hsiu&rft.date=2024-02-01&rft.volume=262&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=395&rft.epage=410&rft.pages=395-410&rft.issn=0721-832X&rft.eissn=1435-702X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00417-023-06142-w&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2922308777%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2922308777&rft_id=info:pmid/37306731&rfr_iscdi=true |