Risk of Hysterectomy After Endometrial Ablation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

To assess the risk of hysterectomy after nonresectoscopic endometrial ablation in patients with heavy menstrual bleeding. The EMBASE, MEDLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov and Cochrane databases were searched for eligible articles from inception until June 13, 2022. We used combinations of search terms for en...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953) 2023-07, Vol.142 (1), p.51-60
Hauptverfasser: Oderkerk, Tamara J., Beelen, Pleun, Bukkems, Ardy L. A., Van Kuijk, Sander M. J., Sluijter, Hilde M. M., van de Kar, Mileen R. D., Herman, Malou C., Bongers, Marlies Y., Geomini, Peggy M. A. J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 60
container_issue 1
container_start_page 51
container_title Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953)
container_volume 142
creator Oderkerk, Tamara J.
Beelen, Pleun
Bukkems, Ardy L. A.
Van Kuijk, Sander M. J.
Sluijter, Hilde M. M.
van de Kar, Mileen R. D.
Herman, Malou C.
Bongers, Marlies Y.
Geomini, Peggy M. A. J.
description To assess the risk of hysterectomy after nonresectoscopic endometrial ablation in patients with heavy menstrual bleeding. The EMBASE, MEDLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov and Cochrane databases were searched for eligible articles from inception until June 13, 2022. We used combinations of search terms for endometrial ablation and hysterectomy. Articles included in the review described the incidence of hysterectomy at a specific point in time after ablation with a minimum follow-up duration of 12 months. The literature search yielded a total of 3,022 hits. A total of 53 studies met our inclusion and exclusion criteria, including six retrospective studies, 24 randomized controlled trials, and 23 prospective studies. A total of 48,071 patients underwent endometrial ablation between 1992 and 2017. Follow-up duration varied between 12 and 120 months. Analyses per follow-up moment showed 4.3% hysterectomy rate at 12 months of follow-up (n=29 studies), 11.1% at 18 months (n=1 study), 8.0% at 24 months (n=11 studies), 10.2% at 36 months (n=12 studies), 7.6% at 48 months (n=2 studies), and 12.4% at 60 months (n=6 studies). Two studies reported a mean hysterectomy rate at 10 years after ablation of 21.3%. Minimal clinically relevant differences in hysterectomy rates were observed among the different study designs. Furthermore, we found no significant differences in hysterectomy rate among the different nonresectoscopic endometrial ablation devices. The risk of hysterectomy after endometrial ablation seems to increase from 4.3% after 1 year to 12.4% after 5 years. Clinicians can use the results of this review to counsel patients about the 12% risk of hysterectomy 5 years after endometrial ablation. PROSPERO, CRD42020156281.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005223
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2824684575</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2824684575</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3017-4012678b0a5e480828acf722070229f8afee42852e72ad9783951327d922cd0c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkNtKw0AQhhdRbK2-gcheehOdnd10N94FqVaoFDzhXdgmE4xuEs2mlry9qfWEczMH_vmH-Rg7FHAiINKn8fzyBP5EiCi32FAYLQOU8nGbDQEwCrRRasD2vH_uRWIcyV02kBojEEIN2cNN4V94nfNp51tqKG3rsuNx3td8UmV1SW1TWMfjhbNtUVdnPOa3a2nZtym_ofeCVtxWGb-m1ga2sq7zhd9nO7l1ng6-8ojdX0zuzqfBbH55dR7PglSC0IECgWNtFmBDUgYMGpvmGhE0IEa5sTmRQhMiabRZpI2MQiFRZxFimkEqR-x44_va1G9L8m1SFj4l52xF9dInaFCNjQp12EvVRpo2tfcN5clrU5S26RIByZpo0hNN_hPt146-LiwXJWU_S98If31Xteup-Re3XFGTPJF17dOn3xhDCBBQ9m8BBOuRlh_CLH7V</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2824684575</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Risk of Hysterectomy After Endometrial Ablation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Oderkerk, Tamara J. ; Beelen, Pleun ; Bukkems, Ardy L. A. ; Van Kuijk, Sander M. J. ; Sluijter, Hilde M. M. ; van de Kar, Mileen R. D. ; Herman, Malou C. ; Bongers, Marlies Y. ; Geomini, Peggy M. A. J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Oderkerk, Tamara J. ; Beelen, Pleun ; Bukkems, Ardy L. A. ; Van Kuijk, Sander M. J. ; Sluijter, Hilde M. M. ; van de Kar, Mileen R. D. ; Herman, Malou C. ; Bongers, Marlies Y. ; Geomini, Peggy M. A. J.</creatorcontrib><description>To assess the risk of hysterectomy after nonresectoscopic endometrial ablation in patients with heavy menstrual bleeding. The EMBASE, MEDLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov and Cochrane databases were searched for eligible articles from inception until June 13, 2022. We used combinations of search terms for endometrial ablation and hysterectomy. Articles included in the review described the incidence of hysterectomy at a specific point in time after ablation with a minimum follow-up duration of 12 months. The literature search yielded a total of 3,022 hits. A total of 53 studies met our inclusion and exclusion criteria, including six retrospective studies, 24 randomized controlled trials, and 23 prospective studies. A total of 48,071 patients underwent endometrial ablation between 1992 and 2017. Follow-up duration varied between 12 and 120 months. Analyses per follow-up moment showed 4.3% hysterectomy rate at 12 months of follow-up (n=29 studies), 11.1% at 18 months (n=1 study), 8.0% at 24 months (n=11 studies), 10.2% at 36 months (n=12 studies), 7.6% at 48 months (n=2 studies), and 12.4% at 60 months (n=6 studies). Two studies reported a mean hysterectomy rate at 10 years after ablation of 21.3%. Minimal clinically relevant differences in hysterectomy rates were observed among the different study designs. Furthermore, we found no significant differences in hysterectomy rate among the different nonresectoscopic endometrial ablation devices. The risk of hysterectomy after endometrial ablation seems to increase from 4.3% after 1 year to 12.4% after 5 years. Clinicians can use the results of this review to counsel patients about the 12% risk of hysterectomy 5 years after endometrial ablation. PROSPERO, CRD42020156281.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0029-7844</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-233X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005223</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37290114</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><subject>Endometrial Ablation Techniques - methods ; Female ; Humans ; Hysterectomy ; Menorrhagia - surgery ; Prospective Studies ; Retrospective Studies</subject><ispartof>Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953), 2023-07, Vol.142 (1), p.51-60</ispartof><rights>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3017-4012678b0a5e480828acf722070229f8afee42852e72ad9783951327d922cd0c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37290114$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Oderkerk, Tamara J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beelen, Pleun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bukkems, Ardy L. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Kuijk, Sander M. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sluijter, Hilde M. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van de Kar, Mileen R. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herman, Malou C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bongers, Marlies Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geomini, Peggy M. A. J.</creatorcontrib><title>Risk of Hysterectomy After Endometrial Ablation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis</title><title>Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953)</title><addtitle>Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>To assess the risk of hysterectomy after nonresectoscopic endometrial ablation in patients with heavy menstrual bleeding. The EMBASE, MEDLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov and Cochrane databases were searched for eligible articles from inception until June 13, 2022. We used combinations of search terms for endometrial ablation and hysterectomy. Articles included in the review described the incidence of hysterectomy at a specific point in time after ablation with a minimum follow-up duration of 12 months. The literature search yielded a total of 3,022 hits. A total of 53 studies met our inclusion and exclusion criteria, including six retrospective studies, 24 randomized controlled trials, and 23 prospective studies. A total of 48,071 patients underwent endometrial ablation between 1992 and 2017. Follow-up duration varied between 12 and 120 months. Analyses per follow-up moment showed 4.3% hysterectomy rate at 12 months of follow-up (n=29 studies), 11.1% at 18 months (n=1 study), 8.0% at 24 months (n=11 studies), 10.2% at 36 months (n=12 studies), 7.6% at 48 months (n=2 studies), and 12.4% at 60 months (n=6 studies). Two studies reported a mean hysterectomy rate at 10 years after ablation of 21.3%. Minimal clinically relevant differences in hysterectomy rates were observed among the different study designs. Furthermore, we found no significant differences in hysterectomy rate among the different nonresectoscopic endometrial ablation devices. The risk of hysterectomy after endometrial ablation seems to increase from 4.3% after 1 year to 12.4% after 5 years. Clinicians can use the results of this review to counsel patients about the 12% risk of hysterectomy 5 years after endometrial ablation. PROSPERO, CRD42020156281.</description><subject>Endometrial Ablation Techniques - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hysterectomy</subject><subject>Menorrhagia - surgery</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><issn>0029-7844</issn><issn>1873-233X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkNtKw0AQhhdRbK2-gcheehOdnd10N94FqVaoFDzhXdgmE4xuEs2mlry9qfWEczMH_vmH-Rg7FHAiINKn8fzyBP5EiCi32FAYLQOU8nGbDQEwCrRRasD2vH_uRWIcyV02kBojEEIN2cNN4V94nfNp51tqKG3rsuNx3td8UmV1SW1TWMfjhbNtUVdnPOa3a2nZtym_ofeCVtxWGb-m1ga2sq7zhd9nO7l1ng6-8ojdX0zuzqfBbH55dR7PglSC0IECgWNtFmBDUgYMGpvmGhE0IEa5sTmRQhMiabRZpI2MQiFRZxFimkEqR-x44_va1G9L8m1SFj4l52xF9dInaFCNjQp12EvVRpo2tfcN5clrU5S26RIByZpo0hNN_hPt146-LiwXJWU_S98If31Xteup-Re3XFGTPJF17dOn3xhDCBBQ9m8BBOuRlh_CLH7V</recordid><startdate>20230701</startdate><enddate>20230701</enddate><creator>Oderkerk, Tamara J.</creator><creator>Beelen, Pleun</creator><creator>Bukkems, Ardy L. A.</creator><creator>Van Kuijk, Sander M. J.</creator><creator>Sluijter, Hilde M. M.</creator><creator>van de Kar, Mileen R. D.</creator><creator>Herman, Malou C.</creator><creator>Bongers, Marlies Y.</creator><creator>Geomini, Peggy M. A. J.</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230701</creationdate><title>Risk of Hysterectomy After Endometrial Ablation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis</title><author>Oderkerk, Tamara J. ; Beelen, Pleun ; Bukkems, Ardy L. A. ; Van Kuijk, Sander M. J. ; Sluijter, Hilde M. M. ; van de Kar, Mileen R. D. ; Herman, Malou C. ; Bongers, Marlies Y. ; Geomini, Peggy M. A. J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3017-4012678b0a5e480828acf722070229f8afee42852e72ad9783951327d922cd0c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Endometrial Ablation Techniques - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hysterectomy</topic><topic>Menorrhagia - surgery</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Oderkerk, Tamara J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beelen, Pleun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bukkems, Ardy L. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Kuijk, Sander M. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sluijter, Hilde M. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van de Kar, Mileen R. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herman, Malou C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bongers, Marlies Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geomini, Peggy M. A. J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Oderkerk, Tamara J.</au><au>Beelen, Pleun</au><au>Bukkems, Ardy L. A.</au><au>Van Kuijk, Sander M. J.</au><au>Sluijter, Hilde M. M.</au><au>van de Kar, Mileen R. D.</au><au>Herman, Malou C.</au><au>Bongers, Marlies Y.</au><au>Geomini, Peggy M. A. J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Risk of Hysterectomy After Endometrial Ablation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953)</jtitle><addtitle>Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>2023-07-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>142</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>51</spage><epage>60</epage><pages>51-60</pages><issn>0029-7844</issn><eissn>1873-233X</eissn><abstract>To assess the risk of hysterectomy after nonresectoscopic endometrial ablation in patients with heavy menstrual bleeding. The EMBASE, MEDLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov and Cochrane databases were searched for eligible articles from inception until June 13, 2022. We used combinations of search terms for endometrial ablation and hysterectomy. Articles included in the review described the incidence of hysterectomy at a specific point in time after ablation with a minimum follow-up duration of 12 months. The literature search yielded a total of 3,022 hits. A total of 53 studies met our inclusion and exclusion criteria, including six retrospective studies, 24 randomized controlled trials, and 23 prospective studies. A total of 48,071 patients underwent endometrial ablation between 1992 and 2017. Follow-up duration varied between 12 and 120 months. Analyses per follow-up moment showed 4.3% hysterectomy rate at 12 months of follow-up (n=29 studies), 11.1% at 18 months (n=1 study), 8.0% at 24 months (n=11 studies), 10.2% at 36 months (n=12 studies), 7.6% at 48 months (n=2 studies), and 12.4% at 60 months (n=6 studies). Two studies reported a mean hysterectomy rate at 10 years after ablation of 21.3%. Minimal clinically relevant differences in hysterectomy rates were observed among the different study designs. Furthermore, we found no significant differences in hysterectomy rate among the different nonresectoscopic endometrial ablation devices. The risk of hysterectomy after endometrial ablation seems to increase from 4.3% after 1 year to 12.4% after 5 years. Clinicians can use the results of this review to counsel patients about the 12% risk of hysterectomy 5 years after endometrial ablation. PROSPERO, CRD42020156281.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>37290114</pmid><doi>10.1097/AOG.0000000000005223</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0029-7844
ispartof Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953), 2023-07, Vol.142 (1), p.51-60
issn 0029-7844
1873-233X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2824684575
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Endometrial Ablation Techniques - methods
Female
Humans
Hysterectomy
Menorrhagia - surgery
Prospective Studies
Retrospective Studies
title Risk of Hysterectomy After Endometrial Ablation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T12%3A18%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Risk%20of%20Hysterectomy%20After%20Endometrial%20Ablation:%20A%20Systematic%20Review%20and%20Meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Obstetrics%20and%20gynecology%20(New%20York.%201953)&rft.au=Oderkerk,%20Tamara%20J.&rft.date=2023-07-01&rft.volume=142&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=51&rft.epage=60&rft.pages=51-60&rft.issn=0029-7844&rft.eissn=1873-233X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005223&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2824684575%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2824684575&rft_id=info:pmid/37290114&rfr_iscdi=true