Amblyopic stereo vision is efficient but noisy

•Stereopsis was identified in the majority (59%) of our amblyopic participants.•This compares to 45% who had measurable stereoacuity on the Randot Preschool Test.•Equivalent internal disparity noise was elevated in our amblyopic participants. People with amblyopia demonstrate a reduced ability to ju...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Vision research (Oxford) 2023-09, Vol.210, p.108267-108267, Article 108267
Hauptverfasser: Alarcon Carrillo, Sara, Hess, Robert F., Mao, Yu, Zhou, Jiawei, Baldwin, Alex S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 108267
container_issue
container_start_page 108267
container_title Vision research (Oxford)
container_volume 210
creator Alarcon Carrillo, Sara
Hess, Robert F.
Mao, Yu
Zhou, Jiawei
Baldwin, Alex S.
description •Stereopsis was identified in the majority (59%) of our amblyopic participants.•This compares to 45% who had measurable stereoacuity on the Randot Preschool Test.•Equivalent internal disparity noise was elevated in our amblyopic participants. People with amblyopia demonstrate a reduced ability to judge depth using stereopsis. Our understanding of this deficit is limited, as standard clinical stereo tests may not be suited to give a quantitative account of the residual stereo ability in amblyopia. In this study we used a stereo test designed specifically for that purpose. Participants identified the location of a disparity-defined odd-one-out target within a random-dot display. We tested 29 amblyopic (3 strabismic, 17 anisometropic, 9 mixed) participants and 17 control participants. We obtained stereoacuity thresholds from 59% of our amblyopic participants. There was a factor of two difference between the median stereoacuity of our amblyopic (103 arcsec) and control (56 arcsec) groups. We used the equivalent noise method to evaluate the role of equivalent internal noise and processing efficiency in amblyopic stereopsis. Using the linear amplifier model (LAM), we determined the threshold difference was due to a greater equivalent internal noise in the amblyopic group (238 vs 135 arcsec), with no significant difference in processing efficiency. A multiple linear regression determined 56% of the stereoacuity variance within the amblyopic group was predicted by the two LAM parameters, with equivalent internal noise predicting 46% alone. Analysis of control group data aligned with our previous work, finding that trade-offs between equivalent internal noise and efficiency play a greater role. Our results allow a better understanding of what is limiting amblyopic performance in our task. We find this to be a reduced quality of disparity signals in the input to the task-specific processing.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.visres.2023.108267
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2823989725</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0042698923000913</els_id><sourcerecordid>2823989725</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-3e46d3f4ed5f25c9caad519edd86903509bb80b04fef277ffba3cc26b2226b93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1qwzAQhEVpadK0b1CKj73YlSVLli-FUPoHgV5yF5a0AgXbSiU7kLevgtMee9mFZWaW-RC6L3FR4pI_7YqDiwFiQTCh6SQIry_QshS1yBmv-CVaYlyRnDeiWaCbGHcY45qR5hotaE0EqwVdomLdq-7o905ncYQAPkupzg-ZixlY67SDYczUNGaDd_F4i65s20W4O-8V2r69bl8-8s3X--fLepNrysmYU6i4obYCwyxhutFta1jZgDGCN5gy3CglsMKVBUvq2lrVUq0JV4Sk0dAVepxj98F_TxBH2buooevaAfwUJRGEplo1YUlazVIdfEw8rNwH17fhKEssT6DkTs6g5AmUnEEl28P5w6R6MH-mXzJJ8DwLINU8OAgynlhoMC6AHqXx7v8PPxrEe4c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2823989725</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Amblyopic stereo vision is efficient but noisy</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Alarcon Carrillo, Sara ; Hess, Robert F. ; Mao, Yu ; Zhou, Jiawei ; Baldwin, Alex S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Alarcon Carrillo, Sara ; Hess, Robert F. ; Mao, Yu ; Zhou, Jiawei ; Baldwin, Alex S.</creatorcontrib><description>•Stereopsis was identified in the majority (59%) of our amblyopic participants.•This compares to 45% who had measurable stereoacuity on the Randot Preschool Test.•Equivalent internal disparity noise was elevated in our amblyopic participants. People with amblyopia demonstrate a reduced ability to judge depth using stereopsis. Our understanding of this deficit is limited, as standard clinical stereo tests may not be suited to give a quantitative account of the residual stereo ability in amblyopia. In this study we used a stereo test designed specifically for that purpose. Participants identified the location of a disparity-defined odd-one-out target within a random-dot display. We tested 29 amblyopic (3 strabismic, 17 anisometropic, 9 mixed) participants and 17 control participants. We obtained stereoacuity thresholds from 59% of our amblyopic participants. There was a factor of two difference between the median stereoacuity of our amblyopic (103 arcsec) and control (56 arcsec) groups. We used the equivalent noise method to evaluate the role of equivalent internal noise and processing efficiency in amblyopic stereopsis. Using the linear amplifier model (LAM), we determined the threshold difference was due to a greater equivalent internal noise in the amblyopic group (238 vs 135 arcsec), with no significant difference in processing efficiency. A multiple linear regression determined 56% of the stereoacuity variance within the amblyopic group was predicted by the two LAM parameters, with equivalent internal noise predicting 46% alone. Analysis of control group data aligned with our previous work, finding that trade-offs between equivalent internal noise and efficiency play a greater role. Our results allow a better understanding of what is limiting amblyopic performance in our task. We find this to be a reduced quality of disparity signals in the input to the task-specific processing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0042-6989</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-5646</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2023.108267</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37285783</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Amblyopia ; Binocular disparity ; Depth perception ; Noise masking ; Psychophysics ; Stereopsis</subject><ispartof>Vision research (Oxford), 2023-09, Vol.210, p.108267-108267, Article 108267</ispartof><rights>2023 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-3e46d3f4ed5f25c9caad519edd86903509bb80b04fef277ffba3cc26b2226b93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-3e46d3f4ed5f25c9caad519edd86903509bb80b04fef277ffba3cc26b2226b93</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3830-6254</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0042698923000913$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37285783$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alarcon Carrillo, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hess, Robert F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mao, Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Jiawei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baldwin, Alex S.</creatorcontrib><title>Amblyopic stereo vision is efficient but noisy</title><title>Vision research (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Vision Res</addtitle><description>•Stereopsis was identified in the majority (59%) of our amblyopic participants.•This compares to 45% who had measurable stereoacuity on the Randot Preschool Test.•Equivalent internal disparity noise was elevated in our amblyopic participants. People with amblyopia demonstrate a reduced ability to judge depth using stereopsis. Our understanding of this deficit is limited, as standard clinical stereo tests may not be suited to give a quantitative account of the residual stereo ability in amblyopia. In this study we used a stereo test designed specifically for that purpose. Participants identified the location of a disparity-defined odd-one-out target within a random-dot display. We tested 29 amblyopic (3 strabismic, 17 anisometropic, 9 mixed) participants and 17 control participants. We obtained stereoacuity thresholds from 59% of our amblyopic participants. There was a factor of two difference between the median stereoacuity of our amblyopic (103 arcsec) and control (56 arcsec) groups. We used the equivalent noise method to evaluate the role of equivalent internal noise and processing efficiency in amblyopic stereopsis. Using the linear amplifier model (LAM), we determined the threshold difference was due to a greater equivalent internal noise in the amblyopic group (238 vs 135 arcsec), with no significant difference in processing efficiency. A multiple linear regression determined 56% of the stereoacuity variance within the amblyopic group was predicted by the two LAM parameters, with equivalent internal noise predicting 46% alone. Analysis of control group data aligned with our previous work, finding that trade-offs between equivalent internal noise and efficiency play a greater role. Our results allow a better understanding of what is limiting amblyopic performance in our task. We find this to be a reduced quality of disparity signals in the input to the task-specific processing.</description><subject>Amblyopia</subject><subject>Binocular disparity</subject><subject>Depth perception</subject><subject>Noise masking</subject><subject>Psychophysics</subject><subject>Stereopsis</subject><issn>0042-6989</issn><issn>1878-5646</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1qwzAQhEVpadK0b1CKj73YlSVLli-FUPoHgV5yF5a0AgXbSiU7kLevgtMee9mFZWaW-RC6L3FR4pI_7YqDiwFiQTCh6SQIry_QshS1yBmv-CVaYlyRnDeiWaCbGHcY45qR5hotaE0EqwVdomLdq-7o905ncYQAPkupzg-ZixlY67SDYczUNGaDd_F4i65s20W4O-8V2r69bl8-8s3X--fLepNrysmYU6i4obYCwyxhutFta1jZgDGCN5gy3CglsMKVBUvq2lrVUq0JV4Sk0dAVepxj98F_TxBH2buooevaAfwUJRGEplo1YUlazVIdfEw8rNwH17fhKEssT6DkTs6g5AmUnEEl28P5w6R6MH-mXzJJ8DwLINU8OAgynlhoMC6AHqXx7v8PPxrEe4c</recordid><startdate>202309</startdate><enddate>202309</enddate><creator>Alarcon Carrillo, Sara</creator><creator>Hess, Robert F.</creator><creator>Mao, Yu</creator><creator>Zhou, Jiawei</creator><creator>Baldwin, Alex S.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3830-6254</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202309</creationdate><title>Amblyopic stereo vision is efficient but noisy</title><author>Alarcon Carrillo, Sara ; Hess, Robert F. ; Mao, Yu ; Zhou, Jiawei ; Baldwin, Alex S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-3e46d3f4ed5f25c9caad519edd86903509bb80b04fef277ffba3cc26b2226b93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Amblyopia</topic><topic>Binocular disparity</topic><topic>Depth perception</topic><topic>Noise masking</topic><topic>Psychophysics</topic><topic>Stereopsis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alarcon Carrillo, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hess, Robert F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mao, Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Jiawei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baldwin, Alex S.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Vision research (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alarcon Carrillo, Sara</au><au>Hess, Robert F.</au><au>Mao, Yu</au><au>Zhou, Jiawei</au><au>Baldwin, Alex S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Amblyopic stereo vision is efficient but noisy</atitle><jtitle>Vision research (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Vision Res</addtitle><date>2023-09</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>210</volume><spage>108267</spage><epage>108267</epage><pages>108267-108267</pages><artnum>108267</artnum><issn>0042-6989</issn><eissn>1878-5646</eissn><abstract>•Stereopsis was identified in the majority (59%) of our amblyopic participants.•This compares to 45% who had measurable stereoacuity on the Randot Preschool Test.•Equivalent internal disparity noise was elevated in our amblyopic participants. People with amblyopia demonstrate a reduced ability to judge depth using stereopsis. Our understanding of this deficit is limited, as standard clinical stereo tests may not be suited to give a quantitative account of the residual stereo ability in amblyopia. In this study we used a stereo test designed specifically for that purpose. Participants identified the location of a disparity-defined odd-one-out target within a random-dot display. We tested 29 amblyopic (3 strabismic, 17 anisometropic, 9 mixed) participants and 17 control participants. We obtained stereoacuity thresholds from 59% of our amblyopic participants. There was a factor of two difference between the median stereoacuity of our amblyopic (103 arcsec) and control (56 arcsec) groups. We used the equivalent noise method to evaluate the role of equivalent internal noise and processing efficiency in amblyopic stereopsis. Using the linear amplifier model (LAM), we determined the threshold difference was due to a greater equivalent internal noise in the amblyopic group (238 vs 135 arcsec), with no significant difference in processing efficiency. A multiple linear regression determined 56% of the stereoacuity variance within the amblyopic group was predicted by the two LAM parameters, with equivalent internal noise predicting 46% alone. Analysis of control group data aligned with our previous work, finding that trade-offs between equivalent internal noise and efficiency play a greater role. Our results allow a better understanding of what is limiting amblyopic performance in our task. We find this to be a reduced quality of disparity signals in the input to the task-specific processing.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>37285783</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.visres.2023.108267</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3830-6254</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0042-6989
ispartof Vision research (Oxford), 2023-09, Vol.210, p.108267-108267, Article 108267
issn 0042-6989
1878-5646
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2823989725
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Amblyopia
Binocular disparity
Depth perception
Noise masking
Psychophysics
Stereopsis
title Amblyopic stereo vision is efficient but noisy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T03%3A35%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Amblyopic%20stereo%20vision%20is%20efficient%20but%20noisy&rft.jtitle=Vision%20research%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Alarcon%20Carrillo,%20Sara&rft.date=2023-09&rft.volume=210&rft.spage=108267&rft.epage=108267&rft.pages=108267-108267&rft.artnum=108267&rft.issn=0042-6989&rft.eissn=1878-5646&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.visres.2023.108267&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2823989725%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2823989725&rft_id=info:pmid/37285783&rft_els_id=S0042698923000913&rfr_iscdi=true