Absolute intensity thresholds for tri‐axial wrist and waist accelerometer‐measured movement behaviors in adults

Aim This study was aimed to: (1) compare raw triaxial acceleration data from GENEActiv (GA) and ActiGraph GT3X+ (AG) placed on the non‐dominant wrist; (2) compare AG placed on the non‐dominant and dominant wrist, and waist; (3) derive brand‐ and placement‐specific absolute intensity thresholds for i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports 2023-09, Vol.33 (9), p.1752-1764
Hauptverfasser: Mielke, Gregore Iven, Almeida Mendes, Márcio, Ekelund, Ulf, Rowlands, Alex V., Reichert, Felipe Fossati, Crochemore‐Silva, Inacio
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1764
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1752
container_title Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports
container_volume 33
creator Mielke, Gregore Iven
Almeida Mendes, Márcio
Ekelund, Ulf
Rowlands, Alex V.
Reichert, Felipe Fossati
Crochemore‐Silva, Inacio
description Aim This study was aimed to: (1) compare raw triaxial acceleration data from GENEActiv (GA) and ActiGraph GT3X+ (AG) placed on the non‐dominant wrist; (2) compare AG placed on the non‐dominant and dominant wrist, and waist; (3) derive brand‐ and placement‐specific absolute intensity thresholds for inactive and sedentary time, and physical activity intensity in adults. Methods Eighty‐six adults (44 men; 34.6 ± 10.8 years) performed nine activities while simultaneously wearing GA and AG on wrist and waist. Acceleration (in gravitational equivalent units; mg) was compared with oxygen uptake (measured with indirect calorimetry). Results Increases in acceleration mirrored increases in intensity of activities, regardless of device brand and placement. Differences in acceleration between GA and AG worn at the non‐dominant wrist were small but tended to be high at lower intensity activities. Thresholds for differentiating inactivity (
doi_str_mv 10.1111/sms.14416
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2825154202</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2847169396</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3886-3b753f17dda9941ff18bb8d239e8fa8d79abc9e2598e1ef799acf0aab6cec7783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10cFO3DAQBmCrKioL7aEvgCz1Ug4BO05i-4hQoZVAHKDnyInHWqMkBo-z2731EXhGnqSGpRyQ8MU-fPo9mp-Qr5wd8XyOccQjXlW8-UAWvGGsYEqoj2TBNKsLyZXaJXuIt4xxqav6E9kVUrBGMLUgeNJhGOYE1E8JJvRpQ9MyAi7DYJG6EGmK_vHvg_njzUDX0WOiZrJ0bZ5ffQ8DxDBCgpjVCAbnCJaOYQUjTIl2sDQrHyLmD6ix85DwM9lxZkD48nLvk99nP25OfxYXV-e_Tk8uil4o1RSik7VwXFprtK64c1x1nbKl0KCcUVZq0_Uaylor4OCk1qZ3zJiu6aGXUol98n2bexfD_QyY2tFjnncwE4QZ21KVNa-rkpWZfntDb8McpzxdVpXkjRa6yepwq_oYECO49i760cRNy1n71ESbm2ifm8j24CVx7kawr_L_6jM43oK1H2DzflJ7fXm9jfwHb_iXmA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2847169396</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Absolute intensity thresholds for tri‐axial wrist and waist accelerometer‐measured movement behaviors in adults</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Mielke, Gregore Iven ; Almeida Mendes, Márcio ; Ekelund, Ulf ; Rowlands, Alex V. ; Reichert, Felipe Fossati ; Crochemore‐Silva, Inacio</creator><creatorcontrib>Mielke, Gregore Iven ; Almeida Mendes, Márcio ; Ekelund, Ulf ; Rowlands, Alex V. ; Reichert, Felipe Fossati ; Crochemore‐Silva, Inacio</creatorcontrib><description>Aim This study was aimed to: (1) compare raw triaxial acceleration data from GENEActiv (GA) and ActiGraph GT3X+ (AG) placed on the non‐dominant wrist; (2) compare AG placed on the non‐dominant and dominant wrist, and waist; (3) derive brand‐ and placement‐specific absolute intensity thresholds for inactive and sedentary time, and physical activity intensity in adults. Methods Eighty‐six adults (44 men; 34.6 ± 10.8 years) performed nine activities while simultaneously wearing GA and AG on wrist and waist. Acceleration (in gravitational equivalent units; mg) was compared with oxygen uptake (measured with indirect calorimetry). Results Increases in acceleration mirrored increases in intensity of activities, regardless of device brand and placement. Differences in acceleration between GA and AG worn at the non‐dominant wrist were small but tended to be high at lower intensity activities. Thresholds for differentiating inactivity (&lt;1.5 MET) from activity (≥1.5 MET) ranged from 25 mg (AG non‐dominant wrist; sensitivity 93%, specificity 95%) to 40 mg (AG waist; sensitivity 78%, specificity 100%). For moderate intensity (≥3 METs), thresholds ranged from 65 mg (AG waist; sensitivity 96%, specificity 94%) to 92 mg (GA non‐dominant; sensitivity 93%, specificity 98%); vigorous intensity (≥6 METs) thresholds ranged from 190 mg (AG waist; sensitivity 82%, specificity 92%) to 283 mg (GA non‐dominant; sensitivity 93%, specificity 98%). Conclusion Raw triaxial acceleration outputs from two widely used accelerometer brands may have limited comparability in low intensity activities. Thresholds derived in this study can be utilized in adults to reasonably classify movement behaviors into categories of intensity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0905-7188</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0838</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/sms.14416</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37306308</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Denmark: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>accelerometer ; adults ; calibration ; Exercise ; physical activity ; sedentary ; validity</subject><ispartof>Scandinavian journal of medicine &amp; science in sports, 2023-09, Vol.33 (9), p.1752-1764</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2023 The Authors. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine &amp; Science In Sports published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3886-3b753f17dda9941ff18bb8d239e8fa8d79abc9e2598e1ef799acf0aab6cec7783</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3886-3b753f17dda9941ff18bb8d239e8fa8d79abc9e2598e1ef799acf0aab6cec7783</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0951-9875 ; 0000-0002-5590-5750 ; 0000-0002-1463-697X ; 0000-0002-3043-2715 ; 0000-0003-2115-9267 ; 0000-0001-5390-8360</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fsms.14416$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fsms.14416$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37306308$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mielke, Gregore Iven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almeida Mendes, Márcio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ekelund, Ulf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rowlands, Alex V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reichert, Felipe Fossati</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crochemore‐Silva, Inacio</creatorcontrib><title>Absolute intensity thresholds for tri‐axial wrist and waist accelerometer‐measured movement behaviors in adults</title><title>Scandinavian journal of medicine &amp; science in sports</title><addtitle>Scand J Med Sci Sports</addtitle><description>Aim This study was aimed to: (1) compare raw triaxial acceleration data from GENEActiv (GA) and ActiGraph GT3X+ (AG) placed on the non‐dominant wrist; (2) compare AG placed on the non‐dominant and dominant wrist, and waist; (3) derive brand‐ and placement‐specific absolute intensity thresholds for inactive and sedentary time, and physical activity intensity in adults. Methods Eighty‐six adults (44 men; 34.6 ± 10.8 years) performed nine activities while simultaneously wearing GA and AG on wrist and waist. Acceleration (in gravitational equivalent units; mg) was compared with oxygen uptake (measured with indirect calorimetry). Results Increases in acceleration mirrored increases in intensity of activities, regardless of device brand and placement. Differences in acceleration between GA and AG worn at the non‐dominant wrist were small but tended to be high at lower intensity activities. Thresholds for differentiating inactivity (&lt;1.5 MET) from activity (≥1.5 MET) ranged from 25 mg (AG non‐dominant wrist; sensitivity 93%, specificity 95%) to 40 mg (AG waist; sensitivity 78%, specificity 100%). For moderate intensity (≥3 METs), thresholds ranged from 65 mg (AG waist; sensitivity 96%, specificity 94%) to 92 mg (GA non‐dominant; sensitivity 93%, specificity 98%); vigorous intensity (≥6 METs) thresholds ranged from 190 mg (AG waist; sensitivity 82%, specificity 92%) to 283 mg (GA non‐dominant; sensitivity 93%, specificity 98%). Conclusion Raw triaxial acceleration outputs from two widely used accelerometer brands may have limited comparability in low intensity activities. Thresholds derived in this study can be utilized in adults to reasonably classify movement behaviors into categories of intensity.</description><subject>accelerometer</subject><subject>adults</subject><subject>calibration</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>physical activity</subject><subject>sedentary</subject><subject>validity</subject><issn>0905-7188</issn><issn>1600-0838</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp10cFO3DAQBmCrKioL7aEvgCz1Ug4BO05i-4hQoZVAHKDnyInHWqMkBo-z2731EXhGnqSGpRyQ8MU-fPo9mp-Qr5wd8XyOccQjXlW8-UAWvGGsYEqoj2TBNKsLyZXaJXuIt4xxqav6E9kVUrBGMLUgeNJhGOYE1E8JJvRpQ9MyAi7DYJG6EGmK_vHvg_njzUDX0WOiZrJ0bZ5ffQ8DxDBCgpjVCAbnCJaOYQUjTIl2sDQrHyLmD6ix85DwM9lxZkD48nLvk99nP25OfxYXV-e_Tk8uil4o1RSik7VwXFprtK64c1x1nbKl0KCcUVZq0_Uaylor4OCk1qZ3zJiu6aGXUol98n2bexfD_QyY2tFjnncwE4QZ21KVNa-rkpWZfntDb8McpzxdVpXkjRa6yepwq_oYECO49i760cRNy1n71ESbm2ifm8j24CVx7kawr_L_6jM43oK1H2DzflJ7fXm9jfwHb_iXmA</recordid><startdate>202309</startdate><enddate>202309</enddate><creator>Mielke, Gregore Iven</creator><creator>Almeida Mendes, Márcio</creator><creator>Ekelund, Ulf</creator><creator>Rowlands, Alex V.</creator><creator>Reichert, Felipe Fossati</creator><creator>Crochemore‐Silva, Inacio</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0951-9875</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5590-5750</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1463-697X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3043-2715</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2115-9267</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5390-8360</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202309</creationdate><title>Absolute intensity thresholds for tri‐axial wrist and waist accelerometer‐measured movement behaviors in adults</title><author>Mielke, Gregore Iven ; Almeida Mendes, Márcio ; Ekelund, Ulf ; Rowlands, Alex V. ; Reichert, Felipe Fossati ; Crochemore‐Silva, Inacio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3886-3b753f17dda9941ff18bb8d239e8fa8d79abc9e2598e1ef799acf0aab6cec7783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>accelerometer</topic><topic>adults</topic><topic>calibration</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>physical activity</topic><topic>sedentary</topic><topic>validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mielke, Gregore Iven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almeida Mendes, Márcio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ekelund, Ulf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rowlands, Alex V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reichert, Felipe Fossati</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crochemore‐Silva, Inacio</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Scandinavian journal of medicine &amp; science in sports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mielke, Gregore Iven</au><au>Almeida Mendes, Márcio</au><au>Ekelund, Ulf</au><au>Rowlands, Alex V.</au><au>Reichert, Felipe Fossati</au><au>Crochemore‐Silva, Inacio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Absolute intensity thresholds for tri‐axial wrist and waist accelerometer‐measured movement behaviors in adults</atitle><jtitle>Scandinavian journal of medicine &amp; science in sports</jtitle><addtitle>Scand J Med Sci Sports</addtitle><date>2023-09</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1752</spage><epage>1764</epage><pages>1752-1764</pages><issn>0905-7188</issn><eissn>1600-0838</eissn><abstract>Aim This study was aimed to: (1) compare raw triaxial acceleration data from GENEActiv (GA) and ActiGraph GT3X+ (AG) placed on the non‐dominant wrist; (2) compare AG placed on the non‐dominant and dominant wrist, and waist; (3) derive brand‐ and placement‐specific absolute intensity thresholds for inactive and sedentary time, and physical activity intensity in adults. Methods Eighty‐six adults (44 men; 34.6 ± 10.8 years) performed nine activities while simultaneously wearing GA and AG on wrist and waist. Acceleration (in gravitational equivalent units; mg) was compared with oxygen uptake (measured with indirect calorimetry). Results Increases in acceleration mirrored increases in intensity of activities, regardless of device brand and placement. Differences in acceleration between GA and AG worn at the non‐dominant wrist were small but tended to be high at lower intensity activities. Thresholds for differentiating inactivity (&lt;1.5 MET) from activity (≥1.5 MET) ranged from 25 mg (AG non‐dominant wrist; sensitivity 93%, specificity 95%) to 40 mg (AG waist; sensitivity 78%, specificity 100%). For moderate intensity (≥3 METs), thresholds ranged from 65 mg (AG waist; sensitivity 96%, specificity 94%) to 92 mg (GA non‐dominant; sensitivity 93%, specificity 98%); vigorous intensity (≥6 METs) thresholds ranged from 190 mg (AG waist; sensitivity 82%, specificity 92%) to 283 mg (GA non‐dominant; sensitivity 93%, specificity 98%). Conclusion Raw triaxial acceleration outputs from two widely used accelerometer brands may have limited comparability in low intensity activities. Thresholds derived in this study can be utilized in adults to reasonably classify movement behaviors into categories of intensity.</abstract><cop>Denmark</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>37306308</pmid><doi>10.1111/sms.14416</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0951-9875</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5590-5750</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1463-697X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3043-2715</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2115-9267</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5390-8360</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0905-7188
ispartof Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, 2023-09, Vol.33 (9), p.1752-1764
issn 0905-7188
1600-0838
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2825154202
source Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects accelerometer
adults
calibration
Exercise
physical activity
sedentary
validity
title Absolute intensity thresholds for tri‐axial wrist and waist accelerometer‐measured movement behaviors in adults
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T18%3A27%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Absolute%20intensity%20thresholds%20for%20tri%E2%80%90axial%20wrist%20and%20waist%20accelerometer%E2%80%90measured%20movement%20behaviors%20in%20adults&rft.jtitle=Scandinavian%20journal%20of%20medicine%20&%20science%20in%20sports&rft.au=Mielke,%20Gregore%20Iven&rft.date=2023-09&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1752&rft.epage=1764&rft.pages=1752-1764&rft.issn=0905-7188&rft.eissn=1600-0838&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/sms.14416&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2847169396%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2847169396&rft_id=info:pmid/37306308&rfr_iscdi=true