Early Complications after Prepectoral Tissue Expander Placement in Breast Reconstruction with and without Acellular Dermal Matrix

Prepectoral breast reconstruction has become popularized with the concurrent use of acellular dermal matrix (ADM). The authors sought to compare 3-month postoperative complication rates and explantation rates for first-stage, tissue-expander-based, prepectoral breast reconstruction with and without...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963) 2024-06, Vol.153 (6), p.1221-1229
Hauptverfasser: Pires, Giovanna, Marquez, Jessica L, Memmott, Stanley, Sudduth, Jack D, Moss, Whitney, Eddington, Devin, Hobson, Gregory, Tuncer, Fatma, Agarwal, Jayant P, Kwok, Alvin C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1229
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1221
container_title Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)
container_volume 153
creator Pires, Giovanna
Marquez, Jessica L
Memmott, Stanley
Sudduth, Jack D
Moss, Whitney
Eddington, Devin
Hobson, Gregory
Tuncer, Fatma
Agarwal, Jayant P
Kwok, Alvin C
description Prepectoral breast reconstruction has become popularized with the concurrent use of acellular dermal matrix (ADM). The authors sought to compare 3-month postoperative complication rates and explantation rates for first-stage, tissue-expander-based, prepectoral breast reconstruction with and without the use of ADM. A single-institution retrospective chart review was performed to identify consecutive patients undergoing prepectoral tissue-expander-based breast reconstruction from August of 2020 to January of 2022. Chi-square tests were used to compare demographic categorical variables, and multiple variable regression models were used to identify variables associated with 3-month postoperative outcomes. The authors enrolled 124 consecutive patients. Fifty-five patients (98 breasts) were included in the no-ADM cohort and 69 patients (98 breasts) were included in the ADM cohort. There were no statistically significant differences between the ADM and no-ADM cohorts with regard to 90-day postoperative outcomes. On multivariable analysis, there were no independent associations between seroma, hematoma, wound dehiscence, mastectomy skin flap necrosis, infection, unplanned return to the operating room, or explantation in the ADM and no-ADM groups after controlling for age, body mass index, history of diabetes, tobacco use, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and postoperative radiotherapy. The authors' results reveal no significant differences in odds of postoperative complications, unplanned return to the operating room, or explantation between the ADM and no-ADM cohorts. More studies are needed to evaluate the safety of prepectoral, tissue expander placement without ADM. Therapeutic, III.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010801
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2823498261</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2823498261</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c237t-625042337aac38095e69c2321b697a9a1bf5f18e0177de770a9d8f014b25f7113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUEtLw0AQXkSxtfoPRPboJXUfSTY51lofULHUeg6T7QQjebm7wfboPzexVcG5zMD3mJmPkHPOxpzF6mqxfB6zv-IsYvyADHkgYs8XvjgkQ8ak8DgLxICcWPvWkZQMg2MykEpEgeB8SD5nYIotndZlU-QaXF5XlkLm0NCFwQa1qw0UdJVb2yKdbRqo1j1WgMYSK0fzil4bBOvoEnUndqbVvQv9yN0r7djfQ906OtFYFG0Bht6gKTvTR3Am35ySowwKi2f7PiIvt7PV9N6bP909TCdzTwupnBeKgPlCSgWgZcTiAMO4QwRPw1hBDDzNgoxH2P2o1qgUg3gdZYz7qQgyxbkckcudb2Pq9xatS8rc9idBhXVrExEJ6ceRCHuqv6NqU1trMEsak5dgtglnSR9-0oWf_A-_k13sN7Rpietf0U_a8gtJRYDL</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2823498261</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Early Complications after Prepectoral Tissue Expander Placement in Breast Reconstruction with and without Acellular Dermal Matrix</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Pires, Giovanna ; Marquez, Jessica L ; Memmott, Stanley ; Sudduth, Jack D ; Moss, Whitney ; Eddington, Devin ; Hobson, Gregory ; Tuncer, Fatma ; Agarwal, Jayant P ; Kwok, Alvin C</creator><creatorcontrib>Pires, Giovanna ; Marquez, Jessica L ; Memmott, Stanley ; Sudduth, Jack D ; Moss, Whitney ; Eddington, Devin ; Hobson, Gregory ; Tuncer, Fatma ; Agarwal, Jayant P ; Kwok, Alvin C</creatorcontrib><description>Prepectoral breast reconstruction has become popularized with the concurrent use of acellular dermal matrix (ADM). The authors sought to compare 3-month postoperative complication rates and explantation rates for first-stage, tissue-expander-based, prepectoral breast reconstruction with and without the use of ADM. A single-institution retrospective chart review was performed to identify consecutive patients undergoing prepectoral tissue-expander-based breast reconstruction from August of 2020 to January of 2022. Chi-square tests were used to compare demographic categorical variables, and multiple variable regression models were used to identify variables associated with 3-month postoperative outcomes. The authors enrolled 124 consecutive patients. Fifty-five patients (98 breasts) were included in the no-ADM cohort and 69 patients (98 breasts) were included in the ADM cohort. There were no statistically significant differences between the ADM and no-ADM cohorts with regard to 90-day postoperative outcomes. On multivariable analysis, there were no independent associations between seroma, hematoma, wound dehiscence, mastectomy skin flap necrosis, infection, unplanned return to the operating room, or explantation in the ADM and no-ADM groups after controlling for age, body mass index, history of diabetes, tobacco use, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and postoperative radiotherapy. The authors' results reveal no significant differences in odds of postoperative complications, unplanned return to the operating room, or explantation between the ADM and no-ADM cohorts. More studies are needed to evaluate the safety of prepectoral, tissue expander placement without ADM. Therapeutic, III.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-1052</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1529-4242</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1529-4242</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010801</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37285211</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Acellular Dermis ; Adult ; Breast Implantation - adverse effects ; Breast Implantation - instrumentation ; Breast Implantation - methods ; Breast Neoplasms - surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Mammaplasty - adverse effects ; Mammaplasty - methods ; Mastectomy - adverse effects ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Retrospective Studies ; Tissue Expansion - adverse effects ; Tissue Expansion - instrumentation ; Tissue Expansion - methods ; Tissue Expansion Devices - adverse effects</subject><ispartof>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963), 2024-06, Vol.153 (6), p.1221-1229</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2023 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c237t-625042337aac38095e69c2321b697a9a1bf5f18e0177de770a9d8f014b25f7113</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c237t-625042337aac38095e69c2321b697a9a1bf5f18e0177de770a9d8f014b25f7113</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37285211$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pires, Giovanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marquez, Jessica L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Memmott, Stanley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sudduth, Jack D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moss, Whitney</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eddington, Devin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hobson, Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuncer, Fatma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agarwal, Jayant P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwok, Alvin C</creatorcontrib><title>Early Complications after Prepectoral Tissue Expander Placement in Breast Reconstruction with and without Acellular Dermal Matrix</title><title>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</title><addtitle>Plast Reconstr Surg</addtitle><description>Prepectoral breast reconstruction has become popularized with the concurrent use of acellular dermal matrix (ADM). The authors sought to compare 3-month postoperative complication rates and explantation rates for first-stage, tissue-expander-based, prepectoral breast reconstruction with and without the use of ADM. A single-institution retrospective chart review was performed to identify consecutive patients undergoing prepectoral tissue-expander-based breast reconstruction from August of 2020 to January of 2022. Chi-square tests were used to compare demographic categorical variables, and multiple variable regression models were used to identify variables associated with 3-month postoperative outcomes. The authors enrolled 124 consecutive patients. Fifty-five patients (98 breasts) were included in the no-ADM cohort and 69 patients (98 breasts) were included in the ADM cohort. There were no statistically significant differences between the ADM and no-ADM cohorts with regard to 90-day postoperative outcomes. On multivariable analysis, there were no independent associations between seroma, hematoma, wound dehiscence, mastectomy skin flap necrosis, infection, unplanned return to the operating room, or explantation in the ADM and no-ADM groups after controlling for age, body mass index, history of diabetes, tobacco use, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and postoperative radiotherapy. The authors' results reveal no significant differences in odds of postoperative complications, unplanned return to the operating room, or explantation between the ADM and no-ADM cohorts. More studies are needed to evaluate the safety of prepectoral, tissue expander placement without ADM. Therapeutic, III.</description><subject>Acellular Dermis</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Breast Implantation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Breast Implantation - instrumentation</subject><subject>Breast Implantation - methods</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mammaplasty - adverse effects</subject><subject>Mammaplasty - methods</subject><subject>Mastectomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Tissue Expansion - adverse effects</subject><subject>Tissue Expansion - instrumentation</subject><subject>Tissue Expansion - methods</subject><subject>Tissue Expansion Devices - adverse effects</subject><issn>0032-1052</issn><issn>1529-4242</issn><issn>1529-4242</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUEtLw0AQXkSxtfoPRPboJXUfSTY51lofULHUeg6T7QQjebm7wfboPzexVcG5zMD3mJmPkHPOxpzF6mqxfB6zv-IsYvyADHkgYs8XvjgkQ8ak8DgLxICcWPvWkZQMg2MykEpEgeB8SD5nYIotndZlU-QaXF5XlkLm0NCFwQa1qw0UdJVb2yKdbRqo1j1WgMYSK0fzil4bBOvoEnUndqbVvQv9yN0r7djfQ906OtFYFG0Bht6gKTvTR3Am35ySowwKi2f7PiIvt7PV9N6bP909TCdzTwupnBeKgPlCSgWgZcTiAMO4QwRPw1hBDDzNgoxH2P2o1qgUg3gdZYz7qQgyxbkckcudb2Pq9xatS8rc9idBhXVrExEJ6ceRCHuqv6NqU1trMEsak5dgtglnSR9-0oWf_A-_k13sN7Rpietf0U_a8gtJRYDL</recordid><startdate>20240601</startdate><enddate>20240601</enddate><creator>Pires, Giovanna</creator><creator>Marquez, Jessica L</creator><creator>Memmott, Stanley</creator><creator>Sudduth, Jack D</creator><creator>Moss, Whitney</creator><creator>Eddington, Devin</creator><creator>Hobson, Gregory</creator><creator>Tuncer, Fatma</creator><creator>Agarwal, Jayant P</creator><creator>Kwok, Alvin C</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240601</creationdate><title>Early Complications after Prepectoral Tissue Expander Placement in Breast Reconstruction with and without Acellular Dermal Matrix</title><author>Pires, Giovanna ; Marquez, Jessica L ; Memmott, Stanley ; Sudduth, Jack D ; Moss, Whitney ; Eddington, Devin ; Hobson, Gregory ; Tuncer, Fatma ; Agarwal, Jayant P ; Kwok, Alvin C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c237t-625042337aac38095e69c2321b697a9a1bf5f18e0177de770a9d8f014b25f7113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Acellular Dermis</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Breast Implantation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Breast Implantation - instrumentation</topic><topic>Breast Implantation - methods</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mammaplasty - adverse effects</topic><topic>Mammaplasty - methods</topic><topic>Mastectomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Tissue Expansion - adverse effects</topic><topic>Tissue Expansion - instrumentation</topic><topic>Tissue Expansion - methods</topic><topic>Tissue Expansion Devices - adverse effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pires, Giovanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marquez, Jessica L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Memmott, Stanley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sudduth, Jack D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moss, Whitney</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eddington, Devin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hobson, Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuncer, Fatma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agarwal, Jayant P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwok, Alvin C</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pires, Giovanna</au><au>Marquez, Jessica L</au><au>Memmott, Stanley</au><au>Sudduth, Jack D</au><au>Moss, Whitney</au><au>Eddington, Devin</au><au>Hobson, Gregory</au><au>Tuncer, Fatma</au><au>Agarwal, Jayant P</au><au>Kwok, Alvin C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Early Complications after Prepectoral Tissue Expander Placement in Breast Reconstruction with and without Acellular Dermal Matrix</atitle><jtitle>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</jtitle><addtitle>Plast Reconstr Surg</addtitle><date>2024-06-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>153</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1221</spage><epage>1229</epage><pages>1221-1229</pages><issn>0032-1052</issn><issn>1529-4242</issn><eissn>1529-4242</eissn><abstract>Prepectoral breast reconstruction has become popularized with the concurrent use of acellular dermal matrix (ADM). The authors sought to compare 3-month postoperative complication rates and explantation rates for first-stage, tissue-expander-based, prepectoral breast reconstruction with and without the use of ADM. A single-institution retrospective chart review was performed to identify consecutive patients undergoing prepectoral tissue-expander-based breast reconstruction from August of 2020 to January of 2022. Chi-square tests were used to compare demographic categorical variables, and multiple variable regression models were used to identify variables associated with 3-month postoperative outcomes. The authors enrolled 124 consecutive patients. Fifty-five patients (98 breasts) were included in the no-ADM cohort and 69 patients (98 breasts) were included in the ADM cohort. There were no statistically significant differences between the ADM and no-ADM cohorts with regard to 90-day postoperative outcomes. On multivariable analysis, there were no independent associations between seroma, hematoma, wound dehiscence, mastectomy skin flap necrosis, infection, unplanned return to the operating room, or explantation in the ADM and no-ADM groups after controlling for age, body mass index, history of diabetes, tobacco use, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and postoperative radiotherapy. The authors' results reveal no significant differences in odds of postoperative complications, unplanned return to the operating room, or explantation between the ADM and no-ADM cohorts. More studies are needed to evaluate the safety of prepectoral, tissue expander placement without ADM. Therapeutic, III.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>37285211</pmid><doi>10.1097/PRS.0000000000010801</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0032-1052
ispartof Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963), 2024-06, Vol.153 (6), p.1221-1229
issn 0032-1052
1529-4242
1529-4242
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2823498261
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Acellular Dermis
Adult
Breast Implantation - adverse effects
Breast Implantation - instrumentation
Breast Implantation - methods
Breast Neoplasms - surgery
Female
Humans
Mammaplasty - adverse effects
Mammaplasty - methods
Mastectomy - adverse effects
Middle Aged
Postoperative Complications - epidemiology
Postoperative Complications - etiology
Retrospective Studies
Tissue Expansion - adverse effects
Tissue Expansion - instrumentation
Tissue Expansion - methods
Tissue Expansion Devices - adverse effects
title Early Complications after Prepectoral Tissue Expander Placement in Breast Reconstruction with and without Acellular Dermal Matrix
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T15%3A32%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Early%20Complications%20after%20Prepectoral%20Tissue%20Expander%20Placement%20in%20Breast%20Reconstruction%20with%20and%20without%20Acellular%20Dermal%20Matrix&rft.jtitle=Plastic%20and%20reconstructive%20surgery%20(1963)&rft.au=Pires,%20Giovanna&rft.date=2024-06-01&rft.volume=153&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1221&rft.epage=1229&rft.pages=1221-1229&rft.issn=0032-1052&rft.eissn=1529-4242&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/PRS.0000000000010801&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2823498261%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2823498261&rft_id=info:pmid/37285211&rfr_iscdi=true