Effectiveness of FeNO‐guided treatment in adult asthma patients: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Objective Asthma control is generally monitored by assessing symptoms and lung function. However, optimal treatment is also dependent on the type and extent of airway inflammation. Fraction of exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO) is a noninvasive biomarker of type 2 airway inflammation, but its effectiveness...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical and experimental allergy 2023-08, Vol.53 (8), p.798-808
Hauptverfasser: Korevaar, Daniël A., Damen, Johanna A., Heus, Pauline, Moen, Maaike J., Spijker, René, Veen, Ilonka H., Weersink, Els J., Kemenade, Geert‐Jan, Hal, Peter Th. W., Hooft, Lotty
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 808
container_issue 8
container_start_page 798
container_title Clinical and experimental allergy
container_volume 53
creator Korevaar, Daniël A.
Damen, Johanna A.
Heus, Pauline
Moen, Maaike J.
Spijker, René
Veen, Ilonka H.
Weersink, Els J.
Kemenade, Geert‐Jan
Hal, Peter Th. W.
Hooft, Lotty
description Objective Asthma control is generally monitored by assessing symptoms and lung function. However, optimal treatment is also dependent on the type and extent of airway inflammation. Fraction of exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO) is a noninvasive biomarker of type 2 airway inflammation, but its effectiveness in guiding asthma treatment remains disputed. We performed a systematic review and meta‐analysis to obtain summary estimates of the effectiveness of FeNO‐guided asthma treatment. Design We updated a Cochrane systematic review from 2016. Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used to assess risk of bias. Inverse‐variance random‐effects meta‐analysis was performed. Certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE. Subgroup analyses were performed based on asthma severity, asthma control, allergy/atopy, pregnancy and obesity. Data Sources The Cochrane Airways Group Trials Register was searched on 9 May 2023. Eligibility Criteria We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effectiveness of a FeNO‐guided treatment versus usual (symptom‐guided) treatment in adult asthma patients. Results We included 12 RCTs (2,116 patients), all showing high or unclear risk of bias in at least one domain. Five RCTs reported support from a FeNO manufacturer. FeNO‐guided treatment probably reduces the number of patients having ≥1 exacerbation (OR = 0.61; 95%CI 0.44 to 0.83; six RCTs; GRADE moderate certainty) and exacerbation rate (RR = 0.67; 95%CI 0.54 to 0.82; six RCTs; moderate certainty), and may slightly improve Asthma Control Questionnaire score (MD = −0.10; 95%CI −0.18 to −0.02, six RCTs; low certainty), however, this change is unlikely to be clinically important. An effect on severe exacerbations, quality of life, FEV1, treatment dosage and FeNO values could not be demonstrated. There were no indications that effectiveness is different in subgroups of patients, although evidence for subgroup analysis was limited. Conclusions FeNO‐guided asthma treatment probably results in fewer exacerbations but may not have clinically important effects on other asthma outcomes. In this systematic review, we included 12 RCTs (2,116 patients) comparing FeNO‐guided with usual (symptom‐guided) treatment in adult asthma patients, all showing high or unclear risk of bias. FeNO‐guided asthma treatment probably reduces the number of exacerbations. It may also slightly improve ACQ score, although the difference of 0.1 points compared to usual care is generally considered clinically irrelevant.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/cea.14359
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2824684686</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2824684686</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3889-554cd36f123f03e708c367466fbde00d0c15df549d9ab048eb9ffb1fabc484d93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10ctKAzEUBuAgiq2XhS8gATe6GM1MMjOJu1LqBYrd6HrIJCeaMpc6ybR05yP4jD6J0VYXgodA4PDxE_IjdBKTyzjMlQJ5GTOaih00jGmWRkmYXTQkImVRzgUboAPn5oSQYPg-GtA8EZTnZIjmE2NAebuEBpzDrcE38DD7eHt_7q0GjX0H0tfQeGwbLHVfeSydf6klXkhvw95d4xF2a-ehDguFO1haWGHZaFyDlyFJNrJaO-uO0J6RlYPj7X2Inm4mj-O7aDq7vR-PppGinIsoTZnSNDNxQg2hkBOuaJazLDOlBkI0UXGqTcqEFrIkjEMpjCljI0vFONOCHqLzTe6ia197cL6orVNQVbKBtndFwhOW8XCyQM_-0Hnbd-G9X4pxwmmS0KAuNkp1rXMdmGLR2Vp26yImxVcBRSig-C4g2NNtYl_WoH_lz48HcLUBK1vB-v-kYjwZbSI_ATuVkZs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2848083223</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effectiveness of FeNO‐guided treatment in adult asthma patients: A systematic review and meta‐analysis</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Korevaar, Daniël A. ; Damen, Johanna A. ; Heus, Pauline ; Moen, Maaike J. ; Spijker, René ; Veen, Ilonka H. ; Weersink, Els J. ; Kemenade, Geert‐Jan ; Hal, Peter Th. W. ; Hooft, Lotty</creator><creatorcontrib>Korevaar, Daniël A. ; Damen, Johanna A. ; Heus, Pauline ; Moen, Maaike J. ; Spijker, René ; Veen, Ilonka H. ; Weersink, Els J. ; Kemenade, Geert‐Jan ; Hal, Peter Th. W. ; Hooft, Lotty</creatorcontrib><description>Objective Asthma control is generally monitored by assessing symptoms and lung function. However, optimal treatment is also dependent on the type and extent of airway inflammation. Fraction of exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO) is a noninvasive biomarker of type 2 airway inflammation, but its effectiveness in guiding asthma treatment remains disputed. We performed a systematic review and meta‐analysis to obtain summary estimates of the effectiveness of FeNO‐guided asthma treatment. Design We updated a Cochrane systematic review from 2016. Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used to assess risk of bias. Inverse‐variance random‐effects meta‐analysis was performed. Certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE. Subgroup analyses were performed based on asthma severity, asthma control, allergy/atopy, pregnancy and obesity. Data Sources The Cochrane Airways Group Trials Register was searched on 9 May 2023. Eligibility Criteria We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effectiveness of a FeNO‐guided treatment versus usual (symptom‐guided) treatment in adult asthma patients. Results We included 12 RCTs (2,116 patients), all showing high or unclear risk of bias in at least one domain. Five RCTs reported support from a FeNO manufacturer. FeNO‐guided treatment probably reduces the number of patients having ≥1 exacerbation (OR = 0.61; 95%CI 0.44 to 0.83; six RCTs; GRADE moderate certainty) and exacerbation rate (RR = 0.67; 95%CI 0.54 to 0.82; six RCTs; moderate certainty), and may slightly improve Asthma Control Questionnaire score (MD = −0.10; 95%CI −0.18 to −0.02, six RCTs; low certainty), however, this change is unlikely to be clinically important. An effect on severe exacerbations, quality of life, FEV1, treatment dosage and FeNO values could not be demonstrated. There were no indications that effectiveness is different in subgroups of patients, although evidence for subgroup analysis was limited. Conclusions FeNO‐guided asthma treatment probably results in fewer exacerbations but may not have clinically important effects on other asthma outcomes. In this systematic review, we included 12 RCTs (2,116 patients) comparing FeNO‐guided with usual (symptom‐guided) treatment in adult asthma patients, all showing high or unclear risk of bias. FeNO‐guided asthma treatment probably reduces the number of exacerbations. It may also slightly improve ACQ score, although the difference of 0.1 points compared to usual care is generally considered clinically irrelevant. No significant effect was found on severe exacerbations, quality of life, FEV1 and treatment dosage. Effectiveness appeared similar in patient subgroups.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0954-7894</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2222</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/cea.14359</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37293870</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Asthma ; Atopy ; Clinical trials ; eosinophils ; Fraction of exhaled Nitric Oxide ; Inflammation ; Meta-analysis ; Nitric oxide ; Quality of life ; Respiratory function ; Respiratory tract diseases ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>Clinical and experimental allergy, 2023-08, Vol.53 (8), p.798-808</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2023 The Authors. Clinical &amp; Experimental Allergy published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3889-554cd36f123f03e708c367466fbde00d0c15df549d9ab048eb9ffb1fabc484d93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3889-554cd36f123f03e708c367466fbde00d0c15df549d9ab048eb9ffb1fabc484d93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fcea.14359$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fcea.14359$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37293870$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Korevaar, Daniël A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Damen, Johanna A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heus, Pauline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moen, Maaike J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spijker, René</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veen, Ilonka H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weersink, Els J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kemenade, Geert‐Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hal, Peter Th. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hooft, Lotty</creatorcontrib><title>Effectiveness of FeNO‐guided treatment in adult asthma patients: A systematic review and meta‐analysis</title><title>Clinical and experimental allergy</title><addtitle>Clin Exp Allergy</addtitle><description>Objective Asthma control is generally monitored by assessing symptoms and lung function. However, optimal treatment is also dependent on the type and extent of airway inflammation. Fraction of exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO) is a noninvasive biomarker of type 2 airway inflammation, but its effectiveness in guiding asthma treatment remains disputed. We performed a systematic review and meta‐analysis to obtain summary estimates of the effectiveness of FeNO‐guided asthma treatment. Design We updated a Cochrane systematic review from 2016. Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used to assess risk of bias. Inverse‐variance random‐effects meta‐analysis was performed. Certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE. Subgroup analyses were performed based on asthma severity, asthma control, allergy/atopy, pregnancy and obesity. Data Sources The Cochrane Airways Group Trials Register was searched on 9 May 2023. Eligibility Criteria We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effectiveness of a FeNO‐guided treatment versus usual (symptom‐guided) treatment in adult asthma patients. Results We included 12 RCTs (2,116 patients), all showing high or unclear risk of bias in at least one domain. Five RCTs reported support from a FeNO manufacturer. FeNO‐guided treatment probably reduces the number of patients having ≥1 exacerbation (OR = 0.61; 95%CI 0.44 to 0.83; six RCTs; GRADE moderate certainty) and exacerbation rate (RR = 0.67; 95%CI 0.54 to 0.82; six RCTs; moderate certainty), and may slightly improve Asthma Control Questionnaire score (MD = −0.10; 95%CI −0.18 to −0.02, six RCTs; low certainty), however, this change is unlikely to be clinically important. An effect on severe exacerbations, quality of life, FEV1, treatment dosage and FeNO values could not be demonstrated. There were no indications that effectiveness is different in subgroups of patients, although evidence for subgroup analysis was limited. Conclusions FeNO‐guided asthma treatment probably results in fewer exacerbations but may not have clinically important effects on other asthma outcomes. In this systematic review, we included 12 RCTs (2,116 patients) comparing FeNO‐guided with usual (symptom‐guided) treatment in adult asthma patients, all showing high or unclear risk of bias. FeNO‐guided asthma treatment probably reduces the number of exacerbations. It may also slightly improve ACQ score, although the difference of 0.1 points compared to usual care is generally considered clinically irrelevant. No significant effect was found on severe exacerbations, quality of life, FEV1 and treatment dosage. Effectiveness appeared similar in patient subgroups.</description><subject>Asthma</subject><subject>Atopy</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>eosinophils</subject><subject>Fraction of exhaled Nitric Oxide</subject><subject>Inflammation</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Nitric oxide</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Respiratory function</subject><subject>Respiratory tract diseases</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>0954-7894</issn><issn>1365-2222</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp10ctKAzEUBuAgiq2XhS8gATe6GM1MMjOJu1LqBYrd6HrIJCeaMpc6ybR05yP4jD6J0VYXgodA4PDxE_IjdBKTyzjMlQJ5GTOaih00jGmWRkmYXTQkImVRzgUboAPn5oSQYPg-GtA8EZTnZIjmE2NAebuEBpzDrcE38DD7eHt_7q0GjX0H0tfQeGwbLHVfeSydf6klXkhvw95d4xF2a-ehDguFO1haWGHZaFyDlyFJNrJaO-uO0J6RlYPj7X2Inm4mj-O7aDq7vR-PppGinIsoTZnSNDNxQg2hkBOuaJazLDOlBkI0UXGqTcqEFrIkjEMpjCljI0vFONOCHqLzTe6ia197cL6orVNQVbKBtndFwhOW8XCyQM_-0Hnbd-G9X4pxwmmS0KAuNkp1rXMdmGLR2Vp26yImxVcBRSig-C4g2NNtYl_WoH_lz48HcLUBK1vB-v-kYjwZbSI_ATuVkZs</recordid><startdate>202308</startdate><enddate>202308</enddate><creator>Korevaar, Daniël A.</creator><creator>Damen, Johanna A.</creator><creator>Heus, Pauline</creator><creator>Moen, Maaike J.</creator><creator>Spijker, René</creator><creator>Veen, Ilonka H.</creator><creator>Weersink, Els J.</creator><creator>Kemenade, Geert‐Jan</creator><creator>Hal, Peter Th. W.</creator><creator>Hooft, Lotty</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202308</creationdate><title>Effectiveness of FeNO‐guided treatment in adult asthma patients: A systematic review and meta‐analysis</title><author>Korevaar, Daniël A. ; Damen, Johanna A. ; Heus, Pauline ; Moen, Maaike J. ; Spijker, René ; Veen, Ilonka H. ; Weersink, Els J. ; Kemenade, Geert‐Jan ; Hal, Peter Th. W. ; Hooft, Lotty</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3889-554cd36f123f03e708c367466fbde00d0c15df549d9ab048eb9ffb1fabc484d93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Asthma</topic><topic>Atopy</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>eosinophils</topic><topic>Fraction of exhaled Nitric Oxide</topic><topic>Inflammation</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Nitric oxide</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Respiratory function</topic><topic>Respiratory tract diseases</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Korevaar, Daniël A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Damen, Johanna A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heus, Pauline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moen, Maaike J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spijker, René</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veen, Ilonka H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weersink, Els J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kemenade, Geert‐Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hal, Peter Th. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hooft, Lotty</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical and experimental allergy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Korevaar, Daniël A.</au><au>Damen, Johanna A.</au><au>Heus, Pauline</au><au>Moen, Maaike J.</au><au>Spijker, René</au><au>Veen, Ilonka H.</au><au>Weersink, Els J.</au><au>Kemenade, Geert‐Jan</au><au>Hal, Peter Th. W.</au><au>Hooft, Lotty</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effectiveness of FeNO‐guided treatment in adult asthma patients: A systematic review and meta‐analysis</atitle><jtitle>Clinical and experimental allergy</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Exp Allergy</addtitle><date>2023-08</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>798</spage><epage>808</epage><pages>798-808</pages><issn>0954-7894</issn><eissn>1365-2222</eissn><abstract>Objective Asthma control is generally monitored by assessing symptoms and lung function. However, optimal treatment is also dependent on the type and extent of airway inflammation. Fraction of exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO) is a noninvasive biomarker of type 2 airway inflammation, but its effectiveness in guiding asthma treatment remains disputed. We performed a systematic review and meta‐analysis to obtain summary estimates of the effectiveness of FeNO‐guided asthma treatment. Design We updated a Cochrane systematic review from 2016. Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used to assess risk of bias. Inverse‐variance random‐effects meta‐analysis was performed. Certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE. Subgroup analyses were performed based on asthma severity, asthma control, allergy/atopy, pregnancy and obesity. Data Sources The Cochrane Airways Group Trials Register was searched on 9 May 2023. Eligibility Criteria We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effectiveness of a FeNO‐guided treatment versus usual (symptom‐guided) treatment in adult asthma patients. Results We included 12 RCTs (2,116 patients), all showing high or unclear risk of bias in at least one domain. Five RCTs reported support from a FeNO manufacturer. FeNO‐guided treatment probably reduces the number of patients having ≥1 exacerbation (OR = 0.61; 95%CI 0.44 to 0.83; six RCTs; GRADE moderate certainty) and exacerbation rate (RR = 0.67; 95%CI 0.54 to 0.82; six RCTs; moderate certainty), and may slightly improve Asthma Control Questionnaire score (MD = −0.10; 95%CI −0.18 to −0.02, six RCTs; low certainty), however, this change is unlikely to be clinically important. An effect on severe exacerbations, quality of life, FEV1, treatment dosage and FeNO values could not be demonstrated. There were no indications that effectiveness is different in subgroups of patients, although evidence for subgroup analysis was limited. Conclusions FeNO‐guided asthma treatment probably results in fewer exacerbations but may not have clinically important effects on other asthma outcomes. In this systematic review, we included 12 RCTs (2,116 patients) comparing FeNO‐guided with usual (symptom‐guided) treatment in adult asthma patients, all showing high or unclear risk of bias. FeNO‐guided asthma treatment probably reduces the number of exacerbations. It may also slightly improve ACQ score, although the difference of 0.1 points compared to usual care is generally considered clinically irrelevant. No significant effect was found on severe exacerbations, quality of life, FEV1 and treatment dosage. Effectiveness appeared similar in patient subgroups.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>37293870</pmid><doi>10.1111/cea.14359</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0954-7894
ispartof Clinical and experimental allergy, 2023-08, Vol.53 (8), p.798-808
issn 0954-7894
1365-2222
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2824684686
source Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Asthma
Atopy
Clinical trials
eosinophils
Fraction of exhaled Nitric Oxide
Inflammation
Meta-analysis
Nitric oxide
Quality of life
Respiratory function
Respiratory tract diseases
Systematic review
title Effectiveness of FeNO‐guided treatment in adult asthma patients: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T21%3A27%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness%20of%20FeNO%E2%80%90guided%20treatment%20in%20adult%20asthma%20patients:%20A%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta%E2%80%90analysis&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20and%20experimental%20allergy&rft.au=Korevaar,%20Dani%C3%ABl%20A.&rft.date=2023-08&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=798&rft.epage=808&rft.pages=798-808&rft.issn=0954-7894&rft.eissn=1365-2222&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/cea.14359&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2824684686%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2848083223&rft_id=info:pmid/37293870&rfr_iscdi=true