Effect of biocarriers on the nitrification and microbial community in moving bed biofilm reactor for anaerobic digestion effluent treatment

The performance of a moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) depends largely on the type of biofilm carrier used. However, how different carriers affect the nitrification process, particularly when treating anaerobic digestion effluents, is not completely understood. This study aimed to evaluate the nitri...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental research 2023-09, Vol.232, p.116350-116350, Article 116350
Hauptverfasser: Jang, Duksoo, Won, Jongyeob, Jo, Yeadam, Kim, Young-o, Jang, Am
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 116350
container_issue
container_start_page 116350
container_title Environmental research
container_volume 232
creator Jang, Duksoo
Won, Jongyeob
Jo, Yeadam
Kim, Young-o
Jang, Am
description The performance of a moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) depends largely on the type of biofilm carrier used. However, how different carriers affect the nitrification process, particularly when treating anaerobic digestion effluents, is not completely understood. This study aimed to evaluate the nitrification performance of two distinct biocarriers in MBBRs over a 140-d operation period, with a gradually decreasing hydraulic retention time (HRT) from 20 to 10 d. Reactor 1 (R1) was filled with fiber balls, whereas a Mutag Biochip was used for reactor 2 (R2). At an HRT of 20 d, the ammonia removal efficiency of both reactors was >95%. However, as the HRT was reduced, the ammonia removal efficiency of R1 gradually declined, ultimately dropping to 65% at a 10-d HRT. In contrast, the ammonia removal efficiency of R2 consistently exceeding 99% throughout the long-term operation. R1 exhibited partial nitrification, whereas R2 exhibited complete nitrification. Analysis of microbial communities showed that the abundance and diversity of bacterial communities, particularly nitrifying bacteria such as Hyphomicrobium sp. And Nitrosomonas sp., in R2 was higher than that in R1. In conclusion, the choice of biocarrier significantly impact the abundance and diversity of microbial communities in MBBR systems. Therefore, these factors should be closely monitored to ensure the efficient treatment of high-strength ammonia wastewater. [Display omitted] •MBBR with different biocarriers was used to treat anaerobic digestion effluent.•Mutag Biochip was the most effective for ammonia removal at an HRT of 10 days.•Biocompatibility of biocarrier improved the nitrification performance.•Hyphomicrobium and Nitrosomonas were the dominant nitrifiers in MBBR.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.envres.2023.116350
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2824695068</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0013935123011544</els_id><sourcerecordid>2824695068</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-ec9879b9784f0cd2165913e51455ed5fb8fe4fb4d6b43f47f157aaf3b879a1ba3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1vFSEUhonR2NvWf2AMSzdzhQFmho2JaWpr0sSNXRM-DpWbGajA3KS_wT8t12lduiB85HnfwzkvQu8p2VNCh0-HPcRjhrLvSc_2lA5MkFdoR4kcOiIFe412hFDWSSboGTov5dCuVDDyFp2xsZdkoHKHfl97D7bi5LEJyeqcA-SCU8T1J-AYag4-WF1De9HR4SXYnEzQM7ZpWdYGPOEQ8ZKOIT5gA-5k48O84Aza1pSxb0tHDSeZxS48QPnrBt7PK8SKayPr0k6X6I3Xc4F3z_sFuv96_ePqtrv7fvPt6stdZzmZagdWTqM0cpy4J9b1dBCSMhCUCwFOeDN54N5wNxjOPB89FaPWnpmm0tRodoE-br6POf1a23fUEoqFedYR0lpUP_V8kIIMU0P5hrauS8ng1WMOi85PihJ1ikEd1BaDOsWgthia7MNzhdUs4P6JXubegM8bAK3PYxu5KjZAtOBCbnEol8L_K_wBp1CebA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2824695068</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of biocarriers on the nitrification and microbial community in moving bed biofilm reactor for anaerobic digestion effluent treatment</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Jang, Duksoo ; Won, Jongyeob ; Jo, Yeadam ; Kim, Young-o ; Jang, Am</creator><creatorcontrib>Jang, Duksoo ; Won, Jongyeob ; Jo, Yeadam ; Kim, Young-o ; Jang, Am</creatorcontrib><description>The performance of a moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) depends largely on the type of biofilm carrier used. However, how different carriers affect the nitrification process, particularly when treating anaerobic digestion effluents, is not completely understood. This study aimed to evaluate the nitrification performance of two distinct biocarriers in MBBRs over a 140-d operation period, with a gradually decreasing hydraulic retention time (HRT) from 20 to 10 d. Reactor 1 (R1) was filled with fiber balls, whereas a Mutag Biochip was used for reactor 2 (R2). At an HRT of 20 d, the ammonia removal efficiency of both reactors was &gt;95%. However, as the HRT was reduced, the ammonia removal efficiency of R1 gradually declined, ultimately dropping to 65% at a 10-d HRT. In contrast, the ammonia removal efficiency of R2 consistently exceeding 99% throughout the long-term operation. R1 exhibited partial nitrification, whereas R2 exhibited complete nitrification. Analysis of microbial communities showed that the abundance and diversity of bacterial communities, particularly nitrifying bacteria such as Hyphomicrobium sp. And Nitrosomonas sp., in R2 was higher than that in R1. In conclusion, the choice of biocarrier significantly impact the abundance and diversity of microbial communities in MBBR systems. Therefore, these factors should be closely monitored to ensure the efficient treatment of high-strength ammonia wastewater. [Display omitted] •MBBR with different biocarriers was used to treat anaerobic digestion effluent.•Mutag Biochip was the most effective for ammonia removal at an HRT of 10 days.•Biocompatibility of biocarrier improved the nitrification performance.•Hyphomicrobium and Nitrosomonas were the dominant nitrifiers in MBBR.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-9351</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0953</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.116350</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37290619</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Biofilm characterization ; Hydraulic retention time ; Microbial community ; Mutag biochip ; Nitrification</subject><ispartof>Environmental research, 2023-09, Vol.232, p.116350-116350, Article 116350</ispartof><rights>2023 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-ec9879b9784f0cd2165913e51455ed5fb8fe4fb4d6b43f47f157aaf3b879a1ba3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-ec9879b9784f0cd2165913e51455ed5fb8fe4fb4d6b43f47f157aaf3b879a1ba3</cites><orcidid>0009-0005-8749-510X ; 0000-0003-2400-7664</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013935123011544$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37290619$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jang, Duksoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Won, Jongyeob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jo, Yeadam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Young-o</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jang, Am</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of biocarriers on the nitrification and microbial community in moving bed biofilm reactor for anaerobic digestion effluent treatment</title><title>Environmental research</title><addtitle>Environ Res</addtitle><description>The performance of a moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) depends largely on the type of biofilm carrier used. However, how different carriers affect the nitrification process, particularly when treating anaerobic digestion effluents, is not completely understood. This study aimed to evaluate the nitrification performance of two distinct biocarriers in MBBRs over a 140-d operation period, with a gradually decreasing hydraulic retention time (HRT) from 20 to 10 d. Reactor 1 (R1) was filled with fiber balls, whereas a Mutag Biochip was used for reactor 2 (R2). At an HRT of 20 d, the ammonia removal efficiency of both reactors was &gt;95%. However, as the HRT was reduced, the ammonia removal efficiency of R1 gradually declined, ultimately dropping to 65% at a 10-d HRT. In contrast, the ammonia removal efficiency of R2 consistently exceeding 99% throughout the long-term operation. R1 exhibited partial nitrification, whereas R2 exhibited complete nitrification. Analysis of microbial communities showed that the abundance and diversity of bacterial communities, particularly nitrifying bacteria such as Hyphomicrobium sp. And Nitrosomonas sp., in R2 was higher than that in R1. In conclusion, the choice of biocarrier significantly impact the abundance and diversity of microbial communities in MBBR systems. Therefore, these factors should be closely monitored to ensure the efficient treatment of high-strength ammonia wastewater. [Display omitted] •MBBR with different biocarriers was used to treat anaerobic digestion effluent.•Mutag Biochip was the most effective for ammonia removal at an HRT of 10 days.•Biocompatibility of biocarrier improved the nitrification performance.•Hyphomicrobium and Nitrosomonas were the dominant nitrifiers in MBBR.</description><subject>Biofilm characterization</subject><subject>Hydraulic retention time</subject><subject>Microbial community</subject><subject>Mutag biochip</subject><subject>Nitrification</subject><issn>0013-9351</issn><issn>1096-0953</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU1vFSEUhonR2NvWf2AMSzdzhQFmho2JaWpr0sSNXRM-DpWbGajA3KS_wT8t12lduiB85HnfwzkvQu8p2VNCh0-HPcRjhrLvSc_2lA5MkFdoR4kcOiIFe412hFDWSSboGTov5dCuVDDyFp2xsZdkoHKHfl97D7bi5LEJyeqcA-SCU8T1J-AYag4-WF1De9HR4SXYnEzQM7ZpWdYGPOEQ8ZKOIT5gA-5k48O84Aza1pSxb0tHDSeZxS48QPnrBt7PK8SKayPr0k6X6I3Xc4F3z_sFuv96_ePqtrv7fvPt6stdZzmZagdWTqM0cpy4J9b1dBCSMhCUCwFOeDN54N5wNxjOPB89FaPWnpmm0tRodoE-br6POf1a23fUEoqFedYR0lpUP_V8kIIMU0P5hrauS8ng1WMOi85PihJ1ikEd1BaDOsWgthia7MNzhdUs4P6JXubegM8bAK3PYxu5KjZAtOBCbnEol8L_K_wBp1CebA</recordid><startdate>20230901</startdate><enddate>20230901</enddate><creator>Jang, Duksoo</creator><creator>Won, Jongyeob</creator><creator>Jo, Yeadam</creator><creator>Kim, Young-o</creator><creator>Jang, Am</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0005-8749-510X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2400-7664</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230901</creationdate><title>Effect of biocarriers on the nitrification and microbial community in moving bed biofilm reactor for anaerobic digestion effluent treatment</title><author>Jang, Duksoo ; Won, Jongyeob ; Jo, Yeadam ; Kim, Young-o ; Jang, Am</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-ec9879b9784f0cd2165913e51455ed5fb8fe4fb4d6b43f47f157aaf3b879a1ba3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Biofilm characterization</topic><topic>Hydraulic retention time</topic><topic>Microbial community</topic><topic>Mutag biochip</topic><topic>Nitrification</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jang, Duksoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Won, Jongyeob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jo, Yeadam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Young-o</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jang, Am</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Environmental research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jang, Duksoo</au><au>Won, Jongyeob</au><au>Jo, Yeadam</au><au>Kim, Young-o</au><au>Jang, Am</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of biocarriers on the nitrification and microbial community in moving bed biofilm reactor for anaerobic digestion effluent treatment</atitle><jtitle>Environmental research</jtitle><addtitle>Environ Res</addtitle><date>2023-09-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>232</volume><spage>116350</spage><epage>116350</epage><pages>116350-116350</pages><artnum>116350</artnum><issn>0013-9351</issn><eissn>1096-0953</eissn><abstract>The performance of a moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) depends largely on the type of biofilm carrier used. However, how different carriers affect the nitrification process, particularly when treating anaerobic digestion effluents, is not completely understood. This study aimed to evaluate the nitrification performance of two distinct biocarriers in MBBRs over a 140-d operation period, with a gradually decreasing hydraulic retention time (HRT) from 20 to 10 d. Reactor 1 (R1) was filled with fiber balls, whereas a Mutag Biochip was used for reactor 2 (R2). At an HRT of 20 d, the ammonia removal efficiency of both reactors was &gt;95%. However, as the HRT was reduced, the ammonia removal efficiency of R1 gradually declined, ultimately dropping to 65% at a 10-d HRT. In contrast, the ammonia removal efficiency of R2 consistently exceeding 99% throughout the long-term operation. R1 exhibited partial nitrification, whereas R2 exhibited complete nitrification. Analysis of microbial communities showed that the abundance and diversity of bacterial communities, particularly nitrifying bacteria such as Hyphomicrobium sp. And Nitrosomonas sp., in R2 was higher than that in R1. In conclusion, the choice of biocarrier significantly impact the abundance and diversity of microbial communities in MBBR systems. Therefore, these factors should be closely monitored to ensure the efficient treatment of high-strength ammonia wastewater. [Display omitted] •MBBR with different biocarriers was used to treat anaerobic digestion effluent.•Mutag Biochip was the most effective for ammonia removal at an HRT of 10 days.•Biocompatibility of biocarrier improved the nitrification performance.•Hyphomicrobium and Nitrosomonas were the dominant nitrifiers in MBBR.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>37290619</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.envres.2023.116350</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0005-8749-510X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2400-7664</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0013-9351
ispartof Environmental research, 2023-09, Vol.232, p.116350-116350, Article 116350
issn 0013-9351
1096-0953
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2824695068
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Biofilm characterization
Hydraulic retention time
Microbial community
Mutag biochip
Nitrification
title Effect of biocarriers on the nitrification and microbial community in moving bed biofilm reactor for anaerobic digestion effluent treatment
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T02%3A55%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20biocarriers%20on%20the%20nitrification%20and%20microbial%20community%20in%20moving%20bed%20biofilm%20reactor%20for%20anaerobic%20digestion%20effluent%20treatment&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20research&rft.au=Jang,%20Duksoo&rft.date=2023-09-01&rft.volume=232&rft.spage=116350&rft.epage=116350&rft.pages=116350-116350&rft.artnum=116350&rft.issn=0013-9351&rft.eissn=1096-0953&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.envres.2023.116350&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2824695068%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2824695068&rft_id=info:pmid/37290619&rft_els_id=S0013935123011544&rfr_iscdi=true